675 posts • joined Thursday 17th January 2008 11:18 GMT
Isaac Asimov, I think you'll find....
Re: Lets test this "law" thing
I think you're in danger of overcomplicating this.
What I think the Attorney General is trying to do is to make people aware that there ARE laws in place to do with contempt of court, so that they can't say, in all innocence "I didn't know I wasn't allowed to say that."
The contempt laws are not in place to just be awkward - they are put in place to protect the innocent (like the babies who were raped by the LostProphets guy) and to ensure that people can get a fair trial.
The second one is particularly important - one day soon, a person who is almost certain guilty of a heinous crime will walk free because some idiot tweeted information about them that gets into the public domain which will make it impossible for them to get a fair trial.
No. It illustrates that ONE WOMAN can't multitask.
Sheesh. I've never seen so much generalization from specifics as I have on this particular comment thread. Most of them are men, so presumably that proves that men always generalize from specifics.
It's not bogus in the least. The reason is because the in-group variation is normally HUGE and the between-group variation is normally tiny. Height is not a good example, as the differences are quite significant between men and women, and clearly sex-oriented. But the difference in driving skills between men and women is (a) probably not as much as people make it out to be and (b) potentially explainable in other ways that "she's a woman, therefore she's worse". For example, one possible explanation is that most people have been brought up to believe that men are better drivers, and so tend to let men drive more, so they get more practice, which generally makes them better drivers....
Re: Supermodel ?
Who did she sleep with in order to "obtain" £200 000 for that ?
There was absolutely nothing intentionally sexist in my remark and nothing was implied, that is merely your choice of interpretation.
Simple question - would it have even crossed your mind to say "Who did he sleep with to get that?" if it had been a male, rather than female?
Don't bother to answer - you and I and everyone else here all know the answer is No.
So yes - sexist.
Re: He got off easy
Hmmm. There must be a broken link somewhere. I seem to have strayed onto the Daily Telegraph or Daily Mail comment pages. El Reg - can you fix this?
Sundays - well, maybe...
Speaking for myself, I think I'd prefer to have evening deliveries....
Which works well.
But aren't you glad your parents didn't have that attitude?
Re: Let's look at this...
"When did physics ever Trump economics?"
It never did.
But I can remember it being theoretically impossible to get more that 9600 Baud down a phone line on a normal modem.
I remember when it wasn't theoretically possible to get more than 10M Ethernet.
Wireless in the home was always going to be very slow, and only useful for emails - if you wanted to stream music, you'd have to use wired access - and films would work, but only short ones in low definition.
True Internet over a mobile phone was never going to work at a reasonable speed....
I know that your theoretical calculations say this'll never work. But I wouldn't mind betting that you're wrong.
Re: Can't be co-incidence (can it ?)
And what do you do with a Wombat?
Play Wom with it.
Re: If proof were needed that police are theives [lying and bribery proof currently in the courts]
"The good news is that if no evidence is found the seized items are returned to the owners. [snip] The hardware will often be returned without hard drives."
Hmmm. The [snipped] bit is "The bad news is that can take several months to happen. If illegal images (i.e. child pornography) are found on the disks, they will be shredded and destroyed without exception."
That's a pretty vital [snip].
"Apple seem to think the cameras are much better in the new model."
Doesn't matter if the camera is better. You're still going to look like a prat when you take the photo.
There's one thing I want....
...and that's a SMALLER screen.
The Nexus 4 is just small enough for me to use one-handed - in fact, just a fraction too big if I'm honest.
And who needs full HD on a phone? If I want to watch movies on the go, I'll watch them on my tablet.
If they were to produce a Nexus 3 with a similar pixel density as the Nexus 5 and a slightly smaller screen than the Nexus 4 at, say, £199 - it would fly off the shelves!
A friend of mine....
...saw someone wearing these at a conference last week. He watched with glee as the wearer walked straight into a pillar.
Re: Time of Genesis?
Time started on Jan 1 1970 as stated above.
Therefore Peter Gabriel.
There is a world of difference between a review of a film...
...and a summary of the story. This, unfortunately, is a bit too much of the latter - and it also seems to me to have rather too many spoilers in it.
Re: 1 out of 10
To be fair, last week's article about the self-service tills was laugh-out-loud funny (or at least I found it so) - and he'd have to do remarkably well to come close to that one.
Re: Big box stores killed plasma
Yep - my first plasma was a Samsung which got "red speckled" after 18months. They wouldn't consider repairing it for a reasonable price, so I bought a new one - a Panny. Which is excellent.
Re: Tough as old boots
"Ruled out the Panasonics straight away. Heavy, use loads of power..."
"...And I've got a bunch of old PCs loaded up with hard drives which contain various media files...."
Anyone else feel this is a little inconsistent?
He may be dead...
...but no doubt there will still be Tom Clancy novels released.
I'm old enough to remember when the death of an author meant that there were no more books by said author. Nowadays, it just seems to mean a short hiatus before someone is employed to churn out a book in a similar style with the original author's name on it.
And yes, sixty-six is FAR too young.
Re: The guy is a prat
A prat? That's a description of someone who did something stupid, or doesn't get something most of us feel is obvious. We're all prats occasionally.
There are several words I could use to describe this guy. Prat doesn't even begin to describe him.
A mean bowl of cornflakes with only three main ingredients?
Re: Only official cables
I've never quite understood the rationale of people who will spend six hundred quid on a phone then jiib at spending fifteen quid on an official cable.
Well, if you're taking photos at a concert...
...you DESERVE to get rubbish pictures.
I'm getting sick to death of people at public events, be it concerts, sports events, or even at the bloody cinema, who feel that the event didn't actually happen unless they took a photo of it - or preferably, a long video of it.
If you're watching it through a phone, you're NOT actually watching it. If you then play it back, all you're doing is playing back a reminder of you watching the event through the phone.
Oh, yes, of course, once you've taken the photo you've got to tweet the damn thing to everyone.
You're at a concert, or a sports event - a once-off event which will never happen again exactly like that. EXPERIENCE IT! Don't record it. There are TV cameras and official videos which will record it a fuck of a sight better than your stupid little phone.
Oh, and contempt multplied by ten for anyone taking photos at these events with an iPad. (It's always an iPad - never any other sort of tablet...)
Re: The most annoying thing
"...They are too accurate."
No. They are too precise. You want a watch to be accurate, so that it shows the time accurately, without drift. But you don't need it to display the time precisely.
Re: You are looking at it wrong
"Not sure why you think 1080p content is worth concentrating on - not everything is a movie. We have multiple screens now and cope quite well."
Precisely. So we don't need super-mega-hi-def for multiple screens.
"Have you never watched picture in picture on a normal TV?"
Hardly ever. I find it damn irritating on the TIVO when I'm trying to program something and some rubbish I don't want to watch is twittering away in the top-right of the screen, and I can't switch it off. - and taking up space which could be better used by the menu app.
Re: You are looking at it wrong
If a program is worth watching in 1080p, it's worth concentrating on.
If you've got four programs on at the same time, you're not concentrating on any of them. If you're not concentrating on any of them, you don't really need it in 1080p.
Unless all you want to do is impress your friends.
Re: A large TV with that resolution might have a use other than High Res TV
So now, I'll not only be able to watch the footy with crap commentary, I'll also be able to see tweets from people at the match (or watching it on TV) saying "OMG - I'm at the match!", "That was never a penalty!","Clear penalty!","He should never have been sent off", "Blatant red card!" etc etc etc etc. That'll REALLY add to my enjoyment.
Orgel's Second Rule
Evolution is smarter than you are.
Hear hear. Surely most books these days effectively start life as e-books and then get printed. How can it possibly be that a new book can be OCR'd? But it happens. A recent book about the fall of Bear Stearns had multiple references on the Kindle version to Bear Steams.
In C-style languages, should braces line up or not?
Some strong opinions here in both directions.
But let me just point out that Kernighan and Richie put the first brace on the same line as the if/while/for statements, not underneath it.
There are times - all too frequently, recently - when I am thoroughly ashamed of my sex....
Re: Slight confusion here
On the other hand the evidence for our origins was famously described as a collection of bones that would barely fill a room, or a closet, if you count only the important ones.
Citation please. That may have been the case fifty years ago. It's a sight more than that now.
The sheer amount of data and some of the contradictory evidence means that there is plenty of controversy about exactly who evolved from whom and when it happened - but the evidence for evolution of humans from an ape-like ancestor is now overwhelming.
Not so much with android...
...a human who takes on an android as his partner (or companion) and treats him / her nearly equal?
Not sure I've ever seen it with android, but I know a few people who've done this with their iPhone...
Watched the first game, and realized that I could hardly see the far court. For some reason, the 3D cameras at Wimbledon were at the opposite end to the normal cameras, and it seems they can't get them quite so high.
So I had a choice between watching the final in 3D at a poor camera angle with glasses on over my normal glasses, or watching it in 2D at a perfect camera angle without wearing two pairs of glasses. Not a difficult decision, really.
I'm completely unconvinced that 3D will ever be worth it. But it's more-or-less thrown in with high-end tellys nowadays.
Re: @Martin (was: ...or words to that EFFECT...)
I'll always accept a beer!
As egregious errors go, I admit that effect/affect doesn't bother me half as much as, say, loose/lose or there/their/they're. I can see effect/affect becoming interchangeable in the future - but loose and lose will never be, so long as I have breath to moan about it.
@system11 - cogs and springs?
Cogs, yes. But the springs were used to (a) give the energy required to drive the watch for a day or so and (b) give the energy to drive the simple harmonic motion oscillator that made it tick. The first, on modern watches, is a battery, and the second is a quartz oscillator. No springs required. Which is why modern watches are so much more reliable - the spring was the item which was most likely to break.
Or are you still wearing a watch that you wind up once a day?
Re: So the ones doing jewelry stores in 2010
You're in the wrong place. This is The Register forum, not the Daily Mail comments page.
(Though to be fair, I get the impression that a lot of the commenters here presumably read and believe said rag..."
I've heard that argument before.
"That man and apes evolved from a common ancestor is settled."
Only in your mind and the minds of other believers in evolution.
"That smoking causes lung cancer is settled".
Only in your mind and the minds of other anti-tobacco evangelists.
I very strongly suspect that in fifty years time, there truly WILL be no doubt in the minds of all reasonable people that man caused climate change. Unfortunately, by then, it might well be too late.
Well, I'm quite interested in the Acer...
...partiularly now it has an SSD.
I have the Samsung already - well, I used to, but these days I can't prise it out of my fifteen year old daughter's sticky mitts. She likes the size and the speed of startup - it does pretty well everything she needs. She even does her homework essays using Google Drive.
"...being that THEY'RE all revolutionary and that..."
The first two items on the grammar t-shirt....
Re: re: Shwinnggg!
She may well have good legs. I agree, she probably was hired for exactly that.
And the fact that people in technology consider that, in this day and age, it is still acceptable to hire good looking women purely for decorative purposes pretty well proves my point.
And I don't think the fact that I consider it unacceptable (and I also consider Mr Shwinngg's comment pretty unacceptable) makes me a moron, either.
"... in the student common room at COLLEGE..."
Collage is art with cutout paper and materials.
College is where you learn things. Or not.
And people wonder why it is that women are not keen to go into technology....