like the content, but...
productise - trad. GB spelling, to boot - is a tough word to journalize.
579 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Apr 2006
Does this cloud thing upload several of my flat tables, match key columns with point and click, and assemble the data in a consolidated and more useful way?
You might have hit on a killer app for SAAS - customers won't care so much about how it works. There could even be humans coordinating the automatons in the background.
The PC billing in our company is around £3000 p/a including support and compatiblity checks. The hardware and the support are a small part, the majority being licence fees and outsourced infrastructure (network&phone, printer,server,....). If we virtualised, we'd get questions about why users have to pay so much when they install a company environment on their own computers. We already pay a BMW price for a Ford solution.
<The result is that IT and the business often compromise and adopt an average charge per user that can bear little resemblance to reality as different types of users have wildly divergent usage patterns.>
It is the heavy users who are increasing your system's value above that of scrap iron. There is a lot to be said for such a subsidy, beyond its simplicity. I've done something similar in the past when charging back on data use while subsidising data entry.
Information is such a big area, it needs all the commissioners it can get: How about?
- an SMS commissioner, who looks into abuses of less than 140 characters
- the electrical information commissioner, who looks at transmission over power lines
- one for official secrets abuse, who looks into espionage, but does not publish any results
- the freedom of info man, to help public officials redefine their information to be either outside public domains, or valuable and therefore covered under the freedom to charge laws.
But wait! We seem to have people responsible for all these problems - it's just the results that are missing.
"the only way for Europe's interest groups – trade unionists, employers, farmers, etc – to have a formal and institutionalized say on draft EU legislation"
This, of course, refers to the fact the MEPs have no formal say in any legislation. Informal lobbying is also standard.
Perhaps when an arab state finds a good way, Europe could copy them, like we made progress in the dark ages.
True status is accompanied by underpowered modules providing a small part of the functionality you might rationally expect: in the 50's the car, 60's the record player, in the 80's PCs, in the 90s laptops. Once they are readily produced, they lose their value as a status symbol. The mobile phone may be last decade's weak link, the next one might be a tablet, ... or health insurance.
Have you observed Asian tourists window-shopping? "ooh, look, we got that in Kyoto 2 years ago". Could be
- they want to make their own feel good while on holiday
- the companies are not well enough organised to manage a world-wide roll-out
- the iffy models get beta-tested at home, and only the better ones make it to ROW
I have tried to wean myself off cutting-edge products, just to reduce the bleeding.
Meissen copied china, bringing the technology to Europe. There were countless European knock-offs, but the finish line came when the chinese started selling copies of Meissen wares.
Google has so much room for improvement that Bing can't become the best by copying it. Maybe they could do a deal with Baidu?
As mentioned in a few posts, the best fit to continuous innovation was HP. Their new manager is announcing an innovation drive. It will be interesting to see if they can find anyone with the engineering and project skills to change the world - their last effort I found interesting was writescribe on disks.
But all innovation is >90% copying - the IT patent swamp needs draining first. It seems the main reason for purchasing companies today is not new ideas, but old patents.
About 1780 people were saying the same thing about industrialists.
Now England and US are mostly service economies, and even most in the industrial sector provide services within their company rather than producing articles.
However, if you do really subscribe to this line of thought, you could buy a patch of the soon-to-be-privatised forests, and set up a tree farm, rather than the hug-a-tree experience trail I would build.
This is so unlikely that it is confirms war won't be getting worse for civilians any time soon.
Like banking, weapons research absorbs a large amount of a developed economy's real money and talent. The trick is to keep both groups from messing around with the real world.
The Swiss way is to reduce the national pension if you retire early (-25% at 60) and increase it similarly if you put off the date and keep contributing, so no double payout. The steep curve comes from the change applying to estimated life, not contribution years.
The company or own pensions could be similar, and are anyway moving towards output being related to input. Other tricks to watch for would be employers no longer contributing after 65, and rampant inflation.
No have-your-cake-and-eat-it icon, will beer do?
Surely you mean a wooden horse made by soldiers of the army fighting the Trojans? The words 'horse' and '^wood' were left out for reasons of brevity. There was only one horse, too, but I guess it went viral. In fact, this case supports H.Dumpty's conjecture, that a word means what one chooses it to mean — neither more nor less.
Too bad we stopped learning the classic myths, and switched to computer studies - the world must have been a better place in the golden age.
Last month I saw a BBC Classic music mag, nominally £4.50, on sale for CHF 22.50 = £15. If I had bought 3 in England, I could have paid for the flight, but I didn't want to face that bad weather.
Seriously though, you are right about the internet exposing price differentials. Both sides are not good Europeans, and keep goods out with Customs terror. (A special hello to the British officers who wanted £60 for a box of chocolates we sent our daughter last Christmas.) Rumors are that this will be lifted between the Swiss and Europe later in 2011.
This was all true before there were computers (and after telephones). What has changed is the [REG?] public sensibility to records policy, potential misuse, and ability to correct wrong or disputed information - probably as a reaction to Labour and Civil Service insensitivity.
It sounds like a worthy pilot case to bring up to date - it is clearly of value, should be easy to realign, and there are currently no other teacups with storms in.
What should the British Government do about foreign companies copying? I can't imagine them wanting to prosecute on behalf of British industry. That would be an even quicker route to national bankrupcy than supporting bankers.
I had a friend who patented a squash referee's chair, which had legs long enough to place it around the court entrance. Predictably, he spent more maintaining the patents than he made from sales. Patents are not intended to make money for small companies.
The IT patent field is a particular mess, which additionally favours rich large companies. Here, SMEs aim should be to protect themselves from gratuitous legal attacks, by publishing their inventions (e.g. open source), or by working in secret (e.g. use compiled code). These methods cost nothing.
Converting from miles per gallon bought in £ to liters bought in € per 100km - the standard European pump price - is the only everyday case beyond the threshold of my mental arithmetic that bothers me. I just can't compare them while driving past the garage.
Could someone confirm there is an app for this, please - or better still , a rule of thumb?