Re: Doesn't matter...
The fun thing about the real world is that it doesn't care about a "shouldn't".
10456 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
The fun thing about the real world is that it doesn't care about a "shouldn't".
"Pedonoia represents the child state of Mind and the first child-like thoughts and child-models of information"
Of course not. Any self-respecting horse wears in-line skates. What do you think this is, the 70s?
I'm sure there is a possibility to bring up VALIS but I can't find it.
The fun thing about Syria is that you get deathsquatted by BOTH SIDES. What do?
Tango was hit thanks to a vulnerable WordPress installation
Maybe people should stop using integrated third-party WebShit 2.0 left and right (those dozens of integrated flypapers icons that NoScript always complains about) and have dedicated secure tools.
Don't you first need to pull a sword out of a block of concrete poured by Kellogs-Brown-Root?
I sure hope so, it is a private company.
No wait, this is 2013, it probably isn't legal.
...whereby settling companies get invited to defray the legal costs of the rest.
So I sit here today at my desk and Java (or rather JEE) is a bloated mess of a language with all kinds of crap I dont need, buzzwords, frameworks, annotations, black boxes, conventions, wierd gotchas and general broken-ness. And to cap it all the black hats are now a step or two ahead at all times.
Yeah, Mr "propellorhead". It's your arse that is a bloated mess. Hint train incoming:
1) You can leave JEE out if you just want SE. Do you know what I'm saying? Notze that you will have to pull in Hibernate or write your SQL queries through JDBC when you want persistent storage, which you will want pretty quickly.
2) If you want Spring, Groovy or soem other non-JEE API or framework building on SE, you know where to find it.
3) JEE is not "bloated" in any particular way. It is just what it is: an environment in which to write server-side applications. And it's pretty elegant, too. Compare with J2EE which was the wrong approach.
4) wierd gotchas and general broken-ness ... care to be precise?
"Black boxes"? What? "Annotations"? Do you prefer XML markup in side-dish files? "Conventions"? Yeah, these are bad, right?
Are you actually sure about what you are talking about? Because you sure don't sound like it.
gb2 your pseudo-assembler fail.
Released together with Windows 95? One would think there is no useful stuff that runs on Java Beta or that the power supply on the i486 box blew up at some point in time...
Epic Freud Stuff of the Week:
"Oracle is yet to respond to Gowdiak's discovery, so it's unclear if and when a fix might become available. The security giant last released..."
Tell me more about your security...
It will pupate and emerge as Lynch's version of Dune.
This will not ameliorate things a lot.
I will be listening to the soundtrack by Toto, thanks. And the thought of using Dick Cheney as Baron Harkonnen comes up...
And didn't Armin Müller Stahl transform the desert of Tataouine into a lush cornfield of genetically engineered corn bearing the alien-black-oil repelling virus in X-Files: The movie?
True but irrelevant as you just need the mark's phone number and his old SIM.
Yes, the Nanny with the leather outfit and the cats ears for me, please.
My coat? The one wih Gotlib's "Rhââ Lovely" in the pocket. Thank you, young lady.
spent a weekend on the Refresh button wondering when the site would return
Could have helped me mixing concrete...
Back in the sad, and portent-laden fading days of the Republic (the "Bubble in Time"), the following went to the printers:
by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Statements of note:
We noticed an increasing number of situations in which highly talented and respected people from the U.S. Government were making statements about how long it takes to crack DES. In all cases, these statements were at odds with our own estimates and those of the cryptographic research community. A less polite way to say it is that these government officials were lying, incompetent, or both. They were stating that cracking DES is much more expensive and time-consuming than we believed it to be. A very credible research paper had predicted that a machine could be built for $1.5 million, including development costs, that would crack DES in 3-1/2 hours. Yet we were hearing estimates of thousands of computers and weeks to years to crack a single message.
On Thursday, June 26, 1997 the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on International Relations heard closed, classified testimony on encryption policy issues. The Committee was considering a bill to eliminate export controls on cryptography. After hearing this testimony, the Committee gutted the bill and inserted a substitute intended to have the opposite effect. A month later, a censored transcript of the hearing was provided; see http://jya.com/hir-hear.htm. Here are excerpts:
Statement of Louis J. Freeh, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
". . . And we do not have the computers, we do not have the technology to get either real-time access to that information or any kind of timely access. If we hooked together thousands of computers and worked together over 4 months we might, as was recently demonstrated decrypt one message bit. That is not going to make a difference in a kidnapping case, it is not going to make a difference in a national security case. We don't have the technology or the brute force capability to get to this information."
I forsee an NSA public relations drive, whereby sputnik gets doxed within 24h.
Then the Prez can appear on the whiteouse lawn for another bombastic speech.
Well, the assassination of Stanley Kubrick covered all the tracks. We will never know the whole story.
> There's also an information sharing system called A-Space etc. etc.
More acronyms and kewl buzz than Calvin can come up in an afternoon of dwelling in the house of club GROSS ("Get Rid of Slimy Girls").
You guys really need to have the keys taken away.
If he had the courage of his supposed convictions, he'd emulate Manning and face judgment for what he's done.
After the New York Times had been enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers — on June 15, 1971, the first prior restraint on a newspaper in U.S. history — and I had given another copy to The Post (which would also be enjoined), I went underground with my wife, Patricia, for 13 days. My purpose (quite like Snowden’s in flying to Hong Kong) was to elude surveillance while I was arranging — with the crucial help of a number of others, still unknown to the FBI — to distribute the Pentagon Papers sequentially to 17 other newspapers, in the face of two more injunctions. The last three days of that period was in defiance of an arrest order: I was, like Snowden now, a “fugitive from justice.”
Yet when I surrendered to arrest in Boston, having given out my last copies of the papers the night before, I was released on personal recognizance bond the same day. Later, when my charges were increased from the original three counts to 12, carrying a possible 115-year sentence, my bond was increased to $50,000. But for the whole two years I was under indictment, I was free to speak to the media and at rallies and public lectures. I was, after all, part of a movement against an ongoing war. Helping to end that war was my preeminent concern. I couldn’t have done that abroad, and leaving the country never entered my mind.
There is no chance that experience could be reproduced today, let alone that a trial could be terminated by the revelation of White House actions against a defendant that were clearly criminal in Richard Nixon’s era — and figured in his resignation in the face of impeachment — but are today all regarded as legal (including an attempt to “incapacitate me totally”).
I hope Snowden’s revelations will spark a movement to rescue our democracy, but he could not be part of that movement had he stayed here. There is zero chance that he would be allowed out on bail if he returned now and close to no chance that, had he not left the country, he would have been granted bail. Instead, he would be in a prison cell like Bradley Manning, incommunicado.
The nazified white house and the "coloured" petulant gangster therein don't recognize "sovereign nations". It's all Amurrica.
Is this the Upstanding Citizen Message of the week?
Have a thumbs up. I always vote Blockleiter.
You will get arrested for causing "public disturbance"
This week in press freedoms and privacy rights by Glenn Greenwald:
The kangaroo tribunal calling itself "the FISA court" yesterday approved another government request (please excuse the redundancy of that phrase: "the FISA court approved the government's request"). Specifically, the "court" approved the Obama administration's request for renewal of the order compelling Verizon to turn over to the NSA all phone records of all Americans, the disclosure of which on June 6 in this space began the series of NSA revelations. This ruling was proudly announced by the office of the Director of National Intelligence, which declassified parts of that program only after we published the court ruling. In response, the ACLU's privacy expert Chris Soghoian sarcastically observed: "good thing the totally not a rubberstamp FISA court is on the job, or we might turn into a surveillance state"; the Wall Street Journal's Tom Gara noted: "Reminder: The style guide for mentioning the FISA court is that it's written 'court' with scare quotes."
Of course, there is no reason at all not to trust Google. Oh, wait ..
Way to miss the point entirely.
"Are you really going to rely for your security on someone who drifts on the wrong side of the law?"
Don't know whether retarded or just trolling. Or a Fed.
Either way, this must be one of the bestest citations of the year.
It goes on....
A federal appeals court has delivered a blow to investigative journalism in America by ruling that reporters have no first amendment protection that would safeguard the confidentiality of their sources in the event of a criminal trial.
In a two-to-one ruling from the fourth circuit appeals court in Richmond, Virginia, two judges ruled that a New York Times reporter, James Risen, must give evidence at the criminal trial of a former CIA agent who is being prosecuted for unauthorised leaking of state secrets. [The authorised leaking is of course fully encouraged]
The timing of the appeal court ruling is ironic as it comes just days after the new Justice Department guidelines were published. Those guidelines were drawn up at the request of President Obama following the controversy over surveillance of the phone lines of Associated Press.
Lucy Dalglish, co-chair of the First Amendment Committee of the American Society of News Editors, said the decision would add to the chill that was rapidly taking hold in America as a result of the aggressive pursuit of leakers by the Obama administration. "It has really got bad, and not just in national security reporting. Every official now knows that if they talk to a reporter they are potentially in a world of hurt."
No because the "tech companies" can be controlled by law or the customers' purses. Whereas the bureaucracy is evidently above any law, even above the constitution and takes its sustenance by sending armed people to your house to collect the protection money.
I will trust the techs. If I could trust the framework.
That's where the Insider Threat program comes in. Detailed by McClatchy newspapers in recent weeks, the new scheme encourages all agencies of the federal government to come up with their own disparate anti-whistleblower rules, at the center of which will be a threat to punish anybody who even suspects a potential whistleblower and doesn't turn them in. The details of the initiative get more terrifying the deeper one delves into them, with the conclusion that recent divorcees and people with perceived money troubles have to be turned in, and will face preemptive action against them, likely ending their careers on mere suspicion that they couldn't be trusted, when the chips are down, to continue betraying the public trust in the name of secrecy.
Yeah. "More Transparency". You want a pony with that, faggot? Medium rare, slightly hellfired? Certainly, sir.
'More disclosures on secret data gathering, please'
Followed by an IRS bullet to the head of those companies.
"Dear Apple. Our tax records show...."
What's that? Ok, that's better. Now shut up. You know the president can kill you at his pleasure?
Talking about bullets, any news on the explodo-car "accident" of Michael Hastings?
Luckily we can't agree. I can still have my ethanol at 15% VAT (a nice tax on the little man, that).
Oh... "profitable" and "government owned".
Care to show the numbers?
Additional hint: "50% of GDP" does not mean "generated". It means "outlays that go on the credit card"
Taxation is the way to make sure that you won't find a job.
Neither will you find the service that is supposed to be provided by the income generated by taxation.
However, your minister will have a brand-new shiny car.
French ministers talking about the titsup "french economy" by taxation... Why is it titsup? Look at taxation and the cancer of government control and spending ... 50% of GDP generated by government farts, quite a lot of them fueled by the printing press, means DEATH any way you slice it.
Then you hear them say "social contract" and you picture a fat mafiosi talking about the good of "our community". Or you think about what happened when you last invoked that "contract" and tried to find a hospital on a weekend.
A more charitable interpretation of what the gnomes are about can be found at Cartman Shrugged: The Invisible Gnomes and the Invisible Hand in South Park. They are mysterious, vaguely menacing, and may not know what they are doing. With 20/20 hindsight their antics are laughable, but they could have been a contender...
But what about the gnomes, who, after all, give the episode its title? Where do they fit in? I never could understand how the subplot in "Gnomes" relates to the main plot until I was lecturing on the episode at a summer institute, and my colleague Michael Valdez Moses made a breakthrough that allowed us to put together the episode as a whole. In the subplot, Tweek complains to anybody who will listen that every night at 3:30 a.m. gnomes sneak into his bedroom and steal his underpants. Nobody else can see this remarkable phenomenon happening, not even when the other boys stay up late with Tweek to observe it, not even when the emboldened gnomes start robbing underpants in broad daylight in the mayor’s office. We know two things about these strange beings: (1) they are gnomes; (2) they are normally invisible. Both facts point in the direction of capitalism. As in the phrase "gnomes of Zurich," which refers to bankers, gnomes are often associated with the world of finance. In the first opera of Wagner’s Ring Cycle, Das Rheingold, the gnome Alberich serves as a symbol of the capitalist exploiter—and he forges the Tarnhelm, a cap of invisibility. The idea of invisibility calls to mind Adam Smith’s famous notion of the "invisible hand" that guides the free market....
Even the gnomes do not understand what they themselves are doing. Perhaps South Park is suggesting that the real problem is that people in business themselves lack the economic knowledge that they would need to explain their activity to the public and justify their profits. When the boys ask the gnomes to tell them about corporations, all they can offer is this enigmatic diagram of the stages of their business:
Phase 1: Collect Underpants
Phase 2: ?
Phase 3: Profit
This chart encapsulates the economic illiteracy of the American public. They can see no connection between the activities entrepreneurs undertake and the profits they make. What those in business actually contribute to the economy is a big question mark to them. The fact that entrepreneurs are rewarded for taking risks, correctly anticipating consumer demand, and efficiently financing, organizing, and managing production is lost on most people. They would rather complain about the obscene profits of corporations and condemn their power in the marketplace.
> But by 2017 100% of Americans will be employed in surveillance of other Americans
Truly, A Scanner Darkly. You can watch yourself on camera, via high-speed Internet.
Finally a good link
Unfortunately it is marred somewhat by the second link to WiseGeek where the author is terminally confused about the Northern Basin and Vallis Marineris not being the same thing at all. Not-so-WiseGeek also says "Moon-sized object nearly hit Mars, but instead scraped a deep scar in the planet".
NO! The MIT article says
"We knew there must be impacts between these size ranges," Zuber says. "But nobody had identified one." Analysis in the theoretical papers accompanying this one show that the impacting object that produced the huge basin on Mars must have been about 2,000 km across - larger than Pluto -- and struck at an angle of about 45 degrees, creating the oval shape of the basin.
I would say that's a "full absorbtion impact". Masses of that size do not behave like billard balls. They behave like very liquid droplets.
Must have been a slow-motion impact though so that the southern half of Mars is even retaining any trace of the before-impact era.
It doesn't know whether to turn clockwise or anticlockwise, so it's still hesitating.
My life experience says that it's too late anyway.
> Millions and millions of eyars ago billions even....
EPIC STORY BRO!
> stolen atmosphere
But can it be found on Pirate Bay? Quick, call the RIAA.
Never call a planet "hemor"
And we know from Half Life 2 that the Combine actually portaled away a whole 3-5 m of sealevel in water mass. That's some serious thirst.
> debris from one humungous collision maybe?
Asteroid belt mass: 4% of the mass of the Moon.
NO. It was in "Captain Future" though.
> Didn't someone once speculate that the Moon was ejected from the hole in the Pacific?
> Perhaps a coalescence of planetary objects that ended up on collision course?
Perhaps an ensemble of neurons firing randomly, forming sounds vaguely resembling a phrase?
> Maybe the Earth (and Mars) were moons of Jupiter at one time.
Maybe the Moon is made of cheese.
> Who really and honestly knows or will ever know?
Spouting CRAP and ending with PSEUDO-OPEN-MINDED PHILOSOPHY will win you friends.
> It's the oil companies keeping quiet about their alternative resource
You now picture Weyland-Yutani ferrying in enough hydrocarbon to suck all the oxygen out of the atmosphere.
I thought this was by Ron Hubbard?
"a return to such repressive days"
What RETURN are you talking about?
"Together, we are working to ensure that the industry imbeds persistent technology that is effective, ubiquitous and free to consumers in every smartphone introduced to the market by next year"
Of course they are. Retards.
Why are they even dealing with this in the first place? What they should do is make sure that one can install such a switch without going through "app store" shenanigans or that network operators get off their fat arse and offer a blocking service.
In truth you would have to build everything from scratch to be sure.
Ermm.... call our engineering department in Vietnam, sir?