287 posts • joined Friday 4th April 2008 12:00 GMT
There are always teething problems when working on new features, whatever technology is involved; I'm not too worried, to be honest. I came over to Three for reasons of connectivity, yes, but the unmetered all-I-can-eat data was the icing on the cake; as long as I retain 3G, I'm happy - if I get 4G (I have a Note 3 to play with!), so much the better!
Re: 3 are great...
Hmm. I know the phrase says "Your mileage may vary", but you must live in the middle of Salisbury Plains, or something. I've had no trouble with Three whatsoever since I moved over from Vodafone.
Now, with Voda, I had bugger all signal indoors, anywhere I worked, and even in Newbury, their HQ town, of all places. And their 3G service was, and I'm putting this charitably, very patchy at best.
With Three, I've not had a single problem - and Newbury has been five bars of 3G signal wherever I've gone in the last few visits there; in London (anywhere inside the M25 belt), I've never seen a lack of signal at all - even in the middle of a shopping centre ground level (can you say Croydon Centrale?). In short, I'm very impressed with Three.
So, this from the bunch that...
..vote themselves inflation-busting pay rises every year (I seem to recall the current or next one will be ELEVEN sodding percent?!), while the rest of us trogs find our spending power and disposable income shrinking year on year?
I have two words for them one of which is rude, the other is "off".
I'll buy from whoever gives me the best bang for my buck (so to speak), and the politicians, who it seems never seem to do what WE want, can go bugger themselves.
It just occurred to me...
...that DAB actually stands for Dire And Bollocks.
Tell you what. Mr. Vaizey...
..when DAB coverage and signal quality matches or exceeds FM for the vast majority of the country, and the size and cost of the receivers come down to more realistic sizes and levels, then, maybe, you might interest me in getting one of those things.
But not until then.
You have a shedload of work to do yet, don't you?
The answer to that, by the way, is "Yes".
Message to 3D Systems:
"We will be commercializing the advanced printing platform beyond smartphone manufacturing use and anticipate it being useful as a fab-grade manufacturing to a variety of products and industries, but Motorola will have an exclusive on the use of it for smartphone manufacturing in the beginning. New materials will be developed and used but there is nothing specific to announce on this front right now. As we develop the new materials they will also become commercially available for other markets."
That's about as clear as mud in so many ways.
Can you try again, this time in Plain English, please?
Oh, and this time, if you would be so kind, please remember to correctly apply punctuation to your reply; I feel sure that many of the readership here would find it much more easy to read and understand, were you to acquiesce to this request...!
...Barclays anti fraud (or whatever they call it) are a 24/7 operation, blocking your card when they see something that "looks odd", "for your protection". This I can understand, and ever so slightly applaud, even if it really is annoying when I'm the one who made the "trigger purchase". So, if they can be this efficient on card purchases, how the heck are they so bloody slow when it's their I.T. end that screwed the pooch?
Or is this merely their way of saying that they've got double standards up the wazoo?
Seems to be up again
Just successfully logged in using their android app.
Re: OK, safety first...
OK, safety first...
...I want a powerkill mushroom switch on the outside door of every Google server centre, in a place where no robot can get at it or it's wiring. And I want it manned 24/7 by a Human. Eat that, Skynet!
...NORAD tracks all the (known) crap in orbit, so surely THEY could be expected to know when and where it was due to arrive, so how come no comment from them this rime?
This is why...
I use Firefox.
...about to comment on the report, other have already done that to death. I will, however, say that you need a better dictionary. You do not spell it "defense". That's the American spelling. Over here, old boy, we spell it "defence".
Re: And people wonder why...
heh. I cut my teeth supporting 3.11 back in the early '90s ;-)
*whistling tunelessly off into the distance*
And people wonder why...
...I'm awaiting Win 8.1.1...!
This is bloody insane, yet again :-(
Company (a) makes a device that fulfils a certain purpose; it later transpires that in order to make and sell this device, they had to licence certain tech from company (b) who owned a patent on that tech in the first place.
Company (c) then comes along, says "AH! This device from Company (a) will do the job that we need it to do, and save us wasting time and funding on developing a whole new branch of radio technology, thus allowing us to bring our product to market in a timely manner" and buys a shedload of the company (a) devices that were licenced from company (b).
Company (c) should not, therefore, have to pay (presumably through the nozzle) *again* to use these devices, as there has already been a licence fee paid to the original patent holder.
Thus, the judge got it horribly wrong. This precedent opens up ad infinitum patent fee charging all the way down to (potentially) the end user (purchase surcharge); for once, the US got something right by denying this from happening. It's a horrid precedent, and needs to be quashed.
Such a usage ban...
...is already in the works for Britain.
IMHO, it's a good move.
Guy was lucky.
Remember, this was at exceedingly short - possibly even point-blank - range. Any calibre larger than .22" or .25" could well have completely penetrated through the phone and its battery, into his chest. .22, and to a lesser extent, .25, are fast, but comparatively light bullets; a .32" or bigger may well have done the poor sod some altogether more serious damage. Still, as close shaves go, nice job HTC - the phone stood up to its name - Hero!
See if I've got this right: He's basically saying that "You can have privacy, but only if we know who you are and can prove it?" Screw that. If I want privacy, I do NOT want someone watching me and knowing who I am as I do whatever it is that I do. I think the man's been drinking too much java.
DAB: Nice idea but...
... implementation was crap, to be generous. In other countries, they've gone to the next DAB standard, DAB+, which is apparently better in reception, error correction, and quality. yet HMG/BBC has declared that it's sticking with DAB instead of upgrading to DAB+
Call me old-fashioned, but I think I'll stick with analogue, for as long as it lasts. Better quality even at long range, the kit's cheap, power efficient (well, the batteries last longer, anyhow), and there are more stations on analogue, too.
...no Black Vulture with Low Observability beak markings?
- the fruity company'll have you for trademark infringement over the frothing gobs!
Ach, No, Meester Amazon..
...I expect you to pay!
...probably so peeved at Microsoft at the moment*, that they cannot string together a coherent sentence!
* Internet Explorer 11 BREAKS Google, Outlook Web Access: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/10/21/internet_explorer_11_breaks_google_outlook_web_access/
To get back on-topic...
...given the frankly oddball legislation that the Yanks pass every year as local "ordinances", the idea of this yank is a surprisingly reasonable, considered, and actually practical one - whether is gets off the ground is another matter. Good luck to him on this one - it actually *should* get voted into law.
...I'll wait to see whose machines it turns into expensive paperweights, *before* I even consider downloading it...
I really don't know...
...why they want to be in the EU anyway - it's buggered up more economies than anything this side of the end of WW2.
So, I suppose that...
...teleconferencing them into the event is out the window too, then?
We may not own the company any more, but it's one of the most successful vehicle designs EVER. And there are STILL series I Landies driving on - and off - the roads of the globe, to this day.
Blow that one out yer bunny slippers.
You led the class from the front.
I strongly suspect...
...that if the Founding Fathers of the USA could see what has happened to their ideals and hopes before they signed the declaration of Independence, they'd defecate masonry, rip[ up all the drafts, and pay that tea tax in Boston.
Must be doing something wrong here; I can locate the phone easy enough in the Play Store, but to wipe it, I've got to activate the facility in the device manager on the phone - this does not appear to be where they said it'd be (settings)?! Or is this another case of a provider deleting the facility to prevent users from having "unfortunate accidents"?
These are also the people who want to legalise pretty much every narcotic on the planet. This is a prime example of why they shouldn't be in charge of anything more complex than a wooden spoon.
That is all.
Rock on, the Flat Earth Society ;-)
No one was pre4ss-ganged. I suggest you look up what the history of that phrase is, by the way. Closed shops mean that you had to join the union, to work in a particular job. If you didn't want to join the union, then you didn't get the job. It's not all thuggery, by the way. I was in USDAW, where there was a closed shop job. They did good work for the membership, and it actually helped management to work woith the union - it improved working conditions and safety no end. I've worked in both open and closed shops, and while there are pros and cons for both, Maggie handbagged us practically toothless with the first of her anti-union laws; Blair didn't help us as he said he would, and it's been even worse now the tories are back in. Open shop means you have the option not to join the union, and that's what we're left with post Maggie. Don;t get me wrong, she did a lot of good for the country, but she let Scargill get to her, and for a professional politician to let it get that personal was wrong, a that mistake has led to a lot of problems in the workplace with certain employers taking the piss something horrid. And by the way, I work in an industry where people come anfd go in and out of the Union, and not once in over eleven years in this job have I seen ANYONE victimised for not being in the union, or leaving the union. Care to give specific examples?
Isn't it interesting to notice that most of the anti-union people are using AC...?
Re: Frankly I don't see the problem
You read it wrong. Bob Crow isn't about to inconvenience London again with this one, as they're not striking. They're still working, they're just not going to use the fingerprint logging system.
And before you say it, while I am a Union Member (and proud of it), it's not with the RMT. I'm with Unite.
'Ad it been launched 'ere at the ESA facility in French Guiana, we would be eating well this evening!
And in a little while...
...the signals will abruptly stop, as it dives into a wormhole, and eventually becomes Vejur...
Well, one lives in hope of something interesting and out of the ordinary happening, anyhow.
Not entirely; we also kick rotten fruit to the kerb too ;)
I take it that the "down the electorate's throat" was an intentional double entendre, right ?
If this is the same firm that back in the early 90's, that, based on the south coast (Kent, or maybe Sussex, visited there once with a Project Consultant for my then-employer at the time), was involved in data translation/compatibility, with a hefty dose of Kurzweil OCR kit added for flavour, then you may well be right.
"financially backed SLA"
Well, that's about as useful as a roof rack on a helicopter, right? All you get back is the value of the proportion of time that your subscription for the services covered, not the value of the financial loss you suffered to your business - assuming it survives the hit - while the service was down.
As to not being able to, or not wanting to, answer the phones (whatever it was) in this situation, I'd say they just pissed away any goodwill their customers had left.
However you look at this TARFU, heads are very much likely to roll at InterMedia, and fairly quickly as well
Before people even considered what the future was bringing, he, and of course, all the other Greats, were already ahead of the curve. We shall not see his, or their, like again.
The world is truly a smaller place for their departure.
That's a phrase designed to make someone feel good about FIRING someone else for no other reason than the profit line sucks. I wish people like this would say what they actually mean: "We've buggered the bursar something horrid, and because of this monumental mismanagement, can't afford to pay both the shareholders and the wages bill anymore. We're therefore going to pay the shareholders, not you."
Is it ANY wonder that people are getting severely Effed Off with these - for want of a more accurate term - clowns?
Let's face it...
We gotta get off this 'ere rock sooner than later. Having all the eggs in one basket is a recipe for extinction.
Re: ...and here we se the "Head In The Sand" approach to system security...
Better a mystery, than having all my persona details sprayed out for all to see and abuse. Let's face it, FaceBook's approach to information security has not, historically, been anything to proudly shout about, has it?
- Xmas Round-up Ghosts of Christmas Past: Ten tech treats from yesteryear
- Analysis Microsoft's licence riddles give Linux and pals a free ride to virtual domination
- Review Hey Linux newbie: If you've never had a taste, try perfect Petra ... mmm, smells like Mint 16
- Special Report How Britain could have invented the iPhone: And how the Quangocracy cocked it up
- Massive! Yahoo! Mail! outage! going! on! FOURTH! straight! day!