2812 posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Hey! Don't knock Japan !
It's a question of basic prudence. Either Japan is so safe that they can spend time chasing cats, or Japanese cats are so intelligent they are responsible for online hacking.
If it's the second choice, then we're screwed because cats then have a worldwide organisation that beats everything the most harcore NSA spy could dream of. They have informants in every village, speaking the local language, watching YOU right now and reporting back on your activities. They don't need to decrypt anything, they're ON YOUR KEYBOARD, WATCHING YOU TYPE.
I bow before our feline overlords. May there always be tuna.
Agreed. The time-lapse may be significant for some, but for me it was just ever-changing black splotches on a white background with a small grey streak in the middle.
No sense of impending doom, no perspective, not even an idea of where the Moon is.
Totally, utterly useless.
But hey, even that must be rather tricky to get a pic of, so kudos to whoever took the snaps. Next time, could you have a few arrows added to it, pointing to relevant celestial bodies ? Like, the Sun is this way <-, the Moon is that way -> ? Thanks in advance !
Re: of all the non-IT stories on this site..
Being French, and an amateur of snails, I am interested in this story.
And I agree, nuke Caen from orbit. C'est la seule façon d'être sûr.
Re: History is on Bitcoins side
In a word : bollocks.
Bitcoin barely has a history, and what little it has is rife with scams, thefts and shady deals.
The fact that the US dollar was, at one point in time, emitted individually by states is irrelevant. Today, the US dollar is a strong international currency and everyone is using it - that is what is important.
Bitcoin might be a nice idea, but micropayments is a mechanism that is already helping people today, right now, whereas Bitcoin is just a pipe dream being abused by crims and hacks.
I dare say we don't need yet another currency, virtual or not. I don't see what it is that Bitcoin purports to solve - the only thing it is actually doing is demonstrating how easy it is to subvert the system.
The only way Bitcoin is going to become anything actually useful is if all Bitcoin exchanges become certified - and that means regulation, laws and enforcement. These laws will have to be implemented world-wide, even in countries that are rife with corruption - countries which will obviously become havens for criminal organizations.
When you want to reinvent the wheel, you had better reinvent it better. Bitcoin is just forcing us to go through exactly the same set of issues to resolve a problem nobody asked for.
Just die already, Bitcoin.
And so Yahoo! continues
it's slide into oblivion
Come on, Marissa, you should know better than to become a pale copy of Google.
You cannot survive on copying Google. You just can't.
Re: replace "strings of numbers" with "pieces of paper" and you describe any modern currency
Try saying that to the barrels of the SWAT team when you nick a sack of banknotes (paper).
BitCoin is a currency the same way bottles of Vodka are a currency : there are rare places that accept to deal with them.
The places accepting bottles of vodka also accept dollars, like everywhere else in the world.
So the difference between any VirtCoin and dollars is that if you steal 400 million dollars, you can be 100% certain that there is someone, somewhere, who's sole mission is to capture you - alive or dead won't really matter - whereas if you steal 400 million VTC, you'll get a lawsuit from another country.
Now tell me which currency is more real than the other again ?
You have because they were actual, real objects that are now in someone else's possession.
These VirtCoins may be unique strings of bits (for a given value of unique), but their value is less than the hard drive platters they are stored on (much less).
Besides, if you had a hundred grand of family heirlooms worth nicking, you should also have insurance on them and a valid basis for judicial action.
Oh, and if you haven't paid Inheritance Tax on that then Her Majesty's Revenue Service would like a word with you . . .
No it isn't.
Gold is real. It is rather difficult to mine, and somewhat dangerous to purify.
Mining VirtCoin is just having the hardware and waiting for the ones and zeros to align properly.
Nothing real, nothing difficult, just a program chugging away wasting time. The only reason people are complaining is because some (enough) have been stupid enough to think that money could actually be made out of this scheme.
Ironically, money will now be made. By lawyers.
Re: why is it okay to be running a 12 year old OS?
Uh, because it works ?
You people banging on and on about how Microsoft has alerted people for years and so on really should get a reality check.
Rule #1 : The Customer Is Always Right
Rule #2 : Getting Money From The Customer Is Hard To Do
Most importantly :
Rule #3 : A Customer Will Not Replace Something That Works Fine
The vast majority of customers are not PC fans, OS adulators of any side, or actually care about PC stuff in any way. They are much more involved with their personal lives/hobbies/problems which can be in activities ranging from caring for actual, living people to going fishing or watching football with friends and a beer (or three).
There is only a tiny percentage of PC users (of which I am part) who truly care what the OS they run is doing on their hardware and ensure that the thing is optimized and running properly.
Now turn the problem the other way around : how many of you who berate users for not moving to at least Win7 are out every weekend polishing their car ? Because car polish is essential for the proper preservation of the paint color and general durability. And you should use <insert brand name> products only, because they have a proven history and have never used <insert chemical product> at any point in their production history since it is proven that <insert given adverse effect>.
So all you XP-demonizers out there need to pull your own heads out and realize that a PC is not the most important thing in most other people's lives.
The customer is always right. Deal with it.
Re: it will be nice to hear from them first hand.
Sure will - as soon as they get electricity to power all those shiny Ipads they must have.
I do hope Mr Zuck gets this done. It will be hilarious watching him try to pass himself off for a humanitarian (bitch!), and it will be even more fun watching the whole financial debacle that will ensue.
11 thousand drones in the air 24/7/365 for years on end ? Won't happen.
But hey, at least some doctors will be able to post fund/material requests faster (I hope).
Happy that he is "taking time for himself and his family"
Yeah. That sounds sincere.
Come on, you're fooling nobody. He's being put out to pasture, end of. He's done his job, time to put a younger wolf to the task.
Re: The guy [...] will stop at nothing to achieve his goals
Good on him, at least he has determination, I guess.
The thing I don't like is that he's always dragging his money-grubbing mouth into the media like a shrill housewife and making everybody take a side.
Icahn : I don't give a flying monkey's about your money issues. It's all private money, nothing to do with me and nothing I can do about it even if you are right. And given that whenever I hear your name it is about you screaming about something you just bought into, I have the gut feeling that either you're an ass, or you're an incompetent ass with too much money. So go wash your dirty laundry in private and keep it away from my ears.
I am so disappointed
I was rather hoping to read that users had been locked out of their Twitter thingy and couldn't use it all.
The only thing this actually did was increase the usage of that moronic platform as users flocked to it even more in an effort to tell everybody and their dog what everybody already knew - as usual.
What a waste of bandwidth.
Re: A bit like highways
It costs millions to lay one mile of highway.
It costs millions to build a data center, for sure, but providing the bandwidth is going to be a side-issue compared to scaleability, reliability and redundancy costs.
The comparison is not entirely wrong, but I doubt that the scale is comparable.
And I'm thinking that, if you are using 200TB of data per user, you are not going to want to have to wait for Internet speeds to get to them. Locally you can have fibre for accessing all that data at GigaByte speeds, but the Internet is going to knock you down to 100Mbps in the very best of cases. Don't argue ; if you have the money to get a GB Internet connection, then you have the money to lay a 100Gbps line in your own company, with all the infrastructure around it.
Plus I doubt very much that having a petabyte of data available is going to cost you "millions". A few hundred thousand for sure, purchasing the various bits and bobs that make a petabyte of data available (NAS and RAID), redundancy and cooling and whatnot, plus an admin to make sure everything putts along nicely. That will take you into the five-digit range for sure, but six ?
"8.1 makes Windows usable with a mouse again (at least if you have a touch enabled mouse). "
And that is the final link in the chain that damns Microsoft to the circles of Hell for all eternity.
There will be no ghosts visiting you this XMas, Scrooge McBallmer - you're doomed.
Good question :)
Didn't catch that. My bad.
"I think PCs will be effected by those changes and react to the extent that they can."
PC's might be affected by the change (and I hope they will, actually), but they will certainly not be effected by change.
Please do not fall into the same potholes that affect the common commenter. When you pen an article, you're supposed to set an example. Set the right one.
Brilliant PR piece
I think this communiqué from MtGoX delivers absolutely everything anyone could want to know about the "company".
First of all, the rambling, incoherent mess of words evoking a thought process but one that is too drunk to realize itself, then the random capitalisation and punctuation (demonstrating a clear lack of knowing how to convey information) and finally the total absence of anything concrete to base a conclusion on.
If I were a Venture Capitalist and had been handed a business plan written like this, I would not have gone further than the second sentence before deciding that this guy didn't have a clue and certainly was not managerial material.
Managing a business requires focus and attention, and this "paper" clearly demonstrates that nobody at MtGoX has either, much less an understanding of what the word "managing" means.
MtGoX never should have gotten off the ground. It never was anything more than a bunch a schoolkid-mentality types who bungled together some software they downloaded and then let things flow thinking they had achieved something.
Now that reality is intruding, their illusions are being shattered big time.
@ Willie T
" if I am about to begin work on a new project I can scan the internal social sites or put out a query to see if anyone else has done something similar"
Because you think someone will have posted something in that line ? If you are about to begin a new project; it is either because someone has told you to do it, or because you think it will make you look good to your manager.
In the first case, you won't go waste time on the social, you're going to start working on the project in order to not look like you're wasting time or risk getting late. In the other case, you won't want to know if someone else has already done it because you want to be able to say that you did it from A to Z.
Social networks in the company space always end up with a case of the lepers. When they arrive, everyone is told to use them for all the usual, marketingly-enthusiastic reasons. Then people notice that it does not help them do their work which they have already been doing properly for the past x years, and the one or two colleagues they need to talk to to get their work done are either not on the social thingy because not part of the local office, or are more comfortably contacted via other means (walking to the office next door comes to mind). From that point, the social thingy spirales into uselessness, then contempt when the workers realize that the only ones using it are the ones actively pining to look good to management, even at the cost of their productivity (or their productivity doesn't matter to the daily business).
What irks me with this "social" trend is the way its apologists totally forget that all they are doing is trying to force people to replace actual social contact with a computer screen. When you've been working for some years in a company, you have social contact with all the people you need to get your work done - either that on you're fired because you don't talk to the people you need to talk to.
So, except for the people who hate the other people they have to talk to and will gladly take a computer screen instead (it certainly does exist), all the people who are happy interacting in a human way with the people they need to keep in touch with will feel that using this social tool will simply tell the other people that they prefer using a computer to talk to them - in other words it is insulting. And normal people prefer not to insult people that they are happy to interact with.
So if we really are in this happy world where everyone is pleased with all of their other colleagues, then nobody will need to use this social thing because they already talk to their colleagues and prefer doing so the human way. If, on the other hand, everybody hates everybody else, well putting a social thing in the middle will just put a glaring point on how much everyone prefers being somewhere else.
Facebook works because people can pick and choose who they want to stay in contact with and it is done on a private level.
The corporate environment is a place where people have to put up with people they appreciate to varying degrees. Socializing with those other people, especially when forced by managerial fiat, is something that is going to be automatically and intrinsically resisted in every way possible.
Failure by design, in other words.
Re: It really isn't...worth it - or free (unless your time is of no value)
Yes it is free and worth it.
Go get your check already, we can see the logo now.
Not to worry, this is going to be another bust on the (increasingly large) list of Microsoft failures.
Work is to do work, not to pitter-patter around "social" tools. The only ones who think this is good are the people who earn money doing Powerpoint charts. They will be happy with it, for sure.
The rest of the grunts don't have time for social tools. They have a mountain of things to actually get done before the end of the day and if that doesn't happen, no amount of "social tooling" will avoid getting their ass fired.
So for once this is a Microsoft product that will clearly define its users : it will be the ones who consider themselves "deciders" and spend their time crowing about how good they are at it.
The rest of us will just suffer with Office in our dank cubicles and be grateful we get a check at the end of the month instead of a pink slip.
Re: Every large corp. I have worked at (a fair number) makes very extensive use of SharePoint
So you're saying that, since 2001, you have worked at a "fair number" of very large corporations ?
That either means that your notion of a "fair number" is rather limited, or your CV is creatively describing good reasons for several abrupt departures that are commonly described as "getting fired".
And if you've had that many hasty exits in the past 14 years, then you are not well-placed for criticising other people's companies.
In truth though, your attitude is much more of a troll than anything else. So I doubt very much that you have ever set foot in a very large corporation. Unless it's to do the cleaning.
"they would have to check with RSA first"
Sorry ? What kind of bull is that ?
Can there be any actual justification to that kind of response ?
Only if they are fireants !
Ok, now I get it
Now I understand why every single post-apocalyptic Hollywood film ever made looks like Australia.
It's because the only people that can possibly have a hope to survive are the ones defying death on a daily basis no matter what they do.
Even lying in a hammock in your backyard can apparently get you killed over there.
I tip my hat to the Nation of Road Warriors and Future of Humanity.
Because the honest company trying to stay in business does not have rumors of bad dealings trailing along with it ?
If Hollywood is anything to go by, if he were in America all he would need to worry about is his car or house exploding when he got in, whereas in Japan, that adorable schoolgirl that just walked by may right this instant be turning around while taking out some weighted chains from her handbag to bash his unwary skull in.
Which is probably why he doesn't walk the streets any more. So it'll be barbed crossbow bolt through the eye socket at 3 A.M. from the building roof across the street then. And shadowy figure vanishing in the night without a sound.
Banks love transactions - anonymous or not
Banks have no trouble with virtual currencies, proof being that BitCoin has a market value. Virtual currencies may be virtual, as soon as real money is traded for something, banks take a cut of the transaction - it's what they live for.
If banks really has an aversion to virtual currencies, you simply wouldn't be able to exchange real money for WhateverCoin and there would be no market value to speak of. Then I would believe your words.
Commercial banks have no problem with anything they can get a cut of.
State-operated banks, on the other hand, probably have issues with this new market thingy - until they read up on the latest vCoin scandal and laugh quietly before turning to the latest money-laundering scheme they are in charge of.
You can create a bank called The Pink Fluffy Rabbit if you want - once you have proven yourself to be reliable and professional, the name doesn't really count.
Of course, getting the customers to allow you to prove your reliability might be an issue at the start.
The reverse is true as well - your company can have a perfectly honourable name but still be shunned because of shady accounting practices or PR disasters of the past. I'm sure you can find some examples yourself.
Glad you do
So if it provokes a reaction, it is art ?
Shit provokes a reaction, does that mean it's art ?
On the other hand, that would explain a lot about Microsoft....
Re: and the money just flows in
But then an exchange falls over and your "money" is either gone or seriously deprecated.
I'm glad that you live happily in a land of milk and honey. Meanwhile, in the Real World, the credibility of virtual currencies has been curbstomped and run over by a column of tanks.
"much of China's farmland will see crops wither or poorly develop "
Hang on, how big is Beijing already ?
This article reads as if all of China's farmland will suffer because of pollution in one city.
I know Beijing must be quite a city, but I doubt the cloud covers 9 600 000 square kilometres.
That said, I read an article not long ago stating the cloud was the size of California - not the smallest of the States.
"Because it's unethical and bad for business, he said"
So, given what I remember of Microsoft business behaviour in the past, if it's unethical and good for business, then it's go! go! go!
You just gotta love it when a Microsoft spokesvole mentions the word "ethics". It sounds so schizophrenic.
Re: Because this system requires either contact with a probe, or close proximity to it.
The system requires a probe for AUTHENTICATING it, which says nothing about what it's doing when not being authenticated.
But, theoretically, it only responds to a probe.
"China needs us more than we need freedom"
Um, you have freedom, nobody is taking it from you.
As for China, it doesn't need you in any way, shape or form.
If it does start to need something like you, it will make its own version.
So go ahead and bend over while the going's good. If you think your customer base is going to have any loyalty to you, well let me just say one day you will wake up very sorry.
Seems pretty clear then
Virtual cash is .. virtual.
About time people started to get the message.
This is all on par with get-rich-quick schemes, and we all know that the only ones who win are the ones who started it.
In any case, this slew of articles concerning MtGox and sleazy dealings in StuffyCoins is the final nail on the coffin.
As far as I'm concerned, all these CoinThingys are just criminal enterprises, period.
So, where are the hookers and the barmen ?
"Our vision isn’t to connect a seventh of the world's it's to connect everyone"
Here, let me correct that for you :
Our vision isn’t to track a seventh of the world, it's to track everyone and sell their personal details better than Google.
"automatically shoots handsfree pictures through the day"
And does what with them ? Post them on your FB wall ? On Twitter ?
Yeah, I can see that being no trouble at all.
Re: fluctuation isn't an issue
If I put money in my bank on Monday, then come back on Tuesday to take the same amount out and get told it is now only worth 1/10th of what I had, then fluctuation is a damn big issue.
Re: you're taking away choice
No you're not.
People can very well continue to use MS Office products and save in .odf format.
The thing is, if that happens then they can also use something else to save in .odf format and that is very much what Microsoft does not want to see happen.
I sure hope you're right.
Re: "why do you think posting this patently untrue and discredited nonsense ..."
Because paid shill still has to shill.
Your trolling is starting to show, might want to cash that Redmond check in now.
I think there's a stack of People magazines in the corner that disagree with you.
Re: What's the chance
Well I think the proper response to that is : we don't have a fucking clue either way.
We're still learning this, people. We don't know everything, and the "models" we use to try and find out are flawed and incomplete.
One day, I am confident we will have the proper data and know how to model it to divine future trends properly. At that time, if the science (not data fudging) says global warming and we are responsible, then that's the deal. Right now ? We don't know.
Once upon a time, people thought the Earth was at the center of the Univers. Today, the same kind of people are steadfast in their belief that Humanity is at the center of everything that happens on Earth, and Earth's destiny is tied to our existence.
Bollocks either way.
Re: For some of us
Yeah, for SOME of you.
The rest of us have to work with Word and Excel.
Oh, and the video is unavailable.
Hang on, this is too good
So, Miss CLEO is now going to assist us in divining our position ?
Who on God's Green Earth (tm) is making up these acronyms ?