There's Banshee, the default music player in Ubuntu.
3061 posts • joined 25 Mar 2008
There's Banshee, the default music player in Ubuntu.
Have you asked the devs of the plug-ins to make them compatible?
Have you offered to sponsor the work?
This is the 1980s, we'd like our HiFi designs back.
Buy bike armour. Well insulated, waterproof and you'll need it when some BMW/Volve driving ass-hat smashes into you. Cost to be fully suited and booted in something half-decent £500-£1,000.
...isn't that just a battery-powered C1 with 4 wheels? Think I'd rather have a C1 to be honest (and repeal the stupid helmet laws for such a machine).
I am sick and tired of El Reg only discussing Azure, when the likes of OpenStack, EC2 et al are tearing MS a new one.
Cloud is a bit like REST, it's an architectural idea and it probably won't scratch all your itches. But to ignore it is a bit naive.
Also, markteers should be taken into a small room by the techs and have the true meaning of "cloud" beaten into them.
If it was sold at the "true" price (which would have been about £213). Oh wait, tax. Make that about £256. Still pricey, but easier to swallow. But no, same deal as always. Rip-off the Brits.
There is a simple answer - don't buy.
If Google just uses it as some kind of index "Book X by Y, ISBN N contains what you are looking for" and maybe with a highlighted paragraph or something, then I totally fail to see the issue.
If, however, Google vomits up the entire book or sells/provides by any means a copy (or large portion) of the book for which the publisher receives no remuneration, then that is an issue.
And looking at Google Books it appears to be the former, so I am not sure what their problem is as Google Books just lets people find their book and then easily buy it. Surely that's of advantage to the publisher?
With 4gb RAM and a HDD to match, they will even manage virtualisation. half-Life etc will also run (and that was also on Ubuntu 10.10). The only problem is these units have a reputation for blowing capacitors.
...only a £3 diff between Ubuntu and Windows? Really? Sod the PC, where can I get Windows 7 and Office for £3?
I did eventually find the Remploy Store on eBay, just a few crappy Dells really. That they're ones known to have dodgy capacitors.
There's nothing about it on the Remploy site.
...to super injunctions. If you covet a public life and/or use your public profile to make a living (film/music stars, MPs etc) then avoid all the injunction hassle by not dipping your wick in someone else's wax, making false claims or otherwise being a total cock.
Personally I don't care if you like to be dressed as a baby and spanked by "mummy", but I do care when you try to cover up your actions and present yourself as something you are not.
...was never really a big project from Skype. You can be sure that MS will kill it stone-dead to ensure that the only real option is MS-centric
...Conan was Schwarzenegger. "Copland" was good, "Rocky I" too.
Change the law to make you liable for what happens on your network.
Not saying that's a nice thing to happen, just saying it's something that could happen.
"Oh, but Hollywood only produces crap and doesn't deserve paid." Really? Really, really? So why are you so dead keen to watch it then?
"Oh, but I'm poor and can't afford it." Really? But you got enough money to spunk on broadband.
Why not support people doing stuff you like? Why not get behind other movements/organisations (such as vo.do)?
Got no sympathy for those who engage in copyright infringement via torrents.
There again, I also have little support for the antics of the RIAA/MPAA/BPI.
MS already have an alternative, OCS. It is one of the few things MS has managed to do right (although only allowing you to store conversation in Outlook is a PITA). Want multi-party video conferencing? Done. You do need to run a server though.
I agree - this is just about buying the user base.
Someone pass a sick-bag, please!
Is this how desperate MS is getting? Kee-rist. They don't even go into the "virtues" of Win7. "This one's touch screen". Ooh-wee, excuse me whilst I get some tissues. That is just a matter of hardware rather than OS as such (although is need OS support, obviously).
It is true that buying a new PC almost forces one to accept Windows, but that is more down to market abuse rather than an informed decision to buy Windows.
WTF? I did learn how an engine actually works when driving, it gave you an understanding of the noises, why gear changes were important, why oil is important. It also gave you knowledge of when to break the rules (e.g. pulling away in second).
You to not need a PhD in electronics to run a PC, but knowing enough to know that increasing your ram to 32gb with one shitty HDD and a weak controller isn't going to speed things up *IS* important.
And as for cars, it is getting harder but many parts are still user-replaceable. I have often thought that road-side maintenance should be taken into the type approval e.g. "It my be possible to change any bulb on the vehicle within 10 minutes and without requiring tools."
...make Windows more like *nix? Why not just cut out the middle man and go *nix?
If .Net is going to be such a pain to port to Azure, the incremental cost of re-implementation on another platform won't be much more and will be off-set by the gains in efficiency (purchase, maintenance etc).
Lets face it "cloud" is just the 1970/80s with a bit of virtualisation (and lots of PR puffery). A big server sharing its resources is exactly the arena *nix was designed to work in. If that is already fit for purpose, why waste time on Azure?
Yeah....sure you are. Sure.
Because Bruce Potts just couldn't get a job, could he?
...the fact the Windows will apparently run on ARM too.
So not only will users get low-power and portability, but also the rich experience of *the* standard environment.
...stealin' yur Upload Codez.
Ok Tnx bbye
See? I can do it too.
I pay for data. If I use that data for texts, web or to push pictures of fully kittens to my PC; so what?
Charge me for the data I use and leave it at that. Simple!
And "simple" is the problem - the market needs the confusion so consumers end up over-paying.
Net neutrality - they're heard of it and want nothing to do with it.
...Indesit to be very good (just don't buy the cheapo models). Miele do have a good rep., as do Bosch.
...can one have the right to bear arms, but not the right to a bare todger.
And people think the UK is repressed!
What the cops should have done is scrounged a pair of shorts and gained some great PR. But no. This is the USofA. Shoot (tase) first and ask questions later.
...Boston area I think.
So why the downvote?
They should have been running embedded Windows. Far more secure.
Did I miss these? Could you perhaps list the prices paid (and places bought from)?
..."World Biggest Pac Man" still doesn't work. Who's to blame? MS for not sticking to the proposed-Standards, or Mozilla for not correctly implementing same?
In the UK ex-directory is free, there is no charge to pay. So either you are not in the UK or you are simply wrong.
THe one things that pisses me off about data is the likes of Experian. They collect data about ME that directly affects MY life, and then have the gall to charge ME for access to MY data. They should be forced by law to open it to the person who the data refers to.
Never happen though.
To be fair to @Fuzz, the Linux-a-likes installed on most netbooks/tablets are pretty socking. Each OEM stamps on their "brand identity" in order to "differentiate" and "provide added value".
Which translates to "mess it up", "slow it down" and "screw it up".
1) I did not realise that Sony had put their customer database up on teh torrentz. Can you give me teh upload codez?
2) Sony appear to have applied security to some aspects of their data, but not others. What is the ICO's position on encrypting personal data?
3) Unlike most government offices, I don't read anything in the story about Sony putting this data on an unencrypted USB stick.
4) Sony are a shower of anti-free-market asshats (rootkits, GeoHotz etc) and deserve everything they get, but I don't see how this suit helps. This is a *global* problem and needs to be addressed at a state level. The countries involved (i.e. just about everyone) should demand that Sony make good any loses and have ID theft teams.
5) *IF* one suffers a loss, *IF* one has evidence that Sony is responsible and *IF* Sony do not make good, then one should sue. *IF* this happens repeatedly, then the courts should consider punitive damages/prosecution.
Just IMHO of course.
Err....requiring people to have legal title (or at least, license) to sell stuff is an artificial restriction?
It's that kind of thinking that has caused the economic problems. Building markets on thin air.
...capitalism does work. What doesn't work are completely artificial trades like "shorting" where you don't even have what you sell. Or "collaterised debt" where you magic a negative into a positive and sell the risk to some poor sucker.
When one or two did it, probably tolerable. When everyone is doing it, it just builds a market on thin air (call it a "bubble") and as we know, all bubbles burst.
No one will complain whilst they trouser their fake cash. it's all milk and honey. Their milk and honey, not yours or mine. When it does go bang, then they come crying for hand-outs.
...more energy, cleaner energy and simply using less.
I think the big problem is trying to a find a "one size fits all" solution. Such a thing does not exist.
In some place wind makes sense. In others solar, others hydro, others...
Each needs to be seen in the local context (topography etc) and in the relationship to the global context ("If I put the solar cells there, how do I maintain/fix them?"). But governments do not like this as it makes it appear that people A get something different from people B and ass-hats in both camps kick up a stink. Despite the fact the peoples A and B actually have different needs.
This puts me in the curious position of quite liking the idea of wind turbines, but deploring they way they have the splatted all over the landscape.
But I thought Google always opened the code after release?
That may not be "open source" in the GNU/EFF sense of things, but it is far ahead of anything MS or Apple ever do (both staunch freedom opponents).
And whilst it may be against the true spirit of "open", it does keep the forking down until after the code is stable and the hardware shipping. If the code was open, I would not put it past some corporations to begin forks just to try and poison the waters.
...a "Wii wii"?
(Got an original, well worth the money).
Then I can pick an old one up on eBay for little.
...release a Google OS that comes with a Google Browser baked right in and uses undocumented Google-only APIs; then Google will be as bad as MS for lock-in and restriction of choice etc.
Google and FB have the *potential* to be as bad (maybe worse, considering the personal data they control) as MS; but so far they are not that bad. MS is still the anti-open, anti-standards, anti-freedom gorilla in the room.
Hell, IBM is more open than MS!
"Likewise Google has come in for attention because it deliberately sniffed wireless connections and geotagged them all over the planet."
I know there was a big hoo-hah in the press and I know the politicians saw it as a popularity contest in "Who can be more outraged?"....but is it a criminal offence to record data that is being blasted into the air unencrypted?
I do not excuse Google from the potential abuses this data could be put to, but are they really the causal party? It's not as if Google had to de-crypt anything. My opinion?
The users were idiots for not securing their networks adequately. "Ah, but not all users are techies." Then not all user should be setting up routers and networks, should they?
Google were (at best) very naive to think that Europeans would not get upset by this. Europeans are much more sensitive to privacy that the USAians. In the USA it seems that asking for privacy is almost an admission of guilt.
Not just China, but that's how things used to be. I thought Patents were to protect inventors (people or companies) who had made investments to perfect a product and (quite justifiably) required some protection to recoup loses. I don't think patents were ever meant to be used in the way they are today.
Survival of the fittest.
All add up (pretty much) to Capitalism. As the USA (and to a large extent the EU) no longer wish to follow those three principles, what kind of market are they running? IMHO the EU is protectionist and the USA nearly Communist.
Move datacenters out of the USA, run near-penniless shell companies in the USA (most probably do that now as part of their tax avoidance strategies), ask your employees to pick a country of choice and leave the East Texas court to vent its spleen all it wants.
One has to ask - Linux has been around for decades, these ideas have been around for decades too, so why wait until now before suing? Patents should have a clause similar to "adverse possession" for land. If you do not actively use/protect a patent for a period of time (say, 5 years) then you lose all rights and that patent goes to the Public Domain.
I thought the USA was all about freedom? To live the dream? Seems it's more about oligarchies and protectionist cartels these days.
"if you consider the level of sentience to be the reason for not causing paint to, or killing animals"
Personally, that does not enter my head. IMHO a sentient being should not cause harm for the simple fact that a sentient being can CHOOSE to not cause harm. Be that to animal, plant or even a rock.
Obviously we need to consume (food etc) and we have little choice in that, but everything else? That's a choice and in order to preserve our scarce resources and to reduce the impact on our own environment, we should choose to harm as little as possible.
Doesn't mean I (or anyone else) is perfect and being perfect isn't even the point. Trying is. Heck, I still eat meat (just not a lot of it).
This bar was just acting like a dick. Maybe they should have raced the owners, encouraging them it water cannon?
...guess I'll wait and see what happens when 4.0.1 comes out of beta.
The Daily Fail etc get their panties in a bunch about some buttocks on the telly before 2100, yet many of these gutter rags will have some waif with her whoppers out on page 3 and are themselves owned by porn peddlers.
Allowing a child to watch "X Factor" is tantamount to child abuse, but for entirely different reasons.
The answer is simple.
OEM price for Windows exclusivity on hardware is X.
The price for non-exclusivity is Y.
Where Y >>> X.
Now, question, why do OEMs want (need?) to ship Windows? Well, the answer is easy. That's what non-techie Joe McPunter knows. Sven Chubbleson and his designer pals know about Macs, true. But Joe McPunter lives in a Windows world. He uses IE6, Word etc at work, plays MMOs with his friends etc. All these (like it or not) demand Windows and as far as he knows, Windows is it.
So if HP (or someone) sell him a PC that cannot run IE, Word, MegaKill 4000 Ultra-Violence Edition; then he will return it as "broken" rather than try to learn a new system.
Even if that system is superior in many ways.
You can argue until you are blue in the face about how "wrong" all this is and I will agree with many of your points, but that is the way the world is. Linux is at least a decade away from being on the desktop, there's still too much Windows-only entrenchment and momentum.