Re: Can GitHub take China to court in the WTO?
Only countries can initiate action at the WTO. In general states have immunity from court actions.
3058 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Only countries can initiate action at the WTO. In general states have immunity from court actions.
Germany, and AFAIK the Netherlands, doesn't differentiate between public taxis and private hire vehicles: they're all licensed under the same rules. Surprisingly I find it doesn't make journeys significantly more expensive in Germany. Though I haven't used a taxi here since the new national wage was introduced. There have been grumblings about this and it might affect availability in some places but casual labour is not a way to improve standards.
Like lots of OTT services Uber doesn't really make long term sense because it adds little or no value. It seems to make sense in the US because the markets there are dysfunctional.
therefore the value of the accumulation of additional data is greater to its benign self than to any malignant third party.
Something similar could have been said about Standard Oil's/Microsoft's business practices and it would have been just as wrong.
Sounds like whoever it is will soon be looking for a new job.
As I mentioned above, being tracked by FB is probably the least of people's worries. Of greater concern is the risk of identity theft, fraud, bullies, stalkers and trouble makers who may go after you in real life.
What happens if you join up those two ideas? The risk of a data breach at Facebook and other data silos is very real. Whether it's merely to the FBI, NSA, CIA, MI5, etc. or to organised crime is why this case is before the court.
Somebody else had to tell me about it. Part of the problem with the current crop of VC funded stuff is the way the media gets co-opted to talk about the companies and products. There was a terrible article on El Reg in this vein a while back about Github being the essentially the only viable choice for repositories because of "the network effect".
Personally, apart from the fact that choice is good, I also prefer Mercurial over Git for VCS. But I also have a reasonably intense dislike of the GitHub UX. I also went as far as reading the T&C's and deciding I prefer the Bitbucket ones (Atlassian is clever enough to be selling technology not just a userbase).
SaaS is all the rage in the states at the moment. I know lots of companies who have no infrastructure just lots of faith in "the cloud".
However, I'm not sure this is relevant here as the item in question may not have had anything to do with a repository. Gist's are Github's pastebins. Really quite worrying if someone did copy some access codes to a gist rather than a properly anonymised pastebin or hackers forum. Be that as it may, you'd really hope it wouldn't make much difference with 2FA for anything sensitive and virtually no straight online access to the database. Really trying hard to think when that would ever be needed. Then again, slick UIs are all you seem to need nowadays to hoover up the VC cash.
And the same is true of every <strikethrough>"ARM server"</strikethrough> Powerpoint I have ever seen.
Fixed it for you: the same could be said for Intel breaking into the mobile market. These things should be decided in the marketplace, assuming vendors are prevented from anti-competitive behaviour.
From the Anandtech article:
The 40nm X-Gene can compete with the 22nm Atom C2000 performance wise, and that is definitely an accomplishment on its own. But the 40nm process technology and the current "untuned" state of ARMv8 software does not allow it to compete in performance/watt.
Pretty stupid to compare 40nm geometries to 22nm ones as the article makes quite clear.
Nevertheless, according to Andreas Stiller at Heise, the CERN team reckons the X-Gene is getting close to Xeon:
CERN-Wissenschaftler haben allerdings vor ein paar Monaten mit dem hauseigenen ParFullCMS-Benchmark etwas bessere Er- gebnisse mit dem X-Gene 1 erzielt, jedenfalls im Vergleich zum nicht so energieoptimier- ten Xeon E5-2650.
So, the real test will be on standardised architecture with similar geometries.
It wasn't so long ago that US export regulations prevented browsers being shipped outside the US with strong encryption. The only way for many years to provide strong encryption was to use ActiveX which is why a whole industry grew up around it. Rolling that can kind of stuff back can take a while but most banks should have managed it by now. If I was faced with a bank that required IE for online banking I wouldn't do online banking with it. But that wouldn't be enough to want to change banks.
Never been the case with any of the banks I work with but then I don't use a browser for online banking anyway as it's setup for the user to carry the risk associated with stolen credentials. HBCI only here.
What the fuck's wrong with you?
Nothing the least time I checked. I was annoyed that the OpEd wasn't properly marked for me to ignore. Worstal's economics are as off as his politics in my opinion. He's got a right to them, just as I have to mine. But I've read enough of them not to take them seriously any more and almost always avoid them.
FWIW UKIP is not just about being anti-Euro and anti-EU. Those are handy fig leaves for some fairly reactionary ideas which Worstal's articles typify. A pox on all populists. And a pox on the mainstream for giving them air to breathe.
from the Register's own Kipper not marked as such.
The UK's new law will remain in force until is legally challenged, though the challenge might need to go all the way to the ECJ given the Supreme Court's current supine position.
In the meantime nation states, the Commission and the European Parliament are currently haggling over a new directive to replace the now disgraced one from 2005 and which will work with the proposed new data protection directive. The nation states are still demanding blanket data retention even though they have now admitted that this does not help prevent crime. Because the 2005 directive is no longer effective, pressure is on nation states to come up with something to stop more of their precious haystacks being blown away by further legal challenges.
Oh, shit! I just agreed with DougS! Does that mean Armageddon is due to start?
How very niche market?
Yes, that's why it's so expensive. But it's so light for the size and USB-C does provide enough power to charge. Shape of things to come, I reckon – not being able to increase memory or swap out the drive would be bigger annoyances for me.
It's not for me but I reckon these will sell like hot cakes.
When it comes to Silicon, Intel will be competing with Samsung, Qualcomm, TSMC, et al. who have higher volumes. This is why they've been catching up on the geometry so quickly. Intel's depends on high margins, they don't.
And when was the last time YOU bought a server with the primary goal of it being $200 cheaper than the power-guzzling slower alternative?
People don't buy individual servers any more, data centres buy heaps of them and people buy or rent capacity there. The owners of data centres, therefore, have a huge interest in the TCO of what they buy: price, density and energy demand are very important.
Most of the software stack is now available and for proprietary stuff ARM is the better platform anyway as it's easier to add dedicated stuff in silicon to boost performance and reduce running costs. ARM still lacks real oopmh for some jobs but it's current problem in the data centre is not having a standard firmware to make it easier to swap bits of kit in and out. We'll have to see if what ARM has promised on this works. On power/performance ARM is still ahead of Intel and the servers can be denser – the years of developing for mobile phones really do matter.
At the end of the day I don't really care what hardware my stuff is running on as long as works reliably. That Intel takes ARM seriously can be seen by the various products it's released over the last couple of years culminating in this. As with AMD's x64 this shows the market working. Once ARM-64 systems are available in number we can expect to see Intel reacting on price.
ARM's advantage over Intel remains the different business model. Instead of going after just AMD (and maybe Cyrix), Intel is facing a bunch of well-funded competitors and ARM itself is insulated somewhat from the struggle. Of course, the diversity has also held back the move into the data centre and Intel has some top notch people but I find the developments in the ARM architecture and manufacturing over the last few years far more impressive than Intel's rearguard action.
And the price differential. Intel is currently slightly ahead in the 14nm process with Samsung and TSMC very close behind. While ARM in the server is still missing important parts of the software eco-system, it benefits even more from economies of scale than Intel. That might be the big difference in comparison with previous Intel vs. AMD, et al. battles. But the holes in the software side will also need fixing.
I'm no Apple fanboy but in my experience Apple stuff does generally "just work" and I certainly prefer it to Windows for work. I really dislike the way they handle the POSIX stuff and replace it with MacPorts. They have in the past been notoriously lax in updating the parts of it that they ship with the OS but they do generally get round to it. Microsoft's patching process is more difficult but that's largely their own fault in the way they mix applications and OS.
Has Microsoft released a fix for FREAK yet?
So, let's get this straight: it's okay for you to hate? Just not anyone else? What an exciting life you must lead!
discovered/invented/created (not sure what the correct term actually is)
"serendipped" is the right word I believe.
Apple's buyers have traditionally proven to be pretty insensitive to price. Indeed for some the high price is part of the appeal and Apple is certainly right to keep out of the bargain basement section. If any of the segments sell well then Apple stands to make a tidy profit. Otherwise it's likely to be forgotten quickly like coloured I-Phones.
That said, I personally think it's poo.
Game of Thrones already holds the record for the most torrented program. Can expect a new record this year.
I use a Mac but I'm not fanboy (use a MacBook from 2009, no I-thingies). A single connector like a phone is great, though a second port would be nice. Presumably £50 gets you a hub. But a mere 1 kg is very, very impressive for the size. I can see Apple selling shedloads of these. The colour and the weight may also appeal to the ladies.
At some point I'm going to have to replace my machine but fortunately I don't have to do much travelling for work.
I use the Pi as a media centre and it plays HD (MKV/MP4) fine. Along with the absence of a real power button and attendant warning about not being shut-off properly or needing several new starts, my biggest beef with the Pi is the piss poor NFS client in userland. DNLA sources work wonderfully, though it can take a while to initialise, but you need NFS if you want to take advantage of the media database functions. Hardly a deal-breaker at the price and there are possibly bits I could fix myself.
For kicks I also set it up to do CI and was pleasantly surprised at how well that worked, just as long as you don't need to compile anything. A Pi-2 setup could be quite good for CI work and might even integrate with the media centre – get notifications that tests have passed while watching your favourite programmes.
MIPS is going to struggle to get the critical mass of developers to write drivers for stuff. Pi has done this well by masquerading as being an educational device (and Scratch is popular).
Indeed, everyone is always guilty of something.
@Hans 1 detention without charge is possible for up to 28 days in the UK thanks to "anti-terrorist" legislation: https://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/human-rights/countering-terrorism/extended-pre-charge-detention
ECJ is in Luxembourg and the ECHR in Strasbourg but your basic point stands.
This will go to the ECHR and the UK will lose. Unfortunately, the ECHR doesn't have many ways of sanctioning viz. several outstanding judgements that the UK has yet to enforce.
They used (and may still be) a levy on recording media. In Germany it applied to blank CDs as well as tapes and also photocopying. I think they may have extended it to SD cards. It never applied to devices. The music royalty collection agencies are usually swimming money so why should they care about the artists?
Why? I'm pretty certain that over 90 % of users will be on Mavericks or Yosemite. Those numbers will only look better when it gets to the release date. (I'm annoyed because my second machine is artificially restricted to Lion but it is my second machine and from 2006). Apple will have the numbers from software updates and is quite happy to splash them around and the hints to upgrade for free aren't exactly subtle. Yosemite has the highest integration between MacOS and IOS making it easier for vendors, such as Microsoft, targeting both with its software.
I thought every Mac that running Mavericks is eligible and able to run Yosemite as well?
Does that mean that they should? Every new OS version brings changes, some for the good, some for the bad. Yosemite includes a lot of pointless UI fuckery. Though to be fair, under the hood it seems to contain mostly improvements. Notable exception: I-Tunes seems to get worse with each new release.
And I upvoted him as he often makes good points. Office on Mac even with the fucking ribbon is a damn sight prettier than on Windows though I prefer OpenOffice's fixed palettes.
I would be too, if it did not require Java for full functionality on OS X.
I prefer OpenOffice over LibreOffice for stability. LibreOffice is busy getting rid of the Java but I'm pretty sure it will have to stay for the database connectivity: nothing else has such a wide range of database drivers.
Radio frequencies were long ago realised as a scarce resource so the ITU was set up to let states manage them. This has let to rather mixed results: sometimes auctions or leases have worked well in that they earned a lot of money and were efficiently used. In most countries there are only a few unlicensed bands such as those used for wifi. It's possible to argue that this is both a good thing: wifi has become ubiquitous and is undoubtedly useful; but it's also a pretty shitty standard that was rushed to the market and has huge problems in areas of high density (an example of the "tragedy of the commons"). There are other ways of looking at this situation.
I don't know the pricing in the UK but I'd expect it to be restrictive. In general, countries with relatively high population density will experience problems of congestion. Conversely, there will also be more commercial interest in providing services to the large, dense population making auctions more likely.
Fibre really is the best thing for backhaul. Various radio technologies may indeed help bridge the gap where FTTH may be prohibitive, though FTTK should now be possible to anywhere with a water supply. The problem with bespoke solutions is less likely to be the cost of licensing spectrum as in knowing you can keep the kit updated and maintained. Femto cells are emerging as the industry standard approach here. They have the added advantage of extending the range of the mobile network.
This is very eleventh hour and, therefore, a bit late. My network started eliminating roaming charges last year and any company that doesn't have a strategy to survive the wholesale rollout next year is not going to survive anyway. Most of the industry has already prepared for the change (billing systems don't usually get changed overnight). More changes mean more disruption which a mere two-year extension of the existing rules is unlikely to make sufficiently attractive.
The ministers can decide what they want, they'll still have to go back to the parliament to get it approved. If no agreement can be reached in time (and that's possible) then existing provisions will apply. The proposed changes are, therefore, merely a bargaining chip for talking to the parliament. In the meantime more and more consumers will continue to educate themselves on how to make the best of the situation. I, for one, am not going to hold my breath on this one.
Morozov can certainly make his arguments better than Worstall who presumably has the column on El Reg because he's mates with the owners.
I don't agree with everything Morozov says but he does make some good points and even when I don't agree with him he has made me reassess some of the positions I do hold. For example, one of his main points in The Net Delusion is how entertainment (in the broadest sense) for the masses is equivalent of the Roman panem et circenses in this day and age: a distraction that among other things serves to prevent political opposition forming. I don't think either Facebook or YouTube were founded with this is mind but as long as people are arguing about what someone's wearing, what's the best or worst, they are <bold>not</bold> engaged in political action.
Worstall on the other hand just spouts bar room clickbait. Is it any surprise that he has already stood for UKIP?
Firefox uses NSS instead of OpenSSL. This just means different bugs, though I doubt that NSS's internals are quite as hair-brained as OpenSSL
I am not defending the result of netmarketshare, I just don't think that El Reg's stats would be meaningful in determining whether or not XP increased market share. But, as you say, without evidence of the figures then this conversation is arguably pointless, although I welcome your well reasoned arguments. It could be that El Reg's figures show an *large* upsurge in XP takeup which would certainly shoot my expectations down.
You might be surprised at what the numbers reveal if only we could see them. Unfortunately, we'd then have to do some real statistics to point out another glaring problem with the numbers that El Reg reports: desktop is steadily losing marketshare to mobile devices. This skews desktop stats to older machines and also makes them more volatile as the sample size decreases.
Collect another badge of fail. Your assumptions 1 and 3 are the same and number 2 is very similar to them both (if A is more generalised than B then B must be more specialised than A. You only qualify this by indicating where the specialisation may be). It doesn't really matter because the assumptions are only relevant in a hypothesis that you are going to test empirically. Which you can't because El Reg doesn't provide the numbers. This is logic, we haven't even got to the statistics.
Furthermore, you might want to get out your dictionary and look up corroboration. El Reg's numbers don't have to be the same as either of these two services to provide corroboration. However, in the past the numbers have *not* been corroborated by data collected by Akamai to which I have repeatedly referred.
Thing is, El Reg is a tech site so any stats are going to be skewed to the readership base so you wont corroborate with general stats.
That's a remarkable conclusion to draw in the absence of the evidence. What is the readership for the statcounter / netmarketshare?
or they could just, you know, license it?
Google doesn't decide which chips companies use in their devices and, therefore, it doesn't pay for the licences. Maybe this will encourage more companies not to use Qualcomm's chip which might not be such a bad thing considering their close relationship with the US military.
However, this might get me to change, and I should probably be thinking about an upgrade on my 2+ year old Android phone anyway.
Or you could just enable encryption yourself (if it isn't done already). Personally, while I think encryption of data on device by default is good, for most people I reckon it's more important to encrypt network traffic. Apple and Google will happily encrypt your device and just as happily read your address book, calendar, e-mail, text messages, etc.
You also get 60 landline minutes a month and 1TB of data
Sounds like a torrentor's dream and would probably burn through even Microsoft's vast cash pile pretty quickly.
And look at how well Sony and HTC are doing with Android phones. They may be selling them - but they're not making any money. The only company doing well with Android is Samsung.
Xiaomi seems to be doing quite well with Android.
Google didn't buy Motorola to get into the hardware business but to get the patents.
The claim falls far short of reality though, with fewer apps available, and often worse implementations of apps that are on the market. Still, the arrival of the M220 shows that Microsoft is making some impact with its universal app strategy, which will make it easier for developers to target Windows desktop, tablet and phone with the same code.
How many crack pipes did you smoke to draw that conclusion? There aren't any universal apps at the moment. The reason for doing the phone is: they already have compatible hardware; the OS is free; MS will no doubt offer marketing support; and sales of their Android phones are disappointing. This is simply a case of try it and see. The reason every other company stopped making Windows phones is that the sales weren't enough to justify even this minimalist approach to diversification.
It looks remarkably like docker for Windows: hypervisor with runtime. The licensing model will be interesting.
Don't forget to shake your head when you're outside so the cameras only get blurry images of you.