By fuss do you mean "ignore the useless new suffix entirely"?
1531 posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Re: This might need more study
They could have been drinking Guinness?
(yep, I know it's dark red, but it's called "the black stuff")
Re: Looking at this
Oh my... and if anything like that really came out when the C64 was vaguely new, it would have been torn to shreds for being a useless waste of screen space and being barely usable.
Re: During the meanwhile ...
On a slight tangent, is there an actual plan by jake to stress test El Reg by amassing an inordinate number of down votes?
...and without looking at it, I wonder if this app is just a wrapper around the HTML components that make up the website accessible version?
Re: Engineering 101
(although sapphire != aluminium)
Just looked this up, and sapphire is essentially impure Aluminium oxide.
just my contribution to the useless factoid of the day.
I'm actually rather thankful that Apple kick started the (not fast enough) demise of Flash on the web...
It's still occasionally a PITA where some sites still insist on using it (looking at you, BBC) but I am surviving quite well these days without it installed on my home PC. Now if I could just do the same with .PDF files which really shouldn't need entire embedded executable environments inside a document...
Re: Prevention or cure
Most of the cat shit problems are caused by lazy "owners". Properly kept cats are trained to only defacate in their litter tray. The lazy owners who don't care and are too lazy to do the basic cat training (in as much as it is possible to train a cat) are the problem. Get a pet? Learn to look after it and do the basics properly. Just because a cat will shit elsewhere does not solve the problem.
Re: Roof of my convertible
I fecking hate the things - what sort of ''pet' wanders the streets and other peoples property ?
Cats are not pets. Dogs have owners, Cats have staff.
Interestingly, cats meet the definition of vermin.
Not come across one so far.
Unless by "useful" you mean "slows browser down to a crawl".
"The retention of communications data is absolutely fundamental to ensure law enforcement have the powers they need to investigate crime, protect the public and ensure national security," May's department said. "We are carefully considering the European court of justice's judgment on data retention and are currently examining potential next steps."
Translation: "We need to push forward May's dreams of a thought police state but don't be concerned, important people such as politicians and your favourite 'celebrities' will be excluded from monitoring. If you have done nothing wrong then you have nothing to hide. We will change what 'nothing wrong' means in the future. Muhahahaha. What? This thing is still recording? Turn it off immediately and delete that last bit, yes delete it from the Internet. Wait, your administrators say that it isn't possible? Fire them and hire some new administrators."
Re: Fan Bingbing?
A brief poll with those that I can quickly ask here who can read Chinese (Cantonese) "Bingbing" is the more literal character translation of her name, rather than as it is likely to be pronounced where the first and second components would be pronounced differently. Basically you'd have to ask her, or at worst somebody from the same region and ethnic group exactly how her name is pronounced.
Still, she has a classy, attractive look, almost regal but with a smile that lights everything up and changes her demeanour completely which would fit in nicely with some of the visuals that Episodes I-III featured. A "stuffy princess who is human in more intimate / personal scenes" look?
Yes but unlike SuperJake, he hasn't don't everything. By hand. Twice.
Re: Where is the bit about fighting off black helicopters
Nothing whatsoever, move along now.
It should be noted that Register sub-editors are involved in managing interaction with our vast, knowledgeable but occasionally passionate readership: this is not a job for those with overly delicate sensibilities.
Oh dear. They will have been warned, but... get the asbestos underwear out anyway just in case.
Re: MS should have
You might have a troll icon... but... ah dammit. There does appear to be a concerted effort to **** everything up doesn't there?
Not all interface devices and not all user interfaces are suitable for all form factors and uses. There's a reason why we don't have mice on our phones and a reason why we don't poke the screen on our desktop computers.
Re: Still asking why (anything post XP)
Microsoft's problem is likely that they insist on being in control (and able to charge) for every part of an application installation and distribution system. The Windows 8 App store system provides updates for installed applications, however it does not allow a user to add additional repositories in the way that we can easily do with Linux.
Re: Windows just gets slower over time
That's pure nonsense, like the rest of you post which talks about Windows, ActiveX and NET (the myth of Windows getting slower has been debunked a long time ago, and saying that a growing Registry is slower just shows your lack of understanding of how the Registry actually works).
Really? So a badly structured and inefficient database that grows and grows and never shrinks and is referred to repeatedly and continuously by the Windows Shell won't slow a system down?
.NET is inefficient. While there are a lot of optimisations in there (particularly on the fully compiled side), it is still slower and less efficient than non-managed code. This isn't always a bad thing, just an important thing to understand when using .NET. ActiveX / COM is the same.
There are continuous new viruses coming out, although you are quite correct in the reduction as the difficulty level of introducing new viruses has steadily risen and the alternative attach vectors that are easier to attack. The daily definition updates and AV software updates demonstrate this (and from a marketing point of view, make the AV software look more useful). However it is not possible for an ever growing definition database to not have a steadily increasing impact on scanning resources. While a lot of clever filtering goes on, the more definitions, heuristics and adaptive scans that are required, the more resources are used.
Re: "windows gets slower"
Optimise software by deploying new hardware? That's Microsoft thinking...
Re: Still asking why (anything post XP)
Windows just gets slower over time, the more modern incarnations suffer more through increased complexity. While I haven't wasted a mammoth amount of investigation time into it, there are a few main culprits:
1) The Registry. Bloats and bloats and bloats, never shrinking, always getting slower.
2) The entire .COM / ActiveX DLL hell, requiring huge numbers of the same libraries, in a version number hell, all underpinned by the registry. The smallest of changes adds even more bloat to the registry.
3) .NET - it is neither fast nor elegant. The more this becomes used for operational parts of an OS, the slower the OS will run. When .NET is used with device drivers, it gets worse - luckily this is still very rare.
4) Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software. While these are more stable than they used to be, they do seriously impact system performance. With more templates and variations to check with every new virus / malware that is released, the more work these systems need to do.
5) Application update software. Little can bring a system to its needs quicker (ha) than multiple competing applications all running their own update check process every time the system starts. A good, flexible API and service from Microsoft could have helped with this, but no... and the hoops that some of these applications go through to provide background updates without a stream of UAC prompts is just horrible. And then the AV/AM software checks every file access and update by each of these update processes....
Re: Upgrade Password
You can manage In-App purchases for Amazon Apps very easily, it's a configuration issue.
It is easy to disable In-App purchases entirely.
It is equally easy to leave them enabled but to require a PIN to be entered.
The Amazon App Store clearly lists that an App features "In-App" purchasing, and while Amazon could do more to publicise it's useful controls on this, it's much better than others.
Re: Easy access?
While I don't like the lack of a number to call, so far I have yet to have a problem with refunding or getting items replaced with Amazon. Getting to the refunds area could be a little easier, which when you're annoyed doesn't help any, but once there you can request that they call you (they do this quite quickly), message them or just use the automated process.
Re: Can't see the gray area here
It's a weird one. Generally when you leave employment you are terminating your contract. Once a contract is terminated then it can't be in force.
Is it generally just technical or IT fields where it's considered "acceptable" that an employer tries to decide where an employee may work afterwards?
So what this really means is that for any shared website domain service (commonly blogs, but not restricted to this), one of these shared resources could prevent the user, or more accurately a specific User Agent (web browser), from accessing any service on the same shared website domain.
In other words, if you have a structure of:
site3.example.com could respond with an abnormally large number or large cookies for example.com, in total more than the web server is designed or configured to support. These maliciously sized cookies would be included with every request to any example.com resource, effectively blocking access to example.com and all sub-domains.
Ouch. All we need now is for a Cross-Site-Cookie vulnerability and a malicious website could block access to any arbitrary website.
Interesting to hear where the most appropriate fixes for this will be, my guess is the only possible or sensible location is a fix to web browsers as the web servers can't tell a given UA to not send cookies and AFAIK it's not possible to limit the upward propagation of cookie paths on the server either as these are client controlled. That'll scupper those that can't update their web browsers due to supplier lock in.
Re: Huh? Ransomware?
Exactly. Industrial control systems and monitoring systems have been done for a long time and don't have to be directly connected in unsafe ways at all. The key is having a standard, or at the very least, tightly defined interface between the two systems that is only usable for the information that is required.
In the past I've dealt with industrial systems that are linked by a serial cable which, while running standard-ish protocols over the link and using standard comms libraries at each end is pretty damn secure. While in theory it may have been possible for somebody to somehow overload the remote serial link and handling software and exploit it somehow (more likely at the higher application level) but given the simplicity of the communication structures it was definitely secure enough. Anybody going to that trouble to exploit such a link would have found it much easier to just walk over to the control system itself. Even at the control system, there were physical limits and safety protocols implemented at the electromechanical level, not overrideable in software. Similar levels of isolation are currently and will be built into automotive systems.
Re: 4,0 GHZ? THat's so 2004...
And for no apparent reason your applications will still sit there "not responding".
Re: Upgrade time :D
It's at the lower, utility system end, that AMD seem to be strong at the moment. Good performance low cost systems with integrated GPUs that aren't appalling are a good thing. Likely the reason that Intel's integrated GPUs are now usable as well.
AMD also seem to be ahead of Intel when it comes to making more general use of the integrated GPU as a specialised compute core rather than solely as a GPU.
Re: Same here...
Same here. One of the (luckily not very) regular couriers that delivers parcels to my village is either illiterate or just a thief. Often items get delivered to a nearby village instead (duh, postcode, clearly printed correct address, nobody of the correct name to sign for the parcel, none of which seems to matter) to items getting delivered and "signed" by somebody no neighbour has ever heard of but after complaints the items tend to miraculously reappear the following day as if they were originally delivered nearby - for example, boxes have appeared opened but re-sealed in the neighbours shed when they weren't there when they were apparently delivered (neighbour is a keen gardener and tends to spot this kind of thing).
Re: I see
"as well as film theft."
Aha! I've just figured out how Google Glass could really help with film theft.
While the cinema and the finest rent-a-lump security staff are pointing at and laughing at the Google Glass wearer, an accomplice can sneak up the stairs, break into the projection room and steal the can of film that is about to be shown. That is theft. A fine plan only only slightly hampered by the fact that modern cinemas use digital projectors and don't have cans of films.
"While our position on mobile phones is that we ask people to put these away when the film is playing, with wearable technology – whether Google Glass or otherwise – we believe that it is generally more difficult to detect when they are and are not recording, so our approach is a precautionary one."
Huh? Google Glass has a light to indicate that it is recording and despite the idiots claiming that the sky is falling down, that they will punch anybody wearing one and that the google mothership is monitoring everything a google glass wearer sees, the google glass device doesn't have the battery or storage capacity to record for long, or in any particular good quality. On the other hand, my mobile phone doesn't have a light to indicate that it is recording and has the battery and storage capacity to record video for two hours and can record in very nice quality.
Go figure. More knee jerk reactions by the clueless.
On the other hand, wearable technology will only improve it's capabilities therefore at some point it will be possible to record two hours of dubious quality movie video using a wearable device, but having specific rules for specific devices is just stupid. It's already prohibited to record the films, why are new guidelines needed? Also as noted above, cam copies in cinemas aren't the real risk to a film's distribution.
Even now, a huge number of copies are of "screeners" - i.e. copies of the movie before it's general release. Often leaked by employees of the distribution company.
And that is still not theft.
Oh come on, you cannot be that naive surely?
All without directly charging the end user anything at all.
(note the added emphasis)
Regardless of many commentard's personal opinions of the value of facebook, it is a damn impressive setup with it hosting as many accounts, users, updates and media (pics, video) as it does. All without directly charging the end user anything at all.
That's some engineering with cost efficiency a critical factor.
Or more likely they're too busy laughing at the sharepoint users who have a much more borked system that somehow managed to inherit a lot of access issues.
I think I may have a few of them here... data could easily be stored in the existing central ERP system. But no, it's stored in spreadsheets that are emailed between team members.
I don't hate myself enough to push a user to MS Access. It'll just cause more pain for me later.
But with google glass, recording video is always on, and unlike CCTV, it is mobile, unlike a video camera or digital camera, it is not obvious that they are using it... I.E you have no idea if the person is reading an email, doing nothing or recording everything you say and do...
Video recording isn't always on, and video recording drains the battery like you wouldn't believe. When recording is in progress, a little LED is lit (while this is technically maskable, it is more obvious than a mobile), and if somebody is using a google glass, it's quite obvious due to their focus point. When you see one for real rather than repeating hypebole, you'll understand.
I wouldn't say that a smartphone needs to be aimed or obvious that it's clear that you're taking pictures or recording. Just with the bare thought of the situation now, I could set my smartphone to record, stick it in my shirt pocket and merrily record.
OK, the damn thing would doubtless fall out within minutes, the shirt pocket on the shirt I'm wearing today would cover the lens, and pointing my chest at people could be obvious... but the principle is still there.
But all of this is possible with current mobile devices, tablets, phones and digital cameras. It was the case before digital cameras, it's just the speed and dissemination is now much faster.
It has been the case for years, and still is: If you are in a public space, anybody may take a photograph of you - you have no expectations or rights of privacy. In general terms these pictures may be used for any purpose that doesn't unjustly misrepresent the person or doesn't imply consent or specific endorsement for any particular goods or services. For example, a picture of you in a crowd, on a bus or train, is representative of a general situation whereas a picture of you standing next to a specific item or service could imply your endorsement and therefore cannot be used without your specific permission.
Re: How do they actually orbit?
Putting it like that, it is an interesting question. AFAIK black holes, whatever they are exactly defined as, have a velocity through space and it's predicted that black holes would rotate as well (as distinct from the orbital spin of the matter collapsing into them). Gravity, whatever the hell it actually is, would have to "escape" the clutches of the black hole otherwise there would be no force of attraction, which would mean no black hole could form (or at the least grow). Gravity tends to work universally therefore a black hole would be attracted to any other nearby (massive) object such as another other black hole, which given some velocity is all you really need for one to orbit the other.
This has doubtless already answered elsewhere in a much better theoretical but thoroughly non-understandable way to the likes of myself.
Re: The closely circling black holes are in a galaxy more than four billion light years away
...and a long time ago as well.
Re: not password protected?
Likely to have been a default home Windows install: auto-login with no password.
sip memory modules
Wow, I had managed to entirely block sip memory modules out of my memory. A quick look at pictures of them again brings it all back...
Not sure that this is a real problem, I read it as a statement that currently these devices are not permitted by the US FAA. In other words, new regulations and controls would have to be put in place to regulate and control what is in reality a new flying protocol - autonomous, out of line of site of operator, satellite (or otherwise) navigated devices.
A lot of licensing is still done on trust, particularly in the the larger corporate environments (or where I currently work at a top University). Server licences particularly so, as the user / access licences are worded so vaguely or inclusively that for example a data access middle tier would only require a single licence to connect to the database tier however could be serving hundreds of distinct users connecting to it. It can be argued that requiring the number of user licences for the number of end users is fair, but where does stop? Are viewers of reports included? How about live (cached) reports hosted on an intranet? To add to it, you then need a few maintenance, service or operational accounts as well.
Re: Complete... err... fabrications
Too right. Statistics: For the perpetually confused or gullible, I'd recommend that a lot of people read the book "How to Lie with Statistics". A nice, easy read and assassinates most statistics that you regularly see.
Re: Brooks is FOUND innocent
Somehow. Despite reported serious inconsistencies in her statements and levels of denials from "They made me do it" all the way to "I had no idea they were doing it".
Re: So Amdahl's law alive and well.
The whole story behind the Transputer is quite interesting... as well as the reasons behind its eventual failure. El Reg has a bit of it here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/18/heroes_of_tech_david_may/
Re: causes the door to close itself?
I agree... I probably didn't get the right level of cynicism over. If you want real fun, try thinking of "Wearable tech" that isn't medical or health fanatic focused.
Re: > there are useful things to be had from it all.
With the fridge I was trying to demonstrate that while it may currently be a relatively basic example, there are potentially useful things that can be done. Even for these examples I would agree that it's a toss up whether or not it's worth the effort, but that's something else and once these things become more commodity then the effort is diluted sufficiently and what was previously a gimmick or "nice to have" feature, becomes standard. The same arguments about "it's not worth the effort" were probably thrown at a lot of the technology that we currently use, take for granted, and would be inconvenienced without. And we'll have forgotten the stuff that really wasn't worth the effort at the time.
An IP stack may be rather complicated but like most technology these things are built on a stack of previous modules incorporating standards, knowledge and experience. Even a serial interface isn't particularly simple if you have to build one from scratch from the physical layer up (and you wouldn't believe the mistakes that I've come across when people have tried), however modern IC systems can handle most of the annoyances and details for you. So while an IP stack is rather complicated it's becoming an established module that is just another tool that a higher level layer can use.
The only question is how your suggested enhancements will benefit from Internet connectivity.
I don't consider that the "Internet of Things" is specifically about giving everything possible an Internet connection - it's about connecting devices that were previously or are currently not connected to anything else, more local or personal area networks. Typically IoT has evolved as a marketing term / buzzword from Machine to Machine (M2M) communications, which doesn't sound particularly inviting but we've been doing this at various levels for years. What it boils down to is that IoT is little more than the miniaturisation (and feature stripping and simplification) of much larger and more unwieldy systems down to the level where they can become commodity / consumer items. There will be a lot of pointless ideas that fail, it won't be anywhere near as big and pervasive as the habitual "industry" tech-predictors predict, but it will become more and more pervasive once people find useful things to do with it and devices like Arduino, Raspberry Pi and similar are the start and allow a lot of interesting, sometimes useful, experimentation.