18 posts • joined Tuesday 20th May 2008 09:16 GMT
It's nice, but..
I'll still hang on for the rumoured 5d mk3.
Oh, and the max iso is 512000 ( well it was on the one I played with).
And large sensors give you shallower depth of field for your movies.
Cameras are tools, well at this level anyway. looks doesn't really come into it, and a touch screen for focus selection is no good when its against your face.
When can we expect to see 50p tax per month on electricity, gas and water bills? I live in a 'rural community' ie in the sticks and we have no access to mains gas or sewage. Our 'lectric is a bit flakey, too come to think of it.
I knew this when I move in and accepted it. Like the way I'm quite happy with my 2Mb ADSL speed.
I don't want or need anything faster. Especially if BT are offering it.
Quite frankly, Mr Darling, you can stick this tax up yer ar$e.
Quick fix for operations
I would have thought that for operations in theatre a quick fix/workaround involving lock-wire and/or locktite* (other brands of thread locking compound are available) would keep the Marines flying for now.
*unless it is a locktite issue. It doesn't work with heat as any fule no.
Paris, 'cos she's tightened a few nuts in her time...
Yours, not mine.
Pornography is fine with me, BDSM included (although not my thing). As long as it's consenting adults.
But then, I don't get my morals from a book. I work them out for myself. Perhaps the MSP's should also work them out or ask their constituents.
I find indoctrination particularly immoral.
Guardians of our morals
Nu Labour appear to be guarding our morals by protecting us against 'extreme' pronography and their current approach to prostitution, yet they preside over the highest rate of teenage pregnancy and sti's in Europe.
Well done, Gordon. Think of the children.
Lewes - PC?
Does Lewes still resound to the chant of 'Kill the Pope' every 5th November? It certainly used to. Does the council still encourage visitors to the town's bonfire night celebrations?
Pot, Kettle etc
Ah here it is.
I've been waiting all week for this story. And here it is where it should be. On a Friday afternoon. Excellent
I was dong this 15 year ago when the heat exchanger for the 3081 failed. Open the windows at one end of the machine room, and the loading bay doors at the other end, and let the breeze through.
Put the PFY by the doors to keep out curious users and bob's yer uncle
The need for secure data centres really killed off ambiant air cooling, now we have to use forced air cos open windows* aren't secure.
* Insert your own Microsoft joke here.
My smartphone (SE P1i) conencted to O2's network at 240Kb/s last night. While not lightning fast, it's better than EDGE's 135Kb/s you quote. and fine for simple browsing.
And I have an 'unlimited' (fair use of 2GB per month) data allowance contract. I've used the 2GB and more per month on several occasions with not a peep out of O2.
A321 as control
How about air *outside* the aircraft as a control. Sure include the A321 as a subject given that the 757 and 146's have a reputation for filling the cockpit/cabin with oil fumes. The A321 can be sampled as a 'clean' aircraft.
With the A321 as a control, all the study can show is whether the air inside a 757 and 146 is cleaner or dirtier than that in and Airbus, and by how much.
The base assumption is that the air inside the A321 is clean, when it might not be. Increased CO2 levels anyone?
This smells (pun intended) of airline PR at worst, or bad science at best.
2000 miles on a tankful
Just as well these UAVs have got a good range. Hurricanes tend to swing well to the noth of Barbados ('53 exepted) unless the NOAA's know something we don't.
Still, Florida or Barbados? I know which I'd choose. (Apartment in Holetown, please. Not too far from Cocomos)
mine's the one with the high SPF.
So a Rotodyne is too noisy for a couple of minutes until the transition to forward flight generates enough lift, but Wokkas* are fine being noisy all the time?
* Chinook, in case you didn't know.
The only aircraft I know that has a system to spin-up wheels before landing is a Cessna Citation (I'de be interested to learn of others). Then it's only on the nosewheel as an option and uses compressed air to turn the wheels. There are plenty of patents for finned wheels to allow the aircraft's movement through the air to spin wheels, but I can't find examples in use.
I agree that electric motors could be used for regenerative braking, but the energy transferred from kinetic to electric must go somewhere. The aircraft's batteries seem the obvious choice for this, but the batteries must have sufficient capacity to store the energy from the electric braking. So the aircraft must land with partially/mostly discharged batteries. Friction brakes would still be required for landings or rejected take-offs with charged batteries.
All adds up to more weight. More weight == more fuel needed
A weighty issue
So how much weight would these electric motors, wiring, control system, strengthened undercarriage add?
And then, how much extra fuel would it take to carry this extra weight around the world between airports?
Flame icon for all that extra fuel burning...
- On the matter of shooting down Amazon delivery drones with shotguns
- Review Bring Your Own Disks: The Synology DS214 network storage box
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- IT MELTDOWN ruins Cyber Monday for RBS, Natwest customers
- Google's new cloud CRUSHES Amazon in RAM battle