Re: 10 Mb/s
That will be a 250% speed increase I'm due, then, and it would be really nice if latency (actual as opposed to the Sam Knows fiction) didn't go sky-high most evenings.
635 posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
That will be a 250% speed increase I'm due, then, and it would be really nice if latency (actual as opposed to the Sam Knows fiction) didn't go sky-high most evenings.
Even so I'm thoroughly pissed off with their repeated attempts to inveigle me into Amazon Prime.
They're far too bloody sneaky about trying that on: have an up-vote for that.
I really wish there was a BBC radio license, along the same lines as the NPR subscription on the US of A.
Because it would give us listeners a financial handle on the way radio programs are commissioned and produced and it would give BBC Radio some leverage against the TV juggernaut. It might even get the quality of Radio 4 drama and Radio 3 music production somewhat nearer the standard it reached in the '80s.
Kids would be much better off interacting with each other, doing stuff outdoors and developing dexterity by making stuff[*] than sitting in front of a BoobTube,web browser or smartphone.
[*] and I DON'T mean assembling the pathetic snap-together so-called 'kitsets' sold by Toys R Us and similar purveyors of dumbed-down junk. They should be using real, sharp tools to shape parts and nails, screws and glues to assemble them. Or riding bikes/building trolleys and learning not to fall off them. After all, if you're older than 40 that's what you used to do, so why on earth would you want to deprive present day kids of the fun of gaining those hands-on skills? Don't give them a kite: show them how to make their own so they can feel the thrill of having something they made fly and fly well.
I'm a coder, and working off site
Why are you using e-mail to transfer "code snippets, scripts and patches" in this day and age? Doing that via e-mail is so last-century.
Your project(s) should be using version control (git or even CVS) and a central code repository to hold patches and enhancements to permanent source code and ftp or sftp to make temporary stuff such as 'code snippets' and throw-away scripts available to the rest of the project via a common disk storage area.
It's dead easy to upgrade/reinstall if you put / and /home on separate partitions to start with.
Indeed. Did that a long time ago. One of the machines I did that on is - TA DAH - a 10 year old Lenovo R61i laptop, currently running Fedora 23 with an XFCE desktop because I prefer it to Gnome. The only enhancement was to add a 2GB RAM card (so 3GB total) which made it noticeably quicker, so its a reasonable development box for C and Java.
Its still using the original disk drive, though its screen, fan and keyboard have been replaced.
Now RedHat have introduced in-situ version upgrades for Fedora, moving from F22 to F23 was no harder than moving my RPi from Raspbian wheezy to jessie, i.e. start the process, wait until its done, then reboot.
...the jamming system uses only the frequency used by commercial drones for communication.
This is the widely used 2.6 GHz wifi band. Drones, like all other wifi users, scan for an unused channel in that band when they establish the link, so its difficult to know how any such 'drone jammer' can positively and uniquely identify which channel a specific drone is using. Thing is, potential collateral damage can not be ruled out each time this, or any other, 'drone jammer' terminates a drone flight unless it can reliably identify the channel the targeted drone is using. If its relying on activating the drone's 'return home on loss of signal' capability then the jammer could be on for quite a while to stop the link from re-establishing itself.
We can test for the existence of God using exactly the same tests that they used, and get exactly the same results....
Not exactly the same, no.
First we need a falsifiable God theory that makes testable predictions and I don't think we currently have one of those. Once we have that, and only then, we can run God tests.
Much as it pains me to say so (as a non-IBMer I strongly dislike the company and its ethos), its QA and hardware build quality used to be second to none.
I've used S/88, S/38 and AS/400 systems and, despite myself, been impressed by the reliability of their hardware and software. OK, stuff like RPG stinks from almost any elegance and usability criteria, but it did what it said on the tin and 'just worked'. Judged from the viewpoints of usability and consistency the OS/400 operating system is one of the greats, up there with UNIX, VMS and VME/B despite its too short file/command names (9 characters fer Chrissakes) and flat, non-hiearchic filing system.
I was a developer/sysadmin on an AS/400, running under OS/400, for 18 months and don't remember a single hardware fail or system software bug. There's no other system I've used that I can say that about.
@Mongo: Points 5 and 6 are prior art anyway: the claimants in this case should never have been given a patent.
In 1783 Jacques Charles made flights in a hydrogen balloon during which he valved off gas to descend (claim 5) and dropped sand to increase his height (claim 6).
I'm truly amazed how often the US Patent Office screws up by not checking prior art. Does anybody there have even two brain cells to rub together?
Who says "overweight" should be re-classed as normal? Not the Cola/MacDarnolds/CandyFloss consortium by any chance?
The problem is they are not telling us the real reason.
Easy: the reason is that system was written by newly minted, hence cheap, code-monkeys led by the PHB who designed it. And his boss was an MBA who decided that system testing was an expensive way to reduce productivity. Since this would look bad on his CV he declared it unnecessary.
So this was basically a failure of the operations team from start to finish.
...sounds like the result of having a team managed by a bunch of MBAs.
Back in the mid '70s I was working in NYC with an bright American guy with a relatively recent BSc in Computer Science. It turned out that they'd taught him COBOL and, err, not a lot else apart from some elementary system design.
Stop the bandits making off with my private information, using their "innovative business models".
Exactly so. Try this on for size:
I think that about covers it. I don't think that this set of rules can harm any legitimate business since it is really just a description of best privacy practise. Admittedly it would be bad news to the Googles and FBs of this world, but who cares: you can make a good case that the way they (mis)use personal data is indistinguishable from data theft.
If they want to stay in business they can always move to a subscription model: I'd be willing to pay for use of Google Earth and possibly for their search engine (since its behind IXquick) and YouTube but nothing else they, FB and friends do has the slightest value to me.
Google could most usefully show leadership by making sure that all the videos on Youtube are available as HTML5, and should preferably remove the Flash version each time they convert a video to HTML5. A quick check of four or five old favourites showed that all of them are still Flash, so YouTube have got work to do.
On the web browser front, Firefox is in the lead: it canned Flash many releases ago, yet strangely El Reg didn't mention that.
I agree with your list of restrictions, but it also needs this addition:
4. Scan all adverts you publish for malware as they leave the serve or limit yourself to publishing pure HTML ads of < 1Kb with no external CSS scripts or images.
Depends how the printed reports were handled.
If "SWIFT printed reports" are sent to the bank over the SWIFT network and then printed locally, its quite possible that a piece of malware on the bank's computers intercepted and altered the report before it was printed. If that is what happened then the falsified report is nothing to do with SWIFT.
I take your point about variation with time, but can't most of the sources of variable magnitude you mention be eliminated by choosing at least one other star of similar magnitude that appears on most of the plates and measuring that too? If all measured stars show similar variation, then the variability is due to the equipment and observation techniques.
I'd assume that this or a similar technique was SOP when comparing archived plates or film and, if not, would like to know why not.
Anyone recommend a good music sync app for macos?
Forget all that sync app wank.
Try using a local NAS box containing at least two RAIDed disks. Use rsync (because its fast) to make regular backups to it. If you're properly paranoid, add at least two USB drives as an offline backup cycle. Each disk must be capable of holding a complete mirror of what's on the NAS box. Use rsync to back up the NAS box to the least recently written USB drive and keep all of the USB drives offline except when making a backup (or recovering lost files).
 The USB drives should be kept either offsite, in a firesafe or offsite in a fire safe. This way, at least one copy of your stuff is proof against both hacking and destruction from power spikes and from destruction of the building where your computers live. Protect your data this way and who gives a flying fart about the evil empires of Apple, Google, et al.
We use it to sign in to just about everything, often including systems where we have privileged access.
If your employer's passwords are regarded as so corplife-threatening as to need such an elaborate vetting process, why not ditch them altogether and switch to a 2FA system? Much more secure.
Its not as if the 2FA tokens are all that expensive (if they were, the banks wouldn't hand them out like candy) or even that new: the GMP were using 2FA logins back in the late '80s, so if plod can handle 2FA then any PHB should be able to get his head round it too.
@David 164: Where've you been sleeping so soundly for the last several years that you missed Care.data's attempt to sell everybody else's data?
There a form you and everyone else would have signed somewhere
Yes, except that its was an OPT-OUT that about a million of us signed. Twice, because the Care.data crew 'lost' the first set of opt-outs. It wasn't as simple as giving the opt-out to your GP either. As well as that copy, you also had to submit one to any hospital you'd ever been treated at, very evidently to make opting out as hard as possible.
IIRC the SWIFT terminal (supplied by SWIFT and acting as the endpoint of the SWIFT network) is pretty much a locked box, but a SWIFT member organisation is responsible for writing and implementing the code (local terminal) on their system that exchanges messages with the SWIFT terminal.
SWIFT supply a test suite that verifies that the member's software has correctly implemented their side of the link to the SWIFT terminal. The member won't be allowed to connect to the SWIFT terminal until it gets a pass from the test suite.
Apart from that, the security of the member's local terminal is, like the rest of their financial system, 100% their responsibility.
...to a much fuller analysis that I read last night:
The link was on Jerry Pournelle's 'Chaos Manor' blog and is well worth a read.
In the US, Apples 22M pounds of scrap steel would fetch about $1M.
The more interesting questions have been left unanswered:
Both questions need answers before even starting to consider whether Apple's recycling is either useful or sensible.
The average US tax rate of 31.5% sounds a bit low judging from what my US friends have told me over the years. So, is that just the federal rate, i.e. it doesn't include state and city taxes?
I'm just waiting until nowtv dies before buying a roku to use plex with
Personally I wouldn't touch any Roku product with a barge pole after experiencing their *cough* wonderful long-term support *cough* for the Soundbridge, the internet radio tuner they used to sell.
The answer's obvious.....
...... BOFH, the movie.
Coanda effect applies only if water sticks to the rod.
Nope. Coanda applies wherever there's a shear in a moving, compressible fluid. The water column is dragging air, whose other side is sticking to the rod, past it. The shear occurring in that air layer as its dragged past the rod is what deflects the water. Air is a compressible fluid, so the combination of viscosity and shear reduces the pressure in the air mass as it passes the rod and, as a result, the water is deflected toward the low pressure region. If the water stream touches the rod then all the shear is in the water stream. Since water is more viscous than air, of course the deflection is much greater.
The Bernoulli Effect has nothing to do with electrical charges. It is the principle that an object traveling though air or water (or a similar fluid medium) creates lift (Vacuum or a decrease in pressure) when one path of the fluid (the top of the wing) is longer than the other path (bottom of the wing).
(1) the air is always separated. There are many wind tunnel pictures using smoke puffs to show that the air flowing over the wing DOES NOT meet up with the air passing under the wing and, doubly unfortunately for the numpties drawing diagrams showing it rejoining and for those who believe them, the air passing over the wing goes much faster than the air on the underside, so the top-side smoke puff is long gone by the time the bottom-side smoke puff gets to the trailing edge.
(2) If a wing really works because air passing along the longer side sucks while air passing the shorter side doesn't, then by your logic:
- no aircraft can fly inverted, yet aerobatic planes do it all the time
- a flat plate wing can't fly at all, yet any sheet balsa toy glider shows this is untrue
...except that Bernoulli has nothing to do with it. The Bernoulli equations are only applicable to flows of an incompressible fluid, i.e. water, and are not applicable compressible fluids such as air or other gasses. In other words they are a good description of the behaviour or water flowing through a pipe, a venturi, or out through a hole in a tank, but not to an air-stream.
The Coanda Effect, which describes the way a fluid flowing past a convex solid surface will tend to stick to it, is applicable here because it applies to any fluid, compressible or incompressible, flowing past a convex solid surface. Similarly, its Coanda that describes airflow over the convex top of a wing, not Bernoulli.
Check the definitions for yourself: even Wikipedia has got this right.
In gliding, the units used are metric. (Probably something to do with the fact that gliding was developed as a sport mainly in Germany).
Not true everywhere: the units used in gliding depend on where you are and its quite messy.
European gliding uses metric units.
In the USA they use feet, knots, nautical miles and pounds weight. Their airspeed indicators are upside down: zero at the top, cruising speeds at the bottom and some older aircraft still use mph rather than knots. I have no idea why they do this when speedometers in road vehicles are the right way up. Everywhere else I've flown the ASI has zero at the bottom and normal climbing and cruising speeds at the top.
In the UK its quite a mixture. Gliders airframes are metric for length, weight and wing area, instruments are ICAO (knots for speed and rate of climb, altitudes in feet), but distance is a mess. We use statute miles when talking to ATC but, because the badge scheme and racing tasks are metric, we think in kilometers for all cross-country flights and related distances.
BTW, until shortly after WW2, all European aircraft had metric instruments, but some time, in the 50s IIRC, all powered civil aircraft throughout the Western world adopted ICAO navigational units (knots, feet, statute miles) along along with their air traffic control systems.
Sharing medical data for medical research should be compulsory but the data should never be sold to anyone else.
I hope you meant that: "Sharing medical data for medical research should be compulsory but possession of the the data by anybody outside the NHS will attract a mandatory custodial sentence."
Its a bit too shallow for them to be really happy sniffing about for cables.
..and for me too, but on this Friday.
Rats are omnivorous and, like all rodents, they eat seeds and fruit. They reproduce like mad in suitable conditions. Given enough of them, they'll eat seeds fast enough to prevent the forest regrowth which would normally replace the trees felled by people to build houses and canoes or for firewood.
Was there at least a payout? Probably nothing of value...
Well, the article did say that each family was getting the equivalent of $US1300 as compensation. The bit the story skipped was to find out what $US1300 would be worth to one of the families being 'evacuated' from the 5km exclusion zone.
That amount would be bugger all to us in comparison with the costs of moving to a new area and then finding replacement housing and a new job, but what would it be worth to a Chinese village farmer? How far would it go to get them set up in a similar house and with a similar plot of land and/or business premises? Could it provide the same standard of living they are used to? Since there was no mention of rehousing them some place else we can only assume that the kindly Chinese Government wasn't about to do that for the 'evacuees' and the $1300 bung is all they're going to get.
The plays are not incomprehensible - watch Baz Lurman's film "Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet" and tell me you don't understand it.
Better yet, go back into the archives and watch Zeffirelli's "The Taming Of The Shrew" or "Romeo and Juliet".
Human viewers employ ad-blockers.
...because ads that jiggle, flash and obscure text are annoying and because of MSAA (Malware Served As Ads). Get rid of both and you might see fewer people running ad-blockers. Do nothing and the ad-blocker kill ratio will surely grow.
I visited the nuclear bunker in Ongar, Essex a year or two back, one May. One of my main memories was that it was rather cold inside, so I think it would be a safe bet that the heating bills for this one, or any other underground nuclear bunker for that matter, would be astronomical.
So, Mr Nelson made a 'backup' and then deleted the files from his main drive?
Obviously that is what he did, or he'd still have a perfectly good copy of the lost files on his main drive. In my books that makes him 100% responsible for the data loss because the act of deleting the originals converted his backup into the prime copy but he didn't back up the now prime copy onto another disk and store that offline in a place that protected it from fire or other damage.
No data can be considered safe unless at all times there is a copy that cannot be damaged by mains spikes, fire, etc. This means that you have a minimum of two backup copies so that at least one copy is guaranteed to be safely stored offline at all times. Paranoid, moi? Yes, and a firm believer in Murphy when it comes to protecting data you value.
Its also worth remembering that a cabin ejection is probably only survivable if it happens at altitude, and that that the majority of airliner disasters that weren't take-off or landing accidents have involved collisions, anti-aircraft missiles, cabin decompression or on-board bombs. In all these cases most of the pax would be dead before they hit the ground regardless of whether the cabin was ejected or not.
Actually, parachutes are NOT typically used in GA[*] aircraft, mainly because egress is too difficult. Most small GA aircraft only have one small door with the tailplane directly behind the middle of it. So, even if there was space to wear parachutes in comfort, its quite likely the crash would be found with one passenger hung on the tailplane and everybody else still in a scrum by the door.
I've never been offered a parachute in any GA aircraft, not even in a Tiger Moth, from which egress is easy (undo your straps and roll inverted). However, I have a feeling that aerobatic pilots may wear 'chutes, not that this affects passengers, since most aerobatic planes are single seat.
Oddly, gliders are the only class of civil aircraft in which all occupants routinely wear parachutes; in the UK and Europe anyway. In the UK this was uncommon before the mid/late '90s, but that changed after a training glider was destroyed by a lightning strike which both occupants survived because they were wearing 'chutes. This caused a sudden rethink... Besides, gliders are relatively easy to get out of (jettison the canopy, climb out and over the side).
[*] GA stands for General Aviation. This term covers all engine-powered, non-commercially operated aeroplanes and helicopters.
Sell somebody a long life item, say a fridge, from a store that's so ludicrously understaffed that it takes longer to find a sales droid than to buy the item. Immediately after delivery, start bombarding your customer with several sales emails a week that they never signed up for. Provide an 'unsubscribe' facility that doesn't work.
Curry's, I'm looking at you. You guys certainly know how to provide a perfectly dreadful UX.
In future I'll go out of my way to buy stuff from anybody else but you.
Fitzroy Maclean's life reads like one of the more outrageous adventure novels.
He was a British diplomat in the 30s, requested a Moscow posting from where he got into parts of the USSR that no westerner had visited for 30 years, succeeding in this by sheer cheek. At the start of WW2 he tried to enlist but was prevented because the diplomatic service was a reserved occupation: you could only resign if elected to Parliament. So he stood in a by-election on a platform of immediately joining the army, won, enlisted and became one of the first members of the SAS. After serving in the desert (he he drove into Tobruk and out again while the Germans were still in residence) he was dropped into Yugoslavia to find out who or what Tito was and fought with the Partisans for the rest of the war, taking up his seat in Parliament after being demobbed.
His book, "Eastern Approaches" is a most entertaining read.
Read his autobiography: "Wings on my Sleeve" to get the full story - DID and the TV docu were good but were very far from telling the whole story.
If you're a pilot or a total aviation fan you'll also want his "Wings of the Luftwaffe", which gives his impressions and handling notes for the various German aircraft he flew.
Yes, put the rotors up high, also use 5 arms, for greater stability and also for safety if a rotor fails.
Thats' already been done. See here:
Both have about a 20 min flight time on a full charge, but at least the Volocopter has a BRS[*] fitted for when it all goes horribly wrong together with rather more redundancy in its control systems and motor collection.
[*] BRS = Ballistic Recovery System. This is proven technology, as fitted to the Cirrus SR-22 among other aircraft. Push the red button and a rocket pulls a parachute out the top so you can float down - always provided you're high enough for the parachute to inflate before you hit the floor.
It looks from a quick scan of the proposed PG 9.5 manual changes that this is a reasonable approach given that the ETL crowd may find ON CONFLICT IGNORE clauses useful.
Using the proposed ON CONFLICT clause is, on the face of it, a good way to go because it looks as though not using the clause retains the current behavior, i.e. adding this SQL extension won't harm existing code and you don't have to use the ON CONFLICT clause if you don't want to.
Not using it suits my style because I tend to check whether a row with a unique key exists before attempting an insert rather than trying the insert anyway and handling the exception if the key already exists. This is probably due to over-long exposure to using 4GLs and COBOL to update ISAM files.
I understand exactly how you feel about IBM and share similar attitudes.
Nonetheless, their QA was impressive in the '90s. I did quite a bit of development on S/88 (a rebadged Stratus), S/38 and AS/400 back then. All the hardware 'just ran' and I don't recall tripping over any bugs in OS/400 or any of its utilities or compilers.
No, I don't think it is. What IS necessary is that the specifications for the voting software should be published and that they should be sufficiently detailed for a competent team to develop a comprehensive test suite from it that includes a set of test cases capable of exhaustively checking the conformance of the voting software to the published specification. All such test suites should be open sourced so that they can be independently verified should their results be challenged.
Electoral law should require that any voter can check the voting software by using a test suite developed from the voting software specification and that, should a independently verified test suite show the voting software is non-compliant with the published specification, the election will be declared invalid.
This approach allows the voting software to remain proprietary while still allowing it to be functionally verified against its public specification.