Have you just re-invented Glade?
XML isn't very good for layout, which is why HTML got CSS.
3106 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Have you just re-invented Glade?
XML isn't very good for layout, which is why HTML got CSS.
If roaming charges are high enough to encourage continued development. This is how O2 in Germany used it while it was building on its network.
I think OLED for Apple is wishful thinking.
OLED life is getting better all the time and is now good enough for most of us: we used to have tellies for > 10 years but I suspect that the norm is now about 5 years. You have to be prepared to tweak anything to get the colours okay.
RGB backlights and filters increase the complexity (massively so for 4k) and cost of LCD with the hope that scale will reduce this over time.
OLED scalability is based on the printable dream. If that ever happens then it will overnight become cheaper than LCD. Obviously, at the moment Samsung can't get good yields on large panels and is concentrating on screens for phones and tablets.
It's the usual Faultline guff. What's surprising is that there is any form of intelligence and even the odd coherent sentence in the rest of the article!
Lisp is also noticeable by its absence.
I think you're missing an adjective in your last clause.
The analysis of defects is heavily dependent upon the bug tracker and the quality of that is heavily dependent upon the users.
Additional information could be achieved through static code analysis, test coverage and penetration testing where possible. Tests can serve as the formal expression of the contract that code is supposed to implement. I'd wager that there is a significant negative correlation between (unit) test coverage and errors regardless of the language. There might be a correlation between language and test coverage, though this might be less necessary for purely functional programming.
C and C++ programmers have at least potential to have worked longer with their language than Erlang, TypeScript and Haskell programmers
Erlang and Haskell have both been around for quite a while and are well-established in certain domains. TypeScript is so new that it doesn't really count.
The problem with the tax situation is two-fold:
Tax-breaks alone are generally not worth it as they do not encourage long term investments and, therefore, often cost more than they generate. Companies often leave as soon as the deal runs out or someone makes them a better offer.
To keep companies long-term you need a well-educated workforce with good productivity.
If it was only the tax-breaks in Ireland then it wouldn't be such an issue. But the ability to combine them with other loopholes in other countries in the EU, while perfectly legal, unfairly benefits the corporations. I say unfair but it is usually perfectly legal.
PowerPC was definitely the right choice at the time: the better architecture meant that especially the mobile products were significantly better than their Intel counterparts. It was only later with Motorola struggling that problems occurred - IBM wasn't interested or equipped for the volume. And, of course, it was things like Altivec in the PowerPC that made Intel raise its game. Just like AMD's 64-bit extensions instead of Itanium inside.
Your camel is pregnant!
Production costs may be little different, but development, sales, marketing and distribution should cost a lot less.
Of those only development could really be moved entirely to China (or elsewhere). Hardware development is already moving to China which had produced good engineers. Software development seems more of a problem but is even more fungible.
Not sure about the cost of Apple's new building. I suspect it's tiny compared to that of the share buybacks. But as a one-off expense I don't think it's relevant.
Land in the US is still comparatively cheap and shale oil and gas have made energy cheap. This certainly matters in some industries but less so in software. The access to international capital means that there is always money to pay for people to work in Silicon Valley as opposed to Detroit or Xianjing and good developers are still a scarce commodity.
It's going to take something very special to compete against that. China is, of course, developing its own software power houses such as AliBaba, Baidu and TenCent but it will need further opening of markets and travel to become a more attractive place to work in.
As Mr Orlowski cogently argued several years ago: the software has become key. This is why power shifted from Ericsson and Nokia to Apple and Google. Will Xiaomi or Huawei create software development departments good enough to build their own Android or IOS? Google is obviously increasingly worried about this which is why it's putting more stuff into Play Store services and mandating more Google apps be installed on devices. This may be a prelude to starving AOSP as a platform in order, say, to prevent Xiaomi partnering with Baidu in international phones.
I don't know how things will turn out. We've seen HTC, Asus and Samsung pour resources into software development with somewhat mixed results.
A couple of thoughts strike me about the article.
So, in a nutshell, I don't agree with this black and white analysis.
Since it affects probably all versions of MacOS X. Hopefully Apple will have a fix in place before January because if this is remotely exploitable I can't see how they can hope to avoid liability when people are exploited. Though I suspect the attack vector will be some kind of payload where a user has to be active.
I really don't like sudo. I usually run a separate shell as root to avoid the hassle. Yes, I know that's no safer I would really prefer being able to run su. Do you get su if you set up an account without admin privileges?
Run VMs for you which can access firewalled sites. With Selenium integration.
So, having spent quite literally tens of billions for licenses and more to build phone networks with those licenses
I think you'll find that those licences were accounted for in a very tax-efficient way.
Roaming for voice can be done within the existing framework. O2 Germany used it extensively during its buildout. The key is to set the fee high enough to encourage all parties to continue building: networks using roaming should have an incentive to improve their own infrastructure; networks providing roaming should be rewarded for the infrastructure they've built and given incentive to do more. Equilibrium would be reached at some point.
Data, as ever, is a different matter because it can be a much scarcer resource.
While the early adopters will probably have to deal with all the teething troubles, they'll also be the ones most likely to benefit from the change. Germany had an IPv6 plan and has more or less stuck to it.
Yes, as if Typo 3 doesn't have its own set of problems.
All software has bugs.
A simple explanation for this sudden drop in XP…
is that there isn't one because it is only visible on of the reported surveys.
We've been complaining about these numbers since El Reg started using them. The articles are little more than clickbait.
Not sure what things work differently on the two OSes in Powerpoint but if it's anything like Excel then a new version won't fix it. An example: charts and images in Excel are positioned using pixels but cells are dependent upon font sizes. The two are not consistent across operating systems and, as the details are part of the ECMA Office OpenXML specification, that has to be changed first.
before that release ships, however, justifiably impatient users
I don't think you'll find many of those: Office 2011 for Mac is perfectly okay and the ribbon interface less of a problem than on Windows. Why would we want to "upgrade" to some kind of cloudy lock-in?
A5 runs at 720 x 1280 pixels to give a 294 ppi pixel density
Fuck that kind of willy-waving! Is OLED or just LCD?
Over 2000mAH should easily give you more than a day's use with those screens.
It's not for me but the Notes seem to pack a lot of functionality into a device. Let's face it, it's the note that convinced Apple of the need for a super-sized phone. I expect Note sales will continue to be good, because most users of them seem to love them. It's other parts of the portfolio which need looking at, where the perceived advantage over cheaper phones doesn't seem to be worth the money.
No, the market is getting saturated and, therefore, more competitive. I would be surprised if we don't start to similar quarter-for-quarter comparisons for Apple starting with this quarter (Q4 2013 was the first time Apple released its products around the world at the same time) with tablet sales already following the general trend: many of those who've already got one don't feel the urge to buy a newer one.
Did anyone proofread it? It seems like some clickbait about open source.
There is only one real advantage of open source: peer review. For some of us, for some projects this is a killer feature. The rest is hype.
No, you're not. But I do think the absence of support SD cards is a bit unusual.
I guess it depends on your server. I thought it was installed by most distros by default but I don't know how many people routinely use it for mirroring stuff. I tend to use wget over curl because the incantation is easier. But I might just install fetch for remote downloads.
Your point about code that isn't there can't be attacked still stands but in that case why even have an SFTPd running. Surely, the really safe thing is to be able to read the files from a remote file system under your control? Even then, can you be sure the files aren't corrupt?
Yes, democracy's such a shitty thing whenever your lot don't win!
The European Commission is charged with removing barriers to trade within the EU. Hence, the way it weighed in about roaming charges and it can most probably use the same arguments as it did then about this: such a tax cannot be applied to citizens visiting Hungary and using data on their mobile devices. It can do the same with companies wanting to offer internet-based services in Hungary.
It's not just the ISP. It affects all service providers, especially aggregate ones like the advertisers, who can and do associate an IP address with a specific individual rather than using one-way hashes for the value of a session.
The main problem is the x86 model. Turns out that context switching is very slow so you put things (networking, printer, etc.) in the kernel to make them run faster. The kernel is architecture-specific. This is why NT 3.5.1 was more stable and secure but slower than NT 4 and later. By then there weren't any customers interested in anything other than x86.
C# and .NET do dive a degree of insulation from the architecture when it comes to apps.
Most of the HAL was removed in NT 4 to improve speed on x86.
Now it should be remembered that "sender pays" is a founding principle of internet video — video providers can’t use reciprocal free peering swaps to deliver low latency, high bandwidth traffic.
I don't agree with this. At some point NetFlix is attached to one of the big carriers (Level 3) and will be billed by them for the traffic based on the agreements they have with the other ISPs.
Net neutrality can only be about ISPs not privileging their own offerings over those of other companies. Customers should be prepared to may more for higher bandwidth, lower latency, better QoS, etc.
NetFlix and bandwidth costs are being used a strawman by vested interests when the main battle, as always, is about the price charged for content. Most countries in Europe have a pretty healthy VoD market with players like Watchever already well-established and the European Commission pushing to remove preferential, location-specific deals: content in Germany, France or the UK should not cost more (or less) than in Estonia.
but where does the money go?
Capex, techies and, apparently, increasingly the salesforce.
They wouldn't by any chance be "licensing" that data to various government agencies, would they?
No, governments don't need to pay. The "licensed data" will be access to the sweet nectar miraculously distilled from the shitpipe full of insights like Twitter users between 30 and 40 in Baltimore like to look at cute pictures of…
I do hope that Alun Taylor will take you outside and enlighten you some more.
A bicycle shop, for example, is significantly more likely to buy a dot-bike domain than, say, a dot-spot domain.
Only in the self-fulfilling prophecies of domain resellers and SEO shops.
What if that bike shop is in Berlin, New York?
FWIW OLEDs don't have backlights.
Full support for fingerprint recognition is being built into the stack, and there'll also be support for other biometrics
So there'll be the CIA version, one each for the FBI, NSA and FSB and also presumably one for the MPAA!
Should be though the related functionality might be missing. Then again OLE is such a fucked up implementation of applications as components that it probably won't be missed.
Then again LibreOffice has enough bugs of its own. I appreciate some of the things the devs are trying to do but I've binned it until it stops crashing so much. I find OpenOffice considerably more stable.
I don't see what either .trust or .secure bring to the party and like you, I'm sceptical that the business model will ever fly.
NCC should stick to making security reviews and penetration testing so relevant that every site uses them.
Sounds just right for China or Saudi Arabia!
On a more serious note: all the new TLDs are a solution in search of a problem. The initial set and the countries providing enough of a taxonomy to work with.
Apparently, it was pcc until BSD 4.4 when it was replaced by the gcc presumably as part of the whole AT&T process. Fast forward 25 years and they again start looking around for a new compiler because of problems with the licence.
Hasn't BSD always had its own compiler? As things stand llvm and clang seem to be doing a good job of displacing the gcc.
Open sourcing either the code or making the specification public are very good ideas for languages. Universities are then likely to pick them up and identify the nice and not so nice parts. I can see a reluctance to do this initially on Apple's behalf as they will want complete control over the first few versions to fit the MacOS / IOS world as good as possible.
Despite Apple's history of serious fuck ups when including open source stuff with the products they do have a reasonable track record with the open source projects they either steward or contribute to (CUPS, BSD, llvm). But WebKit has also shown how company priorities can scupper this: Apple actively resisted a lot of changes in WebKit which is why Google ended up forking it.
Putting a language under GPL is just posturing and helps no one.
Have they really thought this through? I would have thought 3 would be necessary at most:
build & test
I don't have any I-toys and so far I've yet to see any reasons for upgrading to OS X 10.10. Are there any?
If you look at the process manager you'll see that it's the browsers that are eating memory (blame the DOM), the rest should be insignificant.
I still get reasonable performance out of my 2009 MacBook Pro with 4GB memory even with a Windows VM.
Apart from the fact that share repurchases almost never make sense for a company, the whole point is to buy them when they are the most expensive as this "returns" the most money in the most tax efficient form to shareholders: repurchases are taxed as capital gains, dividends would be taxed as income.
However, taxpayers should also note: the whole repurchase scheme is debt-funded. The loans used to do the buying can, therefore, also be offset against tax.