I foresee several
problems with the government's ambitions.
No off road parking in this city... well that easy just use the lamp posts to hang the chargers off.
Taking my road as a typical example .. 120 houses . average 1 car per house(not including the 17 people who insist on bringing company vans home with them)
10 light weight LED street lights so thats 12 cars off each lamp post, each lamppost is set back from the road edge by a pavement width because everyone WILL want their car fully charged.So not only the extra power needed, but also new lamp posts to cope with the weight of the equipment.
Power supply..... sunlight aint gonna cut it... as it will be night... wind... nice calm night = everyone gets the next day off, lets have some nice cheap fossil fueled power stations. (especially since the green lobby hate nuclear power more than global warming)
Oh and the expense
Oh well poor working class will just have to use public (fossil fueled) transport to get to work... except some bright spark put all the cheap warehouse type jobs on the outskirts of towns/cities while the cheap housing in in the middle of cities..
which means areas with well thought out public transport like around here, it can take upto 2 hrs to travel 15 miles to work, a trip thats 35 mins in the densest rush hour traffic..
Now just think...... if we'd built out our nuclear generating capacity to 80% of total generating capacity, that would have dropped our CO2 emissions by TWENTY FIVE PERCENT .. with no change in lifestyle, stir in short range EV cars, making white goods far more efficient in use of power/other resourses and madating house insulation and we could have achieved the emission reduction required fairly easily.
We're basically f'ed at this point because politicians of both hues went for the easiest cheapest solutions....
Oh and always remember it takes the same energy to accelerate a ICE car weighing 1000 lbs as it does an EV weighing 1000lb because physics cannot be fooled
<<proud to be a cynic