Had it coming...
After all, thou shalt not put thy antivirus, Nortons, to the test.
378 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Feb 2008
If I submit some remark on religion, and always get a platform for denigrating others in return, it's not unreasonable that someone would think there was a common "system" for this wondrous transformation...
Happily, and surprisingly, this wasn't the case today; there were posts from people who are actually secure in themselves/their beliefs, and don't feel the need to comment on how infinitely superior they are since they belong to "group A" rather than "group B". But skimming the comments, I couldn't help but notice the number of directed posts, letting those who might be religious know that they are all equally daft - a bit surprising as I could not find the smug religious poster they seemed to be targeting. hmm... This is bound to lead to some people's perceptions being colored just a tinge of red (with a bit of confusion added to the mix as they probably wonder "what triggered this attack??") So while your posts were as objective and rational as ever, I think given the context (the highly repetitive context), a bit of confusion is not only understandable, but to be expected.
I had no idea this was really a hobby. I've seen the movie of the same name of course, and aside from learning that it can be a reference for heroin use, I assumed it originated as some tongue-in-cheek reference - sort of in the vein of, how the f*** hard can it be to spot a train?! It's big, noisy, and follows (to some extent) a schedule.
To each their own of course, but yikes - it's tough for me to think how this would be more exciting than reading a book, going for a walk, sleeping....
"People tend to do things in the name of religion more than they do them in the name of atheism." <- true statement
But as Estariel was responding to this: "If you remove religions from human history, violence and stupidity drop by at least 90% from history" I think it worth pointing out that doing something "in the name of" and "because of" are not the same. If someone has land/resources/political influence that I want a piece of, religion can provide a convenient excuse to acquire those things by any means. Crusades, inquisitions, colonization, slavery have all been justified in the name of religion - and yet oddly enough, they're also beneficial to the perpetrator. At an individual level I agree religion can be the "because of", but even suicide bombers have their politically-connected backers, who never seem to actually want to join in on the religious fervor themselves... hmmm...
So the suggestion that eliminating religion equates to eliminating violence is ludicrous. I 100% guarantee that people would simply find another excuse - we're just that damn clever.
My $0.02 on causality.
Here in the States, when malls start getting frequented by undesirable delinquents, people simply stop shopping there. Eventually the delinquents go away in search of more interesting haunts. I mean, sure, the mall and all of its stores go out of business, and you're left with a cavernous, ugly building and parking lot blighting the neighborhood (large, weather-stained "For Lease" sign optional) - but the delinquent problem is most certainly no more.
The definition of nano was changed after the release of a product from a company named Apple - please update your dictionaries.
@Katana - If a samurai has only two swords, and the wakizashi is his short sword, then the katana, by process of elimination, is the samurai's long sword. ^_^
It's the people that pay the least that expect the most. One of the cheaper airlines here in the States is actually the subject of an interesting sort-of reality series called "Airline" (yes yes it's a very original title I know). Basically it's just camera crews filming what the ticket agents, etc., that work for the airline have to put up with from their, erm, unwilling-to-pay-more-for-a-ticket-from-a-real-airline customers. I can say I've never witnessed such demanding behavior from flyers on pricier airlines. (Watching the show is a lot like witnessing an accident - you're horrified by what you see, but you can't turn away.)
I'll will add in that over here in the land of the free [toilets], tons of people never carry cash anymore - myself included. On the rare occasions that I can't go before I board b/c of a short connection, I hold it! :p
Maybe it's different in the UK, but here in the States, your employment history is not kept by the police. If you don't want someone to know why you lost a previous job, you simply don't tell them about it. Also, if he's found innocent and does put down UMass as a prior job, and they tell potential employers he was guilty of something he wasn't, he can happily turn around and sue them for large sums of money. Is it unfair that, due to the publicity, future employers will know about this regardless of the outcome. Sure - but that's the fault of the media. (Oh wait - The Reg belongs to that grouping - I can't go around bashing them - I blame society instead ;)
Also, I'm fairly certain that government oversight on who you can and cannot fire is antithetical to a "real" democracy. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that most democracies today aren't "real" democracies, but some hybrid governance.
Maybe I don't understand all the nuances of the case well enough - but a confession doesn't count as evidence? I understand a confession being given under duress not counting, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I also don't understand why autism equates to not being eligible for a custodial sentence - which in my understanding doesn't have to equate to prison, but can be any sort of controlled and hopefully therapeutic environment.
The phrase "these feral children" had me laughing it up - mostly because, for me, it seemed original. Then to read your post and find that this isn't new! That's just frightening (ok actually I'm still cracking up over it). If things have reached the state where "feral children" is a common expression, then I'm inclined to think that, whatever deterrents are in place, they're not working.
I was confused on the [sic] as well. Surely the "is" is appropriate - there is only one act of identification being made... else it would read "the identificationS of my wife and daughter" - but that would imply (to these American eyes anyway) that he made multiple postings identifying wife and daughter, not one.
Peanut butter is good for you. A PB&J will only run you about 300 calories, and is very filling. But you're wrong to refer to it as a butty - we don't put butter on a PB&J.
I've never known anyone here put butter on a BLT either - mayo or "Miracle Whip" are the standard condiments of choice (I understand you all don't have Miracle Whip, but salad cream is similar?)
Just get rid of all the $#!@$!@ billboards. I hate billboards.
Though in keeping with the spirit of the article, I will add that, here in the US, if you are driving down an interstate and crossing from a more "repressed" state to a more lax one... about 30 miles from the state line the billboards alerting you to new, erm, attractions awaiting you in the border-town really become quite O_O Believe me - your kids won't have to be able to read to start asking some awkward questions!
To see info on the "odds" - yeah, I know, you don't have to figure [surface area of earth] * 75% - yes, it's smaller than that, there are more factors yada yada yada... but the explanation given for these "fender benders" involved purposefully tailing enemies... I would hope that doesn't apply here.
Surprising as they seem to indicate unfamiliarity with the term "white hack hacker" - these types are trying to stay ahead of the bad guys. Yes, their techniques may be questionable, but this guy reading your email is supposed to be better than the "malicious black hat hacker". Which leads into point 2... yes maybe 20 years ago they were writing about unencrypted tv feeds... but I doubt they mention was bade of unencrypted interwebs - that does add a new twist.
Still, I agree there's no reason to fret. If you send something across the web unencrypted, you should basically expect that everyone can read it.
But lacks specific knowledge. As an example, Red Hat has been DARPA approved for years... these type actions require approval from congressional oversight committees... Regardless, there's always an impetus to at least look like you're trying to save money... big push for java years ago for that reason... el prez is already making a big display by capping salaries... I'm just skimming the surface, but these are all reasons why these open source types would want to make sure they're on Obama's radar in their attempts to gain ground from MS/traditional UNIX.
I was gonna rant and rave and foam at the mouth about a couple confusing sentences - especially the one that implies they're going to debate a topic they're both open to? sounds like a boring debate...
But then I read the comments and realized - Duh! This broaches the topic of religion, so everyone will just read whatever they want out of it, regardless of what is actually written.
Carry on!
Just launched it, let it load, then clicked the button for next song... Didn't even manage a "1 mississippi" to cover the sound gap. Maybe it's only fast in the US though... For me, Pandora is the greatest thing to happen to the net since google... and I hate to contradict (well not really) but I bought a subscription because I like it *that much* (tho the ads were very unobtrusive imo)
I will say I've not used spotify... but it seems like it falls into a weird category of "I know exactly what song I want to hear but don't like it well enough to buy a copy"
I will end by saying I am listening to the "beatles" station I just created on pandora. "spotify really blows them away" psh not if you like the beatles i guess :p
Its nys tu no that.
I hadn't realize that if it weren't for spelling, we would have avoided the economic meltdown, had world peace, ended world hunger, and colonized Mars by now.
I think someone also needs to mention to this so-called spelling society that, along with links to outdated pronunciations, many of our words are hard to spell due to foreign influence <glares at the French>.