2914 posts • joined Tuesday 25th March 2008 12:38 GMT
...this is the UK and the MPs want to help their friends in big business shift all that 100Mbit/s kit they have lying around, as well as recover the costs of the fab. pplants. In return, the MPs can expect sponsorships, junkets, directorships and help getting that peerage.
In the UK an MP will do what is right for them and that's it; not what is right for the country or their constituents. They are corrupt to the core - just look at the recent expenses fiasco. Scum the lot of them.
Once you need an ID card for insurance, bank account, NHS, benefits, and police random stop (where not having an ID card is taken as 'suspicious') there will be a stampede of applications.
The ID cards are coming.
You will obey the machine.
Whilst the outlawing of Word amused me greatly, all this patent faff in the USA is really beyond a joke. There should be some clause whereby if a firm is not actively using a patent (i.e. in the R&D/manufacture of mobile phones in this case) then the patent expires within a few years.
I realise there are problems with the above, but it would stop all these parasitic lawyers hoovering up patents and suing every Tom, Dick and Harriet.
There's no need to advertise the ID card as it will be compulsory.
Either have an ID card, or foget about having a job, bank account, health care, insurance, driving license or being free to walk down the street (no ID card will be 'suspicious').
Thus advertising the ID card would be like advertising breathing.
Who mentioned Linux? Your prejudices are showing through.
But, if people don't want Linux they'd best get rid of all those Tivos then.
And most other PVRs...
And most set-top boxes...
But I wasn't necessarily talking about Linux (other kernels are available...).
I did not "care" if my washing machine had a pre-soak cycle when I was looking. Really, it was not part of my buying decision. I would "care" though if it could not clean my clothes. I did not know in advance that a pre-soak cycle might have been important (luckily the one I bought has one, but anyway...).
So you are right, general consumers will not "care" in advance about multi-tasking, USB, tethering, video out etc. Right up until the point where it does not do something they expect and then they will "care" mightily.
Oh, and thank you for the ad hominem. it;'s nice to see that the powers of reasoned debate on El Reg are still in the gutter. You do realise the irony in calling me a "socially inept nerd" whilst slinging said insult; don't you?
It is more feature rich and less locked down that the Apple iFad at the hardware level (USB etc).
It can run a full, multi-tasking OS.
I know which one I would seriously consider, and it wouldn't be the iFad.
Whilst I agree...
...Apple are not in a monopoly position on desktop PCs. MS are.
There is a stronger case to call Apple a monopoly in the Smartphone/Portable Media Player arena; but there is still probably enough competition for them to duck it there too.
MS, however, ARE a monopoly and this is why they come in for so much stick.
Are you accusing me of...
...illegally accessing content? Are you accusing me of illegally distributing content?
Be very, very careful what you say, buster. And go look up the work "libel". Yes, it does apply to forums such as this.
Porn site - index pictures and video, search on same, deliver content to verified users.
Photo sites - index pictures a, search on same, deliver content to verified users.
Video - index video, search on same, deliver content to verified users.
Content delivery web interface - index content based on meta data, search on index, deliver allowed content to verified users.
Technically they are all very, very similar. If not fecking identical! What next? "Same models of Cannon cameras used at school sports day also used for smut filth! Shock!"
Thinking about, losing the prudish attitude and using the solutions the porn industry have found to verification, delivery, distribution and piracy could well save millions (billions?) in other sectors.
Mad thought of the day: perhaps the porn industry would be better suited to delivery NHS SPINE than the incumbent consultants?
Linux Repos FTW
This is one area where major Linux distros thrash Windows into oblivion. The "repository" system works very, very well. You can install from the existing repos, add new ones etc. So long as the install is done within the bonds of the prevailing package control system, updates for everything (kernel, apps, whatever) just appear.
You have one point of truth (the package manager, call it what you will) and within a corporate environment you can simply run your own repo that pushes out whatever whenever it is tested/needed.
When it comes to updates and remaining secure, I don't Windows users are aware of how far back in the dark ages they are living.
Point of order
H.264 is not "open source" in any meaningful way. It is patent encumbered and you cannot implement it without paying fat fees. Hence why MOziall has (rightly) dug its heels in over the use of this format.
As for the BBC...fix this stupid mistake NOW. (Yes, I have complained)
The BBC really are being monumentally stupid. And the content providers too. Their current antics simply mean that illegal content is easier to acquire and consume than legal. So guess what people will use?
The iPlayer was so good it has hard to believe it came from the BBC. Now it is just getting turned into a sack of vomit by all this Adobe crap.
I was thinking that too
I am also wondering how that applies to a particular version of a movie/song/whatever that is not released here.
Also, where something is released in one region with a long lead-time before it arrives here. Until it lands, is the sharing legal?
In fact, how does it work with DVDs etc? Region on is not available here; so it is OK to share Region 1 encoded DVD images in Europe? Are these different enough to form a loophiole?
I hope so. Not because I want to share files etc., but because I want to see the idiocy that is region locking die a horrible death. Different regions for various language sets is a good idea - but it should not prevent me from playing whatever I had bought. Which is does now.
It is (almost) impossible to buy a PC with Windows on it.
So when I buy an HP (or Acer or...) and reclaim the MS Tax for Win7, will that still get counted as a sale?
Assuming I can still reclaim the MS Tax that is.
I thought it had to be returned to the OEM? Who will probably want the kit back to verify that the license is not being used.
I'm interested in this as I am planning to by a netbook (or small laptop) and I do not want to run Windows, therefore I do not want to may the MS Tax.
He may have meant...
...a more open OS. You know, one where you could go and look at the code if you wanted.
The people who rely on obscurity are the likes of MS and their shills.
And if the site, strictly coded to the standards, does not load in your browser; you'll be the first to blame the web devs rather than the true culprit (your browser).
MS is 100% to blame for all this crap we have to suffer today (web devs and end-suers). They gave us IE6, IE7 and now IE8. Maybe by IE10 they with have got with the FUCKING PROGRAM and produced a strict implementation of HTML6 (or whatever happens to be around at that time).
Somehow I doubt it though.
Still MS's fault
The chose to ignore the standards in IE6 and IE7. So they have made this rod for their own back. People hacked their pages to display to the largest possible customer base (IE6 and IE7 back in the day). Mozilla et al have had to deal with this crap, now it's MSs turn.
They cannot blame devs for having to code down to their vomit-filled implementation of HTML.
And when the world moves to the HTML5 stanards....will IE follow?
I rather doubt it, we'll get a partial implementation at best which will (guess what?) force dvs to write for the sub-standard, sub-set that IE8 provides.
...I have no issue with infected PCs being blocked by the ISP (after their own scanning, or someone alerting them) and the owner being made to cover all costs incurred (including clean-up - they can take it to a certified engineer if needs be). People need to wise-up to their on-line responsibilities.
But for MS to propose such measures is a bit beyond the pale. If their OS was not SO EASY to infect and subvert, we would not have these issues. *nixes (and I include OS X) are not immune, but they are a shit-load harder to subvert with the tricks that work on Windows. They are also a heterogeneous and compatible environment, so it would be extremely hard for one piece of malware to infect more than a subset of machines.
Often it is not the OS that is actually infected, but some application (e.g. MS Office) that is bent to the will of the hacker. If you are lucky, MS will update this on a random Tuesday. But what if it was a non-MS app? You've got little help unless you actively seek our the patch/new version.
The update mechanism on any modern Linux distro (I don't know about OS X, sorry) is vastly superior than the one on Windows; it takes care not only of the OS and ancillary systems, but also all applications that have been installed via the certified repositories (or whatever your particular brand on Linux happens to call them). No need to go looking, your system will check for updates once a day (or whatever you set it to).
One side effect is that you may get a batch of updates every day. This is a "Good Thing"(tm) as you get the fix as soon as it is ready and don't have to wait for that special Tuesday. Reboots are rare due to how *nix deals with files and it is all over in a few mouse clicks (or a few terminal commands if you prefer). And yes, you can modify how all this works for the corporate environment).
If the world moved to Linux (or OS X, BSD, Haiku...) tomorrow, viruses, rootkits, trojans etc would not vanish, but they would become much, much harder to forge given the reasons above. The only losers would be Symantec et al.
So, by all means, block infected machines, but ask yourself why such measures should be necessary. If the internet is the "information super highway", then Windows PCs are unfit for the road and fail their MOT (or TUV or...)
A few things
1) This is obvious, no?
2) Surely their is prior art? e.g. A mobile phone (it's a computer) and it knows its location and it "advertises" a new provider when you leave your normal region.
3) Who sees ads these days anyway? NoScript, AdBlock and GreaseMonkey squish them all. hell, you don't even need to see ads on TV with the likes of MythTV.
Given 1 and 2, why the hell did the USPO allow a patent?
Oh, wait. It's the USPO!
Think of the children? Ok.
This is a book. Learn how to read them. Learn how to maintain a stream of thought for longer than 30 seconds. Learn how to use an index and bibliography.
This is a pencil and paper. Learn how to do basic arithmetic, algebra etc. No, really; it's important. You'll thank me when your bank screws up.
That is the outside world. Go make some actual friends and learn some actual social skills. Get some exercise, lower your risk of heart disease and an early death.
Kids DO NOT need laptops. They need to know how to drive a computer, sure. But there are many more way, way, WAY more important skills than pressing buttons.
Also, last time I checked, my pencil and paper has a better battery life than any laptop. They were cheaper too.
We'll see about that I guess. I'll get mine off in the next day or so.
The "content providers" did not expect people to watch TV programs on their TV? Just how monumentally stupid are these "content providers"? A TV is just a display screen for video content, whatever the delivery mechanism (aerial, satellite, VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray, cable or internet). They are all the same once the stream is flowing in the home. So OF COURSE folks watch on their TV! FFS!
As for deep linking, what the HELL does that have to do with this? I thought they filtered based on IP? So the number of "nawty" programs able to purloin content should be vanishingly small. Deep link or no, if you have your security set-up properly (and as we were lead to believe) then requests from unatned IPs will simply not get through or get redirected (a la AdultSwim).
We shall, of course, ignore the basic flaw in all of this; which is that trying to regionally restrict content in a network that is by design GLOBAL is like trying to empty a reservoir with a sieve. It's a lot of work, some folks will get rich providing a service to do it, but in the end it is utterly futile.
Hence all the barriers the governments are now trying to place on the net. A populace divided is a populace monetised and controlled. The net can probably withstand a nuclear strike, but it is powerless again the RIAA and their lawyers.
My maths teather...
...was a 3rd Dan in Karate (Shotokan I think). Quite frankly he scared the shit out of me (and most other pupils).
Probably explains why we were rather good at maths though!
Way to go Corduroy-ka!
But the Dell Ubuntu landing page is *VERY* anti-Linux!
Aaaaaaand they have one model.
And it's pants.
HP sell Linux PCs too, although they make them nearly impossible to find (probbaly under pressure from MS).
Just buy what you want (after doing some rudimentary hardware compatibility checks)
Reject the MS EULA
Drop on the penguin of choice
Reclaim the Microsoft Tax (around €70, YMMV)
Or consider Frostbite Systems, System 76...
I shall update...
...and check at the weekend. I have an old xBox, so I doubt it has the jucie to handle Flash.
Thanks for the ray of hope!
So because everyone else decided to cut their own legs off and stab themselves in the eyes before the big race, it is not a "Good Thing"(tm) that the BBC has done the same?
Sort of agree...
...but I'll just uninstall all that bollocks. It'll be easy enough.
Am I the only one on the planet left without a Facebook, Twitter, MySpace etc account?
I'll confess to being on LinkedIn.
What a bunch of morons. I love using my old xBox to watch iPlayer (I live in the UK, I pay my license fee) and now I can't because some ass-hat is sucking the Adobe phallus.
We need DRM like we need a freaking hole-in the head. With the coming of HTML5, hopefully the world will wake-up to what utter crap Flash is and we can move on. but probably not.
...they should release the On2 v6 codec (Ogg is based on On2 v3) under an irrevocable free license. Then we can all standardise on that and tell Adobe to ram Flash where the sun doesn't shine.
"In the UK this means you don't need a TV license."
This has nothing to do with...
...watching overseas (that's done by checking your IP).
This has everything to do with breaching standards and applying DRM where it doesn't need to be.
Luckily we are outside the DMCA in the UK, so hopefully a patch will be forthcoming.
As a techie, I can see the advantage of centralised records and data sharing. Putting all issues of privacy to side for one second, it should bring massive efficiencies, reduce time wasted etc.
Our government (all 3 major parties) have shown themselves incapable of delivery any reasonably sized IT project, incapable of respecting the law, incapable of protecting privacy, incapable of coming clean and quickly fixing problems; basically, incapable of being trusted.
And that is also ignore the massive levels of corruption within the greater EU.
Because of this staggering ineptitude and corruption, any data sharing, retention or centralisation must be opposed because of the vast levels of abuse that will happen. So despite the potential advantages, we must forgo systems simply because we cannot trust our employees to use them correctly.
I don't mind the 50p...
...as such. The money has to come from somewhere.
And it would be nice to think that this 50P will evaporate in a year or two once the roll-out is complete.
What I do mind is the fact that this 50p will grow in size and become permanent. Thus we will all end up paying £15 a month (or whatever) for a "internet fund license" which will actually go to pay for first class train tickets etc and not be used for what it was originally intended.
And if you send it in...
...OOXML will they have that? Or the old binary format? Maybe, maybe not.
This is exactly WHY standards are needed (and one standard for one thing - we did not need OOXML as ODF was there first). Now we have the VHS/Betamax wars AGAIN (just like BluRay/HD). The people who lose are the consumers through inflated prices and the devs who have to do everything twice.
And once again the arguably inferior standard will be the one that ends up getting adopted.
...*IS* the competing standard!
Should it be "Microsoft Office continuing to have poor standards support", or something along those lines?
Claiming is easy...
...I can do it to: MS violates all of my patents.
See? Nasty MS patent violators. *waggles finger* Where are my millions?
Of course there are three things to not about the above claim
1) I make no statement as to *what* patents;
2) I provide no proof; and
3) I don't actually hold any patents anyway.
Is it perhaps time for the FSF (or some other body) to challenge MS over these claims? File a suit of malicious falsehood or whatever? I'm pretty ignorant of USA law, so maybe that is not possible.
Either way, MS should either put up or shut up when it comes to these claims. If they have solid proof, then there should be no problem with making that proof public and allowing scrutiny. It's not as if this would show anything "secret" after all, they are claiming it has already been copied and is already in use.