what's the number to 999 again? oh yeah, 0118 999 88199 9119725 3
430 posts • joined 29 Jan 2008
Think of the children.
What if my robot assisted surgery is more important than some other person's robot assisted surgery (i.e. I make more money), with net neutrality, how will I pay to make my more important packets get the priority that someone of my stature expects? /sarcasm
They can divvy up bandwidth from now until the cows come home, but the real solution is to expand their bandwidth. Maybe they shouldn't oversell their real capacity, or maybe, just maybe, things requiring 9 nines of connectivity shouldn't be dependent on a shared network filled with cat videos in the first place.
Samsung are you listening?
I have wanted to replace my aging phone for some time now, here are the things keeping me from buying an S6 phone from you:
1) Knox. Void my warranty if you want, but not allowing me to run the OS that came with my phone because I wanted root access is going too far.
2) No SD card, sorry but whatever size storage you may find it in your heart to bestow upon us is never going to be enough, so leave it up to us to choose.
3) No removable battery. Fail, not just because I can't swap it for a new one in a year when the current one is only charging to 85%, but because now I'll have to wait until my battery dies if my phone locks up to be able to use it again. Did you know some people use 2 physical batteries and swap them out when charging is not an option. I guess not.
4) Glass back. Are you freaking kidding me? What's the bezel made out of? Egg shells? How about you make the back out of a material that would let the device survive an accidental drop better and not the stuff they made Cinderella's slippers out of.
5) Curved screen? Who cares. Talk about a solution to a made up problem.
6) Not waterproof? Are you from the past? Because in the past phones weren't waterproof. I thought we were moving forward. Especially since you cannot take out the battery now if it does get wet. Fail.
7) Not giving me a choice of launchers. Fail. Especially since you'll break my phone if I try to change it myself.
8) Root. I want root, would you buy a computer if you didn't know the administrator password? No. Either would I. Just make it part of the EULA "I realize that if I press Root that I can't cry to anyone about anything. Yes/No" I mean is it my phone, or your phone Samsung? If it's your phone then why am I paying for it?
This TV is for Netflix and this TV is for Hulu.
People really should stop buying TVs with these kind of "features" in them. Manufactures are slow to fix issues related to third party "plugins" and even if they get better at it, why would I want to be able to choose only from the plugins that they happened to be able to get everyone's lawyers to agree with this week? It adds cost and complexity, and to suffer those two things for a sub-par experience is dumb. I would like a TV with many HDMI inputs, some old-timey analog ports, the ability to read the occasional USB stick, and lots of adjustment features. Not some half-baked "Smart" TV. "Oh sorry, your TV is too old to run Youtube 4.3, please buy another TV and try again."
Re: I agree
I will simply not give it my Wifi password and not plug it into a CAT5 cable, so unless they put a SIM and transceiver in my TV it can't ever phone home. They can want it connected all they want, but we decide whether to let it into our data network. Who cares what crappy players they put in their TVs, I would never use it anyway, they never support every codec and usually have menu systems created by morons anyway. Add in privacy issues and the choice becomes clear, just don't use those features.
Re: I am hoping for a stupid TV to become available.
But for a more powerful solution (for fancy skins with fancy menus), use a cheap <$150 Intel NUC (with built-in IR) and OpenELEC (Linux+Kodi [previously known as XBMC]). It will play every swinging file you can throw at it (and decode it in hardware if your kit can do it), it can even decode H.265 in software if you are running something a little more beefy.
If you run Windows there are ways (addons) to use Amazon and Netflix too.
I imagine you already know all that Dan55, I was just sharing because I really like Kodi.
Re: VOIPity VOIP VOIP
We can go round and round all day. Who keeps the 802.1x certs updated when they have no staff? What does a company with one media gateway "test" the new IOS on? How does a small company ever hope to have the ability to test a new IOS and how it will react with all the different daughter cards they may have installed? In most places the idea of a "spare" Cisco 3945 would cause the IT guy to laugh out loud.
I was not trying to sway anyone away from VOIP with its "insurmountable problems", I like VOIP, I think people should setup VOIP in most places, I was just trying properly weight the con side of the argument. The article will send a marginally knowledgeable person racing straight to their IT department (or guy), so I was providing some real-world worries for them to chew on and think about. This site is read by both SAs and managers alike is it not?
Re: VOIPity VOIP VOIP
I didn't intend to make my questions sound like actual questions? I know all too well the virtues of UPS (and their 5-10 year lead-acid battery lifespans). They were meant to be more of a heads-up to the VP that says "hey we should switch to VOIP?" when they long ago out-sourced their tech staff to some temp agency and now have zero technical staff on-site. I have seen many places where some pseudo-tech-savy department head gets taken out to lunch by a gentleman in a nice suit selling Cisco phones and comes back with lofty ideas about how all we need to do is buy this $4,000 router and we will all be running VOIP tomorrow.
I was going for more of a devil's advocate roll.
VOIPity VOIP VOIP
What happens to your phones when your power goes out? What about when you loose your PS in your VOIP switch? When your IOS update for your media gateway goes south? Or when a user sets their BYO phone to the gateway's IP? There are also a lot of hidden yearly costs with licenses and the price differences from one tier to the next can be steep. Do you have a team of people always available to reset your users voice-mail pins? If you out-source the install and setup, how much are they going to charge you to add one more phone later, for adding a new area-code rule, another telco trunk?
I'm all for VOIP, but running your own phone network is a lot like being your own pilot, it's great if you're good at it. It does allow you to do some cool stuff, but you need to have techs that know what they are doing.
It should come as no surprise that Republicans don't want government regulation. They have had this concept drilled into their minds for years by the leaders of their party. They'll scream all day about deregulating this or that, never once making the association that clean water, safe food, and the ability to use whatever phone you want all come FROM regulations. Ask them if they want the internet to change, they'll say no, then try to explain that the "regulations" in question were perceived to have always been there, it's only now that the ISPs have gotten so big that they are chewing on the leash and we need to better define the rules. I mean this is the party who's actual presidential candidate was advocating disbanding the EPA.
Why is it again that we don't give IQ and personality tests to candidates prior to letting them run for office?
Sounds like McDowell is a complete lap-dog. He is saying "You don't want the government to 'regulate' the internet do you? Like China does." But he knows full-well that what he is really saying is "If ISPs aren't free to first create monopolies and then be able to do what ever they want forever, how will they be able to make infinite money?"
The "regulation" the FCC is taking about is basically (as far as the consumer is concerned) ensuring freedom, freedom from being at the mercy of whatever pricing and usage terms the only ISP in your town decides you will be offered. Things like caps, and throttling, tracking your data usage. Without that "regulation" ISPs can do whatever they please.
Re: In space, no one can hear you say "cut"
How did that whole Bio-dome thing work out again? Oh, yeah, it didn't (twice). We don't even know how to do that, let alone launch, fly, land, build, and live on a foreign planet.
I say put them under the ocean and see if they can even do that, if they live THEN spend a couple billion dollars to lob them at Mars.
Re: Privacy and policing
"for those that promote untraceable financial transaction systems, be aware that this is the enabler"
That right there.
Where did the popup come from? Irrelevant. (it's not the computer of the bank account holder, and in the end after trace after trace, it may have simply come from some random WEP secured wifi anyway)
The only reason this persists is that at some point a government or police department can't gain access to the bank account holder. Period. The end.
I agree with the commenter above that the only real way to combat this is with education. Educate people that the police will never "bill" you with Bitcoin or Paypal and the problem goes away. I mean really educate, not some PSA played 3 times at 23:56 in the middle of the night in-between infomercials, but in the paper, on the local movie theater ads before the movies, and billboards.
I think you mean Vista-nentially.
Not really a Luddite either.
I will never buy a subscription to Office 365, I will use my current copy until I can longer use it, then switch to an opensource. I'm not sure why ANYONE would back themselves into a "Pay Forever" strategy but it's not for me. I'm not really a Luddite either, I just like having equity. If a business is "renting" their building, and "renting" their rackspace, "renting" their software, and basically "renting" their employees, how much value can they have "in" their company?
Apple tricked a small company out of their IP, it's that simple.
I was under the impression that the company owned the patent for the glass tech, and that the company signed an exclusive contract for them to make them only for Apple, and in exchange Apple would loan them the money to purchase the equipment needed to meet Apple's demand. However the contract stated that if they failed to make the payments on time that the company's IP was collateral. Then Apple simply didn't order any screens, and because the company couldn't sell the tech to any other manufacturer due to the exclusivity clause, Apple just sat and waited until they defaulted and now they simply own the company. Not really playing fair in my opinion, and the fault is solely with the company's lawyer that didn't realize that Apple was under no obligation to purchase anything.
Apple tricked a small company out of their IP, it's that simple.
Re: Do I care enough to comment???
Anytime I hear that someone "can't wait for Obama to leave" I pretty much know right away that:
1) Your easily led.
2) Don't have any idea about what you are talking about.
3) Watch Fox news while pumping your fist in the air screaming Yeah!!.
4) Are white (and probably southern).
5) Have a memory that only goes back 6 years.
6) The word "Begazi" while be coming out of your mouth shortly.
Let me guess, you also think the Earth is 6,000 years old, and jesus is coming soon? Listen, I'm no great fan of president Obama's accomplishments to date, but he did help get millions of people healthcare (in order to get rid of the whole "prior condition" bullshit), and if you could read charts and graphs you would know that the country is better now than when Bush left. There is no need to argue back, I was just reminding you what your "lib-tard" cousin or brother-in-law probably already tells you all the time on Facebook, that you are kind of simple-minded and really shouldn't voice your opinions in a public place.
Re: Lame Duck Congress, more like Lame Ass Congress
I would be happy if ALL candidates had to take/retake the SAT (or at least the ASVAB) to be eligible for a seat in congress. At least we would know that they had the minimum education we expect a 17 year old to have.
I have seen entirely too many on both sides that didn't sound like they should be making cookies let alone laws.
If technical people need to be certified to work on routers and servers shouldn't the people that are making laws that govern situations involving ALL routers and servers be held to the same standard, or at least be able to tell one from the other?
Who should be on "The Committee on Science, Space and Technology"? How about scientists not 30 lawyers. Seriously only about 5 are qualified to be on that committee out of the 40 that are. Most of them have no idea about what they are voting on and therefore they shouldn't be voicing any opinion.
Coming soon to a city near you, um, I mean near an equator.
Fuel Cell + location in which water freezes = fail
Even if the making, storing, and filling problems are all solved (they aren't going to be solved anytime soon BTW). Fuel cells create water in the process, and that means they are viable only places where water doesn't freeze.
So let's just put this to bed, and break the news to the car manufactures that their cash cow of hydrogen burning cars as an interim solution to low cost fuel cell power cars (yeah right) isn't fooling anyone. The truth is that they want to hold on to ICE powered cars as long as they can because they make insane amounts of money off the hundreds of replacement parts they require. They clearly want a hydrogen infrastructure in place while they work out the kinks and get the price down of fuel-cell cars (aren't the prices of rare Earth metals like scandium, platinum (palladium) dropping daily, no?), is it their fault that the stuff can be burned in the mean time?
"One nation, under Comcast, with limited justice for all."
Own all the pipes you want, but no media or production ownership, ever.
Who can't see that one GIGANTIC company owning not only the pipes, but also the content as well as the news outlets won't end in a dystopia.
"Your ONLY choice in news, television, movies, telephone, and internet. Warn-cast"
Bees making honey.
I'll do you one better, one cannot copyright something occurring naturally in/from nature, (a rock, the tree, honey). Therefore unless we are now adding monkeys to our special classification that we have put ourselves in (separate from nature), this is basically the same thing as a bee making honey or a crow using a nail to open a nut. No copyright.
Re: WIndows 8, SP2?
"it's clear that Microsoft got the interface right for the next generation of users."
Yep, in the future if the need arises for people to use their fingers to fling things or mash the screen a certain number of times, we'll be all ready. There is no doubt that simple people can do simple tasks with a tablet OS, but there is a reason that no one invented the sausage-interface-wand before now. Trying to use a meat-stick to control precise movement is inefficient, well for anything other than throwing birds at pigs.
There is a simple solution to the 'Win8 GUI sucks' problem and it will solve itself. We only need to wait for the programmers at Microsoft to try to make the next version of Windows while using it. The huge hits to workflow and the unfriendliness of the current OS will have to be addressed at that point.
I blame Sinofsky.
Now hold on.
I'm not saying the U.S. is the greatest with phone contracts, but at least once our "Contract Period" is up, (which by the way is only so someone can get a $800 phone for $1), we are free. In Germany you have to sign a contract for 2 years whether you get a $800 phone or not. If you bring your own you're still locked into a 2 year contract (of which you are on the hook to them for the whole total of 24 months worth of bills). If you want to cancel your "contract" you owe them money for services you haven't used yet. Add crazy sauce to that, and you get the fact that unless you send "in writing" a request to cancel it 90 days prior to its end, you will get auto-renewed for 12 more months. If you try to cancel that auto-renewed contract a month in, you will have to pay for 11 months of future monthly payments.
I've never understood why anyone would agree to a multi-year auto-renewing contract with no monetary benefits, but the Germans do it all the time. So, at least the U.S. is better then someone.
Re: [Obama] promptly passed the buck and said it was up to Congress to get it done.
"Yes but considering Obama's predilection for executive actions in so many other instances "
"By the end of 2004, George W. Bush had issued 108 signing statements containing 505 constitutional challenges. As of January 30, 2008, he had signed 157 signing statements challenging over 1,100 provisions of federal law.
Obama has issued 28 signing statements as of June 17, 2014."
So, um, no, you're wrong, he does not do what you just said he does. Now you have no reason to say that anymore. So you and every other person like you that regurgitates FOX's "opinion shows" can put it to rest, you have the facts, so stop. Every, damn, day.
Re: If the developer is stressed
"If the developer is stressed
They're probably reading some rather hairy code"
THEIR MANAGER HAS WIRED THEM TO FREAKING LIE DETECTOR WHILE THEY CODE!
"Microsoft, our code only contains bugs written by the most confident programmers."
Re: I'm surprised...
Not correct, in this case if you like the internet the way it is now, you must let the FCC regulate it.
The problem is that the FCC has always regulated it, and only recently the ISPs have sued to not be regulated. They say that all this time, the FCC was wrong to be regulating them, and that because they shouldn't be regulating them now, that they can do what ever they want, hence, the throttling of certain types of content (bittorrent, Netflix, really anything that they don't like)
We all want them regulated as a type 2 Telecommunications provider, so that we can CONTINUE to have the internet be free. If not, only large corps will have fast speeds, well, those and the ultra rich.
They have a HUGE mis-information campaign going to confuse this issue, this is way you are thinking the way you are. Unless, you like being at the mercy of a company's bottom line, rather than everyone being treated fairly.
Well if you make it a habit of purposely changing or deleting the contents of random binary files in your OS all the time, then yes, I suppose you would eventually lock yourself out.
But on a realistic note, everyone else in the world might benefit.
Google could modify the OS to create a randomly named file in a random location, then any program that attempts to modify it gets blocked. Like honeypot of last resort. Or how about the filesystem alerts the user if a single program is making LOTS of file changes across multiple folders and halts its operations until the user offers input.
Will there be false-positives, sure, will it miss overly clever programs, sure, but how is doing nothing still acceptable in 2014. "Hey, should Candy Crush be scanning all your user files? It's up to 450 rifled through so far. Just thought I would let you know." How is that not something the OS should have been doing all along?
What's the worst that could happen?
Does anyone remember J. Edgar Hoover? Do you remember all that he did with only the craptastic tech he had available in the 20's to the 70's? He was the top FBI man for 50 years right up until the day he died because presidents were afraid to fire him for fear of reprisal. Now imagine what it would have been like if he had access to the internet history of everyone in the U.S., email, web searches, sites visited, transcribed voice calls, and online purchases. Not just for 2014, but all the way back to 2001, and continuing on until the day you die.
I don't worry about the good-guys maybe doing bad things so much as I worry about the bad-guys doing what they will do. Someone could sit behind a desk and control everyone in the United States if they had uncontrolled access to that information, and if someone can, someone will.
So.. They are going to release IIS as a standalone app?
So.. They are going to release IIS as a standalone app? And I can install it on top of Linux? No? Then I don't think so.
Have you seen Server 2012? Who in their right mind (beside a project manager, or CEO, or other low-information plod) would want to run a touchscreen OS as their server.
This isn't Minority Report, this is real life.
Re: Is it not ethically and maybe legally questionable to provide this reg hack?
More like you buy a car, and after the warranty is up you find out when it breaks that the hood/bonnet is welded shut. Then El Reg posts instructions for making the car work a little longer, and someone screams from their Range-Rover about how that is unethical.
People have all kinds of reasons for why they still want to run XP (financial, gaming, PoS, ATMs), and as long as they aren't selling it for money, who cares? Is Microsoft losing money? The product is EOL and hasn't been sold for years.
People need to worry less about whether or not someone is being unethical to a company and more about the fact that a company by definition is an un-ethical, un-dying, non-punishable entity that usually will sell-out or kill its own customers for one more penny.
Re: No longer really useful
Well, for one thing, drivers. Back in the day you could search for a driver with:
VEN_39FD&DEV_2933 xp driver
and it would net some fake results, but have some valid links and a few of those pointing to the .inf file from the driver package. This same link nowadays will net only garbage. And garbage of the worst caliber, such as download managers, and system scanners, and the like.
Sometimes all I get back from a Google search is garbage, and it has gotten worse in the last year or two.
This could be easily solved if Google would allow me to combine multiple search results. So If I put "Policy Server" in one search windows and "Policy Server dolphin rape-cave" in the other, and said that anything found in both is not to be returned. Hell, they could let me store spam search results as a favorite, and always search against it. Problem solved.
Get Windows 8.1 for Free?
No, Remind me later. (or preferably not)
Fool me once, shame on you, have me install your crappy "upgrade" once, and then after I update my firmware, have my OS go insane until I format and reload my OS again?
I know exactly why China doesn't want Windows 8, I know all too well.
Re: Nice idea, but...
For that matter, how do we know that it's not really a Decepticon masquerading as a Router/Switch. Or that the plastic isn't some sort of Lazarus plastic that records all the ambient sound in a room.
Maybe the whole thing has been made from entangled particles, and the NSA has its twin installed in their switch-room at their moon base.
There are lots of things to be worried about, this doesn't seem to be one of them. It seems unlikely that the NSA would have the schematics, personnel, replacements, and machines to pull off your proposed chip-change idea. I'm not saying they they can't do it, just that I don't think they are at that level of caring just yet. They have plenty of America's data to keep them gainfully employed for a while.
Re: So how are they 'tampering'? (I bet it's nanobots, aliens, or ghosts)
All your points were mine exactly.
I remember watching some senate hearing last month about some commented-out boilerplate DOD banner being "discovered" in the html source-code for the ACA webpage and the ensuing nonsense that followed, I realized that all the fact-based and logical arguments in the world don't matter at all.
No amount of rational explanations will make frightened morons stop being either.
If you're serious, an 800FS, if it's for playing around a 5-bay job.
They have Beyond RAID (RAID6), and will automatically expand as you swap out the drives for larger ones. You simply throw some cheap 1TB in there for now, and replace them with larger drives as those prices come down or as the older ones fail. Because it is RAID6, you would have to loose 2 whole drives before you start losing data. Access that storage through its SMB shares.
Born in Mississippi? Inventor of the Opti-grab?
I'd buy one if it had a retina laser projection system, but it doesn't, so it is lame. It "projects" a 1/2 inch screen onto a tiny piece of plastic at half brightness. So much future, such wow.
I have a sneaking suspicion that at some point the plot of the movie "The Jerk (1979)" is going to become a reality for Google.
Rule of thumb.
As a general rule most organic creatures should do the exact opposite of whatever Glenn Beck or Michele Bachman endorse.
Let's get rid of the Shuttles...
Let's get rid of the Shuttles they said.. What could go wrong they said... Russia is our friend now.
It's ok, we didn't need a space program, all that matters is whether or not the stock market goes up, and how much money you make as an individual. The only point to doing anything is to make money. How would people know that you are the most superest duperest guy around if you don't have lots of money. Who cares about exploring our place in the universe, give me a sweet 100ft yacht any day. Who cares about the scientific advancements we gain from pushing the envelope on what's possible, my banker says he's just developed a derivative instrument based on the packaging of home loans that just spits out money. It's great to be rich, and I'm going to live forever.
Why do we care, clearly no one else does either.
Re: Do you like Facebook, Netflix, or Google?
So do we get to decide what kind and how much traffic is "significant" or will that number be pulled from Comcast's ass at will? Also Facebook pushes massive amounts of data, so does Skydrive, so does any popular site. Letting the ISPs pick and choose the tech winners is a bad idea, no matter how fair you think it sounds.
Re: Do you like Facebook, Netflix, or Google?
Your store analogy isn't quite right.
Not having net neutrality is like more like Comcast owning the street in front of the store, and charging one business more money because they do more business.
That is even more accurate when you realize that the QOS that they are selling those "premium" customers comes from somewhere, and that somewhere is "non-premium" users, aka us.
The last mile is exactly like a road, there is only so much room, and when the ISPs can just keep slicing the current lines to more and more "lanes" and then put up stop lights for each lane, why would they ever need to upgrade those lines. They want to keep their resource scarce because like anything else in life, the more scarce a resource, the more you can charge for it. Add the fact that most customers have only one provider "choice" and you see how the whole model is going to suck for anyone without a lot of money.
They need to stop over-selling their capacity, and spend more of their profits on upgrading their existing product to meet demand, and not just paying lawyers to change the laws so they don't need to.
I'd rather just make the lines public and raise my taxes to upgrade and maintain them rather then let a cabal of ISPs turn it into a class system.
Do you like Facebook, Netflix, or Google?
Do you like Facebook, Netflix, or Google? Did you like them 15 years ago? No, because they didn't exist in their present form then, they are only here because the free nature of the Internet allowed them to experiment and develop a user base. Can you imagine if Google was threatened with their data being throttling back when they were in a garage and making no money? How does a 3-day old Netflix pay "protection money" to Comcast?
If Net Neutrality goes away, say goodbye to any future startups. The only way a new startup can flourish in that type of environment is by "partnering" with one of the established big boys , which is probably not the first time this has been realized by the big boys.
I'm guessing Comcast (and all the others) would have a lot more money for upgrading their pipes if they stopped buying out all of their competitors.
Re: I still say this is ripe for abuse.
Abuse? Can you imagine what would happen if a zero-day exploit allowed ALL cell phones in the US to be killed all at the same time? Most people don't keep a land-line anymore, and there are hardly any pay-phones left.
In one day we could be sent back to 1912 as far as our ability to connect, get business done, or call for help. But no California, tell us how it will reduce cell phone theft, what could go wrong?
Re: "It's got what plants crave!"
Pretty much shows why IQ tests are designed to have 49% of the population in double digits.
It all comes down to education and as long as we as a people don't focus on education, we will suffer the consequences from ignorant people doing stupid things. (like allowing a mumps or measles outbreak in a wealthy country in 2014)
Re: Let's see...
Didn't he make Woz sob years later when Woz found out the Steve screwed him out of some money 30 years early? (by lying about how much they were going to get paid)
It seems to me that whatever opinion of Steve Jobs the public might have had, that the reality was probably 4 times worse (I mean, he screwed over the guy that was solely responsible for him becoming rich). Should the jury being made aware of the "lack" of character Jobs had when deciding whether or not he was threatening the Palm CEO, yes, I believe they should.
Sounds like he was a world-class douche when he was alive.
In reality I have no idea whether or not he did it, but how hard would it be for some anonymous hacker to drive around until they find an access-point they can crack in 5 minutes (WPS exploit), crack it, execute the heartbleed exploit, and because the hacker also now has access to the unsuspecting person's local NAT, just put some "evidence" in a shared folder somewhere. The real perpetrator would get away scot-free, and the police would just stop looking.
Sinfofsky, he's that bastard that basically broke Microsoft. He broke every design he touched and the fact that his ego wouldn't allow him to think he could ever do anything wrong caused the GUI nightmares were are all still dealing with.
Re: Bad choice
Requires? No. But from what I've seen, it appears they have conflicting styles mixed together. It's like someone was pointing a gun at the interface designer to make them try to design it for a 4" tablet, and they just couldn't do it. Being forced to look at a crappy touchscreen interface is just as bad as requiring a touchscreen.
It. Is. a. poor. design. Do you honestly think that it is better this way? If not, then why defend something not better.
Re: The beginning of the end of Microsoft.
Why couldn't they have just left the GUI alone and improved the things we use, like the DHCP server role, the NPS server role. Or allowed new types of objects in AD or allow different views (organizational vs geographic), not just the same ones from 95. I mean really why can't they make it so that when you setup a DHCP server, that you can setup a backup, and have the databases sync, and have the failover be automatic? No, let's put tiles on the desktop. Why not have the NPS server be able to query the DHCP server, and if there is a reservation for a MAC in there, allow it access (a DHCP reservation based MAB). No, let's get rid of the start menu. The only thing NPS is good for is pawning off authentication to a real RADIUS server. Look how long it took them to put a "Convert to reservation" feature in the DHCP server. I can tell you, 10 years. 10 years we had to script that stupid task.
The end is near, and good riddance.
Translation: Coming soon, no side-loading.
They're keeping us safe, from ourselves.
I only read this as brick number 1 in their soon to be coming "Walled Garden". So if you like the Apple App store you'll love this.
Soon we'll all need to be "hackers" if we want to install a 3rd party non-approved Minesweeper game.