"Study sponsored by EMC"?
3458 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
"Study sponsored by EMC"?
Having an app that performs a service using the system API means that app may screw up.
And? How is that going to make the system unstable? If the system is not providing APIs for this then it's going to be tightly coupled and much more difficult to maintain than one using an API.
This would require that they shoe-horn every cloud service into the current API
No, alternative services would have to provide code that fulfils the API. That is the whole point of an API.
Alternatively, they would have to add to the API to cover the cases that could not be driven within the current API.
a Skype client that doesn't allow old style Skype logins…
Is anyone still really using Skype? Only a matter of time before Microsoft starts closing down the old style accounts and forcing its UI abomination on the holdouts. For the odd time I use it I still have my pre-eBay Mac OS client; you know the simple one that just works.
Also don't see why they should support other competing cloud services instead, increases the risk of unreliability and bloatware in an Android-like way…
That is complete bollocks. Allowing users to choose different services has nothing whatsoever to do with unreliability and bloatware.
If I'm already using a service such as Dropbox to sync my data to, why shouldn't I be able to continue doing so? By preventing this Microsoft is throttling competition. By all means provide a default but let the user choose to decide otherwise.
giving users a chance to do a little more than point, shoot and…
Why and? Point and shoot is what most people do with any camera, especially phones. I know Nokia has some very clever and good technology in the cameras in their phones but most people do just want stuff to work as quickly and simply as possible.
You praise Windows Phone 8.1 but how far does it go to resolve the gripes that people have with the previous version?
So thumbs up for the effort, but there is a need for an independent review effort…
That is a loaded statement. Code review is always good and should be part of the development process. However, let's think about the suggestion in the context of the OpenSSL debacle:
1. The fork was started after a code review
2. Any good fork should aim to pass at least all existing unit tests
3. There already exists sophisticated penetration testing infrastructure for testing the known weaknesses of OpenSSL and discovering new ones both in it and LibreSSL
4. Code counts - the best way to discover defects is to make the code available
If LibreSSL can pass the existing tests then it is as secure as OpenSSL. Cutting a release will encourage the security experts to scrutinise it and competition here between the two projects can only be good.
Mavericks is pretty well loved by owners of older Apple gear.
Not by me it isn't because it won't run on my MacMini because Apple won't do a 64-bit version of the graphics driver.
Most importantly for me: I wish Apple would move to OS + ports release schedule so that all the Posix plumbing can be updated outside OS updates.
I find Mavericks more stable and responsive than Lion or Mountain Lion and many of the bugs introduced in the move to x86_64 in Snow Leopard still need resolving.
And they had a good year last year. Tablet replacement cycles seem longer than phone ones, something that was also reflected in Apple's most recent report.
Samsung continues to invest in technology and I think may be well placed to benefit from Google's next Android offensive.
Well, yes but… coffee grinds are not neutral for the garden. On the one hand they are full of nutrients, but on the other caffeine can also function as a herbicide.
You mean something like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPgqfnKG_T4 ?
It uses OpenCV for image recognition.
If, as usual, the exploit is only exploitable by side-loaded apps then users are largely on their own as they have to set the phone to allow installs from other sources themselves.
It's a different matter if it can be exploited by apps from the official store but even then it's not really the carriers who need to worry.
You're saying they're not vetted thoroughly before being hired?
Who's they? You mean cleaners and baggage handlers and the security head-the-balls who, at least in America, don't even get paid the minimum wage? Sure, they're subject to thorough vetting and regular checks…
And what about the small army of poorly paid cleaners, security and baggage handlers that routinely pass through all checks with impunity?
It also depends upon whether the weather can be relied upon to come from the same direction for the duration of your stay.
Sure, which is why I'm sceptical: the prevailing winds for Rockall may be from the SW but the north Atlantic does experience significant changes of wind directions as the various system move across.
As you're only strapping the container to a sheer face you're also still not compensating for leverage as you would if you really could dangle between faces so I don't see much difference to pegging it on the ledge: you're at the mercy of the weakest link so aerodynamics are possibly the most import consideration.
Dangling from a cliff face might have been the better option at the time, from the sound of it.
Colour me stupid but I fail to see how dangling is going to give more stability. I can imagine some form of suspension on all sides being used to help diffuse the energy from the wind but how would that work here? How would you stop the thing from being smashed against the cliff face?
Interesting point, upvoted, however stunts are publicity and publicity means awareness and so more donors.
You might expect that (seems to me like a very American position to adopt) but the numbers say not. The experience of many charities is that big, stuntish events tend to raise the take for individual events but lower the annual take. Plus, you keep on having to raise the bar. Little, but often is more effective which is why many charities now employ professional fundraisers and try to get people to subscribe to regular donations.
Yep, and given the number of alternatives already in Germany I don't see this having legs for anything beyond things like CDNs.
Non-roaming telephone users are subsidising those who do roam…
More nonsense: roaming incurs little or no costs for operators. Therefore, there is no (cross-)subsidy. If there was, then the European Commission might be obliged to act under the provisions of the Treaty of Luxembourg, aka known as the Single European Act, signed for the UK by dear, darling, dead Dame Thatcher.
but it raises the phone bills of everyone else
Nope, this is not the case: mobile telephony and data charges continue to fall around Europe. The network operators were given plenty of time to adjust to the changes and did so largely by offering bundles and consolidating network infrastructure. I certainly get more value from my UK PAYG SIM than I did 5 years ago.
does not represent anybody, has no democratic mandate and can never be voted out of office
As is true for any civil service, which is what the Commission is.
Tuesday, while Europeans using their smartphones beyond the EU will face much bigger bills as local carriers respond to the expected drop in sales resulting from the ruling by upping prices elsewhere.
While that may have been the case in the past it simply isn't true any more. Sure, calls outside the EU/EFTA are still more expensive but I continue to see prices falling around the world. This is down to: EU policy setting a precedent; customers getting smarter and using local SIMs where possible; technological change.
is what the document reads like. Also, while it's nice listing the issues and the objectives it's missing the solution: when are the issues going to be addressed and who will be doing it? LibreSSL makes more and more sense: concentrate on getting the core functionality right first.
Why would closing this service be any different to the other services that Google has closed over the last few years? But equally, why should closing yet another marginal service have any affect on the professional, paid-for services such as docs and mail? Users of such services are protected by contracts unlike the users of free services, though I suspect the free versions will stick around in one form or another to entice people to use them. Personally, I don't use many of Google's services apart from the search.
And that's the way it will stay for those who can be bothered.
@paul how about having a look at the "Material Design" docs to see? They're not perfect but the show that it's not a "Metro moment".
On a race bike there is always a strict tradeoff between technical advantage and weight. Particularly on hills there is a desire to spare every gram possible. It was not unusual for people to file or drill things that they thought they could do without. There are even those who consider something like a computer as too much extra weight.
Recently, however, carbon fibre frames have put a floor under the practical weight of a bike - much lighter and they won't really be ridable. You still won't find most of the gimmicks on a race bike but electronic gearing might be nice on a hill as that's the place that you're likely to have problems changing gears. I can also imagine some of the hard core preferring indicators over hand signals so they don't have to take their hands off the bars.
In real life there is usually more weight to be saved on the rider than on the bike so there is more room for creature comforts. Hub dynamos are down to around 450g and can easily provide enough power to charge a phone - handy if you're planning an extended camping trip.
It isn't translation but transcription or transliteration. Or how else do you think we got the word algebra?
Does the upscale to 4K and latest panel negate the "cartoon" look of LCDs versus Plasma screens? I will wait for the professional reviews
OLED has a huge colour gamut and blacks as black, if not blacker, than plasma. But they tend to come poorly calibrated (oversaturated, too high contrast and not enough gamma) from the factory. You're right to wait for the professional reviews but I think you're likely to be surprised as to how good big OLED screens really are.
Access has some use like for a single user
No, it doesn't. There's almost always something more suitable around.
I still sometimes wonder how the muppets got on
They probably went on to found some NoSQL company and are busy at the moment drinking cocktails paid for by our pension funds!
Yeah, I just rely on Google/Apple/etc. to tell me what I've been watching!
Oh, I don't know. Eternity might be a whole lot closer while they try and figure out how to write queries in Access… Access' version of SQL is somewhat special!
My understanding of unified field theory isn't the best but I thought that for forces to work on each other wave/particles ("gravitons in the case of gravity) of force had to be exchanged. Does this mean black holes are not black to gravity? Or does the curvature of space time provide a sufficient explanation?
No, I'm not talking about abusing arrays to create enums. But when an array is your datatype, all operations on it will be working with the array rather than its component values. Calculating the distance between geospatial coordinates is one example of this, but there are plenty of others in other scientific fields.
@BlueGreen - I think the idea would be along the lines of the GIS coordinate model so the fields in your tuple are themselves tuples (or possibly even tuples of tuples) and the calculations that may be associated with them.
SQL could be in line to be moved on from “venerable” tag to “obsolete”…
NoSQL is supposed to be "not only SQL". Why is it that you lot continue misreading SQL for RDBMS and proclaiming the end of the relational database. SQL as a language has many drawbacks and pitfalls but it isn't about to go away: for the majority of large-scale data storage systems it is the only reasonable solution. Key-value and document storage systems may have their place alongside relational ones but any attempt to replace them will require reinventing them.
They have their own OS, and they don't use it by default internally?
Which OS would that be exactly? Android, Chrome OS or one of their server versions?
I applaud the undogmatic use of the Mac: the hardware is good to develop on and works well with external AV. One of Google's strengths is its promiscuity - making its services available to all and sundry. In this Android is only a means to an end.
And for presentation work MacOS video drivers are more reliable than Linux ones. I've seen a number of crashes when plugging Linux laptops into projectors.
The design changes will easily be handled the GPU and shouldn't really affect battery use that much. The main power drain will continue to be the illumination of the screen and any decoding of image or video formats.
Better battery use can be achieved with a runtime that uses less memory and compiles more efficiently. Better compilers are now possible on the newer chips. With the right combination, more apps can be moved in and out of RAM, which requires power, faster.
But based on my devices I'd expect to see better management of the radios. On all my devices, disabling wifi is the single best method of range extension.
Yes, and no. You can certainly see both aspects of Metro and IOS 7 in the new Google stuff and this is as it should be. MS rushed Metro into all versions of Windows 8 and didn't think it through properly: tiles are an excellent approach as is large type and bold colours but they become a problem when you have a lot of them on large screen. MS also didn't invent the "stack and tile" approach.
The paired back icons and areas are definitely a nod to IOS 8 but seem less slavishly puritanical: I particularly like the thought given to (coordinated) transitions. Luke Wroblewski, as ever, wrote a great article on designing for IOS 7 which highlight that good design essentially iterative. This is as true for individual works as it is for frameworks.
@Trevor: shut up, bend over and take it like a good little ally.
The legislation's a start but I can't see Congress passing anything much before the next presidential election. Anything that gives rights to foreigners is bound to be suspicious the Tea Party freaks.
The EU is large enough to have to be listened to in trade deals but I don't think the loss of safe harbour will worry US companies too much.
EnterpriseDB offers its own version of PostgreSQL, targeted particularly at Oracle installations. It's not a NoSQL company.
I remember those days and, while I'm not particularly interested in this IDE, I do recognise the difference: this is built as an extension, i.e. you shouldn't notice it's their if you don't explicitly load it.
Nowadays the JS runtimes are approaching the speed of native code. Gary Bernhardt gave an entertaining talk about what possibilities this offers at this year's PyCon.
Colour me surprised: lobby makes up numbers in report designed to further its interests.
And how exactly do you expect to be billed for this? It would be possible if you were prepared to pay different prices for each call you made depending on the network. And your SIM is necessarily tied to one network for some modicum of security, you're still going to have some kind of base charge (minimum annual spend).
The comparison with Netflix is invalid: Netflix is not a network. A better comparison would be local loop unbundling which has been shown to work (improve coverage, competition and investment) in some countries reasonably well. It doesn't solve problems with white space but there are other approaches, usually based on some kind of public service model (see the French one above) for that. Scandinavia also has examples of how to solve the problem.
What are the incentives for improvements (or even maintaining the current standard) if they pool the services?
Certainly, during build out having the ability to plan your own network is a competitive advantage. Long-term centralised network ownership that is independent of the operators is the most likely outcome. Indeed this has already been happening for years as equipment get into the business of supplying the network rather than just the kit. You still need to balance the demands by the networks of lower costs with those of capacity and coverage. The model might be the rail network… the experience of which varies from country to country.
It was also an essential part of O2's buildout as the fourth network in Germany. It was switched off by O2 presumably because it cost more to keep paying for it (costs no extra to the customer) than build out where it was economically viable and leave white space where not. Establishing the charges - the termination fees could be a model - wouldn't be impossible and if set by Ofcom wouldn't need extra haggling, though you can imagine Ofcom setting floor prices and some operators negotiating volume deals.
White space remains a problem for all operators, which is why licences never stipulate 100 % coverage. In such areas the French solution is reasonable for voice services because these scale predictably: phones need only 2 voice channels at any one time. Data is more of a challenge so you can expect that to be permanently throttled.
The HPC market is still pretty small. In the data centre Intel still has the advantage of backwards compatibility and fear of the potential costs of recompiling all the relevant software for the relevant ARM chips and vendors going out of business (Calxeda). For the foreseeable future it needn't worry too much but once there is an industry standard for the boot process and drivers on ARM things might start to move quite quickly. Of course, the sales guys will be busy doing nice, long-term deals with server makers.