Re: So sorry to see you go.

Certainly not. x

Re: Read The Guardian One

The trailer review is hysterical.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2011/jun/01/loves-kitchen-gordon-ramsay-trailer

Re: the only "big" name?

Well, fair point, but I guess in tabloid terms Ramsay is the big... bird. Would you have clicked on this story if it had Dougray Scott in the headline?

Re: Same shit happening over here

I believe they've backtracked on that now. Good. It was wrong.

Re: Turkey Gordon Bleugh

It's not 'his', it's just that he's the only big name involved, see.

Re: Don't worry John

Fixed now.

It's truly staggering how much lollage you lot get out of typos. It's like jingling keys in front of a baby...

Re: @AC 1051 28/6

Funny Scott Adams would say that and then completely forget all about it.

Re: What the hell.

Speak for yourself, mortal boy.

Re: It shouldn't help him either

Did I forget to welcome all our eminent autism experts to this thread? What an appalling oversight on my part!

Re: Re: Why make a big deal of a disability?

And it's been brought up, so it's relevant, but no one's having a pop, OK?

While I'm here - hey, everyone! Let's see who can win a prize for not being a total dick in this thread.

Re: Why make a big deal of a disability?

In this instance I think it counts as mitigation, actually.

Re: Eh?

Wake me when this thread is over.

Re: Bleedin' Psychologists...

I don't see how it victimises or belittles gay men personally, but perhaps I'd feel differently if I were a gay man.

Re: Peer Review?

Good grief.

Re: Computer Weekly

Oh right I get it.

Re: Causation / Correlation

Yes, that sounds *much* more likely.

Re: Now, now, Miss Bee...

Tsk.

Re: Can't you take the report button off people...

I suspect our tech wizard would have a nervous breakdown.

Re: Ignorance is a fine excuse

This compels me to remove your superfluous apostrophe.

Re: AC 12:01

Entirely appropriate usage. Carry on.

Re: And to fully piss patients off...

I plan to abuse all the substances when/if I'm old.

Re: "Cleary's mum told Sun Ryan was agoraphobic and has a history of mental illness"

Oh dear. You're not fully up on the whole mental illness thing, are you?

Re: Wow!

It has been reclassified as a minge coat.

See, you lot think you're sooooooo *rude*. I would take you to school.

Re: Shirly

No it didn't. Look at the URL.

Re: Hahahahaaha!

I don't think anyone was laughing about that.

Re: No need for burkhas

Not really. It sacrifices leg length to show curvy bits. It's a trade-off. Or a pants-off.

Re: May I be the first to

Nope

Re: Hi Ms Bee

Hey, I'm a pedant, it's just that you're like a one-man PEDANT WAR.

But I understand.

Re: Just got to convince the wife

I see what you did there.

Re: Expresso?

Christ, I don't care as much about misspellings as you, YR, and it's my job to care.

I doubt Italians give much of a fuck about someone on the Reg getting some coffee wrong.

Re: A MICHAEL BAY FILM!

It's when he starts trying to call them 'A MICHAEL BAY JOINT' that we've got a serious problem.

Re: OK let me clear this fasion up once and for all.

I don't believe that is correct.

Re: I remember this site!

It's good, it's a self-selecting group of shallow berks who are welcome to each other.

Sorry, I mean YEAH IT'S LIKE RACISM.

Re: Sounds like a business opportunity to me

There's an ugmo site that got some attention recently when one unpretty person met another one through it and then dumped her and somehow it was a story.

Re: @Scott

Tsk.

Re: It's clearly a publicity stunt

Hi Graham! See Lester's update.

As it currently stands, counting the edit and this comment, you've got two mentions to the site's one. I think you win.

Re: oops

They're not synonyms. 'Racist' is more specific, 'bigoted' is more general.

Re: Title?

I'm saying nothing.

Re: not at all, old lad.

What *is* it with you lot and 'females'? You realise it makes you sound like you're talking about horses or something. We are *women*, if you don't mind.

Re: Re: A throng of ladies

I bet it's not.

Re: A throng of ladies

You would need very sophisticated instruments to be able to identify precisely how little I care about this now. I am changing it to 'string' but there will be no need for you to go running around your place of work with your shirt over your head.

Re: Title? We don't need no stinkin' title!

Heh. You got served.

Re: is crap from the 80's cool again?

I love leggings, me, and I care not a fuck if they are cool or not.

Re: "Unless you have worked in support"

That is fantastically off-topic. There are no guns, stacks or bulls to be found anywhere in that.

Re: re: Not sure about the analogy

Above comment?

Mod troll?

Re: If I was the Reg moderator

Nah, just a few commentards. I know a guy, he does mates' rates.

Re: You realise

You can't ignore the clanging impact of the word. It has too much attached to it.

Re: Indeed.

I think it's the only sane move for the makers to change the name - leaving it as it was would be a huge distraction, overshadowing the rest of it, causing needless controversy and messing with people's suspension of disbelief. It's a sensible decision on artistic grounds.

Re: "This century is going to be for men what the 20th was for women"

I know, right?