7129 posts • joined Tuesday 3rd June 2008 16:11 GMT
- ← Prev
- Next →
Primo, it's "Voilà", not "Viola!"
And then, Venus is drier than an old mummy roasted in the desert, most of the water having been cracked and the hydrogen blown into space.
There still MAY be Heechee tunnels, but don't put your money on these.
Re: Your conspiracy theory
No but Space Nazis will definitely be in it!
Re: "all it does is make people disrespect the entire system"
There is still a system to disrespect?
Really, it's all down to "nearer the state makes right" anyway. Why care?
Sorry to say so, but its articles are oftentimes better than those of the government-sanctioned "leak propagator" and neocon platform "The Washington Post". I won't lose any words about the New York Times and the War Street Journal.
" Apple doesn't invent anything. All they do is trawl around at others ideas and stick them together in something pretty and sell it with immense marketing muscle they have."
That IS "innovation".
Innovation is NOT inventing portals to go to the moon. It's mainly repackaging or tweaking something that exists so that an appealing product results, enabling you to rake in the money.
S'Truth. Marginal utility and all that.
Prices are highest where customers are most chained to their supplier (by choice, lack of competition, strong "IP protection" or worse) or where customers have loads of cash floating around that they don't know what to do with. Another possibility is that the supplier has miscalculated and will soon revise his prices.
Apart from that:
"Microsoft Windows Server Standard Single License/ Software Assurance Pack OPEN 1 License No Level 2 PROC"
What does that gibberish even mean?
Re: Junked junk DNA junks ID junking?
God has a bad compiler, a self-written compression library and moreover codes bad dung when it comes to anything high-level.
Gotta say though, the trick with using abstract algebra for the low-level physics part was neat. Nice one, God.
“provides a stunning vindication of the prediction of intelligent design that the genome will turn out to have mass functionality for so-called 'junk' DNA”
Interesting. Do they specify what part of mass this is mean for? Ave marias? Partaking in the Blood of Christ ritual? Gobbling tasteless bread? Kneeling? Singing?
Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi! Non-Java languages on the JVM are my only hope!
> managed languages seem like tinker toys for freshouts
It's 2012. The fact that people still like their balls feel the hard warm touch of the CPU instruction set and are still coding in C or C++ is NOT a testament to either - it mainly shows how fucked-up, conservative and driven by primate hindbrains this "industry" actually is- It's the anthrophic C principle - it's still with us, so it must be good, right? No.
> bloated, buggy, poorly written
Opinions can be had for 15 cents at the next corner.
> The language itself though it has some flaws is useful enough
The language is useful enough, but that's faint praise. It doesn't seem to progress. It has lots of problems. Many cannot be solved because one needs to stay backward compatible. As for the API, it's generally adequate only and often rather HERP DERP. Just looking at java.util.Calendar will make you age by 10 years. It's that bad. Then people use it and also forget the synchronize keyword....
And it's not getting better. JEE uptricks the program semantics with runtime and composition semantics, not to mention persistence semantics that are hard to grasp, resulting in JEE managed programs croaking with mysterious exceptions under mysterious circumstances. It's not pretty. No sir I don't like it.
Java should be put out to pasture. The JVM can stay. There are lots of interesting languages for it.
Re: I think we are all agreed
You are not talking about an Applet, so your point is moot. Could be your boss has a point.
Re: If you don't like being ripped off, don't trade with Uzbekistan
> like being boiled alive
Err no. AFAIK, "The West", always into democracy and stuff, nicely asked him to stop boiling people alive otherwise they would have to reduce the doubtlessly merited subsidies (as he helps in providing access to Afghanistan). So he has taken to freezing people alive instead, I suppose by dunking them into liquid nitrogen?
As for the russina telco buisness, it's bound to be a competitor to the telco run by the Prez' daughter, no? Never good. I have a first-hand account of a Russian delegation which, immediately after a telco deal went bad, actually speeded to the airport the second the door closed. Tough business environment, indeed.
What are you getting at here?
> those MIPS figures seem absurdly low
Could be because they are S/360 instructions or some other old CISC instruction set
> A 96kB cache just about the same size as a 1MB cache?
Could be because the transistor count per cell is way higher for L1 than L2
> the year numbering in that other graph ... wishful thinking
It's a picture of the past, not the future
> IBM can go full-out in car salesman mode
IBM sells well sure. If the buyer is ready to pay the price because he cannot or won't deal with commodity hardware, what's the problem? Faster machine keeps your existing software infrastructure running and that's worth more than the pricey upgrade in most cases. If you want to have x86 you know where to find it, but chances are you don't want it in the first place.
As someone once said,
"Commodity hardware is like violence, or XML - if it doesn't solve your problems, you are not using enough of it"
"It never existed!"
> Implying that slimy megacorps would use freelancers to disappear a site 90's X-Files style
> Instead of using the IP police or run-of-the-mill lawfare
Posting this on my way to the organic food store.
Re: And the IT angle is...
"Quantum Vacuum Plasma Thrusters"
Oh man, crank alert. Fat chance for success on that. Unfortunately this universe is boring and insists on conserving momentum. And as no-one knows what the "quantum vacuum" is, the math is gonna be dodgy in the extreme. Yes I looked at the presentation. It is extremely fishy. High-school algebra is supposed to illustrate that this idea has any merit?
Re: @Ken Hagan Nobel?
Although lately the discussion has been started whether that rule should be overruled in order to award the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the Higgs mechanism (and the Higgs boson) to more than three of
And even that would be unfair to the CERN collaborations.
The time of easily identifiable "core individuals" responsible for a scientific discovery has passed I think.
"and I'm sure I know how to Google what that is"
But doesn't that mean he doesn't know what that is and moreover is not 100% sure how to Google what that is?
"We don't need to do anything, apart from just stop him entering the room."
"Leaving the room!"
"Leaving the room ... yes. "
Use a big dish, precisely pointed to capture the photons, select a frequency band with little interference so that the whole universe looks as quiet as a Lovecraftian underground cave, reduce bitrate to accumulate more energy in order to reliably decide whether a 1 or 0 was sent, increase redundancy to keep acceptable distance between the symbols of your language.
http://www.uhf-satcom.com/misc/datasheet/dh2va.pdf <- Impressive dB numbers in there: 314 dB at 100 AU
"I've just picked up a fault in the AE-35 unit"
Wherein we read among others:
"Manpower estimates for software development ranged from one programmer in 1974 and 1977, with a peak of four full-time programmers in late 1975."
Clearly not an enterprisey solution.
Re: Apple still needs needs some help
> "No, however it was not the function of this jury to ask that. We were bound to use the law as it is today.
Doesn't know what a jury is about.
Hmm.... sounds good. Really good. I am intrigued.
Wait ... did I say that?
Re: Isn't about time we built another Voyager?
"The Pluto Fast Flyby was later cancelled due to a lack of funding, but it was replaced by the Pluto Kuiper Express."
"The mission was cancelled for budgetary reasons, but later replaced by the similar New Horizons mission."
"New Horizons is a NASA robotic spacecraft mission currently en route to the dwarf planet Pluto. It is expected to be the first spacecraft to fly by and study Pluto and its moons, Charon, Nix, Hydra, S/2011 P 1, and S/2012 P 1, with an estimated arrival date at the Pluto–Charon system of July 14, 2015. NASA may then also attempt flybys of one or more other Kuiper belt objects, if a suitable target can be located."
All right then. Phew.
I think it's time that wealthy people of interest picked up some tabs. Spend some money, guys, I will vote against the tax harpies.
"Good afternoon, Mr. Amer. Everything is going extremely well"
Nevertheless, it's NASA's longest-operating craft ever, rocketing through space for the last 35 years.
"Rocketing" is not the word I would use. "Falling", "following a geodesic through spacetime", possibly "careening" or "hurtling" would be more appropriate.
Nice doing, Judge
[Also said Oracle] didn't even defend its intellectual property until it became clear some of its patents were being struck out in other legal actions.
That is called pouring cyclohexane onto burning gasoline.
High-powered IP lawyers are already downing large cups of black coffee while deciding who to sue right now, immediately, I'm sure.
I said keep it together!
So far, so Roosevelt
In other words, they are angling for "contributions" from the "rights holders" as well as from well-connected insiders that will see freshly printed paper money flowing their way once the "wireless broadband for everyone" industrial policy rides out of the door. That's a good plan for success.
"which largely focused on ways to get the economy moving again"
Ridiculous. The apex of insanity is when you wreck the economy with cheap money, pump in more money to paper over the cracks, have a gigantic debt hole, increase governmental expenditures, especially in regards to military affairs, then still think you have the intellectual nous, not to speak of the economic wherewithal, to get the festering zombie moving again. Of course, once the economy has unf*cked itself in spite of all this (only a decade or so later), politicians will take pride in telling everyone that it was their merit that etc. etc. etc.
Re: How ?
Simplest way of thinking about this is:
You want to execute one instruction. That instruction can be divided into several tasks - fetch, decode, execute, write. Suppose executing the whole instruction takes N seconds, always.
If the processor is "single stage", it will perform one instruction every N seconds, with most of the circuitry idle as it waits for something to do:
If you manage to design the processor (and the program) so that each of the instruction tasks listed above can be done independently, you have a pipeline 4 stages deep. In that case, you can issue a new instruction every N/4 seconds and more of the circuitry is active at any given time. Big win. In reality instruction interdependence and jumps may force the processor to "flush the pipeline", i.e. discard the partially executed instructions, which evidently slows throughput. See in particular "vector processing".
You can now deepen the pipeline by dividing the tasks into subtasks to issue even more instructions per N. Depending on your expected workload, this may or may not make sense.
In the limit, you would get a processor that works asynchronously, without a central clock, where each logic gate does its work as soon as all its inputs have been set.
This has nothing to do with overall clock speed, though as frequency increases you cannot reliably give a good clock signal to all of the chip area "at the same time", so you are forced to compartimentalize anyway.
"Windows NT, which ushered in the era of client/server"
It was neither the first, nor did it really work. Well, it gave us file sharing and printer sharing... which we had on the Mac network already. Meanwhile real client/server was done command-line-wise on the unix host and using X.
Ey RICHTO how ya doing?
I see ya'r still hailing from the Microsoft Dimension of Wishful Thinking, one of the spacetime bubbles in the marketing string landscape that can only be attained through transcendantal medication and whalesong.
Keep it together now.
Re: Right problem, right application, right system, right CPU
Really, Matt. You should leave dissing to people who can actually rap. paralise? Fugeitso? Pchao.
I remember Matt Criswell predicting with 100% accuracy that Oracle would drop Sparc Processor immediately. Hmm.... maybe your CPU design consulting biz is not perfect.
Re: Usual Windoze FAIL
Re: #1 reason why GNOME is not ruling the world
> Nobody in the Linux world is interested in .NET.
But what is .NET? After > 15 years, do we finally know? I always assumed it was a marketing term underneath which unsurprisingly grew "Microsoft's attempt to derail Java as a hardware neutral software platform" (to quote Andrew Orlowski).
Oh the modern world. There are two platforms. One is held by Microsoft, the other by Oracle. We then get told to uninstall the one by Oracle because "ZOMG JAVA IS THE SUXXOR!!11". How did it come to this?
Re: Linux is a TOOL
"so that IBM and Google can make money from it"
I though Linux was Communism? What is it now? Get back inside gramps, be a good boy.
> did I dare espouse a personal opinion
No, you just trolled like a /b/-tard on the very second post.
Palestinians are semites, too!
Journalist working for a newspaper based in New York?
Randomly and accuses people of being anti-semitic?
Could that newspaper be the Gray Lady?
In the next episode: "Gimme one for free or I will attack Iran!"
I don't understand at all
De Icaza stated that within the GNOME project there was too much focus on bits, bytes, engineering excellence and technical purity that meant the platform was a constantly moving and evolving target - software interfaces would be broken and tweaked across versions, which is a nightmare scenario for third-party developers who want their apps to run on as many systems as possible rather than one particular build of GNOME.
So the problems are indeed inherent to the Gnome approach, then?
So many questions...
- Doesn't Gnome focus far much on aesthetics [because they are things that Just Don't Work - that's not focus in engineering excellence, no sir!]
- Sounds like there is a problem with centralizing decision making. Too many prima donnas pulling in all directions? Time to hire an Apple Disciplinator.
- If Gnome wants binary compatibility, why doesn't Gnome provide it? Don't tell me it's because Linus disses it.
- Who are those third-party developers who want binary compatibility?
- Why would the third-party developers want link to the Gnome library?
- Wouldn't the third-party developers use Java and an SWT interface instead, possibly supplemented with a thin JNI layer to the system, "outsourcing" the mutant morphing UI thing to Oracle?
Can you even into programming?
> It's going to make the Reg forums a bit empty
At least we will be spared from glimpsing inane comments by Alan Bourke and merry companions.
It's also wrong
URIs are the same as URLs, or maybe URLs are a subset of URIs...
At http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ we read:
Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs, aka URLs) are short strings that identify resources in the web: documents, images, downloadable files, services, electronic mailboxes, and other resources. They make resources available under a variety of naming schemes and access methods such as HTTP, FTP, and Internet mail addressable in the same simple way. They reduce the tedium of "log in to this server, then issue this magic command ..." down to a single click.
At RFC 3986, we read:
A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of characters that identifies an abstract or physical resource. (Syntax defined herein ....)
And in section 1.1.3. "URI, URL, and URN":
A URI can be further classified as a locator, a name, or both. The term "Uniform Resource Locator" (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the resource by describing its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network "location"). The term "Uniform Resource Name" (URN) has been used historically to refer to both URIs under the "urn" scheme [RFC2141], which are required to remain globally unique and persistent even when the resource ceases to exist or becomes unavailable, and to any other URI with the properties of a name. An individual scheme does not have to be classified as being just one of "name" or "locator". Instances of URIs from any given scheme may have the characteristics of names or locators or both, often depending on the persistence and care in the assignment of identifiers by the naming authority, rather than on any quality of the scheme. Future specifications and related documentation should use the general term "URI" rather than the more restrictive terms "URL" and "URN" [RFC3305].
"giving it escalted privs on an account not running as administrator."
And how would Java do that? Sure the JVM will run some generic Applet code but as it is not itself running as administrator, that code has to:
1) be able to do "intersting things" (which means the jar must have been validly signed)
2) those interesting things must be so interesting that Windows rolls over (in other words, this is a Windows vulnerability)
Note explicitly, that Oracle says taht your account can be compromised but says nothing about magical privilege escalation: The CVSS scores below assume that a user running a Java applet or Java Web Start application has administrator privileges (typical on Windows). When the user does not run with administrator privileges (typical on Solaris and Linux), the corresponding CVSS impact scores for Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability are "Partial" instead of "Complete", lowering the CVSS Base Score. For example, a Base Score of 10.0 becomes 7.5.
Re: Lets not just blame java here
> That's a key reason why Linux webservers are so much more likely to be hacked than Windows ones....
As Steve Jobs would say: Oh wow, oh wow, oh wow.
Welp, I hope school is back on soon so that the juveniles are kept busy.
Oh my here we go.
Cook sending in the troops to take Sammygrad once and for all?
This will go well.
"laws to deal with national security threat posed by Chinese kit"
1) Of what nature would those security threats be exactly?
2) More to the point, of what nature would these laws be?
3) Does anyone in there really understand the economics of having "secure telecom infrastructure"?
4) Does anyone really expect infrastructure with debug facilities and known tap points that might even have gone through a certain knowledge-based economy of the Middle East to be secure?
5) The Athens Affair! Enough said.
Re: How does it not have a sonic boom?
Ok, what Cancer of the Internet™ downvoted this?
When exactly was that a fact?
"I did rewrite some stuff at work -in python mostly, and I had a webmonkey bake some PHP also. He dislikes Java as much as I do so it did not take much persuasion"
> Wants to get rid of Java apparently for no good reason whatsoever expect it's Java
> Rewrites "some stuff" at work in Python/PHP with a webmonkey on the side
> 100% sure he hasn't upgraded the attack surface, possibly to "access all areas"
Re: Stop slapping at symptoms!
> RMS and others were warning people against Java since the dawn of time
RMS preaching in the desert, foretelling the Apocalypse of Sunacle via the Number of Larry, while Philistines give him the palestinian equivalent of the middle finger and program away on Java 1.0 stone tablets, -4000 AD or so? Sounds likely.
Still, what did they say?
Re: 2 birds with one stone (@ Ignazio)
> Java is basically a scripting language
What the hell am I reading?
If not, you may want to revise your basic assumptions about "scripting" and what "compilation" is about.
- ← Prev
- Next →
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Beijing leans on Microsoft to maintain Windows XP support