Re: Did I Read That Article Right?
"Why wouldn't you put Linux on a high-spec system?"
Since when is a 1366x768 screen part of a "high-spec system" ?
2482 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Mar 2008
"Isn't the point of buying an OS free or Linux preloaded system largely to avoid paying the Microsoft tax?"
In the past the "Microsoft tax" was levied--as per the MS OEM agreement--against all machines sold, regardless of whether they are sold with a Microsoft OS or not.
I don't know if this has changed, but I can't imagine it has unless some Supreme Court judge has made a ruling that I'm not aware of.
This is why you don't see Windows free PC's from major OEMs cheaper than their Windows alternatives.
Looks awful. In fact it looks like it is suffering from the same idiotic minimilist UI design philosophy that is currently all the rage in the Windows, Unity and Gnome 3 dev teams.
"Hey, let's simplify things by removing all the visible controls and elements"
"yeah! But what if somebody needs to use the element we've removed?"
"Oh, they can hover their mouse over a part of the screen which will trigger the element to appear using this awesome new poof-poof-glitter transition I made.
"Neat. How ill they know where to hover their mouse?"
"They'll figure it out. Look. poof-poof-glitter!"
"Awesome! You rock dude. Hey, is that your mom outside, honking her car horn?"
"Yeah, gotta go. It's time for my afternoon nap."
Let's ignore the ludicrous price for now and consider the device itself.
If it has an achilles heel, it will be the fact that it is reliant on the x86 archictecture. Even the very lowest power sucking examples of x86 still use much, much more than ARM alternatives.
The bottom line is, if it has a fan in it, it will be a fail.
Nobody wants a tablet that runs hot and needs a whirring, buzzing fan to try and keep it from melting.
You may as well get an ultrabook that has a keyboard and can be put on a desk and avoid toasting your hands and arms while using it.
Not to mention needing a bigger, heavier, more expensive battery to keep it comparable with the competition.
A Windows fanboy pops up (posting AC, natch) to declare victory on the basis that some MS spokesbot said Things That Shareholders Want To Hear in much the same way the same spokesbots did when Vista was the "fastest selling version of Windows evah. EVAH!"
I loved the part where you described how business "customers" are locked in to paying for Windows whether they use it or not. Like that somehow makes Windows 8 a super success or something.
Love your work dude, have a frosty beer on me.
GTA4 rocked, as did GTA3. By comparison, the Call Of Duty games really are asinine in their game play.
I still recall the first time I played a CoD game. I nearly ran out of ammo trying to clear all the enemies from the rooftops, windows and balconies so that my squad could traverse the street unmolested until I realised that the idiotic game had infinitely respawning enemies and that the "correct" way to progress is to run as fast as you can while dodging bullets until you get to the next capture point so the enemies stop spawning.
Once you figure that out you can finish the game in an afternoon. There is no incentive to use proper tactics at all.
Extremely stupid, and so typical of the dumbed down crap that is popular these days.
I use it because my ISP does that stupid DNS hi-jacking nonsense, as does so-called "opendns".
Considering that I also browse while logged in with a google id I'm struggling to see how using their dns server allows them to intrude on my privacy any more than they already do.
If you can enlighten me than that would be great.
"You remind me of those people who freak out the first time they use a task manager when they notice "idle process" is "using up" all their CPU time."
Had a colleague come in one monday morning in an exasperated state complaining that he'd spent a sizeable part of the weekend trying to fix his computer for just that problem.
If they could be a bit more professional about ensuring that upgrades dont completely break the system (such as is the case with 10.04 LTS -> 12.04 LTS) they would be pretty near perfect.
Debian is good but suffers from not providing any sort of roadmap whatsoever. A lack of roadmap is OK for enthusiasts but is problematic if you are deploying in a commercial environment.
RHEL/CentOS are good too, although I personally don't like the YUM/RPM system and their repositories are pretty barren compared to debian/ubuntu. It's worth noting that these guys don't seem to offer any sort of major version upgrade path at all. Well not from 5.n to 6.n anyway. Official advice is to reinstall from scratch although there are some howto's that provide a hugely convoluted process that they recommend against actually attempting.
Fedora on a server? All I can say is WTF? And yes, we actually have a Fedora server in production where I work. That wasn't my doing of course.
Suse I haven't tried but I expect it is not a lot different to the other RPM distros.
Hey mr anonymous idiot, I clearly stated that I was judging them by their ability to hold up their end of a conversation.
If somebody is unable to converse about anything other than how badly their kids behave, football and who was best on "Idol" last night then I feel reasonably justified in assuming they are not overly clever.
The fact that someone enjoys football (or even Idol) is not the point. The point is whether they can also converse outside of those subjects.
Thanks for the demonstration of someone who has an inability to hold up their end of a conversation though, it was quite illuminating.
"evolutionary pressure on humans completely stopped selecting for intelligence thousands of years ago"
I don't know about thousands of years but being stupid sure seems to have been accelerating breeding in the last 50 years or so.
I know several people who I would consider intelligent mainly due to being able to hold a conversation about something other than the latest reality TV rubbish. Most them are approaching middle age and childless.
On the other hand there are another lot whose primary topic of conversation is the latest exploits of their ill-disciplined offspring along with what ever rubbish it was that they watched on TV last night.
That's hardly a scientific sample of course but I'm sure I'm not the only one to experience this phenomena.
"I doubt that a "good majority" of Office users actually feel particularly strongly [about the ribbon] one way or the other. "
A few months back my old man was complaining vehemently about being given "new Windows" and how much he hates it.
I figured he must have been complaining about being shifted from XP to 7 (or god forbid Vista) but I eventually figured out that by "new Windows" he meant "new Office" and it was the ribbon he was railing against.
"Julie Larson-Green and Tami Reller is a boost for the empowerment of women at US tech companies."
Surely the more important factor is whether the appointment of these women will be a boost for their employers?
Or maybe we are looking at the begining of Carly Fiorina cycle of the sisterhood doing it for themselves to the detriment of the company that employs them?
Speaking of HP, how is that other paragon of virtue Meg Whitman going these days?
That has to be one of the most retarded comments I've ever seen.
I mean really, I know you climate catastrophists are not playing with a full deck and all but you really need to go bone up on the concept of cause and effect.
Just for the record, the fact that climate is proven to be naturally variable (the MWP) is not evidence that the climate is fragile, in fact it proves exactly the opposite,
I read somewhere that you could relocate the entire population of Earth to Texas and still have lower population density than many existing cities thereby leaving the entire rest of the planet completely empty (apart from a modest amount of farm land and the rest would be wilderness I guess).
Not that I think that is a great idea, but it gives you a bit of different viewpoint to consider whilst getting all excited by the idea of world overpopulation.
" if they've re-written something which complies to the same specification and merely optimised it, it is entirely possible that the vulnerability is inherent in how the system has been specified rather than the actual code itself."
Why did you use so many words when "they used copy-paste a lot" would have sufficed?
"All supported versions of the Windows operating system from XP SP3 up to and including Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012 will need patching to close three security holes"
Umm, hold on, were we not told by his sweatiness (or one of his minions) that Win8 was "rewritten from the ground up"?
How can one reconcile that claim with Windows 8 sharing bugs with an incrementally upgraded OS who's genesis can be traced back to the mid 90's?
Your understanding of the situation is <ahem> "interesting" there John
Surely the operation of the network costs X therefore the price charged to consumers is;
X / #consumers.
Were a deal with the NBN to be successfully agreed upon then surely the equation would become;
X - NBN payment / #consumers
which should obviously result in cheaper bills.
Of course that will never happen no matter how much money they get out of NBN Co because that is not how things are done in the Peoples Republic Of Australia.
Too true, US politicians and huge numbers of US citizens seem to have no understanding of the depth of their current economic debt crisis. Your downvoter there would belong to that group I'm sure.
The irony is that the entire Chinese military budget is funded by the interest payments that Uncle Sam makes on the massive numbers of US government bonds the Chinese own.
From "After America - Mark Steyne"
"According to the Congressional Budget Office’s 2010 long-term budget outlook, by 2020 the government will be paying between 15 and 20 percent of its revenues in debt interest. Whereas defense spending will be down to between 14 and 16 percent."
That is to say that their interests payments (not actually paying down the debt, just paying the interest) will take a greater slice of their GDP than what they spend on their military and a large proportion of those payments will go straight to China.
Golly, I can't see anything wrong with that, can you?
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address_spoofing probably not covered on your TAFE education"
Did you even bother to read (and understand) that wikipedia article?
I doubt it, otherwise you wouldn't have made yourself look foolish by posting such nonsense.
Free clue: I didn't say that there was no such thing as IP spoofing, I said it was not the same thing as using a vpn to get around geoip blocking.
You're welcome.
Really?
How does that work then?
In fact I checked the Choice article and it doesn't use the word "spoof" at all. It does (correctly) talk about using VPN's to get around GeoIP blocking but that is not the same thing as IP spoofing.
Not even remotely similar.
Does El Reg have minimum standards for IT knowledge or do they just hire graduates from the "introduction to computers" night course from their local TAFE college?
Firstly, there is zero evidence that there is any significant man mad climate change at all. Secondly, doing insane crap like this is likely to cause massive problems in its own right, orders of magnitude worse than any perceived problems we might have today.
As mentioned by another commenter, the sheer arrogance of these people is astounding. Thinking they can manipulate a planetary eco-system on such a grand scale without any adverse affects whatsoever and expecting it to behave exactly as they predict is bat shit insane.
For fucks sake, the computer models that they use to try and predict Earths existing climate variations don't even come close to working, yet they think they understand enough to do shit like this?
Corporate accounting (or tech reporting) sure must be a dark art.
"operating loss of €576m. On the positive side the war chest of net cash is unperturbed at €3.6bn"
How does one lose half a billion dollars and not come out the other side with less money?
I sure would like to have that ability after a bad day at the races or whatever.
"If people won't buy WinPhone 8 handsets until they have an established user base, how will they get an established user base?"
That would fall into the department of "not my problem", unless you think punters have an obligation to build up a user base for MS/Nokia or something.
You would be OK if you had a "magic cave" I suppose.
<shudder> What a terrible movie that was </shudder>
"On Thursday, the software giant posted a profit of $4.47bn on revenues of $16bn for Q1 of its fiscal 2013 – not great compared to the $5.74bn profit it brought in during the same period the previous year"
I know the world of mega corporations and high finance is something that we mortals will never be able to comprehend but to me I would think that most companies could only dream of making more than 25% profit on their earnings.
If they can do that in a bad year and with all their loss making businesses dragging them down then I can only imagine what margins they are making when they force the majority of PC buyers to purchase incremental upgrades of their products whether they want them or not.
If they took away their non performing stuff and just reported their Win + Office figures their profit results would probably be seen as truly outrageous. No wonder they stopped reporting that stuff some time back.