HTML 5 app
You mean JavaScript/ECMAScript app?
16005 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
A one off cost of £7.2 billion for removing a blight from massive areas of the UK as well as providing a more reliable system and creating a serious number of jobs?
Fail at economics. Hoovering up £7.2 billion via taxes, immediate or deferred, does not create jobs. It destroys them.
No, it's bullshit and after having covered in fear of the microwave oven, the ElectroCrowd has moved on to demonized "pulsed" energy from mobiles and Wifi "pollution".
This reminds me of a story from Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction magazine from the early 80s where a kid takes refuge from his abusive father near HV overland lines (his dad can't pursue him there because of a pacemaker). He then acquires the paranormal capability to smell other people's (and animals') emotions.
Well, HV lines were new back then, I imagine.
there is NP complexity behind the Schrodinger equation
That's the first time I have heard that kind of statement. You may want to provide citations.
The Schrödinger equation is a bog-standard differential equation. It solves nothing. You just let it run. Whether you need infinite precision at the density of reals is a matter of discussion, and I remember reading that the symbolic computation of the values would eschew the need of making physical use of the reals.
Unlike conventional computers, which store data on transistors and hard drives, quantum computers encode data in states of microscopic objects called qubits.
Well, the "qubit" is the mathematical representation of a superposition of two distinct states, whereas transistors and hard drives are physical machines. Apples and oranges?
Also, the qubit is not very interesting. Interesting is:
1) Get a bunch of N qubits together
2) Wire them up so that some Hamiltonian is being implemented
3) Let the machinery run, thus moving the "state space vector" in the 2^N dimensional complex space (entanglement!)
4) After some time, measure the qubits along the projective axes, getting a classical 0..1. string with classical probabilities (collapse the wavefunction!)
5) If 2) was good, 4) is probably the solution to your problem.
Here, we are at 1).
You can't prove that but it seems to be a law of nature (see most anything by Scott Aaronson and in particular NP-complete Problems and Physical Reality and this blog entry) Indeed, whenever you think up a physical machine with quantum powers to collapse NP to P, it fails through some unphysical assumptions you need.
As P = NP would actually would mean that things that are easy to check are easy to guess, immense powers of godlike computation would ensue and as this trick is not being performed in nature to all available evidence, the P = NP believers and agnostics have to be firmly placed in the camp of cranks and perpetuum mobilists.
Technically: BQP is strictly smaller than NP.
My dastardly plan to soften up people for imminent world domination by replacing Oetti's brain with my ExtraTard Business-o-Tron StateWorship 2000 death-by-political-hypnosis device is proceeding. Nobody has noticed the operation which we cunningly performed in the loo of the Brussels Ritz Carlton!
But it does. Position uncertainty means non-virtual particles may be faster than c sometimes. Special realtivity means that in that case there are reference frames where these particles go "backwards in time". Turns out that these horrors are exactly antiparticles going forwards in time. So there is a good reason for having antiparticles and they do ferry information from the future in a certain sense. It's very satisfying when you realize that a closed loop (particle pair creation and annihilation) in a Feynman diagram can be seen as the same particle going forward, then backward in time.
Wrong. The "big crunch" is max entropy as at that point, everything has collapsed gravitationally to maximum mixture. At the "big bang", gravitational clumping is minimal, so entropy is very low.
you may be confusing "crunch" with the "heat death" hyothesis where everything gets converted into entropic so-called "heat" energy which just keeps expanding into an empty infinity
"Heat death" means that the universe ages without crunching. Entropy increases constantly until every cm³ of space is just a uniform warm bath of heat and no useful work can be done anymore (this happens after the last black hole has evaporated and possibly the last proton has decayed and/or rest mass has gone to zero for some reason or other). Ultimately, you just have very-low energy photons, and the universe continues to cool off as it expands (OTOH, there would be nothing left to even build a clock with, so is there actually TIME at that point?)
Nothing has changed, this is the basic assumption (remember the "alpha changes!" flap around when Bush II went to Afghanistan ... nothing concrete ever came of that - the universe seems set in most ways)
However these star crackers change their behaviour as the universe ages, kinda like with your bones. There is more metal around at later stages of the evolution for example. So all the physics are the same, but actual behaviours differ. Kinda like you can have hypernovae but only at early stages of the universe.
Congress clearly intended to protect the right of consumers and developers to choose between competing styles of platforms.
Did the publishers just argue to abolish copyrights and exclusive "only on my platform or the highway" contracts?
WOAH!!
I actually watched this 13 ghosts movie. I guess it was worth the beertime I was having but now I feel bad and empty inside. This is "worst ever" levels of quality!
A commenter on imdb says:
Some people praise the set design, but you won't catch me doing so. It might have sounded like a neat idea to have every single wall and floor and ceiling made of sturdy clear glass, with Latin phrases written on every surface in white letters, and it may even have looked impressive to the cast and crew as they walked around the set, but to us, it's just shopping-mall chaos that hurts the eyes and conveys nothing. And what's the POINT, visually speaking, of having the house reconfigure itself, if it ends up looking precisely the same after as before?
He hasn't heard about glass offices.
Now, having "lorem ipsum" in phosphorescent "Extra Serif Alchemical", size 666 on every fucking office glass wall sounds like a neat idea.
I'm conservative as anyone, but...
"cloud computing, HSM, virtualisation, all stuff that's been around for decades under a different name"
Not it hasn't. Pretending otherwise is not a service to anyone and is the general region of "IT creationism".
The situation where IBM had "virtual machines" back when on extra-expensive hardware built from discrete logic and triphase current converters where you could admire the 256 KByte RAM usage indicator on a terminal screen and sip coffee while the next program was spooled from a magnetic tape is NOTHING like today.
Or maybe a WWI infantry charge is just like a modern tank brigade plus air support coming at you. Who knows.
They might well bring the freedoms: The Liberation of Earth
It’s a difficult place to understand, where outsiders are often misinformed about the importance of language localisation and the significance of the caste system. The market has special requirements to cope with poor electricity supplies, putting a premium on battery life, heat, dust, and particularly noise. Locally produced phones often have very large speakers.
Basically, it's a cyberpunk market?
With the Yen now weak
Is this some kind of Keynesian parrot sketch?
Krugman must be having a good laugh over his "in the long run we are dead" cocktail.
How does a certain Linux kernel lead fit into that position? He seems to pride himself on being one.
You have to distinguish between Dilbert-type arseholes and the other arseholes.
Also
If you consider the large enterprise, you have policy implemented across a variety of tools. What changes things is the ability to express those controls in a formal way using Chef. That policy as code also comes back into Chef Delivery
Don't tell me logic programming is back en vogue? That would be rad!
“This is not a crash, even if it looks like one,”
About as recomforting as your dotty doctor saying "this is not terminal cancer, even if it looks like one".
John-David Lovelock: “rapid rise in the value of the US dollar against most currencies has put a currency shock in the global IT market."
It's all relative. On the way down the toilet, the dollar seems to be the least sick man: Why The Dollar Is Rising As The Global Monetary Bubble Craters