2177 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Didn't El Reg recently cover how IBM is moving to HTML 5 for the Wimbledon stuff?
Certainly for publishing content HTML 5 is already the choice of many using things like Adobe's offerings. It might get embedded in a minimalist native app for controlling distribution and charging but the content is all HTML 5 as publishers have finally realised that mobile devices are less limited than desktop browsers. Add to this the commercial imperative of not paying for another billing system and the case is pretty clear.
In the future
If this sounds like a silly question then maybe it is. What happens to Google Maps once Apple has implemented it itself? Is is then banned from IOS because "it duplicates functionality already provided"? If so, and I have no idea whether this is the case, that would surely be an interesting case for the competition authorities.
Google too aren't going to be happy with the ruling either. It had high hopes for the handset and handed out 6,000 of them at this week's I/O developer's conference as a platform for people to design applications around.
Google was handing out the Nexus 7, a different device produced by Asus and not Samsung, at the conference and not covered by this court case.
No one likes to be shut out of a market but historically the US market for mobile phones has been distinct. In the years where Nokia reigned supreme, it had only a paltry market share in the US. Initially, sales of the I-Phone in the US did allow Apple to kick start the app and content eco-system but now the US market is neither numerically nor financially as important as it was a few years ago as the effects of commodifying the hardware and focussing on software ripple through the industry.
My Samsung Galaxy (8.9) has a higher resolution and is noticeably lighter than an IPad 2. It has better connectivity - I use DNLA, SMB, HDMI and an SD card, though the last two require adapters. I can choose which apps can open which files, e.g. Adobe Acrobat or the E-Book reader for PDFs and I use Adobe Proto for work and it's become my main personal music player.
I've seen an I-Pad in action: yes, the display is silkier but notifications and widgets are better on mine as is the default e-mail client. There are more apps for IOS, though few that I really missed apart from The Economist. But even that changed last night, no surprise methinks. Google must have lobbied publishers pretty hard.
Lots of people love their I-Pads with good reason but I have friends who complain about the restrictions imposed and who are planning to make their next device an Android. Though, it would be just as much a mistake to extrapolate too much from their sentiment as Andrew is from his. And, Andrew famously got the emergency of the I-Phone wrong.
Re: There's still China
In continental Europe, and especially Germany, Firefox very much does hold sway. It's about 50 % for a large corporate site I know.
That said, SiteCounters' metrics are not reliable because they are very piecemeal. Aggregates coming from Google Analytics, Adobe or Webtrends or other large providers are likely to be more representative. The stats that I have access to have about a three-way split for Chrome (all versions), IE 8, IE 9 and Firefox (all versions) for the world. Chrome has gone up about 10 % in a year on those metrics.
Been wrong before
Panasonic bet heavily on plasma, which while the pictures are arguably better than LCD, are the smaller player. Even though power consumption doesn't seem to sway many it's worth bearing in mind that 100 Watt difference is about € 70 per year, assuming an average of 4 hours daily use.
Just as with LCD, OLED will benefit from economies of scale but is set to benefit even more so from the "additive manufacturing" technique based on the work from Dupont and others that's already licensed. It's going to need to be as well because of the still unsolved problem of OLED ageing.
Regarding upgrading - OLED screens combine the beautiful blacks of plasma with LCDs low power. The colours tend to be slightly oversaturated but you can, of course, control that. Even though I've only recently bought a beautiful LCD screen I would definitely consider trading it for a comparable OLED under € 3000.
He's from PWC so, of course, he knows nothing about things actually work, just how to charge companies large amounts of money for wasting their time.
As long as there is added value in any of these services, then there is a business model for the infrastructure as the networks in Africa, India and even Afghanistan demonstrate. In Ghana, the government has even started using the same model for collecting revenue. Governments sometimes have no choice but to take a backseat approach to such developments which risks encouraging monopolies. So, regulation and good governance are probably more important that investment programmes, though shared infrastructure (government-owned or contracted towers and backhaul with operator cells) will probably more common as the technology becomes more ubiquitous and standardised.
+1 for Google
They really are coming on in leaps and bounds. I think the Nexus 7 is an attempt to kickstart the market for publishers on Android which has been very sluggish, especially for pads. Google, like Amazon, happy to be a loss-leader in the device market. It's small enough to leave room for other partners to release larger, added value versions and building it with Asus should put paid to the myth that Motorola Mobility is some kind of preferred partner.
Jelly Bean seems to be underlining on the software side what the hardware side has been showing for the last few months: technological superiority over IOS. The graphics rewrite is long overdue and the key area where IOS has been ahead of Android. Offline voice recognition is very impressive.
The Nexus Q looks like a vanity project, which is why they were also giving them away. Might be interesting to see what people come up with. I'm currently looking for some kind of home media system and have not yet seen anything that would really do. I can see a cut-down version of the Nexus Q being it.
You forgot to add that it isn't even a distro. Still, more likely to be the future of consumer-facing linux but one without stupid fucking penguins and silly licensing. Wouldn't surprise me to see them even swap the kernel for something else.
Re: Illegal or not... The raid had the "desired" effect...
Now that there is a precedent I think you'll find they're likely to spring back into action but might have some tougher T&Cs and use of GeoIP to restrict access from the US.
Re: Buy British!
A special thanks to the EU for another pointless piece of bureaucracy.
Yeah, that safe harbour thing, which prevents the FBI, the CIA, and pretty much anyone with letterhead paper from taking a peep without a warrant at your database is just "another point piece of bureaucracy".
I guess I wouldn't mind if this was just Silicon Roundabout but just like toast falls butter-side down, these fools might be involved in policy making at some point...
Meanwhile from the basement:
4.17 [#/sec] (mean)
The competition must be quaking in their boots.
Dear El Reg, is this going to be the article with the most fails ever?
Pity it isn't a real service. :-( That would be my kind of network.
Might make a summer project out of it. You can't post anything unless you've got two ticks. Fortunately, for really important stuff you can simply leak the information.
Re: site down
I'm not sure that will even be necessary. It looks like it's PHP + MySQL so, unless there's connection pooling and a good DBA around, max connections will be an issue pretty quickly and someone will need to add a lot of indices by hand if they don't want queries to die the agonising death of file scans.
Ouch, and before anyone asks, this isn't hacking or DoS.
ab -n 1000 -c 10 http://www.menshn.com/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking www.menshn.com (be patient)
apr_socket_recv: Operation timed out (60)
Total of 33 requests completed
Re: site down
14:43 it's down again.
I wonder if this hasn't been stolen from a future "In The Thick Of It" script? You can just imagine Malcolm Tucker and his adversary setting up rival social networks...
The icon is for the bozos who set this up.
You can also see it as a way for manufacturers to outsource the often terrible UIs and remote controls. Take the user part of the OS out of the telly and give it an API. Control all the house's telly with one device and incidentally make wireless streaming between devices even easier. After all this is what Apple TV does.
I can see people going for the remote alone on this. While I like my Philips remote control and DNLA works pretty well, it's useless for searching: while music has bands, albums and genres films are just one long list.
Damning by faint praise
Windows Phone 8 provides a consistent interface, not a competing service, and that could be as critical as any other feature Windows Phone can boast.
Nicely done, Bill, tucked down at the bottom you point out that Windows Phone 8 does little to suggest that it will be any more successful than Windows Phone 7. Plus, it's still vapourware, while Google is already out there gaining experience and signing up customers. Apple, meanwhile, is pressing ahead with its own NFC-free, gatekeeper system. Again, gaining experience, educating punters and acquiring customers.
While I'm a great fan of NFC for all kinds of things, I reckon that payment by NFC is a bit like the new videophone: touted by all kinds of vested interests but greeted with a shrug of the shoulders by consumers. I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that, as soon as my wallet is my phone, it's even more likely to be stolen? I like paying the banks to provide reasonably secure infrastructure: cash machines, payment terminals, etc. It means I don't have to assume the responsibility for securing them myself.
Re: ok - if you believe this
Apart from the smart meter - not available here but I'm not that convinced by them - I already do. My electricity is supposedly* 100 % renewable and costs the same as the other sort.
* Unless I'm directly connected only to renewable sources this isn't possible but my provider is obliged to buy and, more importantly, provision from renewable sources. We're already at nearly 20 % renewables here: http://www.swd-ag.de/privatkunden/strom/stromkennzeichnung.php (in German).
Re: I am against "renewable" power.
if you actually THINK for a moment, actually impact the environment DIRECTLY.
You've got to love the power of fallacious appeals to common sense, it's what makes American political debate so utterly full of spurious shit. You, sir, are clown of the week.
Houses, office buildings, roads. bridges, dams, ships, ports, oil rigs, etc. all affect the local winds and tides. Then there's farming and forestry. Or didn't farming had anything to do with the 1930s dustbowl?
Re: When channels show ads
I've noticed that all channels seem to do adverts at the same time
Ever since there has been commercial television this has been known as "the chicken race": the first channel to launch the break is going to lose the greatest number of viewers. This behaviour is well-understood and measurable unlike most of what the article covers.
Re: Units of Time
Bugger that! Time is obviously defined relative to the time it takes to down a pint of non-fizzy beer. This allows for relativity making Mondays very slow, lunchtimes too fast, and an excuse to knock-off early on a Friday so that you can "recalibrate your watch!"
And your point is?
The main point of the legal case is to establish guilt, presumably of negligence.
"Injury" is a legal term and covers al manner of things including inconvenience. Whilst I agree that the case may indeed be opportunistic I do think it a perfectly reasonable use of the class action legislation so that once the legal points have been decided further individual cases are not required. I'm ambivalent as to whether I want the case to set a precedent in this. Technically, I think that LinkedIn is guilty of sloppy programming and basically negligence - a bit like a builder skimping on cement in the concrete. But I'm also aware that some of the sites I have worked on myself in the past don't have the best security. However, I suspect the case will spend most of its time worrying about how the data was obtained.
Re: Definitions - are you sure?
Yes, I am sure, seeing as I said "salt or system [for generating a salt]". Because it's systematic it's never arbitrary.
Salting adds extra arbitrary data to a password when it is hashed
Not quite. Any system will use the same salt, or system, for all passwords. So salting is only as safe as the salt and the security is that rainbow tables generated for one site will not work with others.
Re: Geo racial profiling?
Atlanta is pretty cosmopolitan thus the students with international backgrounds living there.
Very weird making stores the gatekeepers though. That's what customs officials are for: person has electronic equipment with them? check boarding cards and massive database and follow instructions.
Re: Not upgradeable is not ok
I suspect this will be down to the kernel not being backported to whichever ARMs run Windows Phone 7. Existing manufacturers aren't going to pay for something that won't sell more phones and you can bet quite a lot that Intel has contributed to the kernel which will mean restricting options even more. Expect Windows 8 phones to be even more identikit than Windows 7 ones. Be interesting to see how long anyone thinks it's worth trying to compete with Nokia - that might be Microsoft's long game.
Any comparison's with Android's upgrade strategy are flawed. While the problems with more recent versions (Gingerbread, Honeycomb, ICS) are largely down to the vendors and networks, they're not all that great and the number of DIY kits that allow you to upgrade yourself. Sure, that's very poor customer service driven partly by the desire to sell newer toys but also by the inability to manage the code base. Earlier changes included more significant work on hardware support so upgrades from 1.x based hardware beyond 2.x weren't really possible,
You can’t do code coverage with a dynamic scripting code
Python does have a coverage module for use with one of the testing frameworks. I don't know how that compares with Java and .NET equivalents but I do think it is wrong to categorically assert that coverage can't be obtained for dynamic languages but 100% is possible for unit tests.
Sure, there are cases where the code can be mutated in runtime but these are minimal and should only come from people who are happy to shoot themselves in the foot or prepared to use PyPy to create a statically compiled version of their code.
I thought that the debate had moved on from simple static vs. dynamic into horses for courses. Statically compiling does not remove all sources of errors, which is why we have testing. It does allow for much better memory allocation which is one of the main reasons that compiled code runs faster.
Apples and Oranges
These languages are "breaking into the enterprise" partly because some of the startups that used them are becoming enterprise. There have been some early successes in certain domains: banks like Python because one of the popular backend systems (I forget the name) exposes the C++ via Python; ILM and Disney were early adopters, because like many others, they discovered its advantage for plumbing other bits together and helping move lots of data around, NumPy and SciPy are moving from the scientific community to enterprise - NASA and ESA are now modelling jet engines in Python.
The jobs fair at this year's PyCon was a veritable who's who of "large" companies: Google, Facebook but also Cisco and Morgan Stanley.
Re: PHP , Python : legacy languages
C#/Java code with high code-coverage during functional & performance testing is less likely to fall-over and need constant maintenance.
A good testing strategy will save many a project and should be independent of the programming language; assuming the language provides nice access to testing tools. I'm not sure what you mean by "functional testing", i.e. whether this is a synonym for unit-testing (terminology may be indicate language bias) also also includes more user-side testing, which unfortunately breaks very easily. A key side-effect of testing is that the premises and hypothesis behind the code become exposed. When it comes to maintenance, and I think the metrics show that more time is devoted to software maintenance than to development, readability counts.
Re: Well I think it looks great
the next couple of generations of Intel chipsets will start matching/beating the current ARM generation in terms of power consumption
You used the wrong icon for trolling... ARM chips are more power efficient because they use fewer transistors to get the work done. Intel's advances are in making chips smaller and cooler but they can't erase that fundamental difference. So, you have Intel competing in a design race it can't win unless it breaks backward compatibility and the various fabs competing with Intel's considerable process nous. The economics are important: Intel can afford to sell its chips for a lot of money so it can afford to continue investing heavily in process and plant. As ARM chips sell for a lot less, the fabs have to sell a lot more of them to be able to continue to invest in process and plant. But the combination of TDP and price is making ARM attractive to areas outside phones, boosting volume. From my own back of the envelope calculation the lead that Intel has on the competition in terms of process is shrinking: Intel is dropping down to 22nm geometries just as the fabs are moving to 32nm, they stayed on 60nm and even 90nm for quite a while after Intel had dropped to 32nm. Plans to go down to 22nm have been announced and in this the fabs profit from the continued commodification of chip design forcing them to co-operate with each other (the volume is high enough) to cover the increasing costs of each new generation, just as such economics are starting to turn against Intel: should there be a significant take-up of ARM-based servers anywhere, expect Intel to drop prices.
CAPTCHA's no longer pit man against machine - most of them have become so annoying that I often give up - but increasingly man against man but with vastly different incentives. The CAPTCHAs I come across are generally related to getting access to some kind of website service and have little marginal value. Post-submission validation by e-mail seems to work just as well and is far less irritating, but where CAPTCHAs are used to protect identity then the thieves have a far greater incentive to attempt to crack them.
...is not what Apple likes to do. It likes to buy in, package nicely and sell on to the customer with a nice margin. Which is why Siri uses Wolfram Alpha, the chips come from Samsung, etc.. Otherwise Apple probably would have bought TomTom for maps and Yahoo for search. They could probably by both for well under USD 20 billion.
Apple still makes the vast majority of its profits from its hardware and uses the software and services to tie people to it, a point that El Reg's Mr Orlowski made many years ago. This was the unsaid message from the Android swipe last week - the small percentage of IOS users on older versions is the same small percentage on older phones. All the rest have already bought a shiny new one.
Re: Silicon Roundabout
The reference was somewhat tongue in cheek. There are more than enough IT clusters close enough to visit - ARM, and co. in Cambridge. I just like the Day Today style implication of how school funding is now so poor that the winter ski holiday has had to be relocated from Lake Tahoe to St Moritz.
Spending money on
In February we took 40 of those GCSE students to Silicon Valley. ...He added that his school used to teach scratch programming until specialist school funding was scrapped and it was no longer able to do so
So funding for school trips from London to Silicon Valley is there but not for programming. Not wanting to go overboard without all the facts but that sounds like a problem of priorities. Anyway, why go all the way to Silicon Valley to find out about computers? Surely, Silicon Roundabout is closer? Or how about pointing out that computing skills don't just get you jobs in the computer industry?
Re: Apples and Oranges @Charlie Clark
I want my lolly!
The right to fork
Git gets high marks for its commitment to the cardinal rule of open source: the right to fork
Ouch! Forking is easy with any VCS, it's merging that is so damn difficult and for which Git, Mercurial and Bazaar and others rightly get their attention.
DVCS have some great advantages such as allowing commits while offline but also some disadvantages especially on very large projects. Github really struggled when Haiku moved to it.
Anyway, although I'm one of the Mercurial fan boys, it's not really your choice of VCS that matters but that you have one at all.
Re: Apples and Oranges
Is anyone surprised? Par for the course, just missing something like "a valuation of $ 100 billion looks a bit small"!
Still, he must be doing something right for El Reg to keep inviting him back on. I wonder if it works like this: Mr Asay writes something nice about some friends of his in the valley which is good for their next round of funding. The article gets lots of clicks and views on El Reg which is good for their figures. And we all get to show how clever we are by pointing out the elementary flaws in the argument. Win, win, win?
I'd rather have seen a seriously long-life ARM-based machine. Will be keeping the current MacBook Pro around for at least another year and giving some money to Samsung instead.
Re: Oh, c'mon.
Don't equate OS with the underpinnings. While I think the BSD userland is wonderful, the NeXTStep framework and GUI are just as much part of the OS but the port couldn't really happen until it was possible to virtualise PowerPC commands fast enough (Rosetta + Intel Core Duo) to remain usable.
Re: OS X & x86!
In essence the big factor was that Apple were far sighted enough to support Bootcamp
Running on x86 meant that virtualisation tools such Parallels were a very viable option without even having to worry about dual-booting.
Re: a hands-on perspective about mongo use
Indeed, very informative. People wanting simple and fast key/value storage for part of an application should look Postgres' H-store data-type.
Another large-scale, write-heavy Postgres-based application:
Still in operation and significantly scaled-up.
What are "operational" and "analytical" databases?
Databases are categorised by how they store and manage data, aren't they? Relational, hierarchical, network, etc. I'm obviously behind the curve on this. Time to resurrect my plan to serialise all data via Twitter!
Not taking the change of manager into account is a serious flaw.
Re: Stupid Apple
That, and the fact that the court may well decide again that it doesn't have the jurisdiction.
Fire the lawyers, Apple, and spend the money on more innovation.
Less of the bile, please
The SIII is innovative in so many ways that stand out from the crowd including Apple. I, along with many, think the size might deter a few but other things like "picture in picture" and intelligent use of the webcam will definitely sell.
Apple has fantastic products and very distinctive styling: the minimalist design of just glass and steel of the Iphone 4 is chic. As long as they can continue to produce such wonderful things, they needn't worry too much about the competition but should respond to the challenge by being even better. I'm not convinced they are doing this.
The recent spate of lawsuits reminds me of Yahoo's recent salvo against world + dog in a feeble attempt to prop up the share price.
I don't know. Discussions with a friend of mine at a bank said they were in a similar situation with the next upgrade pencilled in for 2014 / 2015 at the earliest, if at all.
I can see Windows 8 tablets finding their spot in the heterogeneous environment but not if they are hopelessly crippled as currently seems the plan. If people can't use their existing version of Office then why should they bother with Windows? MS will need very good arguments to get management to swap Ipads for Wintabs and paying for existing software isn't one of them!
On planet earth
The multinational <insert name here> I work with is still busy rolling out XP - Windows 7 upgrades. So no quick upgrade there. At the same time a policy for Ipads has been rolled out and Iphones are due next. Once management migrates completely away from Windows based desktops you can expect them to allow the plebs to do so as well. That process may well be completed before the next upgrade cycle is due and put the whole idea of such a cycle into question.
Consumers don't normally get to choose the operating system on the kit they buy. It was only the revolt of the corporate customers that got OEMs to get Microsoft to extend the life of XP and offer them a choice while VIsta was being pushed.
The guy from Acer must be very glad that they also make Android devices.
What are these feet and metres you speak of?
Surely, if the altimeter had been calibrated to use internationally recognised units such as linguini this "schoolboy error" could never had happened?
Multicore is great a match for Android on ARM but there are no magic bullets for scheduling and I/O. The mobile phone market has validated both the multi, specialised core (CPU for managing the user, DSP for signal processing, etc.) and SoC (squeeze processing and radios onto the same component), which is why Intel and AMD are playing catchup with the unified architectures.
ARMs smaller, weaker cores offer greater efficiency for the majority of tasks, whereas as Intel's larger, stronger single core shines at individual disciplines. If it weren't for the GPU Intel would shit on ARM for rendering websites which is a surprisingly complex task. But the GPUs are there offload the rendering to.
Intel's advantage in chip-manufacturing is essential to be able to compete in the mobile market. But, as long as its unit costs stay at least a factor higher than the competition, it can't afford to maintain that advantage forever. And it's not even as if the competition is that far behind with the move to 32nm already happening.
Why are people trying to confuse two issues - cookies and passwords? Your statement is false - permission is not required for essential cookies, ie. where state must be persisted.
While I think some kind of legal action is necessary to determine whether not observing certain procedures can be counted as negligent, I'm petrified that some judge or committee gets to come up with definitive procedures in much the same way that financial regulation tries to prevent the last crisis. However, there will be considerable inertia to overcome before any such suit can be launched as any judgement would set a precedent for every website out there inviting serial copycat suits.
Passwords are flawed. Support for secure two-factor authentication must become universal but the governments are dead against it as they will argue that only they or naughty terrorists need to keep anything truly secret. Viz. the case brought against someone who refused to give the Truecrypt password for their disk drive.
Re: Who writes this crap?
You make a valid point but spoil it by the tone. It is always a bit embarrassing when people who don't understand something describe it but at least Brid was highlighting the key failure in the procedure.
I wonder if not salting and encrypting passwords will soon be considered as negligent.