Re: It's advertising Jim, but not as we know it.
In the end, the care-o-meter is at 0.
16005 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
Yeah, and it's not limited to females and high-schoolers either. University engineering courses have their share of the Retard Clan. I couldn't believe the blinkered attitudes (along the lines of "Why do you know anything about my area of specialization? You are not supposed to do that!"). What do these people do after they got their degree? They are done learning, become civil servants and grow a paunch. Then complain about Chinamen eating their lunch I guess.
Here is a heads up
0) Iran is still in good standing regarding their nuclear ambitions and all the top brass, even the military and intelligence ones, say that serious action towards building nukes has stopped in 2003 and hasn't continued since then. The fact that politicians disagree is neither here nor there as these are sociopaths without morals who will kill anyone for a longer stint at their taxpayer-provided desk.
1) Iran is not contravening any international treaty whatsoever in running their centrifuges. Indeed, they are adhering to the NPT which certain other countries haven't even signed.
2) Iranian religious authorities consider building nukes as morally reprehensible and issued a fatwa along those lines. How serious can you get?
2) Attacking some country because one feels like it and because it can be done is generally followed by war crimes trials and ropes hanging from rafters, mmmokay?
3) Indeed even threatening it with the usual "options on the table" bull is right out as per the UN charter.
4) So is killing random people on the streets of Tehran by gun or sticky bomb.
5) Cyber-attacking is also a no-no. Remember our western geniuses saying "act of war" about that kind of retardation?
So you "own" your data? Big deal. What data is that? Can you identify it it? Without collating it against another database (think traffic analysis)? What are you gonna do about it?
"Privacy and copyright advocates are really on the same page."
No they are not. Does "this database copyright by Google" tell you something important? Yes, it does.
Unfortunately... yes.
"They sent a slamhound on Turner's trail in New Delhi, slotted it to his pheromones and the color of his hair. It caught up with him on a street called Chandni Chauk and came scrambling for his rented BMW through a forest of bare brown legs and pedicab tires. Its core was a kilogram of recrystallized hexogene and flaked TNT."
Signed off by a colored progressive POTUS wielding a Nobel Peace Prize.
Back when Ashlee Vance was still writing and Andrew Orlowski had other concerns than to whiteknight "Intellectual Property Rights" faggotry, the following was said in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/03/don_capellas_articulates_hpaqs_vision/
...Capellas mentioned "procurement" as often as navvies swear, and the chap obviously believes that this is the killer feature of the SRCAM merger.
"We've got to do this. We can't do microprocessor better than Intel," he added.
Well, we mused, you can't now, now that you've sold Alpha to Intel.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/14/sircampaq_the_winners_and_losers/
"Last week Capellas promised that Windows and Linux would "eviscerate" mid-range Unix. Taking no prisoners, the Don has decided to perform the task himself at the first opportunity."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/11/16/hpaq_execs_pocket_millions/
As a reward for sacking some of the 15,000 staff who won't be needed in the merged HPaq, HP's top management will pocket $33.1 million in retention bonuses. Compaq's team will receive $22.4 million. The bonuses hinge on the successful completion of the merger.
Unfortunately "your image" has only large intrinsic value if it is already known to many, many people.
Remember the burnt vietnamese girl? Yes, that kind of image.
MegaCo may decide to give you 1 USD for your stuff. Or else redo it from scratch. Maybe on a computer. Point is, their "multi-billion pound campaign" is in no way dependent on your stuff and you won't get serious money one way or another.
One might have thought that allowing software libre to get onto the marketplace would have meant destroying the livelihood of the "creators" and cause them to die like flies / transform into emanciated corpses. Nothing of the kind happened. Sure, some saleable services and software packages went to hell or needed to be reinvented and repackaged. But so what? I didn't notice anything about "the world must pay you" in the Declaration of Human Rights.
I am also confused by the logic that sees evil corporations as continually lobbying for "enhanced" copyright legislation, with the evil corporations now lobbying from the shadow for legislation meant to lighten copyright legislation? How is that? Well, maybe they are not the _same_ evil corporations.
...Microsoft will hit their revenue targets in the consumer market over the Christmas period, and follow that with an "onslaught" on the business market to encourage operating system migration during February and March.
Just in time for the big EURO KABLOOIE, the US PREZ PROSTITUTION SHOW, possibly the WAR ON PERSIA's nonexisting nuclear program and not totally impossibly the WEIMAR DOLLAR. We are all set then.
Yes indeed.
I have to say this is painful to read. After 20 years of The Road Ahead and product national-socialism, Microsoft is still hoping that people will try to avoid "connectivity" and "security" issues by standardizing on Windows Eight (weight?) a product with as-yet unknown "features". Yes indeed.
We have been more than 10 years in a kind of Amoral Neverending War Everywhere Against Everyone and are currently dumping ourselves down the loo because we borrowed ourselves to death a bit earlier (some would say that "we owe it to ourselves so there is no problem" ... ha ha ha).
Talking about high-falutin inanities like IPv6, are we?
Yes, Mr. Hilter. Do you want Sachertorte to be delivered to your Bunker?
But really, no-one cares about Maxwell's equations because of course they are classical approximations of "some other thing" (there is the photon quantum field, but getting Maxwell equations out of its description takes some serious operator algebra). So Maxwell's equations do not say much about the existence or not of magnetic monopoles.
It all depends on the type of data.
If you have data that converges nicely to a value when you calculate the mean, you are home free. This applies to physical experiments, which are repeatable, can be studied in isolation and where you have a model to check against.
If you have data that is all over the place and strongly depends on intelligent agents and/or random fluctuations you are looking for trouble. It gets worse if you don't even have a model or a clue what to look for. Statistics-using economists and "traders" (basically, swimming-pool attendants in charge of your money) are dead stinking fish once the party is over (that's you, Krugman) - they never knew what to look for in the first place. Same goes for politicians fantasizing about cakewalks in foreign lands and generals pouring about the latest metrics about how the war is going before they are shipped back to D.C. Your social dreckwork cannot be far behind.
"Star Wars 1313 dives into a part of the Star Wars mythos that we've always known existed, but never had a chance to visit"
I hate this kind of marketroid talk. It's not as if "Star Wars Universe" had some independent existence or (like mathematics or an actual world) had "areas to uncover/visit" because there is no requirement to be consistent in anything.
They should just admit that "We made random stuff up so we could sell you something. Enjoy!"
"Factory output is slowing in China. Europe is still struggling with debts in Greece, Spain, and Ireland. And now the United States is adding a lot fewer jobs than needed."
And most of these are government-sponsored. Oh woe.
Meanwhile, if you think it's over or looking up, the junkie economy is currently so junked up that its head is bound to explode like a pez dispenser any minute now:
"http://mises.org/daily/6054/The-Bernanke-Bust"
"We are looking at another economic bust but, given the size of this building monetary boom, a bust with a real possibility of surpassing anything we have seen in the recent past. Yes, even the housing boom turned bust turned Great Recession."
Great job!
> The speculation continues
Only deranged progressives care. It's called risky business.
Of course, here, it's fuelled by freshly generated money splurging out of banks, central and otherwise, so you may indirectly lose your shirt. Call your elected representative for complaints.
> imagine a fireworks rocket.
Geometrically more correct is the expanding balloon with bits on it can move around and attract each other. Some will collide, some won't get the chance. Also, as the balloon is expanding more and more quickly and lightspeed is max speed, every bit will at some point in time be a lonely spec of solitude on an outrushing surface.
Penrose had some idea that if you magically get rid of the rest mass of the lonely wandering particles, a simple conformal geometrical transformation shows that a very-far-future, very-large, very-empty, very-much-nothing-happening-anymore universe actually looks like a very-small, very-dense, very-young, very-active universe. Like a russian doll. But this still needs some work.