A little surprised you didn't mention this one...
...as you gave it a nice review about three months ago. And it's cheaper than all of these and works pretty well.
807 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
OK - you should assume nerds will check your working.
00110010 in binary is 50 in decimal. 42 is 00101010.
And typing it twice is either 50 50 or a largish number I can't be bothered to work out.
Ahahahaaaaaa... you have a female boss...
I assume you're going for the record for the number of downvotes for a single comment. I think you've got an excellent chance of getting it.
Yes, the Connect box might well be excellent - but £279? Two hundred and seventy nine quid?
Which is why I still soldier on with my Squeezeboxen. Yes, they are looking a little old-fashioned now, and yes, they are not quite hassle-free to set up - but once they are working, they just keep working.
An oxymoron if ever I heard one.
I hate to break it to you, but Dilbert is not a documentary.
"Spending two hours in the company of mindless idiots mouthing obscenities, in the cold and wet of a November evening"
Those mindless idiots are what makes a football match. If there were no fans physically at the game, there wouldn't be any atmosphere. It's like watching in a vacuum - utterly soulless.
And speaking as one of those mindless idiots - we SHOUT obscenities, not just mouth them :)
You go ahead and enjoy your game, with your beer, in front of your HD TV, pontificating about the finer points of the game. But if you've never actually been to a live match - you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Top class professional football is to sport as a top class orchestra, opera company or rock band is to music. It's got top quality performances, thrills, disappointments, overpaid prima donnas - the lot.
WWE is to sport as X-Factor is to music.
So I propose that you always get a paper book along with any ebook which has DRM.
Or alternatively, if you buy a real book, you get an automatic copy of the ebook.
Further to my "citation needed". There seems to be no doubt that more bibles have been printed in the last hundred years than any other book - but that's not quite the same as "would win every year".
Snopes doesn't help, surprisingly.
But this is interesting.
So in Norway, that year, the Bible was indeed one of the best sellers of the year. But please note that (a) it was a new translation and (b) it was still only in the top 15 books for 50 out of 52.
So five minutes of research convinces me that the Bible is not the huge bestseller people would like us to believe, and that there is little evidence for the statement that it is generally omitted from bestseller lists.
Note that the bible is not included in the bestseller lists as it would win every year.
Citation needed. How many people buy a bible each year, as opposed to schools or churches buying them in bulk?
How much the CEO pays for his next Ferrari doesn't impact how much the cleaner pays for rice or gas. It just doesn't.
No, but how much the CEO pays to rent or buy his flat does encourage the prices to go sky-high, putting people who can't afford them onto the street.
"...not a cutdown and limited inferior product like Chrome."
Says someone who has clearly never used a Chromebook.
I think we can safely assume that Windows running on a similarly-spec'd box as a Chromebook will not boot within ten seconds from scratch. It might just crawl up to speed within a minute.
It will also require regular updates (which will take minutes at a time) to keep it secure, as opposed to regular automated Chromebook updates which taken literally seconds to run. Oh - and you'll have to run an anti-virus check on it all the time, which will make it run even more slowly.
It will barely be able to run Microsoft Office, and will not be able to run most games. Which is basically the same as a Chromebook.
So what was that about cutdown and limited?
You don't learn to read by starting with D H Lawrence.
You don't learn to write with calligraphy pens.
You don't learn art by starting with oil paints.
You don't learn physics by starting with quantum mechanics.
You don't learn French by starting with Flaubert.
You shouldn't learn to program by starting with C or C#.
But by your argument, we should only teach kids Excel and Word for office use, as that's what they're going to need. But that's completely wrong. We should teach kids how to use SOFTWARE - so they can use Microsoft Office 2007 or Office 2010 or Libre Office or Google Docs and not be phased because it's not exactly the same.
Similarly - we should teach kids to program - not teach them a specific programming language. Scratch, Pascal, Python - doesn't matter. Hell, I learned to program with Algol and switched soon after to Basic and then Fortran. And my first actual job was in Assembler. It's the principles of basic algorithms you're trying to teach ten-year-olds - not the details of object inheritance, polymorphism and operator overload.
That is all.
When it rains I look outside...
I remember playing Atom Heart Mother on a pretty crap stereo system in the early seventies, with very ordinary speakers wall mounted either side of my bedroom window. There's a bit near the start when a motorbike starts up and goes from one side to the other and off into the distance. A friend of mine who was a motorbike enthusiast, and who hadn't heard the album before, ran to the window to look outside to see if he could spot the bike going past.
...and a Chromebook sitting on the table at home. I always pick up the Chromebook rather than the tablet - instant on, has a keyboard and is just easier to use.
Because, at a guess, I'd say it's likely that 99% of all "revenge porn" is perpetrated by men against their female ex-partners. It is certainly true that 100% of all the instances I have ever heard of were perpetrated by men against their female ex-partners.
Posts like this one give me a severe case of old curmudgeon.
Honestly - is it SO hard to write in standard English? Is it necessary to miss out occasional words and punctuation? Do you have to use "teh"?
Kids these days, I dunno, standards slipping...(wanders off disgruntled to the pub...)
So, from this month, you have to do your road tax by computer rather than join the queue at the post office.
You've been sent a reminder about two weeks ago. You can log on and do it any time between getting the reminder and the end of the month.
It's going to be a new system - there are likely to be teething problems, and there are also likely to be more people on it.
So why, for the love of Mike, would you leave it until the last possible day?
"It wasn't HIS actions, but that of the Mirror's that caused the problems, and the only reason we are all discussing this today."
We're discussing it today because of the Mirror. But I'd give you 5/4 on that if it hadn't actually been a sting, we would be discussing it in six months time when it all went pear-shaped and the papers got hold of it.
He was incomprehensibly stupid. The Mirror has just exposed his stupidity earlier than otherwise might have happened.
Risk your marriage, your relationship with your kids, and your career for an affair - yes, it's happened over and over again. There isn't a married man (or woman) in the world who can't understand how it might happen. Risk it all because you took a photo of your wang...stupid, stupid, STUPID.
That's really my main point. I don't understand how he can be defended.
"...this peccadillo would never have happened but for the actions of the Mirror."
For the avoidance of doubt, I don't agree with what the Mirror did. And I'm very sorry indeed for his wife, and - particularly - for his kids.
But let's get one thing clear. No one made him take his tackle out of his pyjamas and wave it at a camera. He could - and should - have simply said no. Even if it hadn't been the Daily Mirror entrapping him, it's a fair bet that the photos would eventually have appeared on the internet.
He was totally and completely stupid. And it was HIS actions that have caused the grief his wife and kids are going through now.
"You should be playing cymbals music and then listen how it sounds..."
So, for a hi-hat solo (as I once saw performed by Max Roach), it might be a bit naff - but for most normal music it'll be pretty OK, right?
Look - ff we were talking about a box that costs over a ton, your argument might hold some weight. But this thing is fifty quid.
"...being a fan of "real" music (ie with very very few exceptions nothing after 1900 - no not a typo 1900)..."
What a lot of wonderful music you are missing out on - and that's only a selection from the first half of the twentieth century, and completely ignores jazz, rock and pop music.
The Bone Clocks was long-listed for the Booker Prize - perhaps the fantasy bits were a bit too off-the-wall for the judges, as they didn't short list it, to my disappointment.
However, Cloud Atlas was short-listed, and I thoroughly recommend it. I think it's better than The Bone Clocks. What is interesting about David Mitchell is the way that hist books intertwine - not just within themselves, but with each other. Just one example - Marinus in The Bone Clocks also turns up in The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet.
Which is a complicated way of saying - yes - read the rest of his books - they are wonderful !
having no interest in upgrading my aging Nexus 5...
If your Nexus 5 is aging, I guess that makes my Nexus 4 antiquated. But I don't need to upgrade it either. Certainly not for six hundred notes.
But you wouldn't want to listen to classical music through Beats headphones either.
But I'll forgive you this time, as a fellow Squeezebox user. Just don't understand Sonos - it seems very expensive for what it is.
I wonder how many Sonos users also have iPhones?
I was pretty sure that was the hedgehog.
To see Gregory Peck.
...the incompetent people who grace the hallowed halls of Wal-Mart and Best Buy will sell anything to the uneducated who are really looking for a laptop that can run real software, not an "app"!
If you know you want to run real software, you already know you don't want a Chromebook, and so the incompetents will not be able to sell you one.
If you're the "uneducated" mentioned above, you probably don't want to run real software - you'll be happy with an "app". You probably don't know (or care) what the difference is. And it's very likely that a Chromebook will work well.
...and I don't really understand why.
For what 99% of users want, they are perfect. No worries about backup (it's up on the cloud, so you don't lose it), no worries about remembering to update (as it happens automatically).
The more recent ones allow you do quite a lot locally, even when you're not connected to the internet. And more and more, not being connected to the internet is becoming the exception, not the rule.
Yes, they can't run Office. But how many normal users need Office? Yes, they're not much good for gaming (though there ARE some good games) - but then, niether is a cheap Windows machine.
I use mine all the time. My daughter uses hers all the time. And if all you want to do is surf the net, look at YouTube, write a few basic documents, and dash off a few mails, I can't think why you'd need anything else.
I'm on a 120M connection with VM. I get not far from 120M at 8:00 am on a Sunday morning, here in NW London. But at 8:00 in the evening, due to contention, I get 20M if I'm lucky - as every other house in the street also has Virgin Media.
So if I'm increased to 152M, I reckon I might sneak up to 25M...whoo-hoo!
So we should abandon the science labs in Antarctica, because they are only political statements, and because robots can do the job so much better?
If we really want science labs to explore the moon properly, they need to be on the moon, and staffed with people (and, yes, robots).
...we would have, by now, had a permanent scientific colony up there, which would have been able to analyse this sort of thing much more accurately and effectively.
They also plan to offer gold-plated Galaxy and HTC products...
But I bet that over 90% of the gold-plated phones they sell are Apple.
Not forgetting, please, the Command Module pilots:-
Richard F Gordon
Stewart A Roosa
Alfred M Worden
Thomas K. Mattingly
Ronald E Evans
They didn't walk on the moon, but they went with those who did. And they are too easily forgotten.
...and the bevy of California girls.
Well, I personally am very grateful to the Register for bringing it to my attention.
I went with my sixteen-year-old daughter to see this last night. We both agreed it really was an exceptional performance - I have rarely, if ever, walked away from a film feeling like that.
But yes - it's a bit of a minority interest, and that's a damn shame. The assumption is that as it's Ibsen, and theatre, it must be highbrow rubbish. Actually, it's a marvellous play, brilliantly acted, and very accessible.
I am quite sure that the people who did it are exceptionally proud of it - and so they should be. Lesley Manville, Jack Lowden won Olivier Awards for their performances, and the director Richard Eyre won the Evening Standard award for Best Director.
It was awesome, really it was. Sorry you missed it.
What does it do with the grass cuttings in general?
I have a small Bosch mower which is all I need for my two mini-lawns. But I have to empty the grass-cutting box at least once half-way through cutting. So what does this thing do?
I think the third picture means that this should have been labelled as marginally NSFW.
...businesses would bring pressure to BEAR...
But you've had an upvote for the sentiments.
So you can watch a TV show in a smaller picture while you're playing a game in the main screen?
Blimey, if the game is so easy that you can watch TV at the same time, then what's the point of it?
Come to that, if the TV program is so uninteresting that you want to play a game while watching it, why bother to have it on?
If you are driving close enough to someone to see them doing that, you're driving FAR too close to them at 70mph...
The silly ram and HD limitations almost always simply make it a no go.
Hard disk - it's got an SSD so that it starts quickly, and if you want a bigger one, it's a LOT more expensive. What do you need large amounts of disk for? And once they get the promised local connection to a shared disk on the home LAN, there will be even less reason to need a large disk.
RAM - it's got 2GB. 4GB would be better, but again would cost more. People who use it with 2GB are saying that it zips along perfectly fine. What do you get with 4GB that you can't do with 2GB? Open forty tabs instead of twenty?
Like the poster above said - how about trying one, rather than just looking at it?
I was taught at school that the expected result of the drunkard's walk is sqrt(n) - that is, after n paces you'll be sqrt(n) paces away from your starting point.
But that monte carlo simulation seems to indicate that the distance is actually something like 0.9sqrt(n).
So what's going on here?
Therefore, telling Google your password - why not?
I can't even be arsed to vote.
Just supporting everyone else. If you don't like any of them, vote "none of the above" - ie spoil your paper. It's still better than not voting. If you don't vote, you have no right to complain about the result.
I think it would be interesting to have a "none of the above" selection on elections - I think it would win an overall majority frequently. And if enough elections went that way, perhaps politicians would start actually doing some good.