674 posts • joined Thursday 17th January 2008 11:18 GMT
Well, who wants Twitter in Google searches anyway?If I search Google, I'm searching for information. I'm not searching for trivia. Example - last year, I was watching the Proms on TV, and a singer came onto stage. I'd not heard of her, so I searched for her name on Google - and the first two results were people tweeting that she'd just come onto stage. Sigh.
It's not just counter-intuitive....
...it's also stupid.
Once you know where something is in a menu, there it is. Two or three mouse-clicks and it's open.
But searching needs at least three or four keys on the keyboard.
Menus lasted a long time, because they work well.
(And don't get me started on those ridiculous vanishing scroll-bars...)
@Scientologyisacult: I entirely agree with your general point...
...but you weakened your argument severely when you referred to Top Gear as a quality program.
Problem is that...
...the likely gravitational pull on something bigger than Jupiter would make it impossible to even walk...
I'd love to see something where if you bought a book - perhaps only the hardback - you got the ebook for free. That would be truly excellent, and would almost certainly increase the sales of hardback books. People who think "I want to buy that book but I'll wait for the paperback becuase it's (a) cheaper and (b) lighter" might well think "but (a) I get two copies and (b) ebooks are very light - so I'll buy the hardback after all."
Is there actual evidence for this?
Or is it just conspiracy-theory panic?
So, now that a scientific paper actually agrees with Lewis, the scientists know what they are talking about after all?
"The netbook market has slumped over the past couple of years, in no small part thanks to the arrival of sleek, slim tablets."
No - the netbook market has slumped due to the fact that the prices and specs are still more-or-less the same as they were two years ago. Drop the price of netbooks (currently £199-£329) to, say, £129-£229 and watch them shift.
It;s not allegedly...
One click, reboot your superhub and bob's your uncle - you have a high-speed modem.
Works a treat.
Fine for magazines and coffee table books....
...but otherwise, shiny colour pages are just a distraction.
Words are best read in monochrome. That's why books work so well, and why the ebook readers work so well.
Every tenth time this happens, I waste my time wondering...
...why is it on the internet that people are so damn RUDE?
If you didn't agree with someone down the pub, would you call them a "moron" and "dim boy"? No, I suspected not. Then why on earth do you do it on the internet?
It's perfectly possible to disagree with someone - even to tell them they are wrong - without resorting to abuse.
But a firewall is still a vulnerability....
It's a water pump for a water system. The water pump and everything it needs to be connected to should be on a completely separate, unconnected to the internet, network.
It shouldn't matter whose religion it is....
...it should be possible to insult it without actually getting death threats.
Come back, Sarah Bee - we miss you...!
No surprise a stupid statement like that was made by an AC...
"Jesus, here comes that stupid arse who thinks he's God's gift to women, and tries to chat up anything in a skirt. I know - I'll pretend to be on the phone."
Who in god's name thought that stupid floating scrollbar was ever a good idea?
Just repeating for emphasis.
If Ubuntu had got everything else right, that is still a complete show-stopper for me.
There are some applications which just do not work any more. FFS, why should the developer suddenly have to dig into his window handling just to check what subtle mistake he's made which means the app no longer works? Or perhaps he's strictly right, but just using something a bit unusual, and it's actually the stupid vanishing scrollbar that's wrong.
Scroll-bars have worked for twenty years or more. Why change them?
Dogs roam free in the interests of equality, eh?
So, when was the last time that a child was savaged to death by a cat?
Look, if you don't like cats in your garden, use a hose. It's fun, and they learn quickly not to return.
I have a Sony Reader...
...and I've heard it said that you can read Kindle books on it, with a bit of work. Not that I'd know anything about that.
However, at this price, I think I'd be inclined to own both. And if the Sony Reader drops in price to compete, that will become a possibility for a lot of people.
And as for the comment that an extra 2G and sound and the keyboard is a lot for £20 extra - true, but it's still three items I don't need - I'd rather have the £20, thanks.
Beer, because that's what I'd spend the extra £20 on.
It needs a bit of work....
I've just downloaded "Pride and Prejudice" on my Android phone.
Opened the book.
The first line was...
"Elizabeth, as they drove along, watched for the first appearance of Pemberley Woods with some perturbation."
Eh?? - what about that "truth universally acknowledged" line?
Turns out that this is Volume III of the original three-volume book. No sign of Volume 1 or 2 anywhere....
You mean it'll be round? I guess even Apple won't complain it looks the same then...
The vendors aren't mugs....
....they know that there WILL be end users who are dumb enough to buy at these prices, so they'll grab some and sell them on.
I don't approve - I just know it's the way of the world.
estimate based on what, exactly?
Why on earth do you think 60% of iPad purchasers are doing anything more than surfing the net and consuming media?
The target audience for the iPad is people who consume, not create - and I reckon that 90% of iPad purchasers (in fact, ALL tablet purchaser) are just consuming media and surfing the net.
BTW - I'm including "playing games" under "consuming media". I'm NOT including "posting to Facebook" or "sending the odd email" as creating. I'm assuming you are too.
The reason drink/drive legislation was originally brought in was because alcohol causes all the things you mention. However, under the current legislation, if you drink enough that your BAC is above the limit, you have committed a crime - end of story. It doesn't matter if the alcohol has had no effect on you due to this drug - you'll lose your license.
...and my original question has also been downvoted.
To the moderators - could you please investigate? It seems a bit odd...
Out of curiousity....
...why has EVERY post on this thread (including all replies) been downvoted at least once?
Well, that music sharing system of a few years ago might have looked good on paper, and with a few test users - but, if their current Backup and Storage system is anything to go by, as soon as any reasonable number of people got onto it, it would have collapsed and died.
There's more to engineering than just producing a good system - it needs to be robust and resilient too.
...so that's a "no", then?
Nothing in science is ever proved.
But the evidence for evolution is overwhelming - to the extent that it might as well be called a fact.
The main theory for the MECHANISM for evolution is modified descent by natural selection, as proposed by Darwin, modified by our knowledge of genetics, and supported by DNA and fossils. It's a good theory, and makes predictions which can be tested - google Tiktaalik for one excellent example.
The alternative theory for the mechanism is Intelligent Design, as proposed by Behe, supported by handwaving and the argument from incredulity (I don't understand how this can happen, so goddidit). It's a bad theory, which makes no testable predictions.
It's a nice idea....
...but that would not hurt Assange (who has had half a million pounds in royalty advances), it would hurt Canongate (who are currently half-a-million out of pocket).
Just a couple of points.
"What fool decided that more CO2 in the atmosphere is dangerous (hint - CO2 is vital to the existance of plants - and without plants life itself doesnt exist - therefore CO2 is not a pollutant)? What is all that based on?"
Google Greenhouse Effect. Then, bear in mind that we (yes, the human race) are decreasing the number of plants (Google deforestation), which is only going to increase the amount of C02 in the atmosphere. That's what it's all based on.
You are entitled to disagree with the science (or even the "science", if you prefer). But if you don't even understand why the increase in CO2 might well be a bad thing, then you have shown no evidence that you even understand the science - which is really pretty important to be able to refute it.
Your assessment of the IPCC as "a huge bureaucracy of non scientists designed to keep 10's of 1000's of people in fancy hotels and nice holidays" is also a little wide of the mark.
"The IPCC is not, as many people seem to think, a large organization. In fact, it has only 10 full-time staff in its secretariat at the World Meteorological Organization in Geneva, plus a few staff in four technical support units that help the chairs of the three IPCC working groups and the national greenhouse gas inventories group. The actual work of the IPCC is done by unpaid volunteers – thousands of scientists at universities and research institutes around the world who contribute as authors or reviewers to the completion of the IPCC reports. A large fraction of the relevant scientific community is thus involved in the effort."
Finally - you won't convince anyone that your view is correct by telling them that they are "a complete moron" or that they are "so dumb you must struggle to stand and breathe".
So, the asteroid broke up 80 million years ago...
...the dinosaurs were wiped out 65 million years ago....
So fifteen million years isn't long enough for a bit of broken up asteroid to reach the earth?
Obviously, it's a bit more complicated than that - but I'd like a bit more explanation myself.
...just make stupid generalizations.
I learnt to program at school, because we had a maths teacher who taught us Algol. Had to prepare our programs on paper tape and take a minibus to the local polytechnic to run them once a fortnight. Still remember the hilarity when someone wrote the following.
IF A<10 THEN GOTO HELL ;
Make it fun, and you'll remember it !
...she has two days to realize that she has better things to do with her life than live it with someone whose idea of something good to do on a Saturday is watch all six Star Wars movies back to back?
I mean, OCR? Surely no modern book does not already exist at the publishers in some form of electronic format?
I think the worst example of that particular issue I came about was a book about the demise of Bear Stearns - throughout the book, it was called Bear Steams.
7.2? SEVEN speakers around your room, and TWO subwoofers?
God help us.
Why would you want two subwoofers?
Interesting that in the hi-fi world, even at the absolute top end, people are satisfied with two speakers. But put people in front of a screen, and suddenly you've got to have surround sound from all possible directions.
I'm going to patent my 22.214.171.124 system, with seven speakers around the room, three on the ceiling, two subwoofers and one extra subwoofer under the sofa.
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?
- Three offers free US roaming, confirms stealth 4G rollout