Re: The right tool for the job...
CLI? Real sys admins don't use a CLI. They use butterflies, stupid.
3064 posts • joined 25 Mar 2008
CLI? Real sys admins don't use a CLI. They use butterflies, stupid.
A CLI is a tool.
A GUI is another tool.
The CLI is easily scriptable, a GUI usually not.
The GUI is often just a pretty wrapper on the CLI, but maybe not exposing all the features.
The GUI may not even be a desktop app, it could be in a browser.
The CLI is often backwards compatible, the GUI can change radically yet offer no new features.
Sometimes one is better, sometimes the other.
Learn both, their strengths and weaknesses.
Leave the holy wars to the wannabes who think reading everything in hex makes them 1337.
Don't waste your time at B&Q, whenever you go you'll find that whatever you are after is out of stock/broken. The B&Q near me is so poorly run that they have buckets strewn over the floor to catch the leaks when it rains. Hardly a good advert.
Head to Wickes, Homebase (maybe not as hard-core) to a small DIY retailer.
Does our government keep giving deals to these abject failures?
Seriously - we need private companies providing public services like we need Dracula managing the blood bank.
Actually, Dracula would be an improvement; at least he's honest!
Do the patents really cover the use of the Linux kernel itself?
Or do they cover whatever data-mining/processing Amdocs is doing with those Linux servers
If the former - that is worrying.
If the latter - less worrying, but software/business-process patents still suck ass.
But as the rest of your comment makes clear, you think humans are evil
And lo! A straw man did descend from upon high and claimed himself lord! The good people, knowing his form, did set fire to him and burned his fallacy unto the ground.
we mess up the one thing that matters, Mother Nature
Well now, y'see that's where I'm a bit of an agnostic on the whole thing. Is it AGW? Or is it just GW? Are we making it worse? Or better? Will it be as dreadful as for told, or just a bit uncomfortable? Either way, I'm happier to take steps that might just keep things in a zone that suits us best. Oh whoops - does that make me evil?
This worries you more than infant mortality rates or poverty - things that make human life crappy.
But behold! Upon seeing the ashes of the straw man on the ground; the great beast False Dichotomy did raise his head and roar! Only for the good people the rip out the beast's tongue and stab it to death.
You know what could cause a massive rise in infant mortality? Crop failure. Drought. Guess what AGW is being fingered for...oh my yes; that and more.
And by "[living] with natural rhythms more" I meant more eating locally (i.e. seasonally), wasting less, and generally reducing our footprint from all that (plus a bit more).
I put it to you that struggle of resources will cause more infant mortality and increase poverty more than trying to solve the potential problem. Why are you so afraid of option 2)? Is it because you would have sacrifice? Not some nameless poor bastard in Botswana? Is it because you (and if you are posting here, you are probably one of the richest people on the planet, with one the highest standards of living and life expectancy; i.e. you are a Westerner or in the developed East) might have to pay a teensy-weensy, ickle-wickle little more for that cafa-mocha-latte?
But it's me who some kind of human-hater simply because I don't want to shit where I sleep and mess up my only home.
"Carbon sequestration, carbon credits etc."
I think you'll find that "carbon credits" was just a ruse created by the rich so that they could enrich the rich even more. It's a farce. What are they going to do? Eat their money?
The first post? Flippin' hell.
I'm an AGW agnostic. I'm not sure if the science is right or not. I'm not sure if things will be as bad as they say. But neither am I an expert on stats, climate, ecology, computer modelling or any number of other related disciplines.
What is the risk of being wrong? What is the risk of doing what is suggested?
1) We are, as a species, dead. The environment is so loopy that we can't grow enough food and die off. On the scale of "Bad things" that's up around eleventy-billion. It's really is not good.
2) We develop new technologies, better integrate public transport, create new jobs (lose others jobs), pollute less, live with natural rhythms more, stop exploiting people in the third world, reduce our dependency on energy imports, have cleaner water, less particulates in the air and thus less lung issues...the list goes on. Yes there will be problems and yes it might not be necessary. But in the great scheme of things - it's no big.
I put it to you - outcome 2) on it's own is a "Good Thing"(tm) regardless of AGW or not. So why are people so deathly afraid of option 2)? You don't have to go and live in a hut or anything. A bit of insulation, recycling, water-butt and other simple measures are a start. It's really not that hard.
You wouldn't shit where you sleep, yet that is exactly what we are doing on a global scale; and that simply cannot be sustained.
...our rail system wasn't screwed up enough.
Morality is a base human behaviour and does not require much definition. Time and again we see the same basic more appearing, transcending cultures and continuing to exist despite religion.
"Don't be a dick and help each other" just about covers it.
On a global scale, where we fall down is in supporting the "least bad" option when that option remains repugnant (e.g. supporting Saddam back in the day) or meddling for purely selfish reasons (e.g. executing/overthrowing democratically elected leaders simply because they disagree with us).
As individuals, humans are generally great and get along quite happily. As nations we are violent bullies hell-bent on nicking everyone else's sweeties. And IMHO this is because it's the socio-paths who float to the top, becoming business and political leaders.
There is too much money in selling weapons of all kinds to oppressive regimes. And in politics, money trumps ethics every time. Which is part and parcel why the likes of Vodafone, Tesco, Goldman Sachs etc are continually permitted to get way with their, IMHO, overly aggressive tax reduction measures.
This is also why we allow the Turkish are allowed to keep slaughtering the Kurds.
Why we support the House of Saud and the Bahraini regime (up to and including teaching their forces how to suppress protesters).
Sold Hawk fighters to the regime in Indonesia.
Sell electro-shock weapons.
Are happy to allow the USA to commit acts of torture without censure.
If we don't uphold morals and ethics, we are no better than the sub-human bastards spreading misery among their populace.
When it comes to spyware, however, that is an arms race the nations will probably lose. Why? Well you have a few spooks up against every angry, over-sexed and pissed off teenager on the planet. Teens with brains and an awful lot of spare time on their hands. Roll on Tor, Haystack and the dark-nets.
Laser sintering would also allow much more innovative structures that would simply be too hard to manually build.
You'll notice in the slideshow that one of the students is wearing a mask. My guess is that all those who may be exposed would be similarly kitted up. We are talking about intelligent engineering students at a reputable university here; not the plant in Africa or China where you e-waste goes to be recycled by children.
It is very scary. Why? Because people with put the new-and-unstable into production just to get the new-shiney and then moan like all hell when it doesn't work perfectly.
It would be like someone putting ext4 on to their production servers before it was fully-baked, and then blaming ext4 when it goes on its arse.
The big problem we have with this is it won't be techies driving things (BTRFS, good as it is, is not production ready so no one uses it outside of dev/test) but happy-clapping meeja-type and designers who have no clue (and do not care) about the technical risks. They'll get is working on iOS Safari, and then blame the world when it doesn't work everywhere else.
Will this also be banned?
"but really why not just install Linux on any other laptop?"
Simple - you pay the (non-refundable, depending on OEM) MS tax and it gets counted as a Windows sale (adding to MS's PR clout). Much better to buy from a GNU/Linux supporting company (such as ZaReason) or a naked vendor (such as Novatech).
XPS 13 - Would you like Windows 8 or Windows 8?
(Ubuntu is not an option in your territory)
To counter the above I have a laptop which would blue screen every time it tried to use WiFi under Windows XP. Installed a GNU/Linux and it worked perfectly. Not need to tit around with video drivers either.
Now I probably could have got XP to work by spending 3 weeks downloading different patches, reading knowledge base articles and wasting my life. Or I could have gone with something that worked.
Seems I missed the like about it only being on sale in certain regions.
Epic fail once more from Dell. What are Canonical playing at?
Whoops - how did I miss that? So it's effectively not going to be on sale at all then. Good to know.
Dell? Screw you. Again.
And that is exactly what I mean. I am sick and tired of "X sells GNU/Linux computers!" when there are massive restrictions on the sale which means it's NOT on sale unless you are one of the lucky ones.
Hence why I'd buy from a company that genuinely sells GNU/Linux units before the like of Dell.
If Dell make this available globally, for the same (or lower) price as Win8; then I might be interested.
And Fedora and....
But yes, one would expect any Ubuntu derivative to "just work". Debian? Maybe not so much due tot he patches Canonical apply (would depend on the Debian I guess).
Look, we keep getting stories about "X will sell a GNU/Linux system" where X is Dell, HP, ASUS or someone else and you know what? They are only ever on sale in certain territories, to corporate customers, not linked correctly on the website and on shitty hardware or for an insane price.
I hope Canoncial can pull it off - but this is the same company who crowed about ASUS selling Ubuntu pre-installed, then couldn't tell me where I could buy one! So I will believe it when I see it frankly.
And I'll believe it when Dell list this on their UK site, allow UK Joe Public to buy it and have the XPS 13 with an OS option combo. Until then I'll go with a manufacturer/seller who actually supports GNU/Linux in a proper manner; System76, ZaReason, ThinkPenguin, EmporerLinux, Fit-PC (there may be others).
Jeez. DuckDuckGo FTW!
You scheduling software is crap? Who bought/design it? CTO?
Who appointed the CTO?
Too back-ended? What, you can't forecast? Who is responsible for that? COO?
Who appointed the COO?
The contract has an unmovable start date, who allowed for such a low-level of over-sight?
And is this CEO claiming that his company has systemic problems due to inept management not knowing what they need (in terms of software), not doing their jobs (de-risking things, planning ahead) and generally being incompetent?
G4S should be forced to pay-out to the public all costs the tax-payer has to now burden.
The shareholders should demand the removal of the entire board for the reasons above.
They dropped the "xBox" bit a-g-e-s ago because it now runs on other platforms.
In fact, the xBox is no longer officially supported (due to problems with the developer system I believe) fortunately a spin-off keeps ye olde xBox up to date.
No. I have to repeatedly demonstrate to our department (using LO Calc) that the data is correct and it is Excel that is wrong.
"Oh, but BigYin, how do we fix this?"
"Speak to MS and get them to sort it"
"Can't you just update the CSV/DB?"
"Do that then! We need our spreadsheets to be correct!"
"...and if I do that, your productions system will be jaxxied."
Do not start me on how badly Excel's data handling sux balls.
@AC - I never said *I* did. But here are the two big reasons:
1) The document was originally in a proprietary format and an open format cannot guarantee identical rendering. The "identical" is important - similar is simply not good enough.
2) The open format is not widely supported, the proprietary one is the defacto standard.
Personally I use LibreOffice and hold my docs in ODF.
Professionally I use MS Office that that is what I am required to use due to aforementioned integrations that are not supported/possible in Open/LibreOffice.
Speaking as a LibreOffice user....the answer is simple; integration.
If I already have an MS Office plug-in of some kind that integrates the documents with me ECM system and is working well; why would I pay more to have that ported over to Libre/OpenOffice? If all my documents are in the proprietary .doc/.docx formats; why would I run the risk of Libre/OpenOffice not being able to display/edit them properly? It's simple inertia; nothing more. Same reason why IE6 is still the default browser in many place across the globe.
Now...if you look at smaller, more dynamic and innovative companies (or even government agencies) they may well be using Libre/OpenOffice and you might find that due to demand from them that in 10 years time some of the above problems have evaporated (e.g. software vendors will provide their plug-ins for MS Office and for Libre/OpenOffice).
They dominate the desktop and regulation is the only way to keep their anti-competition practices in check.
If you post it on the Internet:
1) It is public
2) It might be quoted
3) It will be indexed
4) On social media, it will get linked back to you
5) You might have to deal with consequences
What we need are actual trained professionals who know what they are doing and can work well in a cross-disciplinary manner. They should be managed by a consortium with a proven track record in working within demanding environments and under the strict control of contractual obligations to provide the required level of service. Reward should be base don delivery.
Just as private-sector involvement works well for other aspects of national and emergency infrastructure; the strict rigour and standards that only the private sector can bring should be implemented for disaster communications.
No more should we rely on enthusiastic but unqualified amateurs.
Well....you can be sure that some ConDem or Labour, PFI-loving ass-hat is going to say something like that!
They stored unencrypted passwords? Really?
I'm a feckin' moron and even I don't store unencrypted passwords!
BigYin standard fine should apply (£1,000 per breach) and in this case that's a x5 multiplier due to the seriousness. So Yahoo! should pay £2.265 billion to the relevant authorities. Recovery should begin by asset-stripping the directors.
OK, the above is OTT but the general point applies; only by making the directors directly liable will anything change. Applies to banks etc too.
.com (global, commercial)
.net (global, infrastructue)
.org (global, non-commercial)
.com.uk, .com.usa etc etc
It's simple, it's understandable and barring non-ASCII characters, it works well without the need for a money generating land-grab. Oh, wait; there's the problem,.
Tag that as NSFW you tit.
1) iFad takes picture of your fizzog (no name required)
2) Sends to muckle-huge 'cloud service'
2.1) Takes some reference points of you face
2.2) Reverse image search (a la TinEye), probably using paid-for Facebook, G+, Other images (meta-data/links) can be used to get your name)
2.3) Finds you, returns name to iFad
3) You are greeted as Ms. Happy-Cat!
Of course, they could just look at your boarding pass/id (which they have to anyway) but that would be far, far too simple.
Now here's the thing, such a system could be used for much more nefarious purposes. Are you dumb enough to be on FourSquare? Chronically stupid enough to let you home location leak? Then anyone with this (or a similar) app could take a sneaky pic and find out what house to rob. Sweet, innit?
Creative Commons - Blurb...
# Non-Commercial - Blurb...
# By-Attribution - Blurb...
# Not-For-Identification - This image (in whole, part or any derivative form) may not be used for the purpose of automatic identification without the written, signed and notarised consent of the copyright holder and all subjects contained herein. Such consents are only valid for a one-time use. All costs to be borne by the user of the identification system.
I want a milk carton that changes colour when the milk inside goes dodgy, save me ruining perfectly good coffee.
Yeah I could just sniff before-hand, but where's the fun in that?
If we can keep it in the "Goldilocks" zone for us for another, oh....200 years say, then we can have colonised a few outposts and the planet can get back to doing whatever it wants.
If it shits on us too quickly - we're boned.
The problem is that when we do know, it'll all be a bit late.
I'm not 100% sure on the whole anthropogenic climate change thing, but it is one BUGGER of a gamble to take and I'll do my bit to reduce, reuse and recycle.
Anything less is idiocy (and short-term gain over long-term success is also idiocy - ask the banks. Oh wait, we bailed them out and paid their bonuses. Shame we can't do that with a planet, eh? The Laws of Thermodynamics aren't open to bribery.)
Is there climate warming? Dunno.
Is the human impact greater than whatever nature (i.e. non-human) itself is up to? Dunno.
Is dumping raw sewerage into the sea, sending toxic waste to be recycled by children in Africa, dumping vast quantities of plastic into the sea, slash and burn on a grand scale, killing off numerous species or any number of others things we get up to in anyway logical or sustainable? Feck no. Something has gotta give and considering that despite all our prowess, we are still smaller than a planet, it's probably going to be us. You can't eat money, y'know. It's only worth the value we grant it and we grant it w-a-y too much value.
It runs a Unix
@AC 11:10 - But that is the problem, one will find it very hard not to buy a PC without it due to that way Secure Boot has been implemented. One will be effectively forced to have MS keys installed (to resolve various driver issues with PCI cards) and then one is at the mercy of MS and any key revocations in the future.
"it won't be certified as "desgned for", or whatever they call it."
I am not talking about MS badging requirements (that's a different topic), I am talking about Secure Boot itself. The current design is cocked. Totally cocked. For example, the authenticode format only allow for a single signature. This means that even if you want to run Fedora, you'll still need the MS keys.
"[MS] worked with Red Hat/Fedora in order to make sure that they have a key to sign their own bootloaders."
Bullshit. Red Hat has to now buy their freedom from MS. Canonical is trying a different approach, but that has it's own issues.
This is exactly what MS want - competition cluster-fucked by a "standard" and some plausible deniability.
Now, with regards to MS's badging service; what "obvious reasons" are there for specifically excluding the user (you know, the owner of the device) from being able to load their own keys on a badged ARM device? If someone buys a badged Win8 ARM unit, they are now an MS hostage too.
The general idea of Secure Boot does offer some benefits. But not in the way it has been done. Now it is just another method for MS to exclude any competition.
It really is time for the regulators to get their whacking sticks out.
The way MS has rammed this implementation of Secure Boot through is simply breath-taking. They have effectively blocked F/OSS OSs (or at least held them hostage).
MS...as evil and anti-competitive as ever.
1) Drop downs are not so terrible - nice to tab into a type. Smart people will do something like that *and* have a calendar picker.
2) It's hilarious isn't it? You've just provided passport details, age and whatever else; then you get to the verify stage, click on "I forgot" (seriously, who remembers that bloody password) and it validates you....by asking for information you have already provided! Wow!
Show the "price on the plane" cost for a ticket which includes all surcharges, taxes etc. All the "extras" like insurance and what not, I can add on later if I feel like it.
By the time you've added on all the hidden-extras, the likes of EasyJet can be nearly as much as Lufthansa or someone; so I pay the bit more and get some decent customer service.
That's right, you get to choose the correct waffle that you need to hear. As a mere member of the USA public, you are not nearly smart enough to know which waffle to listen to.
And I wonder how random "randomly" actually is.
Still, stay on message! Report the party line, not the truth!
I give you "TrackMeNot". Ok, it just does searching but the idea is the same.
Seriously Apple, tw@ off with these patents.
You are part of the problem, and then you try to patent an idea for the problem you are part of.