Re: Too polite
...single poultry upvote ...
Upvoted by a chicken?
I think you mean "paltry".
But I agree with the sentiments.
842 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
...single poultry upvote ...
Upvoted by a chicken?
I think you mean "paltry".
But I agree with the sentiments.
Cats can't digest pork...
Try telling that to our cat who stole a sausage from under the grill - while it was on....
We reckoned he'd earned it.
OK. I get it. Pretend I never spoke :)
At the risk of sounding like an old curmudgeon, why
I mean, really - what is the point?
I can't be the only person who thinks that a screen size greater than about 4.5" is too big. I've got small hands; I want to be able to use my phone one-handed. My old Nexus 4 is at the very limit that I can use.
If I want to use something bigger than the small screen I've got in my pocket (and it's not often that it's essential), then I can use my tablet, or my chromebook.
The satellites of all planets, if present, rotate around the planet. But Pluto and Charon rotate around one another in a "dumbbell" configuration. Charon doesn't revolve around Pluto any more than Pluto revolves around Charon.
I happen to agree that Pluto shouldn't be a planet. But I don't think the argument that Pluto and Charon rotate around each other is relevant.
Pluto and Charon rotate around the the centre of gravity of the Pluto/Charon system, just like, for example, the Earth and the Moon rotate around the centre of gravity of the Earth/Moon system. Pluto and Charon are much closer in mass to each other that Earth and the Moon, and so the centre of gravity is somewhere between them. In the case of the Earth and the Moon, the centre of gravity is about a thousand miles below the surface of the Earth.
I imagine you're all people who claim to be "skilled in Microsoft Office" on your CV too.
As a matter of fact, I don't claim that at all - I state, quite accurately, that I'm competent. There are lots of useful tricks I know exist but can't remember. But the point is, it shouldn't NEED a useful trick to insert a line ahead of a table at the start of an email.
So let me check I read this correctly.
Microsoft have produced a new mail app for quick messages. And it's only available on Apple phones, not on Windows phones.
What happened to "eat your own dogfood"?
"For example, don't ever put a table at the top of a page. As at Office 2010, my version, you still can't then insert a line above it if you need to without a bit of trickery."
I don't seem to have an issue with this, and don't recall it being an issue. go to first cell, press home, press enter.
And what do you know - it works. Thanks for that.
But ffs - I should be able to just be able to put the cursor at the top of the table with my mouse and press "enter". Why doesn't that work?
I quite like the names they give their vans.
Slightly off-topic, but there used to be a wine store in Ealing which had two little vans for delivery, a red one and a white one. They were called Van Rouge and Van Blanc.
...a watch (a relatively simple one, time, date, chronograph, alarm and dual time zones)...
What would you call a complex watch?
Mine tells the time, and looks nice. Which is all I need.
Shall we start a sweapstake...
Originally, each person would put down their stake, and the winner would sweep them all up.
That little Windows 10 logo currently sitting in the taskbar of both my parents' Win7 laptops.
Get them to buy Chromebooks.
Support calls reduced by 90%.
"the original recipe Coke from a bottling plant in Mexico"
Yes, Mexico still uses cane sugar...
And possibly still includes cocaine? Now that's what I call Coke Classic!
I suspect you were downvoted because of your errant apostrophe (Ford's).
It wasn't me, by the way.
You've got it wrong. You actually got a second of your life twice. You had an extra second in bed.
Not quite the extra hour we get in October, but every little helps.
This means [Vesuvius] has not been able to let off er... steam for 66 years and may be bottling something up pretty big, and it's 50-or-so year blast cycle is overdue now.
We went for a walk around the crater.
Well, all I can say is, you're braver than I am !
I've known women burst into tears at comments which would barely have raised an eye-brow if aimed at a guy.
I've also known men get sulky and defensive about the mildest of criticisms. But so long as they don't cry, that's all right, is it?
And for extra quality sound, drop the phone into a pint glass.
For example the metre is the length travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299792458 of a second and a second is 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.
If you were quoting those from memory, I'm impressed.
Not Mecanno. Nor yet Mechanno, as suggested a little further down.
Netbooks were originally small cheap computers (SCCs, El Reg used to call them), which were supplied without Windows; instead they had a basic version of Linux installed on them. They had SSDs to improve boot speed and, of course, limited storage. The first real netbook, I think, was the EEE701; another early one was the Acer Aspire One. They were around £250, which was pretty cheap at the time.
These machines were quite successful - to the extent that Microsoft decided that they were a threat to them. I may have the precise facts wrong here - let someone who knows better correct me - but my understanding was that they enabled a very basic version of Windows 7 to be installed on similar machines at a very low price. This meant that people were able to get Windows boxes at a similar price level - normally with larger, non-SSD boxes.
Now, what SHOULD have happened is that demand increased and the prices would drop. What actually happened was that the Windows boxes sold well (familiar) and the Linux boxes didn't. But what then also happened was that people found the boxes didn't run Windows very well - after all, they were not particularly powerful machines. So netbooks got an undeserved reputation of not being very useful. The prices also never did drop - two, three years later, they were still the same basic spec, for £250.
And then the iPad came along and everyone thought they wanted tablets. So bye-bye to Netbooks.
The Chromebook is an attempt to reinvent the netbook concept. It has more chance of succeeding as (a) people understand that you can't easily get Windows on them, and they are not designed for Windows. They don't even have the same keyboard layout: (b) tablets mean that people are now used to the idea that you don't HAVE to have Windows, so long as it works; and also people have realized that tablets are all very fine, but most of the time, a keyboard is better: (c) they are built to start quickly, be secure and restart quickly. None of this Windows lark of installing patches and rebooting - which with an old netbook could take up to half an hour! (d) they are supported by a name that people know and trust (I know, I know, but people do trust Google).
I loved the original concept of netbooks, and I was sorry to see them die.
I love Chromebooks even more, and in our family we use, most of the time, nothing else.
Both msknight and I have been downvoted. Who could have done that?
1) Chromebook fanboi who is deeply offended by the suggestion that anything else should run on a Chromebook?
2) Militant windows user who thinks no laptop should have anything else but the beloved Microsoft on it?
Apart from that, I can't see anything particularly upsetting about what either of us said.
I use it all the time - and it's very handy to be able to switch from Linux back to the "standard" Chromebook.
Disclaimer - I'm just a very happy user of Crouton.
That sounds like a question for Randall Munroe...
Is that when your beer belly wobbles?
Loose - not tight.
Lose - mislay.
And the sponsored link at the bottom says: What does the next-generation data centre look like?
Hear bloody hear.
I have a Logitech Harmony Touch controller.
I recently replaced my amplifier, so I had to reprogram it. Not a problem - except that it decided it would also change the user interface to the latest greatest version. It's now somewhat worse to use that it used to be - and the first few times we used it, it was a serious pain in the arse until we found out where everything was.
Kids love things changing all the time - they are used to it. We old farts like to be able to pick something up and it works the same today as it did yesterday. Is that so much to ask?
As always, it's a matter of understanding.
I just don't get baseball. I don't even understand the rules. So, to me, baseball is boring on TV.
But I get cricket and I understand the rules. So I enjoy watching it.
I used to enjoy watching "The Master Game" which was chess on TV. But I can well understand why others would find it mind-numbingly boring.
Or how about phone charging centres?
Just somewhere you could recharge your phone for ten minutes - enough to get it working again to phone home or a taxi.
Seriously. If you don't know how transistors work, you'll never really understand computers.
Oh, come on.
I have been working with computers for over forty years. I have written in programming languages from assembler on minicomputers and microcomputers to Python and Perl.
I have written software for theatre lighting equipment and coin mechanisms - all of which needed a real understanding of the hardware behind the software I was writing.
I've written disc operating systems from the chip level upwards.
I have written software for bespoke hardware, working in tandem with the hardware engineer to create a working system - me debugging and patching the software, him debugging and cutting and soldering links to ICs on the board.
By any reasonable standards, I understand computers.
But I have no fucking idea how a transistor works. I just know it does.
Urgh. Blue LEDs.
I bought a useful 4-way usb charger from Maplin. It's great - plenty of power to charge four phones or Kindles - means I can take it on holiday and only have one adaptor instead of four. But the blue LED is so bright, it literally illuminates the whole room - enough to make it impossible to sleep.
That article wasn't unstinting praise.
THIS is unstinting praise.
...raw specifications (18% thinner than last year's 4S, 20% lighter, 12% less volume) don't explain how it seems to float in the hand, and how typing or swiping feels like touching the very pixels.
El Reg - learn from a master!
And six months after that it'll be
Look at me!!
Hmmm, you've got one too.
Oh, look, you've still got last year's model.
A chess program on a phone would probably beat most people these days.
There are at least three free chess engines that run on mobile phones that are good enough to beat ALL casual players (people that just play occasionally, and don't go to a club) and 99% of most serious players.
Which is a bit depressing occasionally. Like I said, twenty years ago I was a county player, before I suddenly realized I had better things to do with my time. I'd still beat most casual players without breaking into a sweat - but I can't beat my phone; I rarely even draw.
OK, I'm not a grandmaster, but I used to be a county level player. So I know a bit about this.
If I had been playing a serious game, and the position was tricky, it would have been very useful to be able to adjourn to the loo with a pocket set to analyse the position properly, moving pieces around. (I've never done it, but I'm sure people have).
Nowadays, if you can disappear into the loo with a smartphone, you're doing the same - only with something that can analyse much more accurately and quickly than you can. Computers are particularly good at sharp, tactical positions, where a slight mistake can mean your position falls apart.
A GM, with a smartphone to help, playing another GM, would have an edge. Not enough to win every time, but enough to significantly improve his chances.
I think the difference is that the perception in New York is that you're not actually safer in a licensed taxi than you are in an unlicensed one; the cars don't seem to be well maintained, the drivers don't seem to be regulated. (It may not be true - I'm talking about perception). Hence, Uber is popular in New York - you can get cheaper fares.
Whereas in London (and presumably Amsterdam) the perception is that you definitely ARE safer - the taxis ARE well maintained; the drivers ARE regulated.
Personally, I would never use Uber.
Ah. Silly me. I'd misread your original post.
You're comparing a tablet (with no keyboard) with a Chromebook (with a reasonable keyboard attached). Not quite what I'd call like-for-like.
Call me and my family old fashioned, but we like keyboards. I really don't think my daughter would be able to do her school essays on a tablet.
Thanks to Intel's new Atom processors and Microsoft's licensing policy changes, actually you can now get a similarly priced Windows tablet with a full OS version that performs better and runs more software for about the same price as a Chromebook these days...
And even so, it'll still need regular patching which will mean a reboot cycle measured in minutes, rather than the less than 15 seconds which is the norm on a Chromebook.
Not forgetting standard Windows cruft, which slows your system down over time....which also doesn't happen on a Chromebook. My 4-year-old Samsung still zips along.
If not, they'd better not bother because I will certainly not buy them.
I don't think they won't bother just because you're not going to buy them. Basically, you're not the target market.
But I am. I'm an unrepentant geek, I'm running Crouton on one of my Chromebooks, which I find very useful. But I love the fact that I can pick up a Chromebook, open it and use it. And so does the rest of my family. My daughter uses hers all the time.
For 99% of users it's does all they need (web browsing, and mail and simple documents). For the 1%, it doesn't work. And you're one of the 1%. Fine.
Paedophilia involves children, who are by definition non-consenting. It's also illegal.
Bestiality also involves non-consenting creatures, and is also illegal.
Homosexuality is legal, and involves consenting adults. It's rather different. It doesn't float my boat, but I have no objections to others doing it. And if they want to hold hands in public, like any other couple, why shouldn't they?
If a homosexual found heterosexual couple behaviour distasteful, to the extent that he walked out of a restaurant, wouldn't you call him a bigot? (Perhaps you wouldn't...)
"Anyone who disagrees with you is a bigot? The bigot is you. Learn some respect for others."
It's not a matter of disagreeing with me.
If the behaviour of a couple doesn't bother you if they are heterosexual, but the same behaviour bothers you if they are homosexual, then you are demonstrating that you are a bigot.
I'll respect you when you demonstrate you've earned respect - not just because you demand it.
You've made a lot of unsupported accusations against the gay community there.
Any actual evidence?
"Try having 2 of them doing it next to you at a table in a restaurant. It happened to me recently - 2 guys slobbering all over each other and holding hands, etc. Made me feel physically sick. Needless to say I rapidly took my business elsewhere."
Simple question. Would it have bothered you if they were a heterosexual couple?
If yes, then it was probably inappropriate behaviour, and you could have asked the manager to intercede.
If no - then you're just a bigot.
Out of curiousity, how do you feel about mixed-race couples?
I imagined loads of IKEA flat-pack shelters, with all the bits except the hexagonal key you need to put them together.
It's the local darts championship. The champion goes up to the oche, and the commentator is ready.
He throws a treble-top.
Next, a single twenty.
The third dart hits the wire, bounces out, crashes through a nearby window and hits a passing nun right between the eyes.
"ONE NUN DEAD AND EIGHTY!!!!"
Moron's on the inside, moron's on the outside and moron's ignoring the whole thing.
Morons. Not moron's. Really, that is pretty basic. I'd expect even a moron to get that one right.
If driverless cars is the cost of getting Jeremy Clarkson off our screens for good, I for one will welcome it.