Re: Pink crapfest
I had to read your comment twice before the penny dropped, then chuckled at the thought of how the OP could possibly have made that observation.
2492 posts • joined 4 May 2008
I had to read your comment twice before the penny dropped, then chuckled at the thought of how the OP could possibly have made that observation.
Obviously someone didn't understand the subtlety of Dr Mouse's comment.
>Take a walk down the girls' aisle of any toy store and you'll see that the only change is the prevalence of pink LEDs.
Now why would an El Ref aficionado walk down the little girls aisle of toy-r-us... Is there something else you are not telling is......
A pointy haired Barbie, now there's a thought that makes me shudder, where's my pink cattle prod.
Wikipedia - Asimov's Rules.
1.A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2.A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law
Rule 1 : The robots(cars) should never be in such a position in the first place. They should have previsional awareness such that the scenario can always be avoided, exemple : very little forward oncoming awareness = slow down in order to be in a position to avoid anything that might arrive.
Rule 2 : The human being in the car would be screaming orders to save their own skin, rather than that of the on-comer, which the robot(car) would have to follow.
Rule 3 : In our driverless car scenario, rule 3 has no real bearing, so we can rule out this ethic.
In the event of a crash the blame would probably resolve down to the last command screamed out by a human.
As much as we would like to believe that everything can be coded within a well written algorithm, the final decision that one makes in order to "survive" will always remain instinctive. I do not believe that "instinct" can be written as a series of rules due to the fact that we, as mere humans, do not fully understand what it is.
>on devices running either iOS or Android. Mac OSX users are also potentially vulnerable but Windows and Linux users would appear to be immune because their operating systems don't accept ICMP redirection packets that carry malicious traffic
Genuine question. : What is the requirement for this subset of OSes iOS, Android and OSx, to use ICPM Redirection but where Windows and Linux don't ? Is this based on various Ping timeouts being used to determine the shortest paths ?
Also does this mean that all Windows platforms are safe from this attack or only the desktop variety..
Interesting attack vector though.
>The issue is, they just want to sign you up,and roll you along. Loyalty isn't rewarded anymore
Loyalty is just a buzzword synonym for "you will get shafted in the long term".
I'll give a huge thumbs up to Trevor for this one, it was after reading one of his posts that I discovered who/what ninite.com is.
Just last night I was helping my parents with an issue and I guided them to ninite.com because it was the only site which I could be sure that they wouldn't by conned into clicking one of those damned false "download now" buttons.
With Ninite you get what you want not what you dont.
Hi Christian ,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I can easilly understand the difficulty that an article such as this can create for a team of developers/business and the pain in the arse consequences of repairing the damage.
As I mentioned though, this article was a little bit "trolly" on behalf of El Reg, who are sharing a little bit of fear-mongering whislt riding on the back of "An unnamed research group operating under the popular Hackito conference"...
And as much as it is always required to read certain El Reg articles with a pinch of salt, articles such as this do make alarm bells ring. As a recent example, we have all seen what has happend to TruCrypt....
I truly hope that the finding are purely hypothetical but meanwhile it is becoming increasingly difficult to trust anything web facing even when encrypted. Snowden has lifted the lid on practices far beyond everyones initial thoughts, we are now absolutely convinced that the 3 letter agencies have the capacity and do actively exploit weaknesses wherever they can.
I am sure that BtSync is used for many private files, although personally I have nothing major to lose other than a few ideas, I am sure that there are others who have a lot more vested interests in not having their work "perused" by others.
I fully sympathise with your teams position and hope that you can quickly overcome this "bump"...
Shit I switched to BT Sync after DropBox bcome a bit dubious. Please don't tell me I am going to have to go back to USB keys...
What I don't like about the article, which feels a little be trolly, is the fact that it mentions that BTSync "might" be leaking hashed, that there is a "probable" situation and as of yet everything was "unconfirmed"...
"Might", "probable" and "unconfirmed" are on about the same level of security as every piece of software every written. This actual article just "might probably" be a little bit pre-nuptial due to it's "unconfirmed" statements. I can understand that the El Reg hack might retourque that it is a heads-up but I would be inclined to disagree until something a little more substantial is included...
Switzerland : Your privacy has been Pwned, it's expensive whilst no longer capable of garaunteeing it's own continuity....... They want the benefits of Europe without being part of Europe and have no longer anything to offer in return.
Unfortunately we have reached peak Switzerland : If I have understood things lately the new havens are either Singapore, Hong Kong or even the Isle of Man. ( I could imagine living in either of the first 2 but definately not the latter.)
>Uhm, emigrate to the LEAST fascist 1st or 2nd world country?
Greece, but the economy is shot to bits.
Ukrania , sorry but that will soon be shot to bits. ( thanks to Mr P..)
Spain, nope historically it wouldn't quite fit and nowadays you have to be Catalonian in order to get a vote.
Germany, nope have to work at two jobs just to pay your rent. They can pretend that all is Ok but we knwo better.
The UK, you must be joking right....the 53rd state....
France : apparently Serge Dassault has been handing out large sums of cash for votes, sounds promising, if you use your vote correctly.
You know what, remain where you are, it's just as bad everywhere else.
WTF is happening down under, since when did the Aussies become such a PC crowd ?
Come on Aussies , stand up to the man, let it be heard that you want your Porn, Drugs ( Silk Road), Dodgy videos like everyone else and historical episodes of Neighbours....
Unbelievable, this is the same damned country that invented Aussie Rules, ffs. Don't let Tony Abbott cow down to the Pommie way of life...
[Yes, there is a hint of sarcasm in the above rant]
Yup and what will happen to that 19 meeeeelion.. Will the Feds buy some new equipment, set up a new "Silk Road FV" (federal version) or will they re-invest in some of the finest Columbian Marching powder.. ( The usage of the word "re-invest" was intentional).
Sniff, sniff what's that, do I smell a small troll in the vacinity.......
Casually lighting up the dry leaves on the bushes as he nonchalantly whistles away down the road......
I concur, and I would hasten to add that there are a lot more than just the climate articles. There are a few others within which it is difficult not to use the AC option, not from fear but simply from the fact that PC crowd can become exceptionally distastefull. They lack argument and prefer to downvote rather than to rationalise or to objectively propose their own personal point's of view.
El Reg, like so many other forums, suffers from the false-consensus effect and being able to openly and truly express one's opinions is becoming a difficult task even within the world of IT. Although I am glad to say that El Ref still remains one of the few bastions of BOFHerey....
Nope, unfortunately it can't be based on a fixed number. If so myself and many others would permanently have a reversed badges. It would have to be based on a percentage of positive votes.
Even then, what would it really achieve. Eadon certainely didn't need a reversed badge and I can think of one or two others that might fall into the same category..
Reversed badge for 200 negative downvotes in 12 months, laughs to self thinking if I only had 200 a year I would ask for the angel badge....... I am quite sure that most of the silver badges and definately some of the gold badges have far more than 200 downvotes per year, more along the lines of 200 per month for some.. What you have may not have taken into account is that they also have a lot of upvotes..
No, that can't be right as the usage of the word "labour" implies that work is actually being done.
Snipers often try to blend into their backgrounds. Would it therefore be an impovement to finds a means of "piggybacking" on someone elses packets... ie blending in to their network environment.
I have no idea if this is possible, nor any idea if it is even remotely feasible.
Theoretically : connecting via a FON connexion, spoofing an existing users MAC/IP address, creating some outgoing traffic, adding headers to the packet that would allow the returning packets to be filtered and returned to you. Idea being that it looks like someone else was TOR browsing.
[Edit : Just read further down the thread and it appears that the basic idea is already being covered, notably using TAILS as the client OS for even further anonymisation.]
That should read as follows :
The top 5% of Apple users actually have an IQ...
It's a very paradoxical and satirical idea that manages to introduce "Facebook" and "Work" into the same project.
ïf you are going to connect it to a corporate network just make sure that you don't have to pay exorbitant telephony provider fees !!
We are still running an early version of BES, 5 I think, which already didn't support the latest batch of BB terminals.
Our current terminals are reaching their end of life and I have difficulty finding terminals that are supported. Guess what, we will be leaving BB to slowly wither away and have already started moving towards an Airwatch( Android and IOS) solution (Echange on the rear end)..
As much as I like my BB for email I have not alternative but to forego it for an Android/Apple alternative...
As far as I am concerned BB threw themselves out of the market... So it doesn't matter what they now offer they are simply too late.
The most recent one that I have seen captures your DNA and Blood, sends a sample to a local Vogon spaceship, anaylses the results for any traces of Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster, calls up Zaphod directly, asks he was drinking with you lately and if not zaps you into oblivion.
Why the importance of this diatribs, simples, it's great to have highly advanced techniques but they MUST BE AVAILABLE before anyone can use them and this takes bloody years......
meanwhile as I reach for a bottle of good Ol' Janx Spirit.... ------>>> Yes it's Friday
All I got was 6,
Were the Pebl, MPX 300, Aura and Sendo really well known ?
A few years ago we said the same thing about laptops, look where we are today. All that changes are the manufacturers goals...
If the marketing bods came to the realisation that battery life sells better than biometric readers then they would push for better battery life than than some silly gadgets that fool the fools into buying..
Battery life will increase but it is simply not a current priority.
2 does not equal 7
>Go back a few years, and that would have stopped you from being a mobile worker. I remember members of staff whose laptops had an extra battery in place of the optical drive, plus they carried 2-3 extra batteries when they went on business trips. It was the only way to get the thing to last more than a couple of hours.
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree but that was several moons ago.
Now we have laptops with 13" screens that have 8 or 9 hours of autonomy so their has definately been advances within the battery technology ( Ok, I digress it is also due to lower Processor requirements and SSDs for the power consumption decrease).
But look at the smart phone market the screens are at least double what they were intially and yet the power duration remains the same. So there have obviously been advances here too, just not enough of them.
Larger screens, brighter screens, scratchless glass, fingerprint readers etc certainely are appealing
but it seems that the research is far to heavily biased on Marketing rather than on function...
The smartphone market hasn't really provided us with anything world changing in the last year or so, maybe we ahve reached peak gadgetry. I can only hope that it will go the same way as laptops and that they will now start to concentrate of developing durability rather than marketability
Since the article is about Nexus 6, ie we are talking smartphones....
The idea of carrying an extra battery pack defeats the purpose...I wouldn't carry a laptop and 4 extra batteries either... The whole idea is to keep things as light as possible whilst requiring the minimum of gadgets/extras/chargeers/cables etc.... The more you need the more likely that you will forget/lose something.
Which smartphone do you know of that has a full weeks battery life and has a screen size larger than 3.5". And I obviously don't mean a smartphone that will remain unused, doesn't surf the web and doesn't receive email from either 2G/3G or Wifi.
I have had several Samsungs which I like but their batteries are certainely not capable of any more that 2 days without requiring a full charge and that is only with the lightest of usage.
I truly wish that the manufacturers would start playing a competition to increase battery life to at least 1
week, Instead of the race to have larger screens, thinner frames etc ..... Can't they make a true smartphone for the road warrior...
Whether I go on a trip for 1 day or for one week I always have to arm myself with extra cables and chargers. Sometime I can use my laptop as a charger, sometimes I can't, so it is always necassary to have at "least one" extra mini usb hiding somewhere.
Ok when you have the cables it's really not a problem but when you don't...... the frustration levels really rise quickly.
A new user interface, so what .... A new app, so what..... unlock with your fingerprint, so what...... We already have most of what we need, except the damned battery life.
5 day battery life, now we are talking...
The part about the fairy tales never changed..
I would argue that moral values have existed since the beginning of man otherwise we would have wiped ourselfs out a long time ago.
The fact that those morals were written down has very little importance other than as a means of propoganda ( albeit with an altruistic leit motif).
If that book had been written without all the Sky Fairy nonsense then it would have been a very good but very short book.
Everyone also seems to forget that Occident societies were not the only people on the planet. Moral values, I believe were well know and even documented within the middle kingdom..
Confuscious was around 500bc...
>I'll get my primary school-age daughter to help you out, if you like.
That is a very disturbing statement. Whatever you do , don't let them grow up without first filling their minds with dogma.....
Personally I thought it was propaganda, can someone explain the difference.
* Thou shall not create or record Porn.
* Thou shall not flame thy neighbour.
* Thou shall not venture into the Silk Road
* Thou shall not make religious parody videos.
* Thou shall not worship false idols( S. Jobs. is not a deity)
I think that there are only so many ways that one can create a UI before it simply becomes are re-mash of the existant..
We are after all limited to a 2d surface and regardless of which pointing device is implemeted, be it physical mouse, touchscreen or finger placement sensor the actions always resolve to the same end function -ie that of moving the cursor. Same goes for the keybaord and character entry.
Until such times as the needs arise for a new kind of entry, ie not a pointing device or character entry device, things will continue to remain kinda much the same.
Windows 8 tried to add something new but in the end it was just a mashup between borderless windows + active icons that were arranged in a new manner. It wasn't so much an improvement as a different way of seeing things.
Maybe what we we need next is a mood detector : ie the screen changes according to our moods.... Or an anger level management system, whereby the UI/OS automatically injects us with morphine or something pleasant whilst we fly of the handle...
In any event as long as we remain with the same material nothing much is likely to "truly" change.
The whale has now been moved. It was removed by JCB digger and sent of to an abbatoir.
FYI : Removal by sea was a problem because of sand banks.
Since the article relates to our antipodean contigency, shouldn't that be baby kangaroo, koala or maybe even wombat videos ?
The last phrase was probably the most important as it actually describes the whole article. ( see title).
Effectively, there is a movement towards small devices, but I hasten to add that the movement is within a particular demography. I can't say who that demography are but I might be able to who they are not. I would suggest that the following is a non-exhaustive list of those they will not move towards the smaller devices regardless of how much power they have.
Hardcore gamers. (There strife for power is never ending)
CadCam (was mentioned the article)
Video Editing ( was mentioned the article)
Photoshoppers ( again need lots of power).
Photographers ( need huge storage and large screens with reasonable CPUs).
Admins ( Any admin that is working solely on one small tiny screen must have a vey quiet life)... Multi-remote sessions require screen estate and a good keyboard, not a dinky thing where finding the Pipe Symbol is a major challenge)
Big Data crowd...
etc etc etc
One of the major differences between the two platforms lies in their "Duree de Vie"... A smartphone has about a 2 year lifespan; a PC is usually closer to 4. This means a much quicker and expensive refresh.
The smartphone would have to be permanently connected to a power source, thereby removing it's advantage of being portable ( I agree that it will retain a least a few hours of autonomy though).
Smartphones are fragile, they definitely cannot take the beating that a PC/Laptop can take. Walk into any office and have a look at the scuffmarks on the PCs that are floor bound... Also have a look at a 2 year old road warrior smartphone, they get pretty beat up...
Personally I don't see a massive migration the smartphone as the sole device, it definitely has its place but not as the sole device... It is more of a compliment to the existing arsenal.
Currently there is a huge choice of platform PCs, Smartphone, Tablet, Tablet that resemble smartphones or PCs ( IBM Yoga style). Most of these devices can have a keyboard added, removed etc so they are quite adaptive. But each will eventually find its own crowd and probably retain them.
If I had to choose between the Smartphone, Tablet and my PC, I would definitely keep my PC and buy a very cheap "talk only" phone.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
@I am sorry, anyone who thinks Donald in anyway resembled a real duck has never encountered a real duck.
Yes but he could be a Higgs Boson Duck.
[Do not read ahead withough having read the first line in this comment. you have been warned]
Since the CERN announced that they found the Higgs Boson I always had the "uneducated" feeling that their annoncement was far too media orientated. Almost as if they were in a position whereby they had to make a discovery in order to justify the expense.
It's a bit like the Big Data thing that is going on, we have loads of data, we can see things happening, we just don't know how to explain them, yet. So let's give it a name....
Very few people truly understand what the Higgs Boson actually is, could be, I certainely don't and I presume that the very large majority of the planet don't either. So how can we truly be sure of what has or has not been found. Are they just giving the name to something new and as of yet unexplained or have they indeed found what they are looking for.. Who is truly in a position to be the judge ?
These Danish scientists are challenging the finding which is a good thing. Science does not always come up with the correct answer the first time....
Uneducated : Other than having read ICE-9 I have no further education physics, quantum mechanics etc knowledge whatsoever, just a passing interest in what is going on in the region in which I live. If things went wrong in the Cern I always imagine that it could be kinda nasty...for humanity....it's the ICE-9 effect....
>if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck...
The problem is that you would have to know exactly what a duck was before a definitive decision could be made and even then there are many kinds of ducks...
Donald looked, swam and quacked lick a duck but was in reality only a 2 dimensionsal animated character.
Harmony, Lets have a look at my initial comment :
"You can't really drain an economy, you can merely change the distribution of who takes which percentage, overall the entire sum remains a constant."
In the above statement do you see the word "Wealth", no neither do I , so please stop referring to my usage of Wealth, I did not mention anything about wealth..
Wealth and economy are 2 different subjects even though that they posses a relation.
If you reread the comment - you will see that I spoke about the "distribution of percentages". When dealing with percentages it is a given that the sum of all percentages will be 100%.
I think it is obvious from my initial statement that the "economy" ie 100% of that which is in circulation, can never be more than 100% of itself. All that ever changes is how that economy is distributed. For example : 20% of the economy is held by the people, 40% by business and the remaining, 40% by the banks ( purely hypothetical figures) , not that the sum is of all that is available is 100%.
Tommorow this distribution of percentages might change, i.e. 43% to the people, 37% to business and the remaining 20% to the banks. Still this represents the same initial 100% percent of the economy..
All that has changed between the two scenarios of the "distribution of percentages". If the economy, at the given time, was worth 54 Trillion dollars in both scenarios this amount would not have changed.. Hence the usage of the word "constant".
>You said that only distribution of share in the economy changes, but that the entire sum of it is fixed. That is wrong.
I think that is quite obvious that we are talking about a fixed point in time and not over a period.
Obviously over a period the economy will change.
Did you actually see something in the comment that stated "that wealth is a fixed constant". I think not, please read again and try to understand rather than remain up high in the tree....
If you have a 1000$ to distribute there are many ways in which you can distribute it but you can not distribute more than the 1000$. Hence, the entire sum remains a constant. Therefore money spent on a car cannot also be spent of software. What I don't spend on software is availabe for other purchases. I am sure that you get the picture.
I don't recall having mentioned anything about the accumulate total since the beginings of time, inflation rates, stock markets adjustements or variable interest rates in my original comment. The lack of these variables removes the insipid thought of "stupid idea of wealth as a constant "
Most of the monkeys in the tree would have understood this, they were successful enough to climb down from the tree.
You can't really drain an economy, you can merely change the distribution of who takes which percentage, overall the entire sum remains a constant.
I read through the article thinking to myself, how much I would love to go to work like this. it's techy, it's fast, you get to travel (lol), you change locations each day but come back to base in the evening ( I presume).
Yes, definately looks interesting,a little bit unique and would certainely make a welcome change from my daily BAU office environment...
>Tim Cook bravely came out last week, sparking a a furious reaction from dickhead homophobes the world over.
If someone doesn't agree with the Homosexual lifestyle can please explain why that would qualify that person as a "dickhead homophobe"....
A lot of people don't agree with a lot of things in life but I don't understand why that should automatically qualify then as "dickhead <insert whatever you don't care for here> phobes".
Think yourself fortunate that you live in a place where contrary views are still possible.
By the way, what do you call homosexuals that really don't like all this media attention. Those that were quite happy to live quietly without all the media fuss. Are they "Dickhead Homophobes" too..
Yes, this kind of article really does piss me off, by it's attitude of "holier than though" more so than it's actual content.