Re: Everything old is new again
And their are not transputers either. Far from it.
10786 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
And their are not transputers either. Far from it.
It somehow reminds me of Connection Machine's "active memory" idea. I think. Regular expression processing in massively parallel hardware? Time for reading!
How is a scan line rasterizer the same as processors on a DIMM?
"Automata processor cuts through NP-hard problems like they're butter"
Going overboard with headlines much, El Reg?
What next? Free energy found by combining lifters with homeopathy?
"Planted Motif" problems are NP-complete only as I read on Jimbo's big bag of trivia (NP-hardness may well mean that the problems is way, way harder). Even Micron's new approach at SIMD processing is not going to crack large NP-complete problems significantly faster - speedup is linear, but the cost still increases exponentially with the problem size, so no joy.
And why do I have to go and google for Micron's documentation.
Copland's "Microserfs" indicates that it was hell for Microsoft people, too.
"Be nice to me, Bill... please!"
But at least they got lucite motivators and - sometimes - share options out of it.
Apparently there is some confusion about how multicore is in competition with GPGPU processor. Newsflash: They are complementary. So cramming more Intel CPUs in there is good, as long as you can afford the gas turbine to power them and the Freon recirculator remove the waste heat, but this wont cause the GPGPUs to be dropped on the floor.
Still waiting for NVidia or AMD to attached ARM cores to their boards, so that the motherboard becomes just a dispatcher.
Knobbly male hooters are much larger than women's diminutive noses because of lean muscle mass, a new study has uncovered.
Check your privilege!
The are talking about the OTHER market place.
Please! This is not a fruitfan fest.
1) It's "premise"
2) It's not the end of Moore, but of his observation
3) What Moore observes is clear and has nothing to do with "advances in size/power/energe/storage/connectivity/bandwidth/price" wishy-washyness: " the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years" (and the price of the end product will be the same)
4) THOSE TIMES ARE OVER. The economic vagaries of going to XUV already say as much.
5) Deal with it.
> but we have long since moved on from the single notion of cramming more transistors on a lump of sand.
LOLNO. Still waiting to run Windows properly on multicore.
> aircraft taking pictures wasn't overhead
More gorgon-stare-equipped drones are clearly needed.
but in the end a modicum of sanity won through and funding was found
Is this code for "they stopped sulking like enormous gay elephants throwing toys out of massive prams, sucked it down and went back to their hobbies"?
DON'T tell me all the bills hadn't been through in September already. That's how the military did it.
Btw, how are the Zumblatt DELUXE FAILVESSEL and the Gerald Ford DEATHTRAP/USELESS AS THE BISMARCK CARRIER SERIES coming? Can we please transfer the money to space exploration?
These are not toys but SERIOUS TOOLS... SEX TOOLS!
The US is a permafailtrain of formaldehyde-laden FEMA trailers full of bad decision making and of non-decision making by a bunch of well-moneyed bipartisan controlfreaks.
"Any hiccups in funding for plutonium-238 production could put planetary science into a tailspin and delay, strip down, or smother nuclear-powered missions. The outlook among scientists is simultaneously optimistic and rattled.
The reason: It took countless scientists and their lobbyists more than 15 years just to get lawmakers’ attention. A dire 2009 report about “The Problem,” authored by more than five dozen researchers, ultimately helped slip the first earnest funding request into the national budget in 2009. Congressional committees squabbled over if and how to spend $20 million of taxpayers’ money — it took them three years to make up their minds."
And don't get me started on "Obamacare" which turns out to be just another voter trolling biz. Are the troops out of Afghanistan yet, "Head Held High"? Yeah. How about Obama's "Asian Pivot" (i.e. encircling the nation that holds a few trillion of your debt and is an important trading partner). Yeah ... that nation. At least we have Janet Yellen with her hand on the money-printing press. Hold on to your gonads, that nation is going places real soon now.
The SAS cannot just drop into Russia. They have at least to tell the FSB first, otherwise the rubberhosing will be applied on the incorrect recipient.
Here is a little story about "unnanounced operations" by the CIA in Turkey, for instance. It's a fun read:
It's not like lots of persons who thought exactly along those lines are now holding very important positions in the political-economic nomenclatura.
I don't think "Bitcoin" is a nefarious organization lurking in a lair underneath [preferred volcano]. "They" don't exist, Mulder!!
Somewhat (it's cashlike anonymous but you can indeed follow the bitcoin in particular when the bitcoin is exchanged with the government-sponsored paper money)
But additionally, infinite money printing by the bitcoin central bank is a no-no.
If you want filtering Software, you know where to get it.
In marketing, not sysoping?
Fail for inability to recognize security and availability as separate concerns, bringing in security here and completely ignoring economics like a juvenile do-it-yourselfer.
Meanwhile "The Internet is only vaporware and it never will get any better ... everyone needs a leased line from the incumbent operator, yadda, yadda, herpers derpers."
CVN-78 is indeed over budget and not ready for prime time.
I like it how Twitter is nowadays immediately used as a safety valve to let off steam and bad karma.
This has probably prevented a few cases of cow-orkers "going postal" and transforming their colleagues and middle management into peppered steak and filleted fish before they can be stopped by the boys in blue.
Cough! Your ideas are very speculative, my dear colleague.
No because information must still be exchanged with light or really fast projectiles.
Yeah, but this is useless if your system doesn't have a few hundred entangled qubits.
What do you do with a single qubit? Not much, it is the same as a tuple of reals.
Hot stuff! What an artist reckons a qubit looks like
What the hell am I looking at?
But postulating random quantum magic dust to explain consciousness is Not Even Wrong.
Penrose never even explained how this quantum thing is going to help doing consciousness in the first place. It was all handwaving flutter with gravity thrown in for good measure. Basically, it's his HOPE that the brain is not just an analog machinery but somehow "special". Then Gödel's incompleteness theorem gets invoked in a totally inappropriate manner. FAIL on this one, Sir Penrose.
If you think nothing is impossible, mother Nature will teach you otherwise.
Now go and solve the traveling salesman problem in polynomial time of the number of cities.
Yeah but it's really busy and also confused from meeting itself coming from the future on a permanent basis. That kind of situation would quantize the charge of anyone.
Creativity is overrated, the last refuge of the wetware-pusher (the other one is "emotion", as if short-circuit decision making was something to be proud of; it is, of course indispensable, but so is machine oil)
There is no creativity to understand because its is not a thing. It is success in search.
Search in very large spaces using Genetic Algorithms has existed since the 80s.
Google's AI chief Peter Norvig believes the kinds of statistical data-heavy models used by Google represent the world's best hope to crack tough problems such as reliable speech recognition and understanding – a contentious opinion, and one that clashes with Noam Chomsky's view.
That would be the view of having a hardcoded grammar processor.
But it doesn't clash. If Noam says "birds fly by flapping their wings" (which may or may not be true), and a Learjet flies by, no views are being clashed at all.
A tombstone with "James T Kirk" written on it appears out of nowhere.
No, wait, that was something else...
There is a fourth possibility here:
The algorithm cannot be compressed into a reduced set of state machine steps that can then be handled by a human brain.
Most things in nature are like that (though of course one pretends otherwise, in particular to give politicians any hope at all to pretend to be successful at anything)
Better tools for better humans.
Quoc V. Le
Pretty sure that is a pseudonym for an undercover agent from Randal IV.
As long as you get loud warnings telling you that you are probably doing something that will bite you later in this and that piece of code, I'm for it.
Back in the 80s, the "Hit Bit" MSX 8-bit sub-2 MHz machine always had a large heat signature and emitted the reassuring (though probably slightly cancerogenic) smell of heated plastics and electronic board.
And we can even start to build up programs with nothing more than natural language.
Yeah not holding my breath on this one.
Well, it probably IS appropriate to these times where you encounter more and more people who are unable to even specify the problem they want to have someone else solve for them.
Modern people don't understand the concept of "cannot be turned off".
That is the true question here.
It's "voilà", as in "Voilà ... another land war in
AsiaThe Middle East." (puts on powdered wig and a mouche)
> I really don't get quite why these designers do all this bizarre stuff
It's the same reason government needs more and more people and more and more money while promising to get leaner and meaner and more streamlined and provide better service really soon now all the time.
Then people install the same guys as ever.
Not really, it is just context-driven search.
Watson against The Prisoner:
Prisoner: "Let me watch you wreck this thing by asking .... WHY?"
Watson: "Why not!"
Prisoner: "The hell!!?"