I always thought that the Instagram logo was pretty good: an iconic retro camera with a flash. I haven't seen it very often but have no trouble remembering it.
The new ones look far too generic.
4584 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
I always thought that the Instagram logo was pretty good: an iconic retro camera with a flash. I haven't seen it very often but have no trouble remembering it.
The new ones look far too generic.
I don't think Bitbucket puts a limit on private repositories and you get to choose your DVCS.
Go to Gitlab,
Allowing Hutchison to take over O2 at the terms they proposed would have been bad for UK consumers and bad for the UK mobile sector.
So fucking what? This is for the UK regulator (OfCOM (joke that it is)) and the Monopolies and Mergers Commission(or whatever it's called) to decide. I'm a fervent European but I don't see, at least from this summary, why the Commission thinks it can rule on this unless it decides that either Three or O2 are getting unfair market share across Europe, in which case conditions could be applied.
The Commission can also get involved if it looks like regulation isn't working. This the logic behind the repeated calls to break OpenReach out of BT because the market for cables in the ground clearly isn't working in the UK. The same goes for electricity distribution in countries like France and Spain.
The patches for Office alone are close to 1 GB. Rolling this shit out across a large network is not fun.
I've no love for Linux but at least the unix crowd have always understood the sys admin's needs.
All the figures look like Lego™ people. Will someone please think of the copyright!
Apart from the apparent love-fest between Putin and Trump. Reminds me of Berlusconi and Putin. Of course, if Trump does get elected, he'll do pretty much exactly what the banks and big business tell him to.
Granted the EU sparked a war in Ukraine where the Russians annexed land they loaned to Ukraine
Don't you just love Russian-apologist revisionism? Even if Kruschev's donation of Crimea to Ukraine was a bit of harmless fun back in the day, it became permanent with the fall of the Soviet Union with Russia agreeing to accept Ukraine's borders in return for Ukraine returning the nuclear weapons stationed there. Had the new nukes still been stationed in Ukraine, Putin might have thought twice about his "little green men".
It's all about appearances rather than outcomes: "don't worry that you haven't got enough to eat, look at our lovely missiles and don't forget to vote for me". Russia doesn't want war with anyone with real weapons: remember the plane shot down over the Turkey-Syria border?
More interesting will be whether Russia has managed to replace the electronics that the Ukrainians used to develop for it.
Long term all the weapons tech in the world probably won't do it much good once conflict really starts in the Caucuses and the *Stans. And it's doing a bloody good job of stoking this. :-/
It's also not an excuse for not defining the long-term aims of a project. Any project that doesn't do that will fail badly whatever methodology or technology is employed.
I've always thought that the point of agile was that the iterative development and feedback loops help get the details right (because you can't imagine everything at the start) and guarantee that at least something will work.
I don't currently work with .NET but there are some libraries I'd be interested at being able to compile and work with. But I completely failed to learn anything from this article except that beta2 is completely different to beta1. Anyone able to fill me in?
Says a lot about the musical chairs at Microsoft over the last few years.
Yes, what with warnings about Flash plastered all over the page along with warnings that I can't see something from Twitter because "I've got third-party cookies blocked" the BBC website is increasingly devoid of content.
Maybe this is all part of some cunning plan to push users into walled gardens?
Too bad proper British values
What are those then? Child labour? The Corn Laws? Monumental hypocrisy? If we're lucky and Bojo willing, we'll be getting them back soon enough.
The only value here was not taking the whole thing too seriously.
The RRS Sir David Attenborough will be constructed at Merseyside shipbuilding yard Cammell Laird, and is due to enter service in 2019
So, exactly what will be missing from the boat when it is delivered?
Mine's the one that used to have a wallet in it…
The Germans have become quite fond of coining English words in German (Handy, Beamer, Wellness, …) that seem oddly out of context to a native speaker. This seems like another and would go with that abominable song.
On the other hand, the yanks are the ones who came up with "onboarding" for training so maybe the is just more west coast bollocks.
Whatever it's genesis I don't really see this tagline getting much traction. Especially in the next Siemens reorganisation, which can't be that far off.
Pretty much, yes. And sadly typical of Faultline's stuff. A pity in this case as it does indeed sound like the company has done some interesting stuff.
I can't remember the full details of stuff but I think UHD with HEVC wasn't really available on hardware until very recently. When the hardware can do it then you definitely do want to use the hardware. I'd like to think there is some custom hardware in the editing suite.
Broadcasting football matches in high resolution is a challenge but you are still largely working with fixed camera positions and a studio setup. Presumably the cameras aren't encoding on the fly and you probably don't want a mobile server farm to do it for you so you need fibre back to the NOC where you can then transcode in relative peace and scale up as and when needed – presumably this is the core of the "software-defined" approach.
It's also easier for newcomers to leapfrog incumbents technologically. And, expensive as the kit may be, it's a lot less than the money spent on the broadcasting rights. I seem to remember an article on The Register not too long ago making pretty much this point with the shift to HD production as standard for broadcasters.
Still the odd UHD broadcast isn't as challenging as doing the whole channel in it which is what we'll see with the European Football Championships next month and the Rio Olympics. Those will be the real showcases for full-stack UHD designed to entice consumers into buying the necessary kit, connections and subscriptions. Like HD in its time, UHD is likely to remain niche for a couple of years so the whole chain can do everything in hardware.
No, but the German banks will issue them on request.
The costs of production and processing apparently now exceed the value for the smallest coins.
The rounding is now the case in Holland (which used to do it anyway) and Finland and is even, shock, horror, being trialled in parts of Germany, though if you insist you can get exact change.
Sarrazin is right, as are the AfD.
Translation for those not in Jormany: Thilo Sarrazin is a bit like Farage but without the jokes, who shot to prominence with a polemic about Muslims in Germany. Weirdly though he's from the the Social Democrats.
The AfD is the German version of UKIP complete with its own infighting between the turn-the-clock-back brigade and the outright racists. In the European Parliament this means that some of them want to sit with Dave's lot and some of them want to sit with the French National Front.
Exactly. The war on cash has begun. It's time to start hoarding gold while you still can.
Every time you read that you know it's probably the last thing you should be doing…
Sorry to disappoint you but the about the € 500 note is as old as the Euro itself, as is the debate about 1 and 2 cent coins.
The Germans used to have a DM 500 note so the € 500 note was introduced to replace this. However, the Euro turned out to be far more tradable than the DM and the € 500 soon replaced the $ 100 in dodgy deals around the world as the Euro became one of the reserve currencies.
I have heard it on the radio said that some houses and cars are indeed paid for this way but no one I know says they've ever done it. Interestingly, Italy has recently lifted a ceiling on cash transactions that was previously introduced to cut down on tax avoidance, which it seemed to be doing quite well.
The € 500 has no real use in everyday life. The € 200 note won't be withdrawn. Cash is cash so when you don't trust the fiat currency you switch to something else like gold. Though that's not looking too safe as an alternative "store of value" at the moment either.
Getting the Germans entirely off cash is going to be damned hard struggle that I don't see starting soon. The financial repression is working anyway – all the governments are benefitting from the low yields but it looks like we've reached the end of the line for a while at least: the ECB's board probably doesn't have a majority for more money printing.
Lots of detail and a clear summary of the issues.
It might not matter. Schrems is precedent and the UK courts are likely to cite it as they hand out smackdowns. The legal position may then be than the bendiness doesn't apply until the courts approve it.
Going through the courts would be the last resort. But the idea is that the Schrems judgement has set a precedent that gives the EPDB exactly these powers. As a result courts are likely to side with the EPDB all the way up the chain making it pretty pointless for member states to challenge the EPDB over this.
Cue groans of "Brussels bureaucrats stopping the UK government from watering down data privacy…" It could, of course, be argued that defending privacy is a key part of asserting sovereignty: safe harbour being struck down because it was unacceptable transfer of sovereignty. But, surely, no UK government would ever trade away sovereignty?
oh, PHP? To be expected really and I have no sympathy.
It's a command line tool for batch processing lots of your own stuff, never give it anything from an unknown source.
Most programming languages have bindings for the relevant image handling libraries.
Want to get pedantic about this? In that case innocuous might be the most apposite but, certainly for the first part the ASN.1 bug, innocent would also be fine: the parser behaves as expected. In which case blunder is inappropriate.
So, still some work to be done.
Yes, despite the ill-fated Surface on ARM devices, it looks to me like Microsoft fired the first shot here because they made no serious attempt for an x86 version of Windows Phone. The few x86 phones that do exist show that this would be possible: the market as a whole might not like them but they're okay devices. The problem for Intel was that there was no compelling argument, other than sacks of cash, to switch to x86. Intel did lots of work to make Android run nicely on x86, but with more and more apps switching to the native kit, it was only going to get harder to convince sceptical users that "only a very few" of their favourite apps wouldn't run. It only takes one high profile game not to run as expected to kill a platform (shades of MS' private APIs back in the Windows 3.1 days).
No, what we're seeing is Intel's mobile division being burned on Nadella's "cloud first, mobile first" bonfire. "Cloud" also avoids the need for the same architecture on screen 1 (mobile device) as on screen 2 (desktop or whatever). Programs either continue to run on the mobile (ARMs are now powerful enough to drive 5k screens and multitask) or are already running on the "cloud". Just stick somethng like a remote desktop server on the phone and add NFC. Moreover, this is also what companies are buying into: mobile devices accessing tightly controlled services.
I reckon we'll see lots of demonstrations of continuum and the like from MS, Apple and Google this year.
Looks like Postgres is going after a slightly different market or markets. SQL Server tends to do well in vertically integrated stacks using lots of Windows tools.
Postgres via thinks like Enterprise DB's Postgres Plus is targeting smaller Oracle shops with the promise of minimal migration pain and much, much lower licensing and support costs.
The most interesting stuff seems to be going on the proliferation of different backends / storages which make Postgres interesting for the "big data" crowd: time series, columnar storage, etc.
Given that the connections are via a CDN would the client ID actually be available or would Cloudflare have hidden it?
Virtually all CDNs make the traffic logs available to the original sites so the UA is available.
Each month, The Register checks out StatCounter, Netmarketshare and the US government's analytics service…
And each month the articles fail to drawn on The Register's own data and focus on changes the size of rounding errors.
This will just be down to the way the statistics software handles the user agents. A lot of vendors are pretty poor at keeping their lists of user agent strings up to date.
Samsung does provide its own browser for its phones, but they are all still running Android.
A key thing would be to include a measure for total traffic. At the weekend fewer people are sitting at desks and mobile use goes up. Shock, horror. Weekend traffic is often less than 50% than during office hours.
But why let simple mathematics get in the way of some clickbait?
We like it because we're aware of no other publicly available data set at this scale
Well, I have repeatedly suggested that you look at the data that Akamai provides in the Internet Observatory. Data from some of the most heavily trafficked sites in the world so obviously not very interesting.
Indeed. Another indication that the sites that run NetApplications scripts are not necessarily representative. Another opportunity wasted by The Register to compare the data with its own stats.
The stats I watch indicate that Chrome overtook IE back in 2013.
It's set to announce its own mobile processor, to be dubbed the Rifle, at a company event on May 10. The device will license the ARM architecture.
No shit, Sherlock: anyone can license ARM chips. And now that Intel has officially got out of the market, there aren't any alternatives. But there's a big difference between licensing ARM technology and building your own chips, Any details regarding custom hardware?
Yes, but every one sold is lots of cash for Apple.
The bigger question: is there really a market for these devices? Sales are tiny when compared with mobile phones and even the current growth rates won't make much difference any time soon.
But cheap ones targeted at kids? They may be on to something.
Yes, the market is hopelessly inflated with ideas of little or no utility. Nevertheless, I think there will be a market for connected sensors: think fire alarms that can call the fire service.
However, I also expect most of the development to be in factories and warehouses as proprietary systems are swapped for something more maintainable.
You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
As a UK citizen living and working in Germany, if you don't have a UK address and you have been there for more than three years you don't get a vote!
The cut off is ten years after no longer being registered in the UK. As I would be personally affected by the decision I'm very pleased that I'm being allowed to vote.
Since the UK buys more from the other EU countries than they buy from it and the UKs traditional trading partners were dumped by the EU there is absolutely no reason why the UK would be any worse off than it is today. In fact it would tent to be better off as an independent trader on the world market.
First of all: trading won't cease but the terms of trade are likely to change and both sides would suffer. However, the positions are not equal. It's not a brilliant analogy but the sanctions imposed by the EU and Russia on each other after the invasion of Crimea are helpful: EU producers suffered but they are able to look for new markets for their products even at a lower price; Russian consumers have to find new suppliers for what they want. Even without the slump in the oil price it's clear that it's easier to find new markets for good products than new suppliers for banned products. Though you read the odd success story of domestic producers picking up the slack, the sanctions have fuelled inflation in Russia and reduced consumer choice.
The UK is able to finance it's trade deficit by running a current account surplus as a target for investment. Leaving the EU is very likely to reduce this inward investment (because the UK would no longer provide access to the single market) but the trade deficit is likely to grow because German cars and, to a lesser extent French wine, (these are the examples that the Little Englanders tend to spout) cannot be easily replaced but they can find new markets. The result, until a new equilibrium is found, is likely to be a decline in Sterling and UK living standards.
It's difficult to quantify any of this but that it is a clear and obvious risk associated with leaving the single market. It's even more difficult to identify areas where the UK has such desirable products for other case (remember the UK has a trade deficit). Moving the legal and financial services to other countries (say Amsterdam or Dublin for access to the EU) or Hong Kong, Singapore Dubai is easy (and already happening). Although HSBC has just decided to keep its base in London, it's easy to see this decision being reversed. In business terms leaving the EU has lots of potential risks and little clear upside.
But the business side is only part of the argument. Sovereignty would be a reasonable argument if there was that much sovereignty left to gain: the WTO, the UN, the proposed TTIP deal all involve loss of sovereignty.
Then there is democracy and accountability. Sorry, but I don't find the UK parliamentary system particularly democratic when compared with other EU countries and there are no indications of it becoming more so if the UK leaves the UK or is Swiss-style democracy (devolution + referendums) on the agenda?
Within the EU the governments of the member states sill wield lots of power with the national veto. The concessions that Cameron has recently wrong out are testimony to this. The European Commission is no less democratic than any Whitehall department or one of the many quangos that governments love to set up.
But, at the end of the day, my chief motivation for wanting the UK to stay within the EU comes down to the many friends I have throughout Europe and the sense of having possibly overcome the dreadful wars of the 20th century that plagued Europe. My dad's house was bombed int he war and I live in a city that was flattened by British bombs. Talk to anyone from the Warsaw Pact or former Soviet Union and they will tell you much the EU means to them. And, how important it is to keep Britain in it.
This is an issue that I've thought about. Taking the hypothetical example of Country A, that deals with 10 other nations [of similar size to each other] in our fictitious trade bloc (TB).
And this assumes that trade with A is spread evenly with countries in TB. In the case of the UK and the EU this most certainly isn't the case. According to The Economist only 1.5% of Romania's trade is with the UK: a lot of member states will find it pretty easy to play hardball in any future negotiations.
However, I don't think either result would have the disastrous effect that the campaigns would have us believe.
Overall neither do I. But for some people and some businesses leaving will be very disruptive indeed and possibly even disastrous.
Nothing too radical in the Specs above (same hardware for all software options)
No, but an awful lot to put in a small package. Development costs would be large and the market small leading to very high unit costs. Mobile devices have thrived on using as much commodity hardware as possible and building to a price.
Physical ports are nice but also more work which is why we're seeing so much emphasis on software solutions: miracast, continuum. Put your phone on a charging mat next to a screen and you're docked.
I never quite got why anyone would have wanted an Atom (x86), powered Samsung Device
Consumers really couldn't care less about the chip but manufacturers will generally buy from the cheapest supplier. But even when Intel was effectively giving the chips away manufacturers weren't very interested.
Losing mobile is seen by many, including Intel, as the beginning of the end of x86 dominance. Once x86 compatibility is not seen as essential, Intel can expect to see market share and margins elsewhere start to plummet.
For IoTs you don't need a raspberry pi
Of course you don't but the RPi is creating something a bit like the old PC ISA for IOT (sorry for the abbreviations). ISA (industry standard architecture) is important because it reduces costs and risks.
People and, increasingly, companies are prototyping embedded devices with RPis, Arduinos and the like safe in the knowledge that they should be able to maintain software and hardware down the line.
A couple of years ago a company like Intel might have been able to own this space by providing the ISA. Now I think they will have to work with whatever is being established out there. There's still a huge opportunity for them: what will follow the RPi 3 now that it looks like Broadcom has lost interest?
Well, the downtick in Apple's sales won't really have surprised anyone.
Pocketing $ 2 bn in profits is smart, even if the guy is an arse.
But it's nice to see that he managed to get Apple to load up on debt for buybacks and dividends. Now, he's gone but the, admittedly cleverly structured, debt is still there and Apple just increased its dividend.
I guess we'll see Galileo compatibility appearing in consumer kit from next year of the year after. But initially the early adopters will be commercial seeking to take advantage of Galileo's higher spatial resolution, especially altitude.
Anyone happen to know the expected lifetime of the existing GPS/Glonass satellites?