Re: Monopoly debt edition
I like it! Certain properties could also be designated as tax havens.
4491 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
I like it! Certain properties could also be designated as tax havens.
This is consumer electronics you know: continual, minor improvements combined with inbuilt obsolescence is what it's all about.
While you and me might not like it, Apple has already demonstrated that non-removable batteries and storage can be very popular indeed. And this is not just some nebulous brand advantage: how many people have ever replaced the battery in their phone? Unified storage also means not needing to configure whether photos are stored on an SD card or not.
And prices are determined by the market: just as with the IPhone 5c/5s, Samsung found itself selling more "Edge" versions of the S6 than they had anticipated, because the curved screen was seen "to be worth it" by many.
As the market becomes more and more saturated and commodified there will be more attempts for this kind of differentiation. Just think of how luxury watches are manufactured: lots of emphasis on craftsmanship and special materials. OLED screens are still hard to make, curved ones are even harder.
No, we're all have a laugh about it.
Good PR for Viz. Might take out subscription myself.
I wonder if there is any network smart enough to pick this up and promote it. While Facebook mutates into a multi-billion dollar version of the Mothers Union, complete with Mary Whitehouse's seal of approval.
* if it ever was.
Why? Are there any special attractions for donkeys?
I've no idea why OS have bothered
How about because they were asked? And also because they know a lot about maps.
Just compared the image with Google Mars and the OS winds hands down on legibility and orientation and that's because they've taken the trouble of not making something for computers that people may or may not be able to use.
There's a lot to admire in Google's mapping stuff but they're not designed for serious navigation.
A couple other countries have successfully done this (negative interest rates) so rather than being theoretical it is something they could actually consider
Define success? Sweden and Switzerland have done it to push the exchange rate down; Japan is just going into it despite failing to get the economy growing with all other forms of expansive monetary policy.
Negative and near-zero rates have extremely deleterious effects on any form of saving. And, as we're seeing, they encourage the dependency on the Greenspan put: that central banks will always intervene to support asset prices.
The US is fine: capital is flowing back in from overseas and it has low energy costs. Of course, the next government shutdown won't be far away. But there are the slight problems of entitlement and pension funding…
If you raise/borrow money and assume that rates will stay this low forever then you need your head examined.
Except that "new normal" is trying to make cheap debt forever true. The long term problems of this are disastrous: pretty much all insurance-based products (pensions, health insurance) will no longer work. But, hey, who cares as long as we hit our targets for the quarter or year?
Not sure what the point of this post is. The Fed's rate rise just put a floor under the price of money. This has less of an impact on investment (money isn't moving from start-ups to government bonds) than it does on debt. Since 2008 central banks have engaged on huge policies of financial repression combing both low interest rates with money-printing to privilege debt. It was this which helped maintain and then pump up asset prices without any associated economic growth (this was supposed to come from the wealth effect that asset inflation is supposed to bring).
The current market uncertainties have little or nothing to do with interest rates but the resurgence of "risk-off" strategies moving hot money from one economy (China, Brazil, Russia) to another (US, Euro) with an associated correction of some asset values. Cue howls from the finance industry. I wouldn't mind so much about that if it didn't mean that central banks trying more of the same (driving interest rates negative such as in Sweden and Japan): in a risk-off environment this can only drive more money into "safer" bets such as US treasuries, or pushing string as the head of one bank put it.
So, the problem for start-ups isn't necessarily that there is less VC cash around but that the exit strategies are less lucrative: IPO or buyout. Not to worry, however, the financial industry will continue to lobby for the public to take on more of the risk (eg. by accepting bonds as collateral) so that valuations can be more or less maintained until that all-important IPO or sale.
Or come over to the light and use FreeBSD.
Whats needed is a federated thread-able searchable categorisation based messaging protocol. You know, like NNTP
I never really got on with NNTP. The problem with any subscription-based service is the barrier they offer to the casual observer.
I hear that. The only way Atlassian can fix their stuff though is:
I find Atlassian very communicative and responsive. Certainly much better than a few years ago.
Why StackOverflow when there is IRC?
Because IRC isn't searchable and has even more noise? I increasingly find good solutions to stuff on StackOverflow because it's content-focussed (unlike the rest of the crap that seem to be all about growing the network).
Let's hope so. Indeed it looks like the business writers have discovered the problems of too much communication. So we can expect the next fad to be just round the corner.
I do think there is a lot to be said for regular reporting within a project as a way of structuring things and encouraging the communication of problems. But the meeting is just one way of doing this.
Dare is a great album of pop music. Accept it for what it is and you won't be disappointed.
Oh, the mere fact that without it modern civilisation as we know it would cease to exist in a matter of days, along with 90% of the worlds population?
You really think 90% of the world's population is dependent upon fossil fuel? I've got news for you: if the rest of the world develops anything like the same hunger for energy as we do, then we're screwed.
But dont worry your pretty little head about it, keep voting green (or red: not much difference these says).
Ah bless, being patronised by a Tory…
No, because drag costs more energy than pushing gives.
However, advances in aviation are likely to make more of an impact, especially if something like SABRE really can be shown to work.
Anyone get a desperate spam email from Lewis Page in recent weeks looking for work?
That would indicate he had access to our e-mail address which would be quite worrying.
Lewis' articles on anything (especially defence) other than climate change were usually entertaining and thought-provoking. But the climate-change stuff was very partial ranting; a bit like Worstall's stuff on economics. I don't mind reading stuff that I don't necessarily agree with – I might learn something – but do when it's too obviously pushing an agenda.
While I do believe that human development is affecting the planet, I'm also not convinced by the greenhouse effect. But this is largely down to the fact that we simply do not have sufficient historical data. However, I don't think it's something we should bet against. And what advantages do we really have in a dependence on fossil fuel?
Would those be the ones trying to eke out an existence on the micro-payments they receive from Uber, et al.?
I'll only call you patronising if you automatically think someone needs more help and encouragement simply because they're a woman.
Can't be ruled out but only as an initial response – I'm the go to techie for a couple of female friends so it easily becomes a habit. Not really by inclination. Though it works both ways: there are things I ask them about because I haven't got a clue. In both situations you can get into trouble by either assuming knowledge of a subject or its absence.
One thing I have learned, however, is always to ask before grabbing hold of keyboard or mouse.
What's one of them, then? Some kind of cross between an entendre and an entrepreneur with some witty reference to the use of irony in the hipster start up scene?
If you're going to use words you're not sure how to spell then at least use a spellchecker before you post! ;-)
In short, as a whole women contribute more successful submissions to GitHub than men do
Nope, that is a logical fallacy. Just because the study contends that women are more likely to make more successful contributions does not mean that, in absolute terms, they do. I certainly many, many more PRs from men than women.
Anyway, the logic for identifying the gender of the contributors is flawed. That aside, I can imagine a lot of men perhaps tending to be less harsh on code from women and maybe making changes post-merge or to the PR directly. Call me patronising but I know that I do behave differently towards people who I think may need a bit of help and encouragement than others. At a conference recently I saw a presentation by a woman who emphasised how important it is for women to be encouraged in their work, which would seem to fit this pattern.
Conversely, I can be blunt, terse and even downright rude to people submitting shit.
They still have the Patents
Who does? Microsoft? No, Nokia kept hold of all the IP in the deal, Microsoft just got licences.
Yep. progress on Vivaldi has been slower than I expected, but thankfully Opera 12 doesn't rot.
Yes, still waiting for it to mature so I can make it my default browser but the return of the listening to users culture is very welcome.
I understand why Opera dropped Presto for Blink – let's face it Vivaldi does much the same thing – but the rest of the crap: getting rid of bookmarks only to reintroduce them; discover; no extensions on mobile; etc. hardly counts as innovation. I used to enjoy reading the release notes for each version of Opera, now they're just about making it shinier.
The mobile package is more coherent but just not very interesting for me.
I'm sure the developers in Poland are working flat out, I just don't know if they know they're supposed to be working on a web browser.
Where's the suggestion that losses in 2016 are expected? Lower profits due to saturation of the market maybe but, although Wall St types tend to think this, lower profits are not the same as losses.
No, because for all it's delusions, it's still only a city.
Anyway Estonia's already done this.
How about simply being able to buy a phone and reload it with an entirely open-source ecosystem?
Don't really give a toss about the open source bit but already done this with Cyanogenmod, 'cos I hate the crap that comes on a Samsung, too. I have lots of Google apps on it because Google works very hard to make them good but, for example, I've never used GMail and use OSMAnd for maps.
The manufacturers don't really care: they'd rather sell you a new phone than provide you with updates. But the market for "anything just as long as it's open source" is pretty damn small.
I don't think people really care about the OS on their phone. They just want "the damn thing to work" (for their own definition of work) and this will include their favourite apps. Microsoft poured millions into making popular apps available for Windows Phone and look how far that got them. Is Canonical planning to do the same? Or are they planning to provide an Android runtime? Because that's worked so well for Blackberry.
The manufacturers originally went with Google because it was the pass of least resistance to get a smartphone OS quickly and this is what they need to sell devices. They might make noises about selling services but that's half-hearted at best. What they like is selling a new device to someone every two years.
The Chinese have demonstrated that it is possible to have Android without Google's services but that was initially down to government intervention. The services is where the market is. What does Canonical have to offer?
I think we may see any future launches taken down, possibly even by the Chinese. But they are stuck between a rock and a hard place: crackdown on Kim Jong Eun and the country might collapse, leading either to war with South Korea and America or straight to US troops on the border. Of course, if they do nothing then it's increasingly likely that South Korea or Japan will take a pop shot at any future launch leading to war…
The best thing might be to pursue some kind of rapprochement with South Korea leading either to full unification, with a huge demilitarised zone, or a Hong Kong: one country, to systems solution. Strategically Korea isn't that important to China any more: it's far more concerned with the nine-dash line in the South China Sea.
The world’s wealthiest activist shareholder?
Has Ballmer suddenly become like Carl Icahn or Elliott Fund Management? Is he demanding a seat on the board of the company he stepped down from?
If Twitter and Facebook went under, one or more something else would take their place.
We know. Still, even if only for a few days, I can't help thinking that the world would be better place without Twitter & co.
Of course, what really worries me is whether of my savings schemes has been investing in this shit. The German banks seem to have talent for it, as the sub-prime mortgage disaster showed.
This explains why millions upon millions of migrants are pushing into Europe. They have the automatic right not to be kept out.
No, it doesn't. It's the Geneva Convention that guarantees the right of asylum (though not where). As for the reasons people are seeking asylum. Well, they're mainly due to the West's fucking around and stirring up trouble.
US is a privacy-free zone
That might be debatable – the legal positions are on it are starkly different – but what isn't at issue is the fact that the US treats US citizens very differently to aliens. "Aliens", and this includes EU citizens, have very few rights in US law.
The opinion of one prof and one unnamed security expert and no mention at all of the current complete revamp of EU data protection and privacy legislation currently working its way through the institutions which will provide minimum standards throughout Europe.
It's laughable to suggest that existing US law provides adequate protection of EU citizens' data. It'a also laughable to suggest that this is somehow some kind of trade war: the European Commission and the member states were caught as much off-guard by the ECJ's decision as anyone else.
It's perfectly reasonable for Prof Walden to criticise the judgement but is disrespectful to imply that the judges didn't do their job properly. The ECJ has thus far had a commendable record in its judgements, particularly those instances where it instructs referring courts in EU law.
Most people don't want their phone to have a globally-unique and addressable address.
There are privacy extensions for that. And it's certainly not the reason for NAT64. This is presumably for 6to4 traffic in the network because most clients don't do 6to4.
The OpenSSL team now has more than enough money. But it still has a codebase that is unnecessarily complicated due to some weird decisions. Code complexity is anathema to security.
If money is forthcoming, I'd rather see it split between OpenSSL, LibreSSL and research. For server work, LibreSSL already makes more sense unless you have hard dependencies on OpenSSL.
That's where AMD has the advantage.
Of course, Qualcomm's chip designers are no mugs and presumably Google will be able to give them targets and real performance data.
Unfortunately, the A72 occupies the same living space as the A57
Apart from "a bird in the hand being worth two in the bush" the point about ARM chips not being beefy is not just about their power drawer what else they bring to the party. The AMD Seattle is not just a 64-bit chip but something designed explicitly for the data centre with excellent network and memory performance.
Just because we haven't heard anything doesn't mean that Google isn't already sampling the AMD chips. With the volumes its buying it can easily afford to have different chips for web servers, database servers, caches, etc. This also suits the Compute Engine model where Google manages the scalability completely.
It's a bit of both: "mother knows best" and "mother hen" come to mind when thinking of her consensus-driven style of politics.
Her premiership has been characterised by her reassuring Germans that they were doing well while everywhere else was going to hell. Until recently she has studiously avoided adopting a position on any issue until the prevailing opinion in the country became clear. She has also demonstrated considerable skill in removing opponents, particularly putative alpha-males, within her own party and out-flanking the others by shamelessly adopting their positions and reversing policy if necessary. For this she has been rewarded by a population worried by change.
The wheels have started to come off recently ever since she surprisingly adopted a position on refugees and proceeded to break EU law (Dublin II). This initially suited the "mother hen" image and was wildly popular for a couple of months.
As for her record on nuclear power: once, when referring to nuclear accidents she made a comparison with baking noting that when you bake a cake not everything stays in the bowl… Of course, this was long before Fukushima…
Well, I suspect the angle will be whether the website can be seen to be aiding and abetting the abuse of copyright. There are already plenty of instances of links being taken down for all kinds of reasons, with DMCA abuse probably being the most common.
However, the ECJ can only really rule on a point of law and not really on the case in point. Freedom of speech is enshrined in the EU treaties, which the ECJ is required to uphold, so I can't see any judgement that would restrict this. Most likely is clarification of what's at stake and a referral back to the Dutch courts: can a case be made that Geenstijl was complicit in the repeated publication of copyright material? This, of course, needs to be balanced against the defence of free speech in cases like Snowden.
There is precedent in cases like the repeated publication of pictures of Kate Middleton's breasts where the courts had no problem coming down hard on publishers.
I'm beginning to wonder if Twitter is actually for this kind of clickbait.
Anyway, a pint for Lester for calling out this pathetic trend!
Testing can't be rushed, particularly given the radical changes it sounds like they've been forced to make.
Testing should be part of the development process. If it was it might have helped pick up these failures: no package hash, no secure distribution channel a lot earlier.
Anonymous transfers are used for money laundering by organised crime. That alone should be sufficient justification.
The EC should also be after the ECB to phase out the € 500 note for much the same reason.
I'm not sure where Ofcom actually sit in all of this and whether or when they may be asked to present to the EU investigation.
Neither do I. Then again, I don't really know what they do anyway. This sounds like an attempt to be relevant.
I don't watch anything on a small screen except the occasional youtube clip.
Neither do I but my phones does MHL so it's easy to connect to a large screen.
The idea of rooting, installing Cyanogenmod, and then choosing Google as a payments service seems to be totally implausible
Not to me. I root because I want to dump the crapware installed on my phones and to get security fixes faster and for longer.
As for the service provider: I'll use whoever I think offers the best service in a free market.
We should not be afraid of that; we should welcome it, even if it means replying to 300 or 400 e-mails at a time.
Until you do a time and motion study of replying to e-mails.
Slacktivists use technology to assuage their technology-addled and coddled consciences. They play into the hands of the PR brigades who can identify which topics need some well-meaning massaging while the general fuckery is unabated. As long as people are twittering about transgender toilets for sheep, they're not protesting in the streets about the price of food, schools or hospitals.
Taking slackivists seriously is a waste of time and resources. This was cleverly satirised in The News Room which took on the "Occupy Wall Street" protests.
And if you do take slacktivists seriously they won't thank you for it because their goldfish minds will have moved on to the next thing they don't really care about.
You've left me speechless, time for the pub now I think....
Indeed, here's one to get you started.
Many of them still don't "get it".
Sigh. I bet you also believe that "this time it's different"?