Hot air
Probably because no one expected these decrees to go anywhere but, unlike China, it's probably pretty difficult to enforce any of these bans in the US.
12166 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Miscommunication between men and women is eternal. It's been well-researched and, even though cultural factors play a large role, there are still innate differences. YMMV but pretending otherwise is at least disingenuos if not downright patronising. I'm constantly having to apologise to SWMBO for not being telepathic, ie. for knowing what she meant to say instead of listening to what she did say.
At our local Python sprint last year one of the teams was working with Transcribe. The results were promising but not good enough for general use. Obviously, Amazon has been collecting training data via Alexa for years but this is mainly going to be on household subjects. Nuance/Dragon has decades of specialised data: I remember installing Dragon Naturally Speaking for a customer over 20 years ago and accuracy wasn't bad then.
Sorry, you seem to have completely misunderstood my point. I was talking about what might become mandated as a minimal free service. Having had such a service for a couple of years I know how limited it is, but also how useful. But more importantly, I know that it's doable for the networks. Might end up being 2 GB on 4G, but the principle is the same. As for autostart videos: there are browsers that stop them.
While there are certain situations where this kind of approach might have merit, current deals are merely commercial: the content providers are paying the networks for privileged access to consumers and this cannot be welcome.
What I think we will see over time is some kind of minimal, free service that all networks must provide. Say 500 MB a month at 3G speeds (adjust these numbers to suit). This would allow most people to communicate and stay informed, I also think we'll see more of the T-Mobile US approach to "unlimited" video usage but only at lower resolutions – bandwidth contention is more of an issue that total data traffic – but this should apply to all providers.
With Rosetta users will be at Apple's mercy. Sure, initially there will be lots of reasons to make it very good but in a couple of years from now there will be lots of pressure to support an ARM-only world.
Besides, whilst most software developers will probably make the shift to ARM fairly quickly – here Apple has done a lot of work in making cross-compiling easy and fast – it's often the less interesting bits but equally important bits of software that won't be updated. For example, switching off 32-bit x86 put paid to quite a few things like my printer controller and I'm routinely being warned that thinks like my Cisco AnyConnect (from last year) soon won't work either. The way Apple has handled these changes smacks of arrogance and doesn't bode well for future changes.
Oh it does in most cases through folks paying £2000 for £500 worth of laptop.
While Apple does charge a premium, it's nothing like that. If you compare similarly specc'd machines from Dell, etc. you'll see comparable prices.
And the reason people keep on buying the machines for work is the "value proposition" of everything just working out of the box. Less time fiddling with drivers, etc. means more time doing what we get paid for.
That said, the move to soldering everything is a real PITA, but seeing as most of the other manufacturers are now doing the same thing isn't really Apple's fault. What we need is better regulation.
Apart from the spectacular ability to capsize and other notable brainfarts, in many ways the Robin was ahead of its time. Because it was so light, it could use a much smaller engine and required thus much less fuel. But it really should never have left the "concept" stage.
The Fed, along with most central banks, has had excessively loose monetary policy for over ten years now. Yes, it's got even looser this year, but tech companies have been taking advantage of it for years.
Softbank has been in a hole since a couple of its big bets: Uber and WeWork didn't go as well as planned. nVidia is just one of the many companies taking advantage of Softbank's fire sale and cheap debt. So, it was Softbank's own failings that have forced it to sell ARM.
It was shown years ago that people who watch Fox News are generally less well informed than people who watch no news. They've had quacks on there for years. But on the other side of the street you've got well-educated middle class dweebs in California up in arms about vaccination in general: spikes in measles infections have nothing to do with the Orange Idiot in Chief. Or, for that matter, the Federal Reserve.
The big problem for resellers that the change in refresh rates removed their main source of revenue: commission. They used to get paid up front for selling customers new contracts on the back of a new phone.
Unfortunately, at some point customers realised that this wasn't necessarily in their best interests and started increasingly to treat phone and contract as a separate items: keep phone, renegotiate cheaper tariff directly with the network; no middleman required. For many of us, phones have become just another piece of consumer electronics equipment.
China already has the best facial recognition software. Yes, it isn't perfect: it can be fooled by many of the usual techniques ("kitten, not kitten") and there have been some highly publicised SNAFUs. But it is also validated by its near ubiquitous use every day throughout China. You don't need advanced silicon for this kind of thing, just suffiicient training data and time.
There will almost certainly be some form of ABI for running Android apps with minimal additional overhead. No, the bigger problem may be sourcing chips, depending on who's prepared to provide ARM chips for them.
But, China has the advantage that normally only the US has: the sheer size of the domestic market. Easy to imagine Harmony OS get mandated for mobile phones in China and then it only has to be "good enough".
Can only be a matter of time before they introduce some new charges for, I don't know, polishing the bits and bytes. I mean, it's not as if, in the Land of the Free, you have much choice. You've already had the "chance" to try the "competition"!
So, stop moaning and hand over the dollars, already!
The reason is that 100 years ago companies were given a monopoly provided their ensured "near" universal coverage. Which they were interested in doing anyway because the more people have phones, the more money they made, because the more people made calls, which were very expensive.
The cable companies biggest beef is the loss of subscribers to their packages of dubious worth: 300 channels of the same shit and pay extra for each type of sport and anything else you might actually want to watch.
It's easy to cost and mandate universal access and seeing as there is little or no competition, it's also easy to pay for it by cross-subsidies: people close to an exchange pay a little more than cost to help pay for the cost of connecting those a little further from an exchange. Network effects mean that there are never that many people far away from an exchange. In fact laying cable to someone in the sticks is relatively cheap because you don't have to worry about digging up the road, etc. to provide the service. Of course, you can still use directional radios for some places, but basically anywhere that already has a phone line, can also have fibre. But, without the dual incentives of monthly rental and connection-based charging, how are CEOs expect to fund their mistresses and property habits?
Hydrogen is just odd and largely defies classification along with the other elements. It's an electron captured by a proton so it doesn't even have a proper nucleus except it has two isotopes that do. But it's metallic behaviour has been absorbed in many ways, not just because it's such an effective reduction agent but also because it can be adsorbed.
Cool H and He enough and they get odder.
It's called the anthropic principle: even though it's all chance. Combine this with rectlinear perspective, which is as ideological as it is aesthetic and humanity must be considered the most advanced life form. We consider our situation special, even though it's just unlikely.
I've just finished reading "Closing Time" by Joseph Heller, he who gave us Catch 22, where the president is referred to by everyone, including himself, as the "the little prick" and who starts the apocalypse by confusing the buttons for ending the world with those of his favourite video game.
IOW: rinse and repeat for every US* president because they're usually dicks.
* insert your country of choice
"Reports of the death of the Dollar have been much exaggerated".
The Renminbi is currently not suitable to replace the Dollar. But I guess we can expect to see more money as hedging moving into it, the Euro, the Swiss Franc and a couple of other currencies. More important for the near term, however, will be payment systems that don't rely on SWIFT
That, and the exhorbitant privelege of owning and, hence, controlling access to the world's reserve currency. Which is why so many companies got out of Iran when the US broke the agreement.
But at some point other means of payment will be established and at some point investors won't feel compelled to buy US debt. Probably won't be any time soon but god help them when it happens because the US debt:GDP is staggering and really low levels of domestic savings means that, unlike Japan and Italy, there's not much of a fallback if international creditors take fright.
SMIC will have already ordered all the kit it needs for the next couple of years so threatening it now will have little immediate effect. Global chip production capacity is limited and new fabs take years to build so forcing Qualcomm to move production elsewhere will no doubt just drive up its prices.
And, of course, all the time China will continue to develop its own IP in chip design and manufacture. Given how capricious the US has become, it would be crazy not to.
I'm afraid that's wishful thinking as things like SSL have shown. Unless you're actually looking for bugs you're unlikely to find any. And, many exploits are not necessarily bugs. Or they would previously never have been considered bugs before someone worked out how to exploit the code.
This is why security testing should be done by a separate team.
"The existence of such commits contradicts one of the key promises of an open development model."
Not really, it just highlights a potential exploit vector. But, really, depending on inferring attack vectors from silent patches means you're behind the curve, because this is a known issue. The usual suspects – the various government agencies around the world – have far greater resources for code analysis and penetration testing for detecting (and then exploiting) unknown issues.
My understanding is that, in general, a security relevant issue is handled by a dedicated team, which then coordinates with the main team on when and how fixes can be committed. I think silent commits stem from this approach and are there largely to avoid spreading unnecessary alarm, prior to a coordinated security release. There are good arguments for keeping everything completely open but there are also potential aspects of liability for disclosing an issue without being able to provide a solution.
When it comes to secure development you really need a separate team that does nothing else than try and find exploits. This is the best way to deal with the risk that trusting your developers brings with it: you have to continually try to break and exploit their code.
If you want to make a notebook expensive, try and make it light. 16" screen at only FHD is certainly usable but will also tax the battery, though maybe a bit less than a 4k one does. But, in any case, a 16" is likely to be too heavy to want to lug around a lot. I generally recommend something smaller and lighter that you can easily connect to a larger external screen when its on your desk. And if you don't need mobility, don't buy a notebook.
When it comes to 5G, Samsung is right up there with the rest of them. 4G and 5G were introduced earlier and more extensively in Asia than in the West because the need for them in their huge, densely populated cities was greater. And Samsung has for years being developing and supplying telephone network kit to the networks in Korea. Being able to design and manufacture its own silicon can't hurt either.
One of the main advantages with ARM-based chips is that they tend to have more specific hardware acceleration so it's possible that the rendering at least would get a boost, though compiling as a generally single-core process might take longer. Either way these new devices are unlikely to be suitable replacements for your current workstation, which is basically what you're using your notebook for.
My Kobos have all are great to read in virtually any kind of lighting condition: ghosting hasn't been a problem for years. Full refresh is now generally one a chapter and some of these can be pretty long and never a problem. Full control of text size, margins, etc. and indirect lighting are a win, win, win.
Electronic paper displays, like those on the Amazon Kindle…
It's not as if Amazon needs its products promoting, but in terms of software it really is an also ran for e-readers (Kobo, PocketBook and even Sony for PDFs), not helped by insisting on its own propietary format. It really is better journalistic practice to mention the type of device first – here e-readers – and name examples afterwards.
The impact depends a lot on the geography and the usual rainfall patterns. Flat areas can absorb a lot of water by flooding extensively, but then take much longer to drain, especially if they are flood plains, and thus below the level of local rivers. In much of the western UK rain is so common (300 days per year) that it's difficult to get that much extra – though flash floods over the last few years have shown it is possible – and local systems can normally cope quite well with a reasonable excesses. But it's also just so much smaller than the US.
In the US hurricane alley you have flood plains combining with subsidence due to drainage, and rising and warming sea levels, which is why the Army Corps of Engineers has already had to revise down the viability of the post-Katrina works. At some point, some of those coastal settlements and flood plains will need to be abandoned.
To be picky, they're forecasts about what might happen rather than predictions about what will. But, of course, as with most things statistical most (sic) of us can't reliably tell the difference.
Anyway, nice to see Watson getting some good press. As one of the pioneering ML systems it's taken some bashing but there has always been some very good technology in there and, just as important, some great people working on it.