So your sample of one is proof that this survey is incorrect?
851 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
So your sample of one is proof that this survey is incorrect?
"that's just because he would have needed to do that to meet a target for the practice bonus"
Doesn't mean it's not a good thing to do - I see no reason at all why your positive illusion should be dispersed because you have a cynical GP friend.
I know there is good ale to be found in the US.
Unfortunately, the stuff that finds it's way into the UK is undrinkable. It's a tribute to the marketing skills of Budweiser et al that people still drink it.
You mean American beer...?
...the violins on the right seems a bit odd.
In general, I actually agree with you. But still, the purist in me feels that if the musician wanted me to hear the music that way round, that's the way I ought to listen to it.
...seeing teenagers sharing headphones, so that one of them can only hear one channel of the music. It would drive me MAD! so the trick of switching automatically to mono when you share is also excellent.
if I type some <b>bold</b> or <i>italics</i> - or even a <a href=http://www.theregister.co.uk>link</a>...
hmmm....the preview is not promising...
To the person who down-voted me - the crack above about taking several six-day weeks to create the universe and the bible being inerrant was meant to be a joke...
...unless I've offended a bible-basher by suggesting God would take more than 6 days...
He created the world in six days, then rested for a day.
Then it was Monday again. And just like you and me, it was back to work, creating the rest of the universe. Probably took him several six-day weeks.
The bible is inerrant, but it doesn't include absolutely everything God ever did.
I'd suspect that some sort of local defence mechanism has evolved over the last few tens of thousands of years.
Unfortunately, that's not an option here...
"I once got a defendant a non custodial sentence for smashing a brick into his girlfriends face.... not a proud moment."
No you didn't. He either pleaded guilty or was found guilty, and the sentence was not a matter for you. You just did your job, which was to defend him to the best of your ability. If the prosecution couldn't prove GBH, or the bench was too soft, that's not your problem.
"Of course the internet is full of lies. But so are most lawyers and a large number of witnesses."
Witnesses do lie, without a doubt. But, in court, lawyers don't. If they did, and it was discovered that they had lied, they would have the proverbial book thrown at them - not forgetting the cost to the public purse of a possible retrial.
And the suggestion that you go out and trawl the internet to find out what you can about the case is just stupid. If the information is pertinent, it will be used as evidence, either by the defence or the prosecution. If it is not, it won't. And if it's not been discovered by either the prosecution or the defence, why on earth do you think that a quick trawl on the internet by a juror will turn it up? Must more likely it'll turn up some information which makes it impossible to give the defendant a fair trial.
(By the way - if the prosecution has some evidence which will help the defence's case, they MUST disclose it to the defence. The defence has no such obligation. It's the job of the prosecution to PROVE the case.)
It is the job of the police to find the evidence. It is the job of the opposing counsels to put each side's case. It is the jury's job to listen to both sides, evaluate the evidence and to make the judgment.
IANAL - but I'm married to one...so I know a BIT about this.
1) He may have been accused of rape and found not guilty. If that's the case, it's certainly true that the previous case should have nothing to do with it.
2) In general a previous conviction has nothing to do with the current one. You've got to PROVE the case - and saying "well, look, it must have been him, he's done it all those other times" isn't proof that he did it this time. Having said that, a prosecutor CAN apply to get "previous bad character" in as supporting evidence - but there has to be a good justification.
Previous convictions ARE taken into account when sentencing, of course.
If the political will was there, and the finance was available, it would be perfectly possible.
If we could start more-or-less from scratch in 1961 and get a moon landing by 1969, then with our additional technical knowledge, and our massively more powerful and efficient computers, I can see no good technical reason why we couldn't have a base on the moon by 2020.
I agree with you, of course. It'll never happen.
Old PC, two network cards and install Endian community.
...the extra price of an Apple PC is trivial in comparison.
And students, like most young people, tend to like to go with the herd.
When I was at uni, I carried a bag which contained the notebooks I needed to take notes at lectures, and the stuff I needed for tutorials. My textbooks stayed in my room, where I needed them on the rare occasions I actually did some work.
I saw literally no-one carry actual books except to and from the library or bookshop.
I can take a disk, plug it in, boot it - and it works. Then, once it's up, I can mess around to my heart's content. It automatically sets up a dual-boot on a Windows box,. too.
If I have to somehow mess about with BIOS settings (which might also stop my Windows working) then it's one extra bit I frankly don't want to have to do.
Linux IS user friendly these days. Anyone with half a brain can install it.
Most people are technophobes in the sense he means. They want to pick up a gadget and it should work, and if it doesn't, they don't want to spend time investigating.
...we didn't get "saddled with the 2018 World Cup" - we would have done it well, and probably made a decent profit out of it, without having to build very much in the way of infrastructure.
The Olympics? Meh. I've already booked two weeks holiday abroad.
...of the bottom half of a woman got to do with this story?
That's just as dishonest as "stealing".
If I produce some music, and I don't give people permission to copy it without payment, then anyone who DOES copy it is not bloody SHARING it.
If I write a book, and someone decides to copy it without paying for it, it is not SHARED.
It's been nicked. End of. And I can damn well tell you (because it's happened to me) that it FEELS like it's been nicked.
It may not be legally stolen. It may not be possible to do anything about it. But someone has acquired something of mine, which I didn't want them to have without payment. They have not SHARED it, and they have no right to "share" it with anyone else.
And anyone who tries to come up with some spurious moral high ground about "it's not really theft, and I'm only sharing it" is just lying through their teeth.
So called, because it's not ultra and isn't a book.
(a) it's formatting fine
(b) I can't withdraw it.
(c) I seem to be able to post without the moderators checking it...!
What have you done, El Reg?
Funny thing is that the preview looks fine.
[new line starts here]Paragraphs are useful.
[new line starts here]So why can't we can't use them?
He was paid $5.7 million for doing a crap job.
You are probably paid 1-2% of that for doing a good job.
You're calling HIM a bozo?
...it's also stupid.
Once you know where something is in a menu, there it is. Two or three mouse-clicks and it's open.
But searching needs at least three or four keys on the keyboard.
Menus lasted a long time, because they work well.
(And don't get me started on those ridiculous vanishing scroll-bars...)
...but you weakened your argument severely when you referred to Top Gear as a quality program.
...the likely gravitational pull on something bigger than Jupiter would make it impossible to even walk...
How about ePub? You know, the original standard for ebooks?
I'd love to see something where if you bought a book - perhaps only the hardback - you got the ebook for free. That would be truly excellent, and would almost certainly increase the sales of hardback books. People who think "I want to buy that book but I'll wait for the paperback becuase it's (a) cheaper and (b) lighter" might well think "but (a) I get two copies and (b) ebooks are very light - so I'll buy the hardback after all."
Spot on, I call that !
"...calling the London Eye a Ferris Wheel..."
I refer you to the picture.
Or is it just conspiracy-theory panic?
So, now that a scientific paper actually agrees with Lewis, the scientists know what they are talking about after all?
"The netbook market has slumped over the past couple of years, in no small part thanks to the arrival of sleek, slim tablets."
No - the netbook market has slumped due to the fact that the prices and specs are still more-or-less the same as they were two years ago. Drop the price of netbooks (currently £199-£329) to, say, £129-£229 and watch them shift.
One click, reboot your superhub and bob's your uncle - you have a high-speed modem.
Works a treat.
...but otherwise, shiny colour pages are just a distraction.
Words are best read in monochrome. That's why books work so well, and why the ebook readers work so well.
...why is it on the internet that people are so damn RUDE?
If you didn't agree with someone down the pub, would you call them a "moron" and "dim boy"? No, I suspected not. Then why on earth do you do it on the internet?
It's perfectly possible to disagree with someone - even to tell them they are wrong - without resorting to abuse.
It's a water pump for a water system. The water pump and everything it needs to be connected to should be on a completely separate, unconnected to the internet, network.
...it should be possible to insult it without actually getting death threats.
No surprise a stupid statement like that was made by an AC...
"Jesus, here comes that stupid arse who thinks he's God's gift to women, and tries to chat up anything in a skirt. I know - I'll pretend to be on the phone."
Just repeating for emphasis.
If Ubuntu had got everything else right, that is still a complete show-stopper for me.
There are some applications which just do not work any more. FFS, why should the developer suddenly have to dig into his window handling just to check what subtle mistake he's made which means the app no longer works? Or perhaps he's strictly right, but just using something a bit unusual, and it's actually the stupid vanishing scrollbar that's wrong.
Scroll-bars have worked for twenty years or more. Why change them?
So, when was the last time that a child was savaged to death by a cat?
Look, if you don't like cats in your garden, use a hose. It's fun, and they learn quickly not to return.
...suppose I DID have a stolen moon rock to sell. Would I really consider contacting NASA to try and find a buyer?