38 posts • joined Wednesday 11th April 2007 11:36 GMT
@Paul Buxton and @AC
The end of the world is not in September. It is in December. 12/12/2012, to be precise. As to everybody else, .999 &c. clearly is equal to 1. I have Excel open right now and it says so right there.
Screwed Up from Day 1
This would have been so easy. Here's my thoughts from the time when "they" first started spouting the electronic voting idea:
1. Go into a booth.
2. Do the touch screen thing to select various candidates/issues to vote against.
3. Your ballot prints out on a laser printer
4. You look at it to confirm it's right.
5. You put it into an OCR reader.
6. Ballot pops out the other side.
7. You toss it into a lockbox and go to Waffle House.
The ballot is counted electronically twice and left on paper for audit. What could be simpler? What could be cheaper?
Come Children - BELIEVE!
"[E]veryone who actually remembers using this operating system is long gone."
I clearly remember seeing the "Windows Toy," as I liked to call it, start up on a computer I purchased when I was in college. It was an accident - I hadn't yet edited it out of autoexec.bat.
But I do remember! I do, I do, I DO remember!
Well of /course/ they're letting it go through without oversight. That's what the Bush administration is /for/! Jee willikers, sometimes I just have to wonder whatever happened with WOW & Co. that el Reg doesn't have anything better to report on.... <uncontrollablesmirk>
Let's step back a moment here. The most essential right of human kind is the right to be let alone. A little less cultural arrogance in the some of the comments to this story would be well taken. "We" are not "better" than "them."
OK, fair enough, Dave, but don't forget that your son's loss of his password is final. Without the User Tools and Groups snapin that comes only with XP <strike>Standard </strike>Pro you cannot reset his password without headache or $$.
Such an offer - NOT!
Who in their right mind would want to install XP "Home" Edition on anything?!
It's not totally efficient. No problem. But shouldn't it still run so long as power is provided (i.e., hot processor) and the parts don't wear out?
"Anyone who makes any comment whatsoever even lightly suggesting that the Germans have been sending large numbers of ne'er-do-wells to other people's countries for yonks wil be banned from reading El Reg for, let's say, 1,000 years."
Wot's a "yonk," then?
That's a paddlin
The term "social engineering" - particularly without quotes - should not be used in reputable journals. Doing so imparts to this intentional criminal activity an aura of respectability which it in no wise deserves. Stop it.
The hands-down best Destroyer of English (and Gluminosity) in decades. P. Anthony could not hold my interest, but book-after-book-after-book - and let's not forget Good Omens - Terry kept creating. Yes, he IS a British national treasure, and in fact a national treasure of English writing and English literature. Keep on writing, Terry!
Great review, but it discussed everything *except* the most eagerly anticipated item for any Motorola cellular telephone: A decent contact/address book system* combined with software that (1) has even a modicum of usefulness and (2) has had its field mapping actually tested before being released to production.
*Defined as one that allows at least two telephone numbers and one email address in each contact entry, that doesn't split such entries when saving to the SIM card (as opposed to the phone), and has zero difference in application regardless of whether an entry is saved to the phone or to the SIM card.
"Supervalu [is] arguing that the company should recover the full amount...." Get the money back from WHOM?
Back to COCONUTS!
I *STILL* say we should go back to swallows, oceans, and coconuts. There is no need for all this new math! I shall be writing a very firm letter to The Times tomorrow - and I don't even live in the U.K. So there.
Kudos to all
Anonymous Coward: Speding is a strict liability offense. Intent don't enter into it.
Frank Bough: If you don't have an expert witness, you lose. The state, however, gets off scott free because *it* gets to "prove" reliability in a single state or district wide case and forever after the defense gets to prove itself innocent, or at least not guilty, while the state rakes in the cash.
Filippo Negroni: Yes, take EVERY case to court. In my experience, in Ohio you'll get out of about 20% of them if you do.
Hedley Phillips: BECAUSE THE LIMITS ARE WRITTEN TO PATRONISE THE LOCAL NEWS AND OTHER CHIKEN LITTLES, THAT'S WHY! Speed limits have nothing to do with the design of the road or the objective conditions. Your point, however, is well taken.
What moving parts?
Last time I looked at a traditional heatsink, there was only one part (apart from the greasy part), and it din't move at all (at least not until I started fiddling with it).
No U.S. Sales?
Not available for dollars then? What about the export laws? Not to mention passports, visas, &c.?
"The difficulty of factoring the product of extremely long prime number...."
What? I can do that in less time that it took to read that sentence. Let's see.... OK! Prime number times anything gives the product! Voila!
No wait - Let's go the other way. Prime number divided by itself equals 1. Voila!
Who authorized a change to SHEEP?!
Who is El Reg to start measuring stuff by sheep?!
For aeons the standard measure of speed has been the SWALLOW; the standard measure of distance has been the OCEAN; and the standard measure of weight has been the COCONUT. Not sheep, stars, and grapefruits of all things! Traditional measures area clear, precise, and understood by all. There's no need to go mucking about and getting Science involved.
All this sheep stuff is just gonna confuse people, not to mention making life difficult for lonely adolescent shepherd boys who might not be able to keep up. Now let's have no more of this.
"[L]egitimate software suppliers"? Do you mean that as a software supplier they're not legitimate, or that they don't supply legitimate software? Either way, what is your def. of legit? If they're doing a better job at support than "other" soft suppliers, then whose the blacksheep struggling to come in from behind the cold eight-ball?
Not Gonna Work
This scheme is absitively posilutely NOT gonna work if they attempt to use BEC's. Everybody knows you gotta use BEM's for this kinda stuff. They'd be well advised, and much further ahead, to just bite the bullet and use correct terminology.
GANDALF IS NOT FICTIONAL
How DARE you say that Gandalf is fictional?!
I have several books Right Here that talk all about him! Crap on a crutch, where have you guys been?!
As alleged journalists you should KNOW by now it couldn't be published if it weren't true!!!! MOREOVER, there's only ONE book with Jebus in it! Sheesh!
Yes, Customer Service SHOULD Know!
With all due respect to our venerated first commenter, Dell's customer service people /should too/ be fully aware of this issue.
Every agent should have a comprehensive, searchable database of known issues. Even a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet would be fine.
But there is no excuse for Dell not having completed a weekly update training of their telephone staff. And if they're not doing such training, well, then, they have no business even publishing a customer support or customer service telephone number.
Their Time Machine Didn't Exist Until It Was Used, Either
Hmmm. There was no vulnerability until the kid discovered it.
No, wait! There was no vulnerability until he proved that there was.
No--that's not right either. There was no vulnerability until BeThere stepped in it.
No, that can't be it . . . . I guess there just wasn't any vulnerability. Therefore there is no vulnerability . . . .
Didn't we already do this in quantum mechanics class? I'm getting a headache.
"teens refrain from abstinence..."
Golly gee. Who'da thought.
Send Bush to the moon
". . . when he announced the US would return to the Moon by 2017 . . . ."
George Bush is no John Kennedy.