Re: Yeah, whatever
Whovever downvoted this was not following the news.
And the 50 Kopek brigade joins El Reg…
4096 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Whovever downvoted this was not following the news.
And the 50 Kopek brigade joins El Reg…
As opposed to Yanukovich and his cronies before? Or Putin and his kleptocracy?
On the one hand we have:
Over the short term, Akamai found that 4K readiness has actually decreased by 2.8 per cent worldwide quarter-to-quarter.
And on the other:
Akamai has noted that over the last year 4K readiness has gone up by 32 per cent
Of course, both sentences include the nonsensical term "4K readiness".
The rest of the "article" reads like the hastily scribbled notes from a press conference.
Will the site makeover include the chance to avoid articles from those who can't write?
Not sure the OnePlus One compares directly with a Note 4 but it's still certainly excellent value. Though it also looks like OnePlus are cutting some corners with their products. Caveat emptor.
OLED's a breaker for me so I'm happy to stick with Samsung and, to be honest the stylus-based Notes are damn impressive machines with no direct competition for what they do. But if you don't want that, then sure, go for something cheaper.
Android 5 has a new, faster and less memory-intensive runtime.
Security updates should have nothing to do with upgrades. We need some court cases around companies failing to provide them.
The only slightly worrying thing there is that the latest version of the OS
What's the problem with that? Lollipop is the first version with significant changes (new design, ART, etc.). Even then the changes are tiny compared with the major changes in API in earlier (1.x and 2.x) versions. I would expect adoption to be slower than other point releases in the 4.x series and Lollipop not to be the most common version before the next wave of handset "upgrades".
The most important thing is actually the distribution of security relevant patches. Manufacturers have an understandably limited interest in having to integrate or backport changes into their mods but it is for the regulators to make sure they do their job or fine them otherwise. Users generally don't really care what's running as long as their favourite apps run.
FWIW I stuck Cyanogenmod nightly on my S4 Mini the other day and it's very stable with just a couple of things missing.
Personally, I think that there are lots of things to like in Material Design but such things are always a matter of taste.
There will certainly be calls for more Big Brother action but there is now evidence (on top of the small matter of legality) that all the snooping does is cost money.
I'd don't understand how you can do "move fast and break things" without having unit tests. They seem pretty sine qua non to me, otherwise how do you know what's broken?
That said: tests are a development aid and a developer's friend and not an end in themselves. TDD can be a trap because without some code you won't really know what to test for. Better to write code/test couplets where the tests help you think through (and perhaps improve) the logic you've coded and then fix the implementation so that any breakages will be caught.
Maybe I'm wrong here, but that's just my own perception from looking at web logs on my own servers.
These services generally use JS code to get the stats which excludes a lot of bots: http logs commonly contain 4 - 10 times as many requests as those reported by JS.
My sig's 6 lines (address, two telephone numbers). It doesn't really matter: good mail clients will strip it in replies.
I personally find the lack of text/plain, top-replying and the lack of quoting far more annoying that even the most ridiculous signature. But I guess that puts me in the small minority of people who've been using e-mail for more than 15 years.
Within their walls I think you'll find they have a lot of rights but it is basically whack-a-mole trying to disrupt other wifi networks while trying to protect your own.
There really is such a things as "the norm", and these days mobile phones and mobile wifi really do qualify.
Not really. In all these things there is the principle of caveat emptor. You should always find out how much things will cost before you use them. That said, if that information isn't available, then you should hound the shit out of them.
I remember my first business trip to the US in 2001 where the staff of the Marriott Courtyard in Redbank couldn't tell me how to get an internet connection (dial-in was all that was available back then), nor how much an international call would cost. So, I ended up using a null-modem cable with my mobile phone and dialling in via Germany (worked surprisingly well). Needless to say I complained strongly to Marriott and, to their credit, they refunded the charges incurred.
I hope not, at least for those hotels with international customers. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that I'll use my European provider's data plan when I'm in the US, at $DEITY only knows how many €€ per GB.
To be clear: I'm not in any form condoning the rip-off charging for mobile data. But I think it's worth looking at what the hotels are trying (and generally failing) to do and why they probably want to get out of the business.
When I'm in America I normally pick up a SIM for data (fucking expensive when compared to Europe). I've nearly always had more bandwidth with it than wifi in any of the major chains (a couple of hundred kbit/s if you're very lucky and repeated firewall signups). It really is quite a challenge to set up a reliable wifi environment in a large hotel, which is why is usually isn't available (no matter what they charge). Smaller hotels with one or two access points just don't have the same problems.
With the US mobile market finally maturing I'm sure data SIMs will start getting cheaper and, who knows, they might even introduce wholesale data which will make it easier for non-US providers to buy bandwidth at reasonable prices. In the meantime I may just pick up a T-Mobile SIM that will give me cheap data in the states.
I do believe that there is a genuine issue around the kind of unsecured wifi networks that are preferred by hotels and conferences: they are incredibly easy to spoof as clients only care about the SSID. Wifi is such a shitty (but cheap) protocol that it doesn't come with any kind of strategy to avoid this. If security really is the issue then fixing those issues should have priority. There are now wifi networks that can use the telcos' networks to do SIM-based authorisation, and/or customers could "bonk" their mobile phones to get network keys but notebooks would present more of a problem.
I do believe that the hotels are slowly thinking of getting out of providing internet for guests: it's a lot of gear to buy and look after and it's increasingly difficult to compete with what people can get from their mobile provider notionally for a fraction of the cost. But then I never fail to be surprised at the extras that American hotel chains routinely charge a fortune for (in much of Europe free wifi is now pretty much ubiquitous in hotels). I suspect the solution will be to cooperate with the mobile networks to setup pico cells in the hotel for improved coverage (and reduced load on the public cells).
You see, this is the endgame for capitalism. Sooner or later, you end up with a winner.
You seem to be ignoring the lessons of > 10 years 3G in Europe and the expansion of mobile in the third world. Companies can do it at a profit but not as monolithic providers of everything.
What will happen is what's happened everywhere else: telco's will pool resources where possible and outsource whatever they consider not to be core business.
The shareprice has been driven as much by money printing as anything else but debt is still ridiculously cheap so there are no real problems.
Of course, pressure on the the regulator to smother the competition through a merger or a takeover can't be ruled out. I take this article as part of the lobbying process of the new Congress along those lines. Golden parachute for the FCC being packed as I write, no doubt.
I just topped up my PAYG with the annual minimum of € 15… and the provider is going to give me € 5 on top. However, now that it no longer costs me anything to receive calls in the EU I will be retiring on of my UK SIMS and using my German one there: it is now cheaper to use a foreign SIM for calls in most EU countries. The other one may go to if I can get a reasonable rate for data, once that becomes fully unbundled. So, my current provider may end up the winner for my miserly spend.
Makes you wonder why the Yanks thought the same would never happen to them.
I like Python because the code almost always remains readable. Lots of web frameworks to choose from. YMMV.
I was thinking of particularly of Ruby on Rails
That's one particular framework, which is reasonable for a particular domain and shit for everything else. The ActiveRecord pattern is one of the many examples of poor designs from lazy or stupid programmers, though that isn't helped by SQL syntax: a "wire" interface for set algebra would be a much better way for client code to talk to servers.
But, while I don't like the Ruby syntax, there's no denying that quite a lot of thought has gone into the language.
In one sense it's very difficult to do the web nicely thanks to the stateless http protocol and fuck-ups like HTML forms (look and smell like MIME elements but you can't nest them). But having a universal protocol and no runtime lock-in also has its advantages.
I doubt any serious admin is accurately showing the actual version they are running,
Oh, holy fuck! If you start messing around with version numbers for that kind of shit you really will have problems.
Distros may choose to backport security fixes to older versions (though there are plenty of cases where that isn't really possible) in which case they may manage their own patches but otherwise the version number is the only way to know if you're secure or not. The hackers don't bother checking version numbers, they just use brute force vulnerability/feature detection as anyone who's ever read an error log will know.
What is really impressive is that SpaceX was founded with only $100M
hm, I just found that behind the back of the sofa…
As impressive as the work of the company has been (comparisons with the competitors such as Orbital Sciences are welcome) when it comes to money there is the small matter of a large NASA contract. This doesn't mean that I want to detract in any way from the quality of the team and the innovative work they've done. I wish them every success.
I'd guess all companies with > 10000 employees are in this boat. The big problem for Microsoft is that not even Enterprise mode solves all the problems. This is hindering the adoption of Windows 8 tablets for mobile workers.
It's The Reg's attempt at a clever bit of clickbait. It was slightly relevant a couple of years ago for phones that generally had insufficient hardware for the OS, now it's just jarringly patronising.
That would be a peer-to-peer network of which there are already several. They have the advantage of being robust and the disadvantage of being slower due to that robustness.
The current standards are pretty weak and are observed largely in the breach. Things will change in 2016 when the new directive is due to come into effect. Then there'll be squeals as to whether US companies' can appeal to arbitration if onerous EU law affects their profits.
Actually, there is a need for the print link.
Agreed but the stylesheets for printing can still be improved to strip the sidebar and the navigation.
I never quite understood the issue.
Well, I guess that's why you don't work for any competition authority: Microsoft was using its dominance on the desktop to develop a proprietary version of the internet that was based on its own browser. It was using this proprietary internet to promote its own services.
The browser choice screen was just a small part of the settlement which has also set a precedent for other vendors in all areas such as Google and search.
We're very happy for you. I, too, don't need MS Office for Mac. Lots of people don't need it but actually like it. There are, apparently, real fans of Outlook around.
I do have Office 2011 for development purposes. I think it's actually a lot nicer than the Windows version.
I'm pretty sceptical about the move to subscription-only software but the market will decide.
I wouldn't know: I always kept my eyes shut!
LTE had one aim: improve data performance by moving to an IP-based stack. Speed improvements were largely achieved using 3G technology.
5G has started as a marketing term: we've got WCDMA and TCDMA and multibeam. So far, no one has come up with a new way to squeeze more data bandwidth (there's a reason for the name) into constant physical bandwidth in the same time and with the same power at the same distance. I think I've got all the constraints but I'm not a radio engineer so please correct me if I'm wrong.
The LTE business model is no better than the 3G one: free WiFi acts as a break on price expectations and open the door for OTT. If the networks hadn't wanted to charge $$$ for video or international calls but had just made it available, OTT would never have stood a chance. The US was able to charge a premium for LTE because the market is dysfunctional but Verizon's noises are a sign of a long-overdue correction.
There is money to be made from mobile networks, not least by concentrating on the basics: providing reliable voice calls anywhere.
Trying to avoid IPv6 is very much a head-in-the sand moment. It's coming (not least because we will need those addresses) and the best thing to do is learn how to handle it as soon as possible and start making suggestions on how it should be improved.
I think that if CGNAT wasn't so widespread in Asia we probably would already have run out of addresses even if they could be easily transferred from one region to another (they can't).
Beyond the router it hardly matters as long as the router or ISP has 6to4 solution. Most smart TVs are Linux-based so IPv6 isn't a problem; all the ones running Android (an increasing number) definitely do support IPv6.
Yep, in use here.
Use within companies is another aspect entirely: as long as they have enough private IPv4 addresses and the 10 blocks are pretty generous, there is little incentive but the more sensors and devices they have the urge to switch internal networks to IPv6 will grow. Another drive will be once they start routing more traffic in VPNs on public networks.
Ownership is fuzzy, viz. the sale of Lucent's to Microsoft and others. Some of the original blocks were, it seems, entirely allocated to individual entities including companies.
But it's dangerous precedent to set for the state to try and sell them and, thus, effectively legitimate the trade. The consequences of open trade in ip addresses (in real time, why not) could be disastrous: it would be akin to reallocate road names and numbers in real time!
In any case while the 30 million might seem like a lot, they could be gone in a trice with IoT in any government department.
And, should it ever come to selling the damn things, their value well decline even further as it becomes cheaper to adopt IPv6 with 4to6. In the meantime the UK's tech sector is losing out by not gaining experience with IPv6, especially in the area of security. Maybe they're waiting for GCHQ to signal that they know how to snoop IPv6 traffic?
Late and Sunday opening depends on where you live. The supermarkets near me are open till 22:00 or midnight and we also have the kiosks or petrol stations who exploited loopholes in existing legislation to supply after closing. Late opening is largely a function of the ability to employ people part-time in underfinanced mini-jobs: the missing contributions to health and unemployment insurance, and pensions will have to be made up by the taxpayer in the future. I try and avoid going to the shops after 20:00 as there is almost always time during the day. It was different when I first came to Germany where the idea was very much that only housewives did the shopping.
The city-state of Berlin has let the ban on Sunday trading fall entirely.
See my other post: the state is hardly involved in this at all, which makes a nice change. In fact, if the state had bothered to do its work properly (namely apply the Entsendegesetz to sectors with wages blatantly below regional averages) there wouldn't even be the need for a national minimum wage because the deals between unions and employers would apply.
Mail-order companies are traditionally treated as retail in Germany.
Due to the Briefmonopol laws.
No, not least because the monopoly on delivering letters fell several years ago.
In Germany there is something called Tarifautonomie which means that unions and employers are responsible for negotiating wages and politics is kept out. Unions and employers collectively decide what branches there are and terms and conditions are negotiated for entire branches on a state-by-state basis. Agreements usually contain opt-out clauses for individual companies as long as their works council's agree. The system has worked very well for years because it is efficient: individual companies do not have to devote resources to negotiating conditions and strike days are kept to a minimum. As a result German companies can afford to pay workers more than in other countries due to the increased productivity, as in the case from approx. 2000-2012, agree on pay increases below inflation to regain competitivity.
There are outliers with employers refusing to play by the rules using several techniques: cherry-picking or even setting up a compliant union with which to negotiate; sub-contracting to foreign companies who are exempt from the rules unless the federal government says otherwise (building work is not exempt, abattoirs are); or deciding that they belong to a different branch. Non-German companies often adopt confrontational positions until they understand how much easier and more profitable it is if they follow the rules.
We've also got a couple of smaller unions pulling an ASLEF: bringing a whole company to a halt even though they only represent a small section of employees. The German equivalent of ASLEF the GDL seems to be copying their militant tactics with Klaus Weselski every bit as militant as Bob Crow or Arthur Scargill. The pilots are doing the same. The end result, I fear, maybe a weakening or all employees' rights as well as bringing forward fully automated trains and planes.
Carefully crafted American micro-brewery pints all round. Except to the FAA until they pull their fingers out and authorise this historic mission.
Significantly, however, Xiaomi's entry into the list means that three of the top five smartphone makers are now Chinese firms.
Seeing as Apple's phones are made under contract in China by Foxconn that would make four out of the top five are Chinese.
But you sure as hell won't get Guardians of the Galaxy if everyone can just take their non-DRMed copy and share it with the whole planet.
Is that a promise? ;-)
DRM is expensive to develop and enforce and, as many examples have shown, pretty easy to break; most notably in large markets like Russia and China where it's largely unenforceable anyway. Result is that we have to pay not just for content but for lawyers and developers. I suspect DRM will be kept around as a fig leaf for another couple of years (it's already largely disappeared from music).
The real problem remains tho: Region locking. Remove that and you'll see your sales go up.
It's more than just region locking – it's the attempt to maximise profits by selling licences to different countries at different prices. I have a copy of Wag The Dog that forces me to watch it with German subtitles if I watch it in English! This is anti-competitive and precisely the kind of limitation that the internet is designed to work around. Long-term it's bound to fail but companies chasing quarterly profits and don't care about the long-term.
It will be interesting to see if the EU does follow up on threats to break down national borders for content. It'll be a hard fight if they do but it's such a glaring breach of the rules over the trade of products and services within the single market.
What's anti-competitive about it?
Same situation as in many countries. LLU is the important thing.
Your anit-Google rants are all well and good but so often off the mark.
In the case of Google Earth the API is far less important than the data that is made freely available, which as far as I can tell, will continue to be the case.
Any developer who makes their livelihood dependent upon a company continuing to provide a free service deserves to go bust. The whole point of the free APIs and data is to see what services are possible and popular and, thus, suitable for either for charging or running ads. Google is publicly traded company with a duty to its shareholders to make money. Shock, horror, I know. I don't remember Microsoft ever providing the same amount of services.
As the article points out this particular API now looks pretty outdated and I suspect, though I don't know, that its use is limited. We'll have to see whether a replacement (WebGL, Canvas, PPAPI or whatever) is forthcoming. Some of the of the other APIs to have been retired have been granted both extensions and replacements: Google Charts was due to be phased out this year and has been superseded by Google Visualisation.
None of this means that I particularly like Google (I don't use Chrome and run Cyanogenmod) but I do have a more than grudging admiration for the company's engagement in open source. We'll have to see how much of that remains if the various tax loopholes are ever closed or the EU is able to enforce rigorous data protection and privacy standards from 2016 (when the new law is due to take effect).
sticks fingers in ears and shouts "lalalala"