Re: Nation state?
Pirates Informatiques sans Frontières!
14182 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
Pirates Informatiques sans Frontières!
I only there was a script which checked whether a domain was suspiciously similar to one from of a given set of expected & usual domain names and flagged the email with a "SCAM" warning ....
I would say there is skill there
Indeed. Most people couldn't design a website if their life depended on it, ending up with something like Geocities of the President Clinton Era. Definitely a skill.
“One of the reasons I’ve said I wouldn’t be talking to Vladimir Putin right now is because we are speaking to him from a position of weakness brought on by this administration, so, I wouldn’t talk to him for a while, but, I would do this. I would start rebuilding the Sixth Fleet right under his nose, rebuilding the military — the missile defense program in Poland right under his nose. I would conduct very aggressive military exercises in the Baltic States so that he understood we would protect our NATO allies…and I might also put in a few more thousand troops into Germany, not to start a war, but to make sure that Putin understand that the United States of America will stand with our allies… We must have a no fly zone in Syria because Russia cannot tell the United States of America where and when to fly our planes. We also have a set of allies in the Arab Middle East that know that ISIS is their fight…but they must see leadership support and resolve from the United States of America…we have the strongest military on the face of the planet, and everyone has to know it.”
Dumb kids on pulpits. Our only hope is that ISIS does a suicide strike on the whole bunch.
new and harder Edge browser
But does it wear a long leather anorak and sport garish earclips?
CEO level attained?
> multiple CCNPs, MCSEs, VCP, storage experience
Not really, just finagle the interview, too.
PHB will be impressed by your KeywordDrop strategy that you will undoubtedly deploy.
However, this is not news I was taught this in an astrophysics course nearly thirty years ago.
This is pretty cool, I had to get my astrophysics from scrunged books and "popularizations" (soon abandoned) I barely understood.
Any computer models on this?
We have bigger problems than puny ISIS
> we don't really know much about gravity
Thta's just fucking bullshit pulled out of donkey arses. The Einstein Field Equations have not shown a single hole in about a century of application. I strongly suspect this will stay that way until someone comes up with a viable description of quantum gravity.
> So we are supposed to believe in magically invisible stuff?
So we are supposed to have magically different behaviour of gravity under nicely left-unstated conditions?
I don't see what the XKCD strip adds either. Especially as it shows the Newton equation. Feck off.
The answer you are looking for is a resounding NO.
Dark matter is nearby, indeed in our galactic halo, right here at home. Besides, you are looking for 6 times more dark matter than visible matter. A loner galaxy in a void does not cut it.
Clearly the "Oubliette" Galaxy.
And why not.
I guess someone with a skill level above the average commentard would have thought about that.
> blind test/bias
This is not a medication test. "Half the patients will drink real coffee, and half will be given a yet-to-be-invented placebo". I don't think so.
Also, I remember reading about a study giving the exact same result way back when, possibly even before the War On Stuff.
Welcome to the discussion squelched 14 years ago.
Biggest trolls EVER.
But for some reason he wanted to "kill them immediately". Never found out why.
I will be in the server room, tracing patchcables some ex-popsicle from Pandorum...
"Creating road rage" sounds like a new, pressing problem that presidental candidates could work on prime time TV and for which emotional solutions could be proposed.
Some of you might know about the DO-178B/C process. Design Assurance Level 'A' and all that analysis and documentation. Often required for safety-critical software.
Non-applicable in any case of real-world-handling machine.
Even in aircraft/spacecraft, only small elements of the whole software have "A" level design assurance - those where things are basically running on rails (reflex arcs, completely specifiable subsystems). Once it gets interesting, guess what? Downgrade to level "C" or worse and let the error handler make everything go to "safe mode" as needed.
A sensible human driver can almost instantly see and discard.accept many option on the best way to get out of the way of emergency vehicles. I'd really like to see what a computer controlled car might do in those many and varied situations.
Pretty sure that the machine can do better and more "360° awareness" planning and evalution than the meatsack. Maybe not yet, but then pretty soon.
Humans tend to overrate their abilities. Some go so far as to credit consciousness with "special sauce" qualities instead of the intermittent stuttering introspective debugging review that it is.
You're supposed to start reacting when you see two or three cars in your rear-view
I will post a reaction meme over my facebook account accessible via the built-in entertainment facilities...
If two cars (same mass) doing 100 kmh crash head-on, that's basically the same as each hitting a brick wall at the very same, non-summed, 100 kmh.
Not entirely surprisingly, this is not exactly the case in the reference system of the passenger.
Some people actually believe that practical self driving cars are just around the corner. This implies that Strong AI is here
Pfff.... meatsacks that actually manage to drive and otherwise are just good for pushing buttons that do nothing of consequence in real life clearly belie that kind of statement.
This includes quite a chunk of military personnel btw.
Every driver in LA becomes highly skilled at driving fast without accidents.
SHAOLIN MONKS OF LA DRIVING!
If you have 5 cars backed up behind you, you are required to get out of the way.
Okay. So how do you count those cars? Unless you have a video feed from the coppercopter on your dashboard?
> the terror now enveloping Europe
Embrace the warm blanket of ... no wait. Is that the title of the next Dr. Who?
FedEx to ISIS
Yeah. You see the thumbs down. The keyboarder arsehole brigade is strong again and smelling blood in the water.
Don't give me this kind of whiny shit.
We have brought this on ourselves, and it's only gonna get worse. Painted ourselves into the corner of mendacity. And now it's getting dark.
Can't say I don't like idea, but fighter pilots generally do have a bit of a problem with releasing military ordnance on a civilian population in their own country.
That's because they are sitting in the wrong plane. They should be sitting in a ground-attack aircraft.
'It's WW2, we need a new airport - quick, let's find a prime bit of real estate densely populated with poor people'
More than one posh fox-hunting ground was destroyed by this defense perimeter action...
The US was looking into special fast-blackening glasses for their pilots back in the 90s when it was feared that high-powered lasers might be used against US warplanes to actually blind pilots for good (verboten by UN conventions, but hey) in case a shooting match breaks out with someone whose armed forces are a bit serious about that war business. What happened to that?
Well, sitting in a cockpit with what would be heavy sunglasses still would not make instrumental landing practical.
These are not the KneeJerk crowd you are looking for.
The other part of the KneeJerk crowd is blathering about our freedoms being under attack and how they are shocked, shocked!! and mourning, mourning!! about some blowback shock-and-awe in Paris and how they will let their inner Nazi out. Oh my.
Your personal belief in stating facts shall be amply rewarded in due time!
But maybe they will plant trees on the roof?
One yet but it's only a matter of time.
> future architecture
More like "niche architecture"
Our PMO knows EXACTLY where we are on a perfectly blank surface with moving hills
Well, I can only upvote the spirited discussion of the both of you.
Just don't veer off into a Hubbard vs. Heinlein thread.
(It's "Ursula K. Le Guin" though. That's been some time since I last heard that name now. Or Theodore Sturgeon. Well, we are 2015. Must .... resist .... urge ... to open old books.)
Using the cosmic background radiation – the “echo of the Big Bang*” – as a random number generation isn't a new idea, but a couple of scientists have run the slide-rule over measurements of the CMB power spectrum and reckon it offers a random number space big enough to beat any current computer.
Idea close to Stanislaw Lem's "His Master's Voice" whereby someone sells neutrino spectrum data as good sources of random numbers to make a bit of money on the side. Then these turn out to be unexpectedly very nonrandom, which leads to a suicide, lawsuits and more.
"I couldn't seriously present a recommendation to switch to a NoSQL architecture and then... "
I don't understand what the "and then" subphrase is doing there.
Actually Wilhemine Germany was quite far from a totalitarian government even after Hindenburg had put the "Total War" economic suicide train into motion. They also didn't want to invade the UK. Like, at all.
It's true that Bismarck is the founder of the modern social-democratic "bind the the citizen to the state from birth to death" doctrine, which leads to all kind of excesses, but still....
some .... but how many?
And nothing of value was lost.
Make the legislation and interplanetary flowers will bloom? And will the Space Navy defend the right of US citizens to select the space trajectories that they damn well please if
tsarist soviet russian space police overtakes a colonists' cargo ship on the high spaces?
"Throughout history, governments have spurred growth in new frontiers by instituting sensible legislation"
Like, trade barriers, letters of patent, blocades, tariffs and duties and a bit of genocide of the natives on the side. Yeah, we get it, the pleasuring of political animals is de rigeur, but can we keep it low-key?