727 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
Given that Google are a pretty significant technology company...
...how hard would it be to ensure that the tickets for the show are not transferable and hence put the kibosh on the profiteers?
And if you do need some way of valid transfers at face value only - well, Google are a pretty significant technology company and should be able to solve said problem.
You don't have to use the Amazon tool...
Pymazon is excellent.
Is this a news article or an op-ed?
Look, we know that Lewis Page only ever covers news which supports his anti AGW agenda. But with comments like "famous climate-alarmist scientists", he is going way beyond what is really justifiable.
It's actually a good thing for everyone that someone has done some research and discovered that things are not quite as we first thought. It's called science. We can never be sure we're absolutely right. But it's just another datum. As someone above said, it doesn't mean that global warming isn't happening.
Honestly, the last time I saw so much one-sided reporting on a science issue, it was the Discovery Institute trying to deny evolution.
Re: Reading is Zombie H.Q. all the time, everyday
So you've turned down a beggar, who might possibly have been hungry. And you'd like to "deport chavs".
Presumably you went back to reading the Daily Mail when you finished your lunch.
Re: $40m in venture funding and had been valued at $500m
Difference is that I could see how useful a good search engine would be. I don't see why a huge number of people would want to make their photos look old. I bet 25 million of the 27 million users have downloaded the app, tried it and thought "Cool!" and then never used it again.
Re: Is it just me...
It's also missing the usual rant about alternative energy sources...
Re: Pi Day
Have they still got those stupid disappearing scroll bars?
If so, I'm staying with Mint.
Orlowski - alternative energy is a waste of time.
Page - Global warming is a myth.
Look, could you please put the names of the authors on the front page, so I don't have to waste my time clickiing on articles which are going to say nothing except repeating the author's prejudices?
Re: Re: If only it (LibreOffice) didn't have such a terrible name
And Suse, Fedora/Red Hat, Debian, Mandriva and Mint are such sensible names...
Well, we'll see...
I'm going to buy the HL-2250DN - Duplex and networked, good reviews (including here), linux drivers and you can get it for less than £80. Why should it be useless?
I appreciated it.
Re: Grass Growing
My statistical sample of one garden proves that climate change is wrong.
Re: Good grief.
This is Lewis Page. ALL his articles can be reduced to "lulz climate change int so bad rofl".
Science - what it's about !
Science - We had a hypothesis and tested it - didn't work as we expected. Better change it and retest.
Dogma - we can't possibly have any effect so not worth worrying about it - oh,. and throw in some FUD, too.
And did they also...
....have to return every last payment that was made to them? And did the directors of the companies go to prison for six months, and get banned from running a company?
Re: Is the top of your TV flat?
The sensor bar can live UNDER the TV - you just change a setting in the Wii. Presumably the candles could too.
It's called a Kindle.
Actually, in the original 1931 Frankenstein...
...the assistant was actually called Fritz. And in Bride of Frankenstein, he was Karl, apparently - played by the same actor. (Even though the Monster killed Fritz in the first one...)
Don't know when Igor became the norm...
Prices would be useful...
But nevertheless, much appreciated !
I'm going to give you the same advice...
...as I gave to the person who was approximately as rude as you were about Verity Stob.
At the top of each article, you'll see a few words. These are called a title. They are there to give you some idea what the article is about. The BOFH articles always have the word "BOFH" at the start of the title.
If you don't like the BOFH, refrain from clicking on these articles.
Linux and GUIs??
"...Gnome and KDE would never dream of radically updating the GUIs to make them less usable..."
Ask anyone who switched from Gnome 2 to Gnome 3.
Come to that, ask anyone who has recently abandoned Ubuntu due to the execration that is Unity.
I can reasonably fit about four thousand books into my house, and I've now run out of space.
I buy beautiful books, and I buy first editions for my collection - all else I get as an ebook if I can. And I'm told that it's relatively easy to strip the DRM, so that it becomes my own. Not that I'd know anything about that, of course.
Kindle buyers really are braindead morons in my eyes...
Another braindead moron here defending the Kindle.
The Kindle sold well despite it not supporting ePub (which I personally regret). It's dead easy to use and it's cheap, and it looks good.
I've got both a Sony Reader and a Kindle. Means I can choose the cheapest book.
And btw - if you wouldn't up to a large hefty bloke reading a Kindle on the tube and tell him he's a brain-dead moron, why do you think it's acceptable to use the same language on the Internet?
@AnotherNetNarcissist - Odd
If the research showed that iOS crashed fewer apps, and someone said "Rubbish! - I've got an iPad and a Android tablet and the Android works much better", I would have made exactly the same comment.
What's your point?
So your sample of one is proof that this survey is incorrect?
"that's just because he would have needed to do that to meet a target for the practice bonus"
Doesn't mean it's not a good thing to do - I see no reason at all why your positive illusion should be dispersed because you have a cynical GP friend.
I know there is good ale to be found in the US.
Unfortunately, the stuff that finds it's way into the UK is undrinkable. It's a tribute to the marketing skills of Budweiser et al that people still drink it.
You mean American beer...?
...the violins on the right seems a bit odd.
In general, I actually agree with you. But still, the purist in me feels that if the musician wanted me to hear the music that way round, that's the way I ought to listen to it.
It irritates me...
...seeing teenagers sharing headphones, so that one of them can only hear one channel of the music. It would drive me MAD! so the trick of switching automatically to mono when you share is also excellent.
So let's see what happens...
if I type some <b>bold</b> or <i>italics</i> - or even a <a href=http://www.theregister.co.uk>link</a>...
hmmm....the preview is not promising...
Should have used the "Joke Alert"...
To the person who down-voted me - the crack above about taking several six-day weeks to create the universe and the bible being inerrant was meant to be a joke...
...unless I've offended a bible-basher by suggesting God would take more than 6 days...
You've got it wrong
He created the world in six days, then rested for a day.
Then it was Monday again. And just like you and me, it was back to work, creating the rest of the universe. Probably took him several six-day weeks.
The bible is inerrant, but it doesn't include absolutely everything God ever did.
How does the native Burmese wildlife survive?
I'd suspect that some sort of local defence mechanism has evolved over the last few tens of thousands of years.
Unfortunately, that's not an option here...
"I once got a defendant a non custodial sentence for smashing a brick into his girlfriends face.... not a proud moment."
No you didn't. He either pleaded guilty or was found guilty, and the sentence was not a matter for you. You just did your job, which was to defend him to the best of your ability. If the prosecution couldn't prove GBH, or the bench was too soft, that's not your problem.
"Of course the internet is full of lies. But so are most lawyers and a large number of witnesses."
Witnesses do lie, without a doubt. But, in court, lawyers don't. If they did, and it was discovered that they had lied, they would have the proverbial book thrown at them - not forgetting the cost to the public purse of a possible retrial.
And the suggestion that you go out and trawl the internet to find out what you can about the case is just stupid. If the information is pertinent, it will be used as evidence, either by the defence or the prosecution. If it is not, it won't. And if it's not been discovered by either the prosecution or the defence, why on earth do you think that a quick trawl on the internet by a juror will turn it up? Must more likely it'll turn up some information which makes it impossible to give the defendant a fair trial.
(By the way - if the prosecution has some evidence which will help the defence's case, they MUST disclose it to the defence. The defence has no such obligation. It's the job of the prosecution to PROVE the case.)
It is the job of the police to find the evidence. It is the job of the opposing counsels to put each side's case. It is the jury's job to listen to both sides, evaluate the evidence and to make the judgment.
There could be several reasons...
IANAL - but I'm married to one...so I know a BIT about this.
1) He may have been accused of rape and found not guilty. If that's the case, it's certainly true that the previous case should have nothing to do with it.
2) In general a previous conviction has nothing to do with the current one. You've got to PROVE the case - and saying "well, look, it must have been him, he's done it all those other times" isn't proof that he did it this time. Having said that, a prosecutor CAN apply to get "previous bad character" in as supporting evidence - but there has to be a good justification.
Previous convictions ARE taken into account when sentencing, of course.
Why the hell not?
If the political will was there, and the finance was available, it would be perfectly possible.
If we could start more-or-less from scratch in 1961 and get a moon landing by 1969, then with our additional technical knowledge, and our massively more powerful and efficient computers, I can see no good technical reason why we couldn't have a base on the moon by 2020.
I agree with you, of course. It'll never happen.
Or, even easier...
Old PC, two network cards and install Endian community.
Well, it costs so much to go to college in the US...
...the extra price of an Apple PC is trivial in comparison.
And students, like most young people, tend to like to go with the herd.
Why would you carry your textbooks round with you???
When I was at uni, I carried a bag which contained the notebooks I needed to take notes at lectures, and the stuff I needed for tutorials. My textbooks stayed in my room, where I needed them on the rare occasions I actually did some work.
I saw literally no-one carry actual books except to and from the library or bookshop.
Yes - I install Linux because it's easy.
I can take a disk, plug it in, boot it - and it works. Then, once it's up, I can mess around to my heart's content. It automatically sets up a dual-boot on a Windows box,. too.
If I have to somehow mess about with BIOS settings (which might also stop my Windows working) then it's one extra bit I frankly don't want to have to do.
Linux IS user friendly these days. Anyone with half a brain can install it.
Of course they do!
Most people are technophobes in the sense he means. They want to pick up a gadget and it should work, and if it doesn't, they don't want to spend time investigating.
@Ian Stephenson - it's actually a shame...
...we didn't get "saddled with the 2018 World Cup" - we would have done it well, and probably made a decent profit out of it, without having to build very much in the way of infrastructure.
The Olympics? Meh. I've already booked two weeks holiday abroad.
What has the picture...
...of the bottom half of a woman got to do with this story?
That's just as dishonest as "stealing".
If I produce some music, and I don't give people permission to copy it without payment, then anyone who DOES copy it is not bloody SHARING it.
If I write a book, and someone decides to copy it without paying for it, it is not SHARED.
It's been nicked. End of. And I can damn well tell you (because it's happened to me) that it FEELS like it's been nicked.
It may not be legally stolen. It may not be possible to do anything about it. But someone has acquired something of mine, which I didn't want them to have without payment. They have not SHARED it, and they have no right to "share" it with anyone else.
And anyone who tries to come up with some spurious moral high ground about "it's not really theft, and I'm only sharing it" is just lying through their teeth.
So called, because it's not ultra and isn't a book.
- JLaw, Kate Upton exposed in celeb nude pics hack
- Google flushes out users of old browsers by serving up CLUNKY, AGED version of search
- China: You, Microsoft. Office-Windows 'compatibility'. You have 20 days to explain
- GCHQ protesters stick it to British spooks ... by drinking urine
- Twitter declines to deny JLaw tweet scrubdown after alleged iCloud NAKED PHOTOS hack