This is a title
So, if Im reading this right, there were a handful of people that were arrested only because their names were on a list? And the only way onto that list was to subscribe to it?
(Personally I'd be suprised if they hadn't caught any innocents, its not like everyone checks everything they click/download/put CC details into.)
They said there was no evidence that there was CC fraud, but what does that mean? The culprit didnt use the card anywhere else, so it looks like a 'normal' transaction?
Shirley if you are going to convict someone for somthing like this, then you have to prove that they did sign up to the list, not that there wasn't any CC fraud, no?