Bah!
So we are now in the Piblic Spanking phase of The Volkswagen Defense. One wonders why people still use it, since it always ends in tears for everyone.
Refreshing to get a new "pivot defense" - I honestly expected a standard Asperger's ploy.
7284 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2008
Two days plus one half day for fulfillment if I order at night is usual from key click to ripping open the box for me (if it is a prime deal). It is why I re-upped and re-upped again, even when the price for doing so went up. If they couldn't live up to the promise I wouldn't pay miller fer privilege.
Including an order that went in on the evening of Wednesday the 21st and the box was in my hands on Christmas Eve. And three orders for stuff that were put in on the previous Monday morning and were in my hands by that Wednesday night.
I admit that when I ordered that "home NAS" thing the Reg writer de jour was frothing over they told me that it would take weeks to deliver on account of them not actually having any in stock yet - so I cancelled the order and Amazon were happy to let me do that.
I also had one order listed as prime that took five days to deliver, but that one was NOT shipped by Amazon, but by the vendor. Can't blame *Amazon* for that. That ball is squarely in the vendor's court (though they did deliver within the terms of service, even so, so there were no formal grounds for complaint).
Returns, in the rare event I've had to make them (I think four times in as many years), have been a dream to conduct too. When I contrast this experience with what I went through when I lived and shopped in the UK I laugh 'till I cry. Yeah, "unfair" practice is what is killing the high street vendor.
Amazon, right here, right now = toasted bacon sandwich with HP sauce good.
You're living in the wrong place, Jeffeypoooh. 8o)
"Also how is it insider trading. They were not 'insiders' they obtained information that lead them to want to buy shares in a company."
They traded using non-public information. That is the definition of insider trading. It doesn't matter how you get the information, if you act on it, even if you lose money, you are an insider trader and breaking the law in the USA.
" These 'hackers' were not in a privileged position."
Yes they were. They had information Joe and Jane Shmoe did not have and used it to gain an advantage over them. That is pretty much the definition of being in a privileged position as far as stock trading is concerned in the USA.
"The way they got that information is illegal, not how they used that information."
Actually, both are illegal in the USA, as I have explained. It is generally all about intent when it comes to Federal Law. The intent here is pretty bloody clear to anyone. Break into someone else's computer (illegal, and well-known to be illegal after numerous very public prosecutions concerning same so intent can be inferred to a high degree of confidence) and trade in stocks based on that stolen private information (again, the intent to trade stocks based on the information stolen is pretty easy to infer on account of it being exactly what they did).
Just because we have domestic criminals at the corporate level who are gusty of much worse abuses doesn't mean everyone working at a lower reward expectation level gets a free pass, and this might just put the fear of the FTC in those other buggers for a bit.
Heads on pikes please.
Pick your battles appropriately, EFF, for fuck's sake.
This sort of idiocy is the same path to madness by which Labor Unions are now seen to be a bad thing instead of the foundation for proper and decent working conditions In Our Time.
No no no to allowing morons to tweak the automatic systems of farm machinery when they typically bow out of any responsibility once their "properly designed" software is launched. Guarantee it will do what it says on the box? Not in this universe.
That said, loose use of CAN jargon is not the end of the world.
But No. I'm with John Deere on this one.
You no more have a right to alter the CAN systems on your farm vehicle than you do to alter the carburetor mix screw on your car (prevented by a metal slug for Lo! these many years so the old Gunsons Colourtune is rendered moot), and John Deere is not obliged to help you do so.
The response is to hide the battery monitor? How Applecorp. Like those NDAs they made people sign when the lids of the macbooks wouldn't stay closed A decade or so ago. No binding agreement to hide it from the world, no warranty replacement.
Reminds me of the caption on one of my favorite tee shirts.
"Meat is murder. Quick, eat the evidence."
Really? People at corporate level are opting for a branded proprietary *nix that will not run on their existing kit but will require a captital outlay I conservatively estimate at about three times what they paid before? Not counting the rip-out'n'replace costs? In this economy?
Are you sure that alternative isn't pronounced "Red Hat"?
Because that would be an unnecessarily high cost (but waaaay lower than OS X running on iThing) software swap only option. Corporate would love the "someone at the end of a phone in an emergency" factor and the techs wouldn't have to move, store and dispose of umptytump bits of kit that would suddenly be usless under the iScheme.
Another excuse for the Reiser Is Innocent crowd to trot out daft reasons why this was the pilot's fault. Love it.
Extra credit for the "should have checked the mac address" meme.
Of course, these are only hystrically funny to those of us in the computer biz.
As for over-reaction, yes America would seem to be the only place on earth one can be shot for pulling out a cellphone ... oh, wait a bit.
.
Low Earth Orbital velocity, which can be barely achieved with the current state of the art I might add owing to all the so-called scientists renaming stuff instead of getting proper rocket science done, hardly qualifies as "relativistic".
Just because going up and down the well futzes up yer digital watch doesn't imply a meaningful red shift in the rear-view mirror.
Or ... take the time to learn Latin and speak with authority not predicated on some anonymous un-peer-reviewed garbage scraped from one place and replicated all over the web.
No, I don't speak Latin. But neither do I bust someone's chops because they know more about it than I do, and I don't make fatuous appeals to popularity by citing anything on teh intarwebz.
"Manifest fucking destiny, assholes. [This translation was brought to you by The Spirit of '49 Corporation -- Providing Significant Keywords since 1800 Zulu hour]"
There were Americans at Rourke's Drift?
I remeber Burt Lancaster was at Islwanda, but Baker's men were colonial-free as I recall.
No, no, South Carolina has a history of spearheading bold new initiatives.
Why on this day, December 20th 1860, South Carolina spearheaded the bold initiative to secede from the Union, and look how that turned out.
People always rush to judgement but history will have the last word regarding South Carolina and the Magic Porn Firewall of Moral Rectitude.
If you're a fan, read the books.
What, even the tree-killing and worthless for any other purpose fifth installment? Aren't there international treaties limiting the mandatory infliction of that sort of pain on innocent bystanders?
'Cause if there ain't, there bloody well should be.
The HBO writers should get a Nobel Prize for making Game of Thrones a proper story again, using pacing, plot and POV characters the viewer cares about instead of spending five hundred plus pages introducing fifty new POV characters we don't give a fewmet for at the expense of bringing the story to a shuddering halt.
GRRM is now involved in the author's equivalent of writing spaghetti code to prolong the paycheck, and after the agony of episode five I'm done contributing.
"Contrary to how its portrayed in the movies, forensic accounting is how Al Capone was nailed."
Contrary to every movie put out before 1960 maybe. I can't think there's a person on the planet who ever went looking for the Al Capone story who didn't know that he was nabbed over tax, and just about every movie since about 1980 which deals with organized crime mentions that "obscure" fact somewhere.
Board games I love but for which I cannot scare up players because of rules fright:
AH Dune, Circus Maximus, Speed Circuit, Conquistadore, Search For The Nile, Diplomacy(!), or any of my old SPI games.
Oh, and Colditz (mine's a Gibsons Games reprint).
No youtube video explaining play, game off.
Part of the problem is the piss-poor job game companies make of writing rulebooks these days. With the Case System you didn't have to know every bleeding rule by heart because you could find the one you needed in seconds when you needed it. Now RPG graphic art sensibilities trump usability.
Oh dear, I've picked up a disgruntled kickstarter backer who needs someone to shout at.
First, no-one paid Mick Jagger to drive the car so your vacuous contention doesn't hold unless the device itself is so monumentally ugly and/or unfit for purpose that no-one in the public eye would be caught dead wearing it.
Secondly, I always take it as a bad sign when people who are not "family" start talking about a company CEO or KS project launcher by first name. The peachy printer comments were full of people being super chummy and supportive as their money was being embezzled, as were those idiots who forked over small fortunes to "Charley" at Chaosium in what turned out to be a KS-enabled multi-project ponzi scheme (scarily bad management rather than personal gain as far as I can tell, but still). You know all reason is absent in any argument where someone refers to the former head as "Steve".
Thirdly, I couldn't parse I doubt the kickstarter backers would like their money going that way, or Charles River Leeches. I'm afraid I don't understand the point you were making.
Fourthly, why would you want someone unintelligent to showcase the device, which should, if everything people have been saying about it is true rather than hyperbole, sell itself to the brightest and best? Get it on the wrist of, say, a Doctor Who and life is gravy.
Well spotted.
Interestingly, though, Morgan was going broke trying to sell its iconic little hand-made motor cars, then Mick Jagger bought one and the waiting list for a Morgan was born (running at 12 years when I enquired in 1980).
So the point about famous people wearing them is actually, possibly inadvertently, well made. Had Lady Gaga or The Stig worn a Pebble the world would probably have trampled the VentCaps underfoot in the dash to buy the things.
Luxury! I know a fast breeder nuclear reactor what runs on a Science o' Cambridge Mk 14. If the dam' thing guz more'n 20 degrees out o' proppa temp'rature specs, some bugger 'as t' pour boron soaked concrete inter the reaction vessel core t' prevent consequences o' carry register error.
An' if yer tell the lazy young sods terday about that they'll never believe ya!
Neglecting the all-but insurmountable problem of an "average" value presented for what is obviously a dynamic process of deceleration more suited to analysis by means of fiendishly complex integral calculus, this revelation throws the main issue into stark relief: why are we still putting the bloody clocks back and forward when this variation makes a mockery of the process?
Isn't it time to finally rid ourselves of the tyranny of this bucolic klepsidra-bothering in the same way we finally ditched a bunch of ridiculous licensing laws foisted on us by a jumped-up teetotaler during WW1?
To the barricades! Vivre Les Brexieurs! Down with the Clockwatchers of Whitehall! Give us back our lost hours-and-a-bit!
So you know how to dodge jury duty by exaggerating your paranoia into "reasonable doubt".
I know one foreign consultant who is an incompetent lying bumbler. Should I assume all foreign consultants are fit only to be shipped "back where they came from" or is that unreasonable of me?
And by being rejected as a juror you proved conclusively that part of that prosecutor's job was indeed to judge your doubts as unreasonable.
The lack of persuasiveness you are citing is from reports in a newspaper, not statements in evidence. No-one has been sworn in before speaking. No doubt forensic evidence will be offered to back up the contention that Sir Wanksalot is guilty of arson.