Re: Story behind Seattle layoffs
Sounds stupid enough to be true.
3339 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Sounds stupid enough to be true.
Along with the cognitive load of using and of these things there are simple mechanical considerations such as the effect on your steering as you lean over to touch or adjust anything.
The main problem, however, is enforcing much of this. Having a noisy family in the car is probably just as distracting and dangerous.
This is really a splatter-gun approach which fails to grasp the attack. Most of the points are reasonable, though I'd argue that a public server should only install and run the services that it needs. Coincidentally, this is OpenBSD approach.
As (some) others have noted the attack uses remote file inclusion on servers running PHP. There is a simple solution to that… ;-) If you do need PHP then configure it so that RFI is not possible. Relying on defaults and auto-updates in this case are not sufficient.
Using a CDN to soak up and scrub traffic is certainly a good start but your server will generally still be accessible via a sub-domain or via a port-scan.
I think you may be right. The speed of delivery seems to indicate it's not getting the most love. Now that Microsoft and Intel seem to have come up with a reasonable device with the Surface 3 Pro – reasonable as in a lightweight replacement for corporate laptops – I suspect they will be concentrating on that segment and maybe scaling for some purely business devices.
I wonder if this is the last of Lumia's with the spankingly good camera technology which Mr O wryly notes, has been more written about that bought.
Playing devil's advocate here rather than simply bashing Microsoft. I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
What I don't understand is how is competing in the "higher price tiers" the same as no to cheap Android but yes to cheap Windows Phone. I could understand something like "concentrate resources (and sack the rest…)" but that doesn't sound very much like a services first company. The decision, of course, was inevitable whether for brand or engineering reasons but how did Elop let it get so far?
And, as Mr Orlowski has pointed out elsewhere: where are the resources coming from to increase the speed of development? 8.1 has been a long-time in the making, breaks existing stuff and has been released buggy.
PS. you might think about enabling a spell-checker for your posts
as a result more existing Android users are switching to iOS than iOS users are switching to Android
I've not seen any stats outside the US to back that up. All-in-all the I-Phone is better hardware but the differences between the high-end devices are now minimal and I think the halo/lockin effect is diminishing: I know lots of people who have IOS and Android devices and are happy with that arrangement.
re. your other assertion about developers preferring IOS. I don't think that this is still the case. I recently read the first piece of an IOS developer praising Google for their support as his company starts to successfully sell to both platforms. Sure, the margins may be higher on IOS but the size of the Android market often more than makes up for that.
Actually, early on Samsung wasn't really part of the Android picture.
It's classical brand segmentation Brand X (leader) or Brand Y (challengers) or Aldi's own. Doing things worldwide fuzzes things up because Xiaomi is pretty much only available in China. Indeed Xiaomi's numbers suggest that these figures are heavily, and perhaps inevitably, skewed by the Chinese market. Other manufacturers may be doing well in smaller markets. Certainly HTC, Sony and Motorola have started to carve their own niches in the wake of Apple and Samsung.
Good for you that you're happy with that kind of aspirational advertising. Sounds like a load of bull (white not add "brings world peace" to the list?) to me but that just tells us we're different kinds of customers.
I like more specific uses that are relevant to me: phone, camera, mapping, e-mail, listen to music / audio books, battery life, cost, etc.
So Samsung has 5 models in the top 10 – we've no idea what the median or average sales are so the list is fairly meaningless (the 5c in the middle makes me suspicious) – and Apple 3. I If I was Samsung I'd be pretty happy with that, especially with the high margin phones doing so well.
The LibreSSL guys knew that throwing away tons of cruft was going to introduce bugs and problems…
Less code should mean fewer bugs. This looks like a test was missing: "untested code is broken code".
Yep, the release was exactly for this purpose. Whether the exploit is esoteric or not is by-the-by, it was something the developers hadn't thought of. It's been fixed and there is now a test for it.
The title of the paper is misleading but they do state quite clearly.
The target audience for our results is younger economists (graduate students, junior faculty) or researchers who have used the computer less often in the past for numerical analysis and who are searching for guideposts in their first incursions into computation.
The focus on different implementations and compilers is revealing as is the algorithm chosen. The aims to suggest what are the best tools for scientists/statisticians. These people are often not trained scientists and will use whatever tool they know to get a job done. In some situations this will be fine and dandy but in others it will have performance will be unacceptable and they will be open for solutions: using a specialised and optimised library; using a similar high-level language more suited to their task; or a different implementation of their current on; or faster hardware. Learning how to use a low-level language is usually not on the cards.
I wouldn't discount any minor gains for Facebook. A while ago they stated that they serve 600,000 images per second. That's 51.8bn images per day. If they manage to shave even half a kb off each, they save 24TB of bandwidth costs per day.
Sounds good but it's not that simple and the results of the compression are pretty disappointing in my view. Being able to server WebP where possible (ie. all Chrome users so about 40 %) will save a damn sight more without screwing the images much. But it may be something as simple as having a shitty library do the compressing (the tradeoff between speed and quality may actually be more important than bandwidth). Hence the interest in Mozilla's work.
But really, Mozilla, get with it and learn to love WebP.
Microsoft's JPEG-XR is not open source but it's also not worth bothering about. WebP via mod_pagespeed is probably the only sane thing to do (store a nice quality image and mod_pagespeed will handle compression and serve WebP if the browser can read it). HEVC is encumbered not sure about any restrictions on a spun-out bitmap format but I don't expect it to have legs over WebP.
As far as I can tell Facebook uses very high compression settings for relatively little gain.
They didn't flog ALL their ARM to Marvell either. They have an ARM based comms SoC.
AFAIK They did sell all the ARM to Marvell, the comms SoC was bought from Infineon and is a different beast to the pretty impressive StongARMs they had.
ARM trying to breakl into the server room is much like Intel trying to break into mobile space.
It will depend on the kind of servers being required: for some jobs x86 is just what you need, for others it's just too much silicon. Of course, there will only be any kind of take up if the migration between systems is easy enough and we may need a whole new metrics area which works out which services run best of which architectures. I think AMD's approach may work well here: x86 for grunt stuff, GPU for vectoring, custom (ARM) for encryption and standard ARM for simple stuff like http-serving.
As soon as we've got our pals Microsoft to drop all ARM support
Microsoft has pretty much done this already with the Surface 3 Pro being the only Surface 3 in town. Pretty much everyone else has given up making Windows Phone now that Microsoft makes them itself. But the world hasn't really noticed because, despite what the enthusiasts say, Windows Phone is very much a niche player.
But Intel dominates in PC CPUs, and whatever decline there is in PCs will be made up for by increases in servers.
For how much longer? The current server boom coincides but doesn't correlate with the PC business.
ARM is continuing to expand up the food chain and we'll start seeing serious ARM servers over the next 12 months. If any of them deliver significant reductions in capital or operating expenditure we can expect to see the results in Intel's bottom line as it will be forced to reduce prices to maintain market share.
Hey cowardly AC, Then Windows 7 and Office 2010 is it,
Not being facetious but what bits can't you do with OpenOffice? I find 4.1 pretty damn good. Otherwise Office 2011 on Mac is fine. Or do you need Outlook?
Netbooks were/are amazingly awesome. Until Microsoft got/get their hands on them, that is.
It was only the ones with XP that sold in any volume but the concept was really hampered by the restrictions that Intel placed on them, limiting screen size, etc.
Actually, this looks like the Toshiba: http://www.toshiba.com/us/computers/laptops/satellite/C50/C55-B5299.
Around 2kg, only 2GB RAM and poor resolution for the screen size and not very beefy (not removable) battery.
It is an identity service, just not a named identity service. But it couldn't do that without some kind of formal backup such as id cards.
Google+ is the single-sign-on for the Googly services. Google+ serves some people well as communities and others continue to ignore it.
"Manko" means mistake or drawback in German so you can imagine all the fun they have when discussing the reasons for vehicle recall.
Then there's "mushi, mushi" to say hello on the phone. This is funny in German because "mushi" is "fanny".
Oil will be 10% of Scottish GDP. Salmond is talking of getting loans of 3% GDP to stimulate businesses and create unemployment
What more of it? ;-)
Salmond is a smooth talker and a canny (no irony intended) politician (he's still a shit like the rest of them). However, I do think that much like Arafat he may actually prefer remaining First Minister a Scotland within the UK than of an independent Scotland because it is electorally extremely advantageous to be able to blame England/The Tories/London for things.
I hope the referendum in September goes well and sees a large turnout. I also hope that the "better together" campaign finds better arguments than the financial ones. Devolution has been an undoubted success, more of it please including to the English regions. Tax raising powers (and concomitant responsibility).
I can also recommend the piece in this week's Economist that covers many of the practicalities of dealing with independence. Worth reading whatever side you take on the issue.
I refrained from .sssr (Scottish soviet socialist republic) because that would give the wee man even more delusions of grandeur
I don't know. I can imagine Mr Putin being only too happy to help him out: out go the Tridents in come the Russian subs…
Moot: the vast majority of Scots speak a descendant of Anglo-Saxon and not Gaelic (around 80,000 I believe).
The bigger problem is how all these vanity domains erode the underlying sense of the domain name system.
I agree that El Reg got it wrong but my understanding is that it's currently even stevens re. North Sea oil and money from Whitehall.
London has its own collection of subsidised masses: bankers, TechCity and anyone benefitting from the various subsidised mortgage schemes.
This is another example of why American law is so fucked. Sexual harassment should be a criminal offence: report it to the cops and let the public prosecutor take over and not a feast for civil action lawyers fighting not for right or wrong but for the biggest payout.
I think you're the first Dutch person I've come across who dislikes subtitles. All my friends claim that they don't notice them, at least for English language films. Here in good old Jormany we get horribly dubbed films: Clouseau does not have a silly French accent in German versions of the Pink Panther!
So the implication is that studios should be paying the filesharers for the benefit they confer?
Not necessarily. The research does seem to back up the idea that file sharing can act as publicity: whether it's because people dislike screeners (I can't stand them myself) or subsequently decide to watch a film on the big screen or both.
However, one thing file sharing definitely does is displace activity: if you're watching something you've torrented you're not doing something else (such as watching the same item on DVD or TV or out down the pub with your mates). In fact, in many countries torrents of Hollywood films have displaced local films.
Hollywood has for years been griping about sales lost to piracy, and got some nice laws drafted for its efforts, but it has also been far more positive about digital downloads than the music industry. Both have suffered more from expected incomes from format shifts (remember all the CDs we bought for vinyl or DVDs of VHS we already had?) failing to materialise. In music this was coupled with some stupid contracts and artists rediscovering concerts (previously a means to publicise records, now highly lucrative events not least because the record companies were cut out). Hollywood has profited from the proliferation of TV channels as additional means of distribution in the digital age but failed to see those channels as potential threats: HBO, et al. have for years been producing better quality fare of their own and have become more interesting for artists.
It doesn't matter anyway as although the taps were/are illegal there won't be any court cases as a result, partly because they'll be too much leaning on the relevant companies from other governments keen to join in and partly because the "national security" joker would be played preventing any evidence being admitted.
However, it is foolish in the extreme to change the law before a new EU directive has been crafted.
"Study sponsored by EMC"?
Having an app that performs a service using the system API means that app may screw up.
And? How is that going to make the system unstable? If the system is not providing APIs for this then it's going to be tightly coupled and much more difficult to maintain than one using an API.
This would require that they shoe-horn every cloud service into the current API
No, alternative services would have to provide code that fulfils the API. That is the whole point of an API.
Alternatively, they would have to add to the API to cover the cases that could not be driven within the current API.
a Skype client that doesn't allow old style Skype logins…
Is anyone still really using Skype? Only a matter of time before Microsoft starts closing down the old style accounts and forcing its UI abomination on the holdouts. For the odd time I use it I still have my pre-eBay Mac OS client; you know the simple one that just works.
Also don't see why they should support other competing cloud services instead, increases the risk of unreliability and bloatware in an Android-like way…
That is complete bollocks. Allowing users to choose different services has nothing whatsoever to do with unreliability and bloatware.
If I'm already using a service such as Dropbox to sync my data to, why shouldn't I be able to continue doing so? By preventing this Microsoft is throttling competition. By all means provide a default but let the user choose to decide otherwise.
giving users a chance to do a little more than point, shoot and…
Why and? Point and shoot is what most people do with any camera, especially phones. I know Nokia has some very clever and good technology in the cameras in their phones but most people do just want stuff to work as quickly and simply as possible.
You praise Windows Phone 8.1 but how far does it go to resolve the gripes that people have with the previous version?
So thumbs up for the effort, but there is a need for an independent review effort…
That is a loaded statement. Code review is always good and should be part of the development process. However, let's think about the suggestion in the context of the OpenSSL debacle:
1. The fork was started after a code review
2. Any good fork should aim to pass at least all existing unit tests
3. There already exists sophisticated penetration testing infrastructure for testing the known weaknesses of OpenSSL and discovering new ones both in it and LibreSSL
4. Code counts - the best way to discover defects is to make the code available
If LibreSSL can pass the existing tests then it is as secure as OpenSSL. Cutting a release will encourage the security experts to scrutinise it and competition here between the two projects can only be good.
Mavericks is pretty well loved by owners of older Apple gear.
Not by me it isn't because it won't run on my MacMini because Apple won't do a 64-bit version of the graphics driver.
Most importantly for me: I wish Apple would move to OS + ports release schedule so that all the Posix plumbing can be updated outside OS updates.
I find Mavericks more stable and responsive than Lion or Mountain Lion and many of the bugs introduced in the move to x86_64 in Snow Leopard still need resolving.
And they had a good year last year. Tablet replacement cycles seem longer than phone ones, something that was also reflected in Apple's most recent report.
Samsung continues to invest in technology and I think may be well placed to benefit from Google's next Android offensive.
Well, yes but… coffee grinds are not neutral for the garden. On the one hand they are full of nutrients, but on the other caffeine can also function as a herbicide.
You mean something like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPgqfnKG_T4 ?
It uses OpenCV for image recognition.
If, as usual, the exploit is only exploitable by side-loaded apps then users are largely on their own as they have to set the phone to allow installs from other sources themselves.
It's a different matter if it can be exploited by apps from the official store but even then it's not really the carriers who need to worry.
You're saying they're not vetted thoroughly before being hired?
Who's they? You mean cleaners and baggage handlers and the security head-the-balls who, at least in America, don't even get paid the minimum wage? Sure, they're subject to thorough vetting and regular checks…
And what about the small army of poorly paid cleaners, security and baggage handlers that routinely pass through all checks with impunity?
It also depends upon whether the weather can be relied upon to come from the same direction for the duration of your stay.
Sure, which is why I'm sceptical: the prevailing winds for Rockall may be from the SW but the north Atlantic does experience significant changes of wind directions as the various system move across.
As you're only strapping the container to a sheer face you're also still not compensating for leverage as you would if you really could dangle between faces so I don't see much difference to pegging it on the ledge: you're at the mercy of the weakest link so aerodynamics are possibly the most import consideration.
Dangling from a cliff face might have been the better option at the time, from the sound of it.
Colour me stupid but I fail to see how dangling is going to give more stability. I can imagine some form of suspension on all sides being used to help diffuse the energy from the wind but how would that work here? How would you stop the thing from being smashed against the cliff face?
Interesting point, upvoted, however stunts are publicity and publicity means awareness and so more donors.
You might expect that (seems to me like a very American position to adopt) but the numbers say not. The experience of many charities is that big, stuntish events tend to raise the take for individual events but lower the annual take. Plus, you keep on having to raise the bar. Little, but often is more effective which is why many charities now employ professional fundraisers and try to get people to subscribe to regular donations.
Yep, and given the number of alternatives already in Germany I don't see this having legs for anything beyond things like CDNs.
Non-roaming telephone users are subsidising those who do roam…
More nonsense: roaming incurs little or no costs for operators. Therefore, there is no (cross-)subsidy. If there was, then the European Commission might be obliged to act under the provisions of the Treaty of Luxembourg, aka known as the Single European Act, signed for the UK by dear, darling, dead Dame Thatcher.