Re: First rule of engineering.. cover thine Arse!
I can't disagree but it sounds like the engineer's version of "crazy preparedness".
12003 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
I can't disagree but it sounds like the engineer's version of "crazy preparedness".
TODAY ONE CAN NEVER BE SURE.
This really could be a 100% honest statement by any of the US-american presidential hopefuls.
Yes, we are living in those times.
hedge funds buy up oil futures thus creating a future shortage which drives up the price
I declare this utter tosh and a confusion of cause and effect. Plus, someone must SELL the oil futures.
textbook on hedging was bloody expensive and you can pay to read all the details for yourself
I'm not going to read any crap by mathematicians with a PhD out for a quick buck. Ever.
How can hedge funds drive oil price? They are hedge funds - they hedge risks. One fart by a Saudi Prince into a sillken handkerchief has more effect on oil price.
And then your government, which already gave you around USD 40'000 to pay off while you were
awaynot even born yet (it's a "social contract" you see; it says that your future must suck), decides to ream you out with "Quantitative Easing" while you look at the worstalling prices.
Whom can we trust anymore?
I've seen that allegation in El Reg comments, but nowhere else. By whom "are we told" ?
By common sense?
You don't behave like a sweaty guy with a Mackintosh if you can actually perform.
Maybe we should enshrine it as additional "Human RIght".
That would just make it legit, liberals could take to the benches and defend the utter goodness of governmental oversight, "accidents by MP5" could lead to heartfelt expression of "he wanted too much of his right not to be forgotten" etc.
Once we go full Oswald Mosley/hard left this can be morphed into the "right to be remembered".
At least 3 fanbois have the anti-capitalistic mentality where jesus phones are extruded whole out of governmental offices and fabianistic planning by sharing, caring bureaucrats ensures success.
Or maybe they just think that Apple and Rapacious Jobs just CANNOT be opportunistic because that would DEMEAN THE CHURCH?
These are the same governments that visit death, destruction and ISIS on whole areas of the world for political support by lobbies of foreign undemocratic governments and the self-indulgent illusion of reaching "defenestrator of the freedoms / responsibilizer to protectoratify" hit levels in history books.
Money is not everything!
Cannae make her do it capt'n! I need more stockmarket energy!
Why is that guy a CEO of anything except his garden shed?
I'm sure non-opportunity-seeking regimes like North Korea will receive him with open arms.
Indeed it is not so much that the web is moving too fast, but that there has been seemingly no effort whatsoever to fix things that have long been broken
Are you gonna hold a speech or not?
Guess the next version will be written in PHP. Cheaper that way anyway.
Is that Catbert I hear?
Maybe something in the DIY route has fallen under the table? What could it be....
Well, Well it's getting hotter in the "democracies" because the Message Needs Some Control, right?
Ironically, shortly after the New York Times expressed its concern for journalists in early August, the Guardian reported in an article written by William C. Bradford, a recently hired assistant professor in the law department at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. The article, entitled “Trahison des Professeurs: The Critical Law of Armed Conflict Academy as an Islamist Fifth Column,” was published in the National Security Law Journal of George Mason University Law School.
Bradford argued that the U.S. should be more aggressive in attacking Muslims to include attacks which are war crimes under the law of war. But it was his advocacy that the U.S. military attack other “lawful targets” in its war on terrorism, which include “law school facilities, scholars’ home offices and media outlets where they give interviews” that caught the most attention. These civilian areas were all places where a “causal connection between the content disseminated and Islamist crimes incited” exist, according to Bradford.
Furthermore, Bradford wrote, “Shocking and extreme as this option might seem, [dissenting] scholars, and the law schools that employ them, are – at least in theory – targetable so long as attacks are proportional, distinguish noncombatants from combatants, employ nonprohibited weapons, and contribute to the defeat of Islamism.” In other words, dissenting scholars are unprivileged belligerents and subject to attack, just as journalists are according to the Law of War manual.
Not to defend him but Bradford was articulating the underlying logic of the new Law of War manual’s position that dissenting journalists can be targeted as unprivileged belligerents. This, as stated above, is consistent with oppressive extra-constitutional martial law practices which Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins boasts of as “U.S. domestic common law of war.”
In modern days "revolutions" are just about tweeting a bit more than usual, then going back to watch TV.
*We* were on the frontline covering the little surrender monkey's ar$es.
For this style of historical retconning you now get the AMURRICAN BAGDE OF EXCEPTIONALIST KEYBOARDER HONOR!
Long may it stain your shirt.
What an impenetrable utter crap. He's actually pining for more state intervention and control? I hope he's happy and will get a fat drone on his worthless arse.
A fundamental disorientation which completes and perfects the social and financial deregulation whose baleful consequences we already know.
I'm still waiting for "social and financial deregulation" that exists anywhere except in the minds of the Marxist/Leninist and "Progressive" lumières. The drowing man cries for more water!
If they want a First Amendment online, or to let some gun-toting nut argue that writing viruses is the online equivalent of carrying a concealed weapon and so counts as a constitutionally protected right then they can go ahead - the rest of us can do things differently. ('Viruses don't trash hard drives - people trash hard drives.')
A cyberspace in which each machine is 'within' a jurisdiction and where actions can be mapped onto physical space will be very different from today's Internet.
In the mapped network we will not have the absolute freedom of speech which cyberlibertarians claim they want, but neither will we get absolute oppression, absolute free market capitalism or even absolute communism. We will instead get compromise, and regional or national variation, just as in the real world.
I can scarcely comprehend how utterly stupid and out-of-touch this now sounds after the Summer of Surveillance and the tendency to fascist-out on just about everything. It's the vision of the "Peace Grid". Well, we are getting it anyway, willy or nilly.
Epic. But wait, no George Clooney?
When I was a nipper, "digital" was an adjective for the punishment the village priest meted out on pupils declared unruly according to secret papal standards, using a wooden ruler.
At some point, we got black & white TV....
But the price will "trickle down".
> did I miss something in Quantum 101
The answer to this question is complex with unit 1.
You put them on the market, of course and let haggling commence.
This not being the case here....
Did I hear the "dollar appreciating"? I can't hear you behind all the
economic problems for kidsdollar and EURO containers.
The light-cone of the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy has become a lot more active in the last year
That's another thread though.
benevolent dictatorship is my form of government of choice
For all 15 minutes of it. Then the Heydriches move in.
it is obvious, that there is no convergence, no global minimum and it is subject to at least one positive feedback loop with a potential tailspin death of the service
I like overheated rhetoric as much as anyone, but most data-processing systems are not amenable to cybernetic analysis. Even in simple analog systems, control engineers have to go through major contortions to get something that behaves predictably.
Anyone can get the basics really quickly, but I daresay that in these systems here, it is very unclear how to analyze things in terms of feedback loops. This is worse than an electric power circuit. Even finding the relevant loops seems dicey as they may change from day to day. Overprovision or build in features to kill services off in order to regain control and sod the quality of service are two possible options.
Oh, four thumbs down? Are there Amurricans in the forum today? Please excuse my hotheadedness.
Tensions between the US and Russia are already at a near-term high in recent weeks, and look to be getting even worse amid new reports from Germany’s ZDF that the US intends to deploy new nuclear weapons to Germany and upgrade its nuclear infrastructure across Europe.
Russian government spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the move a “very serious step toward exacerbating tensions on the European continent,” and warned that if the US follows through on these plans Russia would carry out retaliatory countermeasures, adding more ballistic missiles to its exclave of Kaliningrad.
The ZDF report came simply out of publicly available US budgetary information, and publicized some deployments the administration clearly did not intend to make a matter of serious discourse. The deployments are likely to also rankle Germany itself, because the deployment of Cold War-era nuclear arms was already highly controversial, and many Germans simply want the weapons of mass destruction removed, not upgraded.
Excellent timing. Carry on.
Now, I want to bring to the attention of the estimated delegates the suave poodle play exhibited by the EU during the Ukraine ominshambles ...
Welcome to the Reg.
If you want aligned talking points, go listen to neocons
"In our well-ordered society, protection of private property is essential"
I'll pass on the "well-ordered", but I note that he didn't talk about "Intellectual Property", which, of course, is no property at all even though starving artists and supermoguls alike all pretend it to be so.
QM is straight-arse extension of classical probability. No infinites involved as no Quantum Field Theory yet. Bohm didn't get anywhere near QFT as far as I know.
It's been some time, but I remember bohmian interpretation being very much worse, because in disagreement with experiment and/or inconsistent. More here.
Quantum Physics is so hard, even Quantum Physicists don't understand it!
How very yesterday.
The quantum mechanical formalism doesn't support our intuition, nor does it elucidate the key concepts that govern the behaviour of the entities that are subject to the laws of quantum physics. The arrays of complex numbers are kin to the arrays of 0s and 1s of the early days of computer programming practice. In this review we present steps towards a diagrammatic `high-level' alternative for the Hilbert space formalism, one which appeals to our intuition. It allows for intuitive reasoning about interacting quantum systems, and trivialises many otherwise involved and tedious computations. It clearly exposes limitations such as the no-cloning theorem, and phenomena such as quantum teleportation. As a logic, it supports `automation'. It allows for a wider variety of underlying theories, and can be easily modified, having the potential to provide the required step-stone towards a deeper conceptual understanding of quantum theory, as well as its unification with other physical theories. Specific applications discussed here are purely diagrammatic proofs of several quantum computational schemes, as well as an analysis of the structural origin of quantum non-locality. The underlying mathematical foundation of this high-level diagrammatic formalism relies on so-called monoidal categories, a product of a fairly recent development in mathematics. These monoidal categories do not only provide a natural foundation for physical theories, but also for proof theory, logic, programming languages, biology, cooking, ... The challenge is to discover the necessary additional pieces of structure that allow us to predict genuine quantum phenomena.
Please, no pilot wave. Magic unobservable stuff to "explain" straightforward maths/force? Bohm and Lucas: same problem. Failure results.
No, both are in a linked state ("entangled", geddit?), so if you examine the state on side A, you INSTANTLY KNOW (evidently) what the state side B must be in. The fun is only that the state on either side is undefined (only the common state is defined) until observation on side A or side B actually takes place. The extremely fun thing is that the order of observation can be arbitrarily shuffled by choosing the appropriate relativistic reference frame (A before B, B before A, A simultaneous to B - results must be the same).
It's really very simple. COUGH
Artificial Insanity detected in botnet?
Because politicians/reliogiotards/people_minding_your_own_business and "no fun allowed"
... because he has let a disturbance in the Force appear between the US and Israel. These disturbances let in all sorts of transdimensional nastyness: Warp Ghosts, Undead Tentatcular Beings, Antivaxers, Neocons, Presidential Candidates, Keynesians ....
DMCA does not say anything about "trade secrets" though. AFAIK, reverse.engineering is still ok (not sure whether you need to be outside the US today). Of course, you may then fall into a patent trap, rent-seeker minefields are everywhere..
Yeah, if Euros say it's "fundamentally different" it's quite likely far far worse. "Policy regarding increase of monetary mass in the EU is FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT from the one applied in the US" etc.
DEAR PC PLOD,
THANK YOU FOR BEING OFFENDED ON MY BEHALF!
Reminds me of the protest letters to The Economist about the use of "niggardly".
but at a cost of barfing out 40 times the permitted levels of nitrogen oxide
should hopefully be "up to" etc.
It's only explanation that makes sense, and I don't even need NAVY CSI style image enhancement techniques to come to that conclusion.
GOP-think ... has an underlying racist tone to it, with the presumption that those not quite Caucasian foreign people are not really like us, don’t think like us and can be shot or droned on sight when they fail to heed our advice. It’s not about Israel per se or about anything that would make sense to any disinterested observer. It is all about having a “security zone” that is global in reach and preempts the rights of anyone else. It is coupled with superpower hubris driven by an “exceptionalism”-derived unwillingness to treat people who are not Americans with any respect or consideration. Washington reflexively turns potential friends into enemies at every opportunity and perseveres in a foreign policy based on a whole basket of false premises that has been disastrous vis-à-vis any actual United States interests. Unfortunately for the American people the likely alternative to all this blatant and dangerous nonsense is Hillary.
"Because you rely on us to protect the digital world"
Err... no, actually?
Only in liberal discussion groups.
Just before the "Responsibility to Protect" discussion leads to a vote to bomb some sanddudes.