Re: Battery life
@DijitulSupport - MBP batteries are non-removable.
3080 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
@DijitulSupport - MBP batteries are non-removable.
Lucky you! But how do you measure the health? My 2009 MBP hasn't give me more than 2 hours real use for more than than a year.
BTW. the 11 h in the report are for a MBA so not comparable with our hardware.
I can still get 11 hours plus out of my 2010 Air…
Really? I've yet to own a computer battery where performance didn't deteriorate significantly (< 60 % initial capacity) after two years. That is the mean reason for wanting to be able to replace it.
Steve Balmer with one "l"? Runs the stationery cupboard?
I think the most important information is that the figures we often hear have an incredible US bias. This was also evident in the Akamai stats until they tapped into their global data
Looking a mobile browsers and IE isn't in the top 10. It does a little better if you look at all browsers which indicates a fair number of laptops with dongles or built in 3G.
Not quite as tough as the Caterpillar phone but came out pretty well in the comparison in the c't magazine: based on an S3. I picked mine up sans SIM for € 260 because I'm looking for a phone that I feel okay about using on my bike. Certainly not as slick as the highend phones but it does the job and has a separate camera button.
Is anybody in corporate space really listening to this and seriously considering WP for their company? A lot of CIOs have been burned very badly by sticking with Microsoft in the last few years. BlackBerry is back in the game and pushing updates thick and fast and in the meantime both IOS and Android have increasingly good offerings for corporates.
Yes, I know I'm slagging MS off but as Shelluser points out their form in this space has been dreadful in the last three years.
Comms are like roads: traffic always grows faster than capacity. Plus, anywhere of low population density is generally better served by satellite, for television at least.
Of course ESA/CNES/EADS has been a pretty cosy relationship for years. The same argument about subsidies was brought up in the Boeing versus Airbus case at the WTO: result US and European governments are guilty of subsidising their industries; in Europe it's more explicit but the contracts awarded to Boeing, Lockheed and co. perform the same function.
Arianespace currently operates successfully in a competitive environment (it has to tout for business because European governments don't spend as much money on spy satellites) and has a very impressive track record - this is important as insurance premiums are going to be significant for any new entrants to the market until they have established track records. SpaceX has had a very impressive start and it's to be hoped that it and other companies, including Arianespace, can continue to improve the market but, as we can never expect NASA to put any of these contracts out to fully competitive tender, ESA is going to continue to have a preferential relationship with EADS.
I though that SpaceX's costs were roughly on a par with those of Ariane? Anyway it's a bit of a nonsense to pretend that SpaceX is so much more private and efficient than EADS: it has a nice reliable contract from NASA for the work. The important thing is moving from the traditional cost plus arrangement. But if it ever gets involved in DARPA work then the usual rules are likely to apply: cost explosion, secrecy and silliness.
I'd be very surprised if more than 10 % of Android users update the OS on their phone if it is not pushed directly to it. 4.x was released last year so people are moving to it "organically" when they renew their contracts / change their phones.
However, the differences for many phones between 2.3 and 4.x are not that significant. Yes, it's a unification of tablet and phone OS but that is under the hood.
Isn't that par for the course for many stock exchanges that initially got inflated by the money printing in Japan earlier in the year. And now everyone is getting the jitters because it looks like the Federal Reserve might start reducing the amount of money it prints. We've also had the "Sharibor" problem and indications that Chinese growth is going to slow.
All in all most stock market movements this year have extremely little to do with expected profits and lots to do with the "will they? won't they?" of loose monetary policy. But, hey, we won't let that stop us from writing clickbait.
I cannot see much use out of these, if anyone can, do please enlighten us.
While I disagree with most of what you say I, too, would like to know what the server that Oxford University is buying is going to do. Even if it's just for research purposes - software development on such a system as a cheap way to develop and test HPC code - it makes sense. It may well be that academia is indeed going to be the target market for systems for the time being but don't underestimate how that may work: this year Oxford University, next year CERN, the year after that IBM has them in its portfolio.
I guess that you aren't a product manager anywhere, though it might just be possible that Nokia has been listening to you for the last three years.
When taken along with Samsung's less-than-stellar results also released on Friday
Seeing as Samsung had another record quarter the comparison is not just flawed but totally off. Please, El Reg get the monkeys masquerading as journos to think twice before writing such tripe.
for which the operators will not release a new version,
Is the one like where car makers won't pay for recalls while they fix dodgy pedals, tyres, fuel lines, etc? All we need are a few customers ready to say "class action" and updates will be rolled out.
5) Not globally enforceable
Cause and effect of man-made climate change are separated not only by time but also by place which is one of the reasons why there has been so little agreement of substance so far and this looks set to continue with polluting countries not feeling the full force of their activities, which are, of course, not directly measurable in any case. Carbon trading is so far the only economic approach to try and address this.
Current EU law requires sites to obtain a visitor's consent before they install a cookie in their browser
There is no single EU law on this - it is devolved to national governments so not really the Commission's problem.
Explicit consent is only required for non-essential cookies for which there is no fixed definition. Among essential cookies can be considered to be session cookies and shopping basket cookies, user preferences, etc. Statistic cookies are probably debatable depending on how they are configured: lifetime and data contained. Problematic are all the third-party cookies. However, as El Reg should but apparently doesn't know: agreement can easily obtained through a sign-up form. As long as Twitter's users are logged in then they have agreed to Twitter's T&C's, as indeed we commentards have to El Reg's, which presumably include the right to trade personal data with third parties. The stupid banner at the bottom of El Reg does not comply with the law as it "we'll assume you're happy to accept the cookies anyway." can in no way be construed to be someone providing explicit consent.
But still nothing in Libre/Open to compare with MS Access
I'm not really sure what to say to that. Is MS Access worthy of emulation?
oh, I use Notepad
Now we have stats based on usage rather than licences sold, and I bet people will still stick their head in the sand and claim it was a flop.
It is a failure - the resellers and manufacturers have been saying this since launch.
Comparisons with the much unloved Vista are appropriate. Check the stats for the uptake of Windows 7 in the same time frame.
It would cost a whole lot more if it wasn't capped - just go anywhere outside the EEA to see what the operators think they have a right to charge.
It'll happen automatically - just get a SIM from another country and roam in your own. LBO is just unbundling by another name.
Yes, operators are allowed to make additional offers but must provide at least the capped service. Note, some operators dream up packages and sign you up to them automatically, ie. you have to actively say "no thanks, I'll just stick with the EU package". Travelling anywhere, but especially outside the EU, for more than a couple of days it's almost always worth buying a local SIM card or two.
It will allow proper wholesale markets. In essence it's not much difference to the international calling cards or SIMs that are already available. It just add an incentive to offer travellers better services. Sure, the comfort of being able share the profit with the traveller's home network is out the window (this was the whole reason for the caps) but that just means that local operators get to keep all of the profit themselves. This will encourage specialisation (ie. providers of backhaul), customisation and innovation (calls will go all VoIP pretty quickly). Get two SIMs from different countries and avoid forever being tied to stupid plans.
Pity Bill seems to think that this stimulus for competition is somehow bureaucratic. Just shows you how cosy the old telco world was.
Except the water there was contaminated before the fracking started.
Hi Thicko, meet fact:
The relationship cannot be put down to gasmen's penchant for plonking their drills in spots where natural gas is most abundant in the first place. In the absence of drilling the gas, being trapped in the shale beds 1,500-2,500 metres beneath the countryside, would stay put; concentrations nearer to the surface would remain unaffected.
Now where's my "Manchester North of England" t-shirt? Don't really give a fig about shale but devolution or independence would be good and persecuting Southerners is always good. "They don't like it up 'em, you know" Well, actually they probably do: time to find out!
Where do we go to join up? (Picture of Mark E. Smith with Kitchener tash proclaiming it's our duty…)
You can normally get any "subsidy" in contract renewal through some kind of rebate or package. I got € 5 a month for two years rebate for renewing a couple of years ago. They wouldn't extend it recently so I've go post-paid PAYG with the same network bringing down my monthly costs from € 10 to less than € 2 (yeah, I don't use it very much because I'm Billy Nomates). Their loss, I'd say.
Here in Germany I see lots of people on the street with S4s but also S3s and a few of the big HTC's. It wouldn't surprise me to see worldwide sales of the S4 to be somewhat above the S3 over its first quarter so still impressive but less growth than expected but I'll wait for real shipped/sold figures. Would be nice to see analysts reimburse their customers if the get it wrong.
You might want to take a look at PC-BSD. Comes with all the creature comforts of many modern Linux distros, it's just FreeBSD underneath.
Unfortunately the more liberal license is the reason we're all bickering here about Linux almost forgetting the BDSs
No, the licence had nothing to with it. AT&T took UC Berkeley to court at the same time as Torvalds was cloning Minix. Until the court case finished, and this being America it took a few years, BSD was considered tainted so there was an incentive to use something else, Linux was around and the rest is history.
Massive success for Microsoft - and a significant market opportunity to connect companies with customers now that it is integrated with Lync.
Where's the payback on the $ 8 bn? Keep taking the tablets.
Incidentally "jammer" (same pronunciation) means shame in Dutch and for some reason I can't avoid thinking of it every time I read about it. Seems fitting.
Sorry, after aQuantive, Skype we fucked up again and spent oodles of your cash on a fashionable company. If you sell quickly you won't be affected too much by the write down when we announce it. In the meantime we're going to run a smokescreen campaign telling everyone how wonderful everything is and how our customers love Jabber…
If you want double precision, it drops down to 691 teraflops per rack.
Admittedly this is probably for specialist applications but that is still fucking impressive. We are starting to see how see these systems are going to really shake up the market. This is probably why IBM wants out of the x86 racket, or even out of the business altogether. Though if IBM hasn't got something ARM-based in the closet then I'd be very surprised. They've already done much of the leg work with cell designs.
Nobody wants to split the phone bill with the Brazilian guy who spends all night on the phone to his girlfriend back in Rio.
Why not? With the right package it shouldn't make any difference. It's pretty much all VoIP now anyway so if your provider starts taking the piss, just provide and OTT solution and set the router up correctly.
I think LibertyMedia is also considering buying at least a slice of Kabel and as they are less geared this could have legs.
4-play is largely irrelevant in the UK due to the dismal level of investment infrastructure and the subsequent dependence upon on BT's wires and a captive regulator.
Good report in the most recent c't about how the market is being carved up. Got Unitymedia here with fibre to the kerb 50 Mb/s downlink 4 Mb/s uplink with telephone, telly and mobile for € 35 a month. Even with the € 17 compulsory connection fee it's still more competitive than the DSL offerings.
Cooking your own food is always cheaper than junk food. If you budget really is stretched then it can be a bit bland or boring but things like lentils are hard to beat on a price/nutrition basis.
but chemicals is chemicals however you get them.
You obviously don't know your chemistry. There are an awful lot of molecules out there that are easily available from biological sources but extremely difficult to synthesise: left-handed and right-handed isomers for a start. And that's only the start - finding out which substances work together is even more difficult. Add environmental and biological factors - does your body have the right enzymes for this?
That there is a market for this kind of pseudo-science is obvious from all the comments for people looking for a silver bullet solution. But there really is no substitute for a varied diet with lots of fresh fruit and vegetables.
@Lester - love the new mouseover on the SPB logo!
The blenders used to blend tea to suit various parts of the country. It sounds like you've got Tetleys suited for hard water and PG for soft. Try making both after using a water filter and then compare, I've always found Tetleys distinctly lacking in taste even when using soft water.
But who put the C*** in Scunthorpe?
Don't know but I wish he'd stay there.
PG Tips here - I prefer the dry Assam taste over classic builder's brew. Yorkshire tea is also good and I'll have to give the hard water blend a try next time I can pick some up. The water here next to the Rhine is hard as fuck: great for beer, shit for tea, filter is essential and you have to stop the Jormans giving you luke warm water with a teabag and condensed milk.
Even though we know Mr O. loves these phones he identifies the two problems facing Nokia: it's confusing the market with too many "flagships". Samsung can afford the spraygun approach, Nokia can't. It should be adopting a very clear Apple-like approach: entry level, last year's and extremely desirable. But at the end of the day there is only so much Nokia can do: if Microsoft doesn't pull its finger out and update the OS then the fleet is sunk. And, even if Microsoft does come up with the goods, who's to say that Windows Phone 8.5 (presumably to avoid confusion with the x86 only version of Windows 8.1) will run on all the current hardware.
Yes, ships do tend to sink pretty damn fast.
Nokia's in the EU and it is not possible to ban foreign takeovers the way they are done in the US. That said some kind of joint venture is more likely than an outright takeover. At the moment it's all just posturing and rumours from Wall Streeters hoping for fat commissions.
Nokia's patent portfolio has come up in some recent spats and doesn't look as compelling as it once was, especially as we move towards LTE. Obviously, there is still a lot there but much of the useful stuff is already FRAND so trying to hold the competition to ransom is not really an option as many recent court cases have illustrated.
The maps business is still worth something and they obviously still have some great product designers and engineers.
Markets are all a bit frothy at the moment due to the money printing (credit is cheap) and financial repression (bonds have negative real returns). All told Nokia should be worth more than Skype but could find itself bought for around the same price especially if cash is in involved. Definitely make or break year for Nokia.