I dunno, are you not technically a nincompoop?
> bosom particles
11270 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
I dunno, are you not technically a nincompoop?
> bosom particles
<I<Dark Matter doesn't exist</i>
A peremptory statement followed by utter FAIL because replacing "dark matter" would demand that gravity "decay" SLOWER over large distances.
As in time flows slower that farther away from a strong gravitational source.
Again, arse backwards. Also, it is "proper time" and it does not "flow" in any particular way.
I have some Downloadable Content for you. For a little fee. Just study this little pamphlet.
I t is possible.
The problem is finding a model that yields useful predictions and is testable. Pluspoints if it has a very compact beautiful mathematical formulation, which for some reason seems to be the preferred way of it.
All the rest is metaphysics.
I whined about downvotes and criticism?
Metaphysically related, how can I whine about downvotes and criticism if I must not post?
"Black holes have no basis in General Relativity..."
Dear Plasma-Universe Colleague,
Your paper has received all the attention that it deserved. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to write up a complete analysis of your doubtlessly well-reasoned ideas since my cat had a little accident and I needed cellulose-based material in a hurry. Rest assured, however, that further submissions on your part will be looked at with the same intellectual curiosity as your latest missive managed to elicit.
Believe me always, yours faithfully,
But Kissinger just had a pen and a couple of genocides under his wing.
Not good enough. I do think someone used this for the magnetic photon /quid vid/. Experiments sadly proved the absence of this this kind of matter-penetrating light.
I think you meant "Just as planned"
(white fluffy cat stroke from a wheelchair-bound diminutive figure)
Yes, and this IS odd, which is good.
Ah, this would be the name calling and style criticising bit of the "scientific debate". Good to see so many upvotes for this fantastic bit of reasoning.....
Thank you for the expectation that I would have enough time and energy to seriously dissect an ALTERNATE EXPLANATION OF
THE MATRIXLIFE, THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING in El Reg reader's forum.
People interested in learning more about the (non) controversy are invited to apply Google to the problem but to stay within the bounds of what common sense tells them about the websites they visit. There are also "books".
In particular, the following information may be of help when you encounter Tim The Enchanter and his Electric Staff:
There is an electrical model of the universe that doesn't require dark matter.
Unfortunately it resides in crank universe and it firmly intends to stay there. It seems to be pretty much at odds with things that one can see in a telescope. In a positivist science, this is generally a Bad Thing. I won't even mention websites promoting it that look like something out of geocities. I think it's mainly made up by electrical engineers afraid of an Einstein mass/energy tensor letting fly.
This device from Company (a) will do the job that we need it to do, and save us wasting time and funding on developing a whole new branch of radio technology,
...you forget to add "which might be covered by patents held by someone else anyway that no-one is aware of as yet", so why bother developing anything new?
Patents are a trade-inhibiting and pauperizing crock from A to Z.
"It's a non-issue"
They would say that, wouldn't they?
"Was it a crypto-anarchist wing of the anti-Monsanto hippies?"
Deploy Roundup! Anyone protesting Monsanto while rooting for what makes Monsanto deserves it.
Unless you want to cripple the economy by taxing the street-level grunt, no.
Frank Chodorov, in Out of Step, Devin-Adair, 1962:
First, as to method of collection, taxation falls into two categories, direct and indirect. Indirect taxes are so called because they reach the state by way of private collectors, while direct taxes arrive without by-pass. The former levies are attached to goods and services before they reach the consumer, while the latter are in the main demands upon accumulations of wealth.
It is not the size of the yield, nor the certainty of collection, which gives indirect taxation preeminence in the state's scheme of appropriation. Its most commendable quality is that of being surreptitious. It is taking, so to speak, while the victim is not looking. Those who strain themselves to give taxation a moral character are under obligation to explain the state's preoccupation with hiding taxes in the price of goods.
Taxes of all kinds discourage production. Man works to satisfy his desires, not to support the State. When the results of his labors are taken from him, whether by brigands or organized society, his inclination is to limit his production to the amount he can keep and enjoy. During the war, when the payroll deduction was introduced, workers got to figuring their "take home" pay, and to laying off when this net, after taxes, showed no increase comparable to the extra work it would cost; leisure is also a satisfaction. A prize fighter refuses another lucrative engagement because the additional revenue would bring his income for the year into a higher tax bracket. In like manner, every business man must take into consideration, when weighing the risk and the possibility of gain in a new enterprise, the certainty of a tax-offset in the event of success, and too often he is discouraged from going ahead. In all the data on national progress the items that can never be reported are: the volume of business choked off by income taxes, and the size of capital accumulations aborted by inheritance taxes.
What we would LIKE to hear
"We need to know who really owns and controls our politicians. Not just who owns them casually, but who really benefits financially from their existence," Cameron is expected to say at a conference.
But unfortunately not.
"For too long a small minority have hidden their business dealings behind a complicated web of shell companies and this cloak of secrecy has fuelled all manners of questionable practice - and downright illegality."
And we make the "legality" - in particular in order to spend other people's money on various shit, wars as well as ourselves. As the income is not enough, we introduce VAT, income taxes etc. As this is STILL not enough, we need to upgrade constantly which we then sell to the sheeple by claiming that widows and children are being treated unfairly.
I am not a Product. At least, not to Facebook.
Collectivism and state-worship is a bit strong in this thread.
I think it's time you all started to think about meeting the next 5-year plan's goals because Mr. Mosley will be reactivated SOON the way things are going.
Of course, of course. But the "spoils of war" are even worse. Like GWB's self-financing Iraq war.
So what's wrong about that?
The Colosseum: Built by govnm't on taxpayers' expense to amuse and awe them
Hagia Sophia: Built by govnm't on taxpayers' expense to control and awe them
Tower of London: Built by govnm't on taxpayers' expense as its cozy home and torture cellar
Steve Jobs' Garage: Generates taxpayers' expense and actual things people want!
"I can't get the cut that God himself entitled me to have... WAAAHHAAAAMBULANCE!"
Young lad! I have stories to tell....
People are actually also using Windows and x86 and even Linux and C.
Your Face When cockwomble encounters industry standard.
> Goldman Sachs
Nothing to do with Conrad, everything with Ridley.
I want to see repairmen on the lower decks!
To me it sounds like the spin you get when your Pratt&Whitney turbine has just accidentally hoovered up someone from the flight deck.
CUT ENGINES! CUT!!
Btw, it is "Grand Fromage" in french.
"Grande" sounds spanish. Nobody likes the Spanish Inquisition.
We have detected suspicious behaviour in your immediate future.
Step away from the keyboard and show your hands. We have the permission to use deadly force!
Deal with it, AC.
There will be tax hikes long before that. As this means no jobs, expect a government-provided one in a canned goods factory or something.
Apparently the continuous QE3 monetary inflation effort is not strong enough to get us out of the perma-depression. There are rumors to go Weimar for real now:
The Fed has worked for decades to suppress inflation, but economists, including Janet Yellen, President Obama’s nominee to lead the Fed starting next year, have long argued that a little inflation is particularly valuable when the economy is weak. Rising prices help companies increase profits; rising wages help borrowers repay debts. Inflation also encourages people and businesses to borrow money and spend it more quickly.
Fasten your seatbelt, this economy is going places. I suspect disk drives will be manufactured, bought by government and carted directly to the landfill.
"Everything dies, Mr Mulder!"
"actually a folder with multiple files inside, abstracted into a single object by OSX"
Actually that is very good file format in systems which have no internal structure to "files", but it should really behave like a single "package" (like the OpenOffice files, which are actually jar files, which are actually zip files of a file tree)
> Actually, it was a computer. Just a computer.
gb2 The Telegraph
It's still large, have a look:
119 pages, 47384 words.
Changes to such high-level documents happen all the time. I hear a big change was a hush-hush removal of something about cloud computing, which happened after a USUK delegation was seen hogging the lobby...
Apart from that, companies better have good lawyers if this is translated into national laws. Apparently sometimes it might be very unclear whether one would or would not compliant with the law.
And upwards both ways!
> overtly sexual
Welcome to Catholicism.
Not enough fluffy cats.
One container full of harddisks would be enough for that. or not?
.. that never wants to be employed/employable, yeah.
Which is why "professionals" are complaining about "muh jobs are being outsourced" as "locally written stuff" falls over at the next sneeze.
Your paperbag, sir. Please code your way out of it.
> .Net has a wonderful toolbox for developers to use to get sites working.
That is very deep in the Gravity Well of the Microsoft Dark Star. Stay away, you won't have enough delta-vee to ever get out again. It's for Volksgrenadiere not afraid to give up their soul, not for education.
Jesus Christ Don, are you working in Brussels?
What is "institutionalized Icahnism", why are "bucks" free and why do you "dilute long-term value" by not redirecting scare resources to your preferred project? Maybe people want a (subsidized?) Wal-Mart nearby instead.
Hey, I'm not against having broadband everywhere, but this is just made-up political justifications. Broadband rollout happens as an economy builds up its capital structure. The capital structure is not built up by pushing broadband (even if the EC says that this is so).
So kick the arse of the current monopolist until it softens up so that the offer can be extended. If that means BT can no longer honour pension payouts, so be it.
I bet once the broadband is there, you will see protests against "the wholesale destruction of local shops" followed by french-style regulation, but I digress...
The price of electricty is a red herring when we are killing this planet for our kids and grand-kids. Let em suffer if I can get 10% off my bills. How short-sighted &fucking selfish.
Unfortunately, economics is the only heuristic you have. And your kids & grand-kids will suffer anyway (UK debt = 90% of GDP, probably optimistic; enjoy paying it down. No, it will NOT be paid down by "the rich".).
You should feel free to give your money to green energy initiatives (government-mandated or not) of your choice, but don't diss "cheap". Paying "more" now might well make the difference between "energy" and "energy and a bike" later.
Excellent, thank you.
Sorry for the grumpiness and waldorfstatlerisms, just having a bad
day week monthyear.
It estimates the archive should contain at least 40 undiscovered novae – but the images are fragile and analogue, and their data is difficult to access.
In this case the opposite of "digital" ins NOT "analogue". From where does this 100% stupid vocabulary originate? Let me guess: it's because you can have an "analog signal" and a "digital signal" (better described as a "symbol-based signal"), amirtite?
You may call the image "based on chemical substrate" or "based on bulk material" or "not digitized", but "analogue" it ain't.
Come to think of it, it is "quantized", photographic grain and all that. Still not digital.
This is why the Net Neutrality idea is a problem: The consumer won't get the movie.
Their business is to provide connectivity and not worry about what goes over that connection.
QoS aspects are part and parcel of connectivity. Pretending this isn't so does not help.
But what guarantee is there that that won't be dropped and made incompatible in future releases of Windows?
Regime Uncertainty is what will bring us out of the Great Recession! Ask any politician.
It was dead far earlier.
And I don't mean "mercilessly tortured by eBay in a damp cellar".
Why it even exists and hasn't been replaced by something that works and actually makes sense will forever be one of the mysteries of the Internet.