Re: Where's the PR staff to paint this as a good thing?
Would be nice but revenues continue to increase…
4584 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Would be nice but revenues continue to increase…
Transportation using round wheels.
2019 does indeed sound a bit late to come to market. By then pretty everyone and their dog will either have launched, or have advanced plans for their next generation cars.
Still, this assumes that Apple wants to go head-to-head in the production. Even going the cheap way Tesla did to get capacity this doesn't sound like the best thing to do with their cash pile. But it also doesn't fit the way Apple does business. Maybe they're working on some kind of mobility subscription concept which combines Uber with a Merc: nice car whenever you want one. At a price.
Or they could just be about to buy Fiat / Chrysler because it's cheap.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Doesn't seem to bother a lot of people about their mobile phones…
There, here? Funny how your running around in panic yet we have not started leaving. You may want professional help to get you through the stressful 2 years of negotiations.
Haha, you fucking UKIP numpty: "here" is Düsseldorf. So, in this thoroughly undemocratic EU I'll also get to give my voice on any deal Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber™ try and come up with. Guess what? I'm not keen on free access to single market.
But it also seems your sarcasm detector is broken.
I can’t see any reason other than political for the rush to sign up the Ukraine to closer integration when EU member states have said no to it.
No to what, exactly?
The EU's foreign policy focusses heavily on soft power using things like trade agreements to shore up neighbouring countries because the last thing the EU wants are neighbours that are failed states. In case you hadn't noticed: the Ukraine's economy has been a mess for years after being plundered by the oligarchs and it was getting close to collapse. An association agreement offers alternative markets for famers and the electronics industry and also the prospect of the rule of law. Many people don't realise that, despite its many problems, how attractive the EU is for people in eastern Europe: reduced threat of going to prison for saying the wrong thing; being paid on time; drinking clean water; etc.
Putin talks a good talk but is, nukes notwithstanding, no longer in much of a position militarily. Otherwise he would have marched all the way to Kiev and Lviv two years ago. This is why he's forced to do deals with fellow failure Erdogan, even though they have diametrically opposed interests in Syria. That's going to work out well. :-(
I'm really curious about codejunky the person
Most of the posts do seem to be related to the referendum. Wonder if it's someone from the "50 kopek" brigade. The speech patterns are inconsistent and indicate a non-British speaker. Some examples:
I absolutely voted leave
then your in for a bit of an upsetting surprise.
My tip is a troll. Downvotes only in future.
Ok well you dont know. But the UK does as does the EU (see BoE/IMF/etc statements pre referendum) which is why the EU is pushing its ever closer union stuff. The currency is again in trouble as people look to Italy (again now the referendum is over) and massive cracks are showing through the many crisis.
Which particular statements are you referring to? Both the BoE and the IMF said that the UK was likely to go into recession and that the rest of the EU would suffer. Oh, hang on. Wasn't that shameless scaremongering by clueless "experts"? If it was wrong to try and worry people about the economic consequences of leaving the EU before the referendum, how come its okay to mutter vague threats of doom now?
What should Italy do about its banks? Surely it couldn't nationalise them like the UK did with RBS and Lloyds, and the Germans did with Commerzbank? Fun fact: bailing out Italy's banks will be a lot cheaper than the ECB continuing its financial repression.
And, despite the UK's growing deficit, I'm really worried about companies relocating there to take advantage of the smell of freedom. Huawei recently opened a massive campus here. Should I be out there protesting against the jobs they're stealing? Or maybe asking for one? Or begging them not to relocate to the UK because we Europeans are obviously not as good at doing trade deals as people like Liam Fox?
I spent last night putting brown paper on the windows. I also bought lots of tinned food and bottled water. Do you have any more tips?
The significance of headlines such as "Cameron considered last-ditch appeal to Merkel" seems lost on you. Unless you liked being run by Germany.
Germany's role in the EU, and in particular in the Council of Ministers, is constantly overstated because it makes for good headlines.
As things stand at the moment: Merkel is almost a lame duck Chancellor thanks to a short-sighted, if heart-warming, policy towards Syrian refugees.
We hire immigrants because there are not enough local skills.
This applies only to a very small part of the market: technology and, to a lesser extent the trades, where years of little or regulation has deskilled the workforce.
The UK has imported EU nationals largely to work in labour intensive fields such as agriculture because the English won't do the work for the wages on offer.
We know the EU is doomed as it is.
Do we? That's news to me. What should those of us in the EU do? Duck and cover, perhaps? Create a Ministry of Unfeasible Trade Agreements?
httpd -t already does this
Not really. He did highlight the increasing polarisation of modern politics and you seem to be providing the proof.
JFK may be a Democrat icon but was he really liberal? The Apollo project was undoubtedly progressive but it was also one of the best examples of the military industrial complex. And, in a way, it was the ideas of Barry Goldwater that, through Nixon and Reagan did more to reshape American politics.
this led to a 5.5 per cent decrease in wireless revenues for AT&T on the quarter.
Hardware is not where the money is for providers: phones are just a means to selling voice and data contracts. What's more important would be the ARPU and the subscriber mix (pre-paid vs. post-paid) but I don't see any details in this report.
The 5% decline just confirms what we already know: people, even those with I-Phones, are getting less keen on getting a new phone every two years. Forbes at least expects margins to rise.
Uber drivers are solely responsible for ensuring they have a car…
So, Uber does no checking? What happens in the event of an accident involving a driver without a driver's licence?
The basis for the court case is contract and employment law which presupposes fair negotiations between equal and independent parties. As soon as one party appears to be dependent upon the relationship then the negotiations can be considered unfair. Lots of businesses try all the time to reduce their costs by converting "employees" into "contractors".
I can understand that everyone who uses Uber because it means a better (and possibly cheaper) service than what they were used to, but that just exposes the flaws in the existing system.
As for ratings: these have no legal status. This is one of the reasons why we license certain jobs. Or are you planning your next flight based on the rating of the pilot?
I think the problem is that it's great for Uber and passengers if there are lots of drivers. However, it's less attractive for the drivers as more of them are chasing a more-or-less constant set of fares: the more you work for Uber the less rewarding it is. Drivers who a year ago were making £15 an hour now find themselves earning around only £5 putting them in a Catch22 situation: should they drive more or get out of the game?
The model seems to work well when additional marginal capacity is required: more drivers become available to take up the slack. In practice, as in other industries like power generation, this competes with the base capacity model and drives prices down. This is great until prices fall below costs, in which case the base capacity model collapses and, hence, the raison d'être for providing additional marginal capacity.
Uber makes money whatever the situation. But it also sets the rates for the "market" and I think this is where there is a legal case that the contracts with drivers are effectively employment contracts because drivers have virtually no bargaining power.
I wonder if it was situations like this that led to regulation in the first place? The UK should simply work on removing the synthetic distinction between taxis and private hire. This would create a more efficient market at a stroke and require everyone to improve their game. Licensing could then be used as it should be to prevent the worst abuses.
Unless you have some insider knowledge MS have only paused on windows phone for now
You mean it's only resting? It does have lovely plumage…
Running WP10, but maintaining a superb camera, then it is still a very nice system.
Why would this work for Microsoft when it didn't work for BlackBerry?
Why would enterprises want "superb" cameras in phones?
I do hope a ton of companies do UWP apps
Seeing as Microsoft has effectively pulled the plug on Windows Phone, why should companies bother developing UWP for an ever decreasing market? HERE for Windows Phone isn't getting any updates.
Redmond is popular with the retail sector – which won’t touch AWS because Amazon is a competitor
Sounds like bullshit. For the retail sector, as for any sector, AWS is just another service provider. Azure is perhaps simply better at migrating existing stacks to run on MS hardware, whereas AWS requires redesign.
With also more boobs, just in case...
And higher heels… hm stiletto icon seems to be missing.
As far as I can tell "data science" basically involves piping datasets into some kind of machine learning environment and running various statistical models. There's some maths involved but little or no science but it makes the job title sound better.
If I pay for the infrastructure…
What you create the land for cables to be laid or space through which to beam radio signals?
Regulation is unavoidable and must come with conditions that encourage competition, innovation and investment. Just handing it out without conditions will create inefficient monopolies.
By regulating spectrum, one thing is certain. Only big players will play, and consumers will pay more in the end.
This is complete bollocks. You seem to be equating regulation with auctioning. Countries like Sweden gave spectrum away for free but still regulate it. The success of Free in France show that, even where resources are leased, newcomers can still enter the market, you just have to include unbundling within the regulation.
And of course the business case is further eroded by restrictions on charging models like oh net neutrality and roaming ...
T-Mobile's success would seem to debunk both of those objections.
In an interview the T-Mobile CEO pointing out that by providing a flat-rate but limited bandwidth video offering they had been able to reduce peak usage while improving customer experience.
Roaming charges are almost entirely synthetic and one of the purest examples of gouging by restrictive practice you can find. Sure, it's a nice little earner but it also actively discourages investment in backhaul or alternative providers.
Some kind of traffic management (such as voice services over data) is inevitable and I personally dislike the term "net neutrality" as it obscures the issues. Licences are awarded for the infrastructure and/or spectrum and the right to offer data and voice services on them. Users pay for data and/or voice. Vertical integration which prioritises a company's own content offerings over those of others is basically breaching the terms of the licence. Technology and good CRM provide lots of ways to make a company's own offering attractive to users, but effective competition for content rights is probably the best solution.
I think the patent for hands is to extract all the water out of them so that signals are unaffected. This will be in the Apple MacBook Ultimate (Bloodsucker edition).
When you make a laptop with a metal case, it will affect the performance of the antenna.
Worse than that: it's almost bound to cut the antenna off from the outside world entirely. So, you can't do this unless you have ways to mitigate the Faraday cage that is the casing. You have two choices: stick the antenna on the outside or create a cavity antenna. There is just so much prior art here that a new patent cannot be granted. At least in a world where the job of the patent office is not simply to provide "litigation fodder".
While I can't say for sure there's no prior art, I can state with absolutely certainty that it wasn't obvious to YOU to do that.
Yes, it fucking is. As if Apple was the first company to try and put high frequency antennas inside metallic casings with variable geometry. What else are you going to do?
This is another massive fail of the American patent system.
With Andrea [Polsci, Warwick, 2.2]
Really that bad? Still, didn't she go on to have a stellar career in the City? Obviously all that BS will have prepared her well for dealing with angry farmers…
Wasn't he one of those twats who decided he couldn't stay in the Church of England when it ordained women priests?
Nice to know the Tory party is still producing progressive thinkers. And, once we're free of those EU shackles, we can go back to creating cheap cattle feed from scrapie-infected sheep. What could possibly go wrong?
The EMC shareholder vote on the $67bn Dell acquisition of EMC
With profits at around $ 2.5 bn a year that's nearly 25 times the price, and the loans will have to be paid back from those profits. No wonder they're trying to peddle 30-year bonds (at 8 %) to finance this! I think I'd rather finance toll-roads!
Oh, the things you can achieve in a world where interest rates are zero!
NT 3.51 was indeed pretty solid but it wasn't fast enough for desktops so they fucked it up for NT 4.0
It is also noted that no author was indicated for the aticle.
It shows up here as Mark Whitehorn
While I agree with the general thrust of your argument: this is essentially a bit of PR for Microsoft, I also know some people are really happy with the MS stack, of which SQL Server is a key part. And let's face it, if Microsoft wasn't in the mix, the world would be divided between Oracle and DB2 — fine systems but at a price.
Andrew Frank, research vice president and distinguished analyst with Gartner…
Answers on a postcard please.
I'm another one waiting for the Vivaldi mail client but I don't expect to see it this year. It's a small team which is obviously and understandably focussing on the browser.
Over the last year Opera seems have got its act together and started doing sensible things in the browser to differentiate it from the rest. The Chinese are bound to focus on the mobile side, which I uninstalled because I couldn't install an ad-blocker on it.
In the meantime I'm sticking with Opera Mail even if the filtering in the search seems broken (I have six different mail accounts and nothing comes close to Opera when it comes to searching).
Since Opera is a Norwegian company, what has the Bureau of Industry and Security, a US government organisation, have to do with it?
US extra-territoriality: companies often need to comply with their rules all over the world in order to be able to trade there.
Can't remember off-hand but I think the old Opera was. however, allowed to use strong encryption in places like Korea, when it was banned for Microsoft and Netscape.
The assets are the workforce and you cannot easily move them.
What? You mean like Surrey Satellites? I think you'll find that engineers are often very happy to move.
No idea if relocation is on the cards for ARM. I think the first thing will be a bonanza for the tax consultants.
They run the same ARM instruction set as the official designs, but otherwise contain no ARM IP.
They license a bit more than just the instruction set: they get to customise the chips as much as they want.
save a little on the licensing costs and (possibly) create a more efficient design.
Having in-house chip engineers is almost certainly going to be more expensive than the licence costs. And even at Apple's volumes, it's cheaper to buy off-the-shelf chips than design your own. It's the ability to do whatever you want in hardware then is attractive. Apple has been able to make sure IOS and the chips work well together.
Well, they did try the brand the A3000 (or was it the A3010?) with BBC branding.
Yes, but by then Intel had transformed the computer industry into one that suited its mode of production: a demand for x86 compatibility: excellent process engineering; huge volume assembling in Asia.
It was a risk at the time but with hindsight, Acorn's decision to go fabless was the way to go.
It does make you wonder what all the new employees will be doing. If they're supposed to be engineers and developers in Cambridge I suspect that won't happen now that the UK has decided it doesn't want any migrant workers from Europe.
I guess this also means that Softbank is walking away from the US. Can we expect Sprint to be sold off, presumably to private equity, some time soon?
Why would Softbank risk this large amount of money in an area of business that they have no experience?
They're not. This is a debt-funded acquisition, so all they're risking is somebody else's money. Due to financial repression debt is ridiculously cheap and ARM is 10% cheaper than it was a month ago.
Unless ARM need investment I don't see what Softbank is bringing to the table.
Softbank is already heavily in debt due to acquisitions in the US so it's unlikely to see them providing funds for anything.
This looks and feels like a mechanistic move, helped by the exchange rate.
I heard there was problems getting the ingredients. Something to do with an extensive Met investigation after recent flooding on the Thames uncovered what appeared to be human remains…
And considering that the UK Foreign Secretary is now Boris Johnson...
Even if we all think Bojo is a dangerous clown, prepared to risk ruining the country for his own personal advancement, doesn't mean we put him on a par with mass murderers.
We're all going to have to deal with the fallout of the referendum (comments on El Reg in the run up mirrored an angry and mistrustful society) but can we at least keep it away from the BOFH?. It's our very own "safe space".
Let them speak for themselves, then.
I don't find it offensive or even relevant. The PFY and the BOFH are nearly always plotting someone's gruesome (and) tasteless death so that they can get to the pub early. That's what we read it for.
In Nice a nutter murdered people indiscriminately. And there was that cunt in Yorkshire the other week. Big difference.
When people speak to me of Mr Cameron's legacy, I always refer them to Impossible.com.
As if that were the biggest money pit Cameron tried to fill…
I get a container is a selfcontained instance of an OS
It isn't. It's a more like a child copy of an OS. This removes the overhead of virtualisation and makes provisioning almost instantaneous. You have a lot of flexibility when it comes to the software and within the container you do have IPC, though as this tends to complicate things, you tend to have one container per process (they can be deployed anywhere).
Because one thumbs up wasn't enough!
If the comparison with bare metal then it's just a straw man. Containers are competing with VMs and these do have better security because of CPU support.
The only thing containers really provide is better performance on systems with low I/O. Though trying to turn everything into a "microservice" is a one way to reduce any such improvements.
There's probably a legal case in there if someone's willing to pursue it.