Huh?
At that price, surely your 'non-technical' purchaser would be much better off with a Drobo?
249 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Apr 2008
"Apple for either a) letting a key piece of strategic hardware out of a controlled environment or b) engaging in a pretty tawdry piece of publicity".
I'd got with A ( presumably they didn't think they'd need to tell their staff to avoid necking several jars of memory inhibitor while in possession of one of the test units) but how exactly is B at all true? All Apple have done is send Giz a letter asking for their property back after Giz made a big song and dance about having it. A private communication which Giz then put on their front page.
They didn't squeal about it. They didn't publicly call for Giz to be dragged off to the nick, they just sent a letter asking if they could have back something which it appears there is a good argument was stolen from them.
Just what exactly have Apple done at any point in this that can at all be described as tawdry, especially compared to Giz, who paid five grand for something they almost certainly knew they shouldn't be buying and pretty much kicked an innocent bloke's career into touch for the crime of losing his phone?
F'ing norah, talk about double standards.
"That person apparently tried to return the handset to Apple, but the support desk staff (who don't have access to the goings on in the R&D department) told him it was just Chinese knock-off and not to bother them with it."
Call me cynical if you like, but I wonder if he/she (the 'finder' - oh the irony) has any proof they did that and what Apple's response was. If they haven't and it ends up being Apple's word against theirs well... I wouldn't advise booking any holidays soon. I do know that Gizmondo wouldn't have paid 5 grand for a 'chinese knockoff', which suggests they at least knew that wasn't true.
As has been mentioned elsewhere, the SOP round these parts if you find some lost property in your local is to hand it in to the bar, where they keep it in case the owner comes back looking for it. The fact the finder didn't do that puts him/her on very sticky ground, as does the fact they didn't try to contact the engineer bloke himself, given they had various ways to ID him from the phone. Going to an Apple shop and talking to someone who logically would have no clue either way looks very much like an attempt to observe 'the letter of the law', which I doubt the court will consider sufficient.
"I wonder how I could, say, work on my Python (ipython with scipy and matplotlib) and Matlab (OK, Octave, but still) data analysis, while checking my mail, browsing the web and posting comments on El Reg."
If you're posting on El Reg you're not working on Python code. You're either doing one or the other. You may think you're doing both, but you're actually task switching, not multi-tasking.
And iPhones have been able to play 'DRM free music' in the background since day one.
@Alex - You can (and always have been able to) download the PS3 firmware from the EU playstation site, stick it on a USB pen drive and reflash a PS3 from that. You can even, with the right combination of holding down of buttons, reflash a PS3 that won't boot up to the usual OS.
If they get a firmware fix people will be able to apply it. Well, people with access to a PC, at least.
With contract iphones doesn't it technically belong to the telco until the contract expires?
I general, given that is Apple's stated policy, it seems incongruous to suggest they would provide mechanisms or support that go against that policy. Whether that policy is the one we may want (or indeed is sensible) is a separate issue to that. Apple has that policy and all the systems it develops follow that policy. I for one am not entirely surprised by that.
At the end of the day, if you don't like the way the Apple system works, there are plenty of alternative phones you could get that do more or less the same job.
Those saying the EyeTV and PlayTV units are HD compatible need to read the article. They are compatible with the form of HD the rest of the world is using/planning to use, NOT the weird variation we're getting in the UK. I guess there's a fighting chance that either a firmware or software upgrade to those two products would enable UK HD reception but as it stands, they are no better than any other UK stb product i.e. they'll still be usable for SD transmissions but the HD will be a no-go.
OK, the clue is in this sentence, which you wrote
"Something must be a bit wrong with the Apple implementation of this daemon."
You appear to know about BSD (which is a very laudable skill IMO) however you also appear to have failed spot the major point of the story, which is that this security breach is sod all to do with Apple and in fact they've specifically designed the iPhone to stop this kind of breach happening and you have to circumvent their security architecture yourself before you can be vulnerable to it.
And if you'll forgive me, it's a bit rich of someone using the 'devil Jobs' icon under these circumstances to call anyone else a troll.
Jon
I'm currently sat twiddling my thumbs because the beancounters can't get their act together and make a their minds up so I can move my project on. How dos that affect my productive time percentages, and how does it affect theirs? Do I assume because they're in another sodding meeting trying to avoid having to make a decision, they still count as working but I don't?
"And it's not as if Apple have even the guy on the street tech gadet market locked up, the likes of HTC and Acer are doing huge numbers in sales on Microsoft-based products, because if nothing else, they have a superior product."
Cobblers. It's not about having a superior or inferior product as a phone. They're doing it because the businesses that are buying the phones in bulk have an existing investment in MS based architecure i.e. Exchange and MS based expertise i.e. All those MCSE's who can't cope with anything that doesn't have the words 'group policy' attached to it.
MS mobile succeeds at the corporate level for the same reason Office does - not because it's better than the competition, it's because the people writing the cheques and building the back ends know only that and are too bloody scared to look at the competition.
I could probably count the number of people who bought a phone with their own money because it had windows mobile on it and was therefore 'superior' on the fingers of one hand. And even they have to use voice dialing until they manage to chew through the straps. Quite a lot of people buy phones that are superior in spec to the iPhone then have to fight windows mobile to be able to use any of the extra power.
Statement:
"the number of malware programs actively targeting the OS is most likely measured in the hundreds, security experts said."
Translation :
"We have no idea how many malware exploits there are for Mac OS. So here's a number that's sufficiently large and scary for us to continue to be paid."
Tell you what guys, when you 'experts' actually DO have a proper idea of what you're talking about, how about you come back to us then? The only thing worse than 'experts' are 'analysts'.
"Apple doesn't release Safari to earn brownie points but to provide a front-end to iTunes store."
What? The front end to the iTunes store is er... iTunes. You know, free download, was cross platform years before Safari, the standard way to get stuff onto an iPod, you know, THAT iTunes?
Apple made Safari because MS had allowed the Mac version of IE to rot on the vine. By the time Safari hit the world, Mac IE was about three versions behind windows IE code and even further behind the likes of Firefox and Camino. Apple made Safari because they felt there had to be a web browser there when you switched the machine on the first time and at that point Mac Firefox was clunky and, frankly, ugly as sin.
They already had some parts of a browser there (because iTunes does use webkit after all) but the decision to actually make a browser themselves has absolutely sod all to do with the iTMS.
Jon
Several apps have been withdrawn from the Apple App store due to legal issues - Delicious Library and Pocketpedia because they breached Amazon's new terms for use of their data for example (another example of Amazon doing stuff that pisses off the paying public but anyway) - and in every case so far, those who have already paid for the app retained their copy of it. You can't buy those apps any more but if you already have them they still work.
I dare say Apple do have that kill switch in the system. Even if they do, they don't have the pervasive wireless network or the level of control that Amazon do over the Kindle. If you had the 'turn my iPhone into a raygun' app and Apple puled it AND issued the killswitch, you'd still retain the app until you did a sync with iTunes, which of course yo don't actually have to do very often. There's no way for Apple to do what Amazon has done, which is pull something from the device with no way for the user to intervene in the process.
Jon
Already been done, in a way
http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody
bit of webcode that will detect which browser you are using and pick the appropriate encoded file to present within the <video> tag. All you have o do is provide the content in H264 MP4 and Ogg theora and it does the rest. Not streaming, but it works.
Jon
'K' said "I can't see Apple switching to AMD / Radeon".
Apple already use Radeon chips - they've always been a BTO option in the Mac Pros and they've used them in the iMacs as well from time to time. Apple are pretty much video card agnostic. Mac OS X therefore also already contains the relevant drivers for a bunch of Radeon architectures and they certainly have the expertise to write more if they need to.
I have no doubt whatsoever if they had/wanted to, they could switch to using Radeon chips at a model refresh without missing a beat.
Jon
With all due respect Sarah, ido you really have grounds to take umbrage with the comments posted in this thread given the story in question is virtually a fishing exercise to get them. Did you really expect to get any other sort of comment? In fact doesn't the story kind of apologise for itself on exactly the same basis?
Not that I approve of them I think they're pretty crass in the main. However, if you don't want lots of outrageous comments about a young woman's breasts maybe not posting a story about a young woman's breasts - with embedded video for Pete's sake - might have been a better option? Seems very slightly hypocritical of the reg (as an organisation, not you personally) to me.
On the subject of the woman and her apparent plans, It's not unusual for athletes in any sport to have operations which will repair injuries or the like to allow them to continue in competition even though they could continue to function in normal life perfectly well without the surgery. This seems to me to be a rather extreme case of that. It's her choice to do as she will, assuming she understands any long term effects it may have.
Jon
Seems to me that VMWare are doing something fairly funky which was always likely to break with an upgrade to the video driver. In fact, isn't it the case that in their READMEs VMWare have always said the 3D acceleration is kind of unfinished, isn't necessarily compatible with any particular bit of software on the guest OS and should be considered a bit experimental?
In any case, given you'd have to have successfully performed the OS update to get the problem in the first place, logically you'd have to say that for the victims in question Apple's stuff did 'just work' - it's VMWare's that didn't.
Course, there's no reason for the facts to get in the way of a variety of 'tard responses. Where's the 'storm in a teacup' icon?
One test worth doing - how long does it take to set up and authenticate to a WPA-protected wifi network from the 'home' screen. If there's one thing that makes me want to jump up and down in hobnail boots on every WM phone I've ever seen, it's that.
Does look very nice though.
Jon
So, assuming it's got a HDMI port, the thing may well be able to output at HD resolutions. Fine.
a) Will it actually be able to decode and display HD content? We're talking about something the size of a mobile phone being able to decode 1920*1080p 25fps video (H264?) here. It'll have a battery life of minutes and you'll need an oven glove to hold it.
b) How big a file is a standard (say Sky/Virgin VOD or iTunes) HD film? 8Gb something like? So assuming you have some music and some images on your Zune, you're going to be able to fit about 3 films on the big one if you're lucky.
Serious kudos to them if they can make a proper, practical HD video decoding device that's battery powered and you can fit in your pocket but for now I remain a bit sceptical.
Jon
The data is made up of a statistical analysis of how many support calls they get over a given period factoring in the relative market share of each vendor? That's an utterly idiotic mechanism. Apple run their own in house (or more accurately instore) support system and a lot of people who buy EeePC's tend to be the techy types who can and do fix stuff themselves. Just as two examples that could skew the figures. In a lot of cases, they're using stats from the self-selected group of people too thick to figure out how to get support without having to pay extra for it.
How on earth is this considered useful information?
Jon
No, but given her history and craving for self-publicity there are probably plenty of other pics of her on the interweb she wouldn't show to her granny.
In fact, even though I do actually agree with her that this is an invasion of privacy, isn't it a bit rich for someone who essentially takes her clothes off for a living to complain that having similar pictures nabbed off her phone caused her such distress?
Jon
The presenter specifically said 3.0 will support 'turn by turn navigation'. However he also said Apple's licence for the Google Maps data doesn't include this, so if Garmin or TomTom want to make an iPhone satnav app, they will have to include their own maps. I don't think they'll mind too much about that and, along with the new 'in app billing' system, it'll give them a nice revenue stream.
'Ah, I see you're on the way to the channel tunnel entrance. Care to download some maps of France before you get there? Only £20..."
Jon
"I bought my P5 iMac some time ago (obviously) and was very annoyed to find that it comes with an American keyboard"
Then you bought a grey import; either intentionally or they robbed you. Every Mac or mac keyboard I've bought in the UK has come with a keyboard with a £ (and more recently €) sign on it. They've always had @ and " the wrong way round mind...
Jon
Yay for blatant copyright infringement. All power to people who do little more than rip off someone else's idea to make a quick buck. Hooray for shoddy productry wrapped up to look like another companies product in the hope of conning some money out of the unwary.
Wait, what? You say that's supposed to be a bad thing? Oh I see, it's a bad thing /unless you're doing it to the iPhone, which we don't like/. Hmm.
Jon
Err.. sounds like they still have to take a photo of you to do it. Taking a photo with an iPhone ain't exactly a subtle thing to do. Plus there's no reason they couldn't do the same thing with a windows mobile phone, if some bothers to write an app for it.
In fact, why are they mucking about with phones at all? Given the prevalance of CCTV in our new shiny 'enhanced freedom' Britain, why not just grab the photos off CCTV feeds from nice warm offices without having to go out and mix with the surly proletariat?
Jon