What's the fuss
Surely this is just the latest iteration of "Round Corners"
104 posts • joined 20 Dec 2007
Surely this is just the latest iteration of "Round Corners"
<Irony>Outlook IS an amazing piece of work. Anyone who dismisses it has never ventured into the more hidden features. </Irony>
As there are Apps out there that can allow you to selectively dial back the rights that an App can exploit, this multiple user/profile needs to also factor this into any implementation.
More than happy for the kids to pick up the phone for a game, but it would be nice to dial back any rights on a per user basis such that when they are using it, it is a glorified games console. when I use it, its full potential is available.
Otherwise - this falls short of being truly useful.
Of course, this will mean that the people need to be as thoughtful about their phones/tablets as they are about the home PC.... Oh well, queue the arguments.
"it's becoming increasingly clear that our politicians have no idea what they're proposing."
Or... they are counting on the fact that they can blag their way through this, knowing full well exactly what it is that they are proposing. Using a fine balance of ignorance and apathy, they get acceptance from a percentage of the electorate. The remainder they will seek to discount in some way.
Sometimes feels that it's happening in a lot of other countries as well.
Conspiracy theory fails under mild scrutiny
The debate was broadcast on STV – a free to air service that is available to that part of the country where those of the electorate with a vote actually live.
It was not available (reliably in real time at least) outside of this area
So friggin what.
Those living in rUK don't have a vote – and while they may have an interest in the issue and may feel that they want to see wee Eck or bushy eyebrows, it doesn't change the fact that no one in rUK is materially disadvantaged by having missed the live debate.
It was a technology failure – they happen. Life goes on.
When they recently hiked Prime to include film here in the UK, it provoked a "Let's Review at renewal" flag.
If Prime and Unlimited were bundled at a fraction over the Unlimited price then it becomes interesting again.
For example, there are books that I possess which would be nice to have on Kindle to reread for the commute - Unlimited would make that a simple process
Only heavy readers are likely to spend more than $10/month on books.
Teenagers bust this easily - certainly would here in the UK where a teenage fiction book might go for £5 or more and last less than a week. Even with daily deals and public domain which I have urged my teenager to consider, for some parents, knowing that they can get the years reading for a fixed fee is a blessing.
Every bank that has every been fined for facilitating bank trades on behalf of citizens of Iran or Syria or Cuba or Libya or <insert country that the USA [did, does, will go on to] not like> can not argue that those silly banking rules constitute a hindrance to their profits.
So they can go and sue the US Government. :-)
Money Laundering - yeah! that hits profits if you stop that so can HSBC have their Mexican money back please.
Or does this rule only works in one direction?
.... as the time honoured sentiment would put it.
It's a treaty, a negotiation, a consensus of minds. In what version of insanity to the Brussels Bureaucrats possibly believe that this ability to sue due to adverse regulations is benicicial to the European side of the cause?
EU: Aircraft manufacturers - we'd rather that you didn't fall out of the sky - so much so that we will put some of the rules into law.
US Air plane Corp: Mwaaaaaah! Uncle Sam! They being mean to me!
UK: we really don't think our citizenry should have assault rifles. We have banned them by law.
US Armaments Corp: Mwaaaaaah! Uncle Sam! They being mean to me!
Please - tell me there is some sanity left in this poxxed empire called Europe and that someone with the balls to do so with tell them to go take a flying fuck! - Subject to the appropriate health and safety rules of course.
First name Gaz
za by any chance?
A wallet/Credit card that suffers far less abuse.
Will admit - I just don't get the fascination with uber expensive audio kit!
Sometimes it is easier (cheaper) to just "make do" with something that still allows one to enjoy the music/artist and not get so wound up in determining if the sound has been clipped/distorted in one of the many rooms that it could be conceivably be piped into.
...... Unless it has a volume knob that goes to 11 - then I might just be tempted :-)
"it's a no-brainer, there's a clear public interest in that information remaining available."
Google hasn't removed the original article. Google is also not paid (at least not directely) to provide some form of library service as you would get from a public body.
It is a private entity that, based on some some and mirrors arcane algoritm, decides where an article appears in a search result. But I don't see how they can be obligated to make sure that a particular result is displayed - unless one decides to drag in the regulators with their "Fairness" definitions.
Publicity gaff - most certainly.
Looking like kids who spat the dummy Yep! got that one covered.
Showing that the EU law is poorly conceived - I'll grant them that.
Breaking the law - don't quite see it.
IANAL - but hey that's never stopped Reg Commentards offering opinions.
Not only a terrorist - but also damaging the commercial interests of all those media outlets that would like to use your photos without attribution or payment. Just think of all the images that they could "fail to identify the suthor of" if such Deep Web practices were forbidden.
All hail the media overlords!
Whose damn language is it anyway?
Following the usual level of due diligence carried out by the US Patent Office, they were unable to find any prior art.
Accordingly they have issued a patent on the language assigning ownership to the 'merkins.
Ah! That "Listening (a)round Corners" technology.
Lovely idea - but....
The US refuses to become subject to the jurisdiction of an international body such as the International Criminal Court. What makes you think that they would ever respect any sort of Internet Governance body that issued rules on data protection that were inconvenient.
Surely the point about an organ donor card is that it represents what you want to have done with some or all of the body that you leave behind. While I carry a card, I for example have excluded some organs - it's a personal choice.
While I can understand the need to be sensitive with next of kin, they won't own the body when I die - it's not as if I've left it to them in my will....
Perhaps it helps being married to someone with a similar mindset - it means we've discussed it in advance of any such eventuality - and that's probably the real key aspect.
@wolfetone - Last time I checked, it was not correct to use the term "The Republic of Ireland" to refer to the 26 county state. The name of the state that is
fecked up governed from Dublin is just Ireland; a name that is now accepted by the government of The United Knigdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
It's a bit of reciprocal arrangement where they each agreed to call the other by their chosen names.
Oh! I know I shouldn't feed the troll...
It's as dynamic as a set of Labour policies....
Were you asleep/away for the Starbucks bit....
Tax is paid on profit - not income and when the likes of Starbucks spend several millions to "Licence the use of marketing materials" (i.e use the logo) then the profit is erroded - legally if somewhat imorally.
I call fake on this - lovely idea which will not be implmented this side of several general elections.
Before 6.x, most companies I've worked in had to resort to far too regular use of dsrepair.
In which case, they were doing it wrong. DSREPAIR became something akin to the modern antibiotic. Regardless of the disease, regardless of how it should be treated, chuck them into the mix - after all what harm can they do.
Want to make a Novell Support Engineer wince - tell them you've just run an unattended full repair - 'cos it seemed like a good idea.
The number of Sys Admins that have been chastised over the years for running needless DSREPAIRS is quite scary. Now that in itself raises another question? Why weren't they properly trained to use the proper utilities in the proper circumstances.
I used Netware 3.x in several jobs at large and small companies. I never really had the chance to try Netware 4 or 5 because everyone
upgraded migrated from 3.12 to Windows NT 4.
There - fixed that for you.
Remember doing it back in about 1986 when there were still some old A - B button phones available.
As I recall 1s, 9s and 0s could be dialled directly - the numbers from 2 to 8 had to be tapped.
Which raises a further question. 999 was picked to avoid the accidental dialling of 111 through the contacting of lines - essentially the same result as tapping or dialling a 1.
Wonder how many phantom calls the new non-emergency NHS number gets these days. Sometimes it pays to remember the old history.
Statistically speaking, that Kzzzerrrt is imminent.
As I zoom in, I can see the builders vans that filled the site in 2011. Another level of zoom and zap! they are gone, the extension is gone...
Out again. Oooo it's back.
Feels like I have my own personal cloaking system :-)
Just waiting for the manufacturing cock up which will see the polarity in the stand and polarity in the iPad results in a N-N or S-S attempt at docking. Will they patent this as a fast eject mechanism?
Ah! That explains how a shop that I last visited 15 years ago managed to address mail directly to me at my current address some three house moves later.
Post Office service described here http://postoffice.mobi/marketing-services-regular/choose-your-audience/data-management/ncoa-suppress
If they are still editing .doc files then odds are they have not gotten past Office 2003.
Wonder if they just don't like the ribbon - in which case introduce them to LO.
Interesting that he used the unit of "Programmes". So of ten arbitrary programmes, the nine that cost £1m each are OK and the one that cost £2b is over budget and delayed.
All in the interpretation of the
The idea is that we have countries undercutting each other in giving tax
brakes breaks to big multinationals. It they stop doing this, every country would have a larger income from taxes.
If only it were that simple. On a level tax playing field, companies will increasingly be driven by cost of labour - it's still one of the largest expenses that any enterprise must bear. When the EU went through the expansions of 2004 and 2007, the multinationals didn't relocate to eastern Europe out of a sense of altruism. Skilled and cheap labour is a compelling motivator.
A lesser corporate tax rate acts as a counter balance and for the likes of Ireland, it's probably the most important factor in ensuring inward investment.
Is that really 100% accurate.
Normal salaried employees are allowed claim for expenses related to their employment - e.g. mileage up to the HMRC approved levels; professional fees; subscriptions.
All of these lower their tax liabilities.
On that basis you could argue that they are being taxed on profits not revenue.
but they are still putting vehicles on our roads, employing people educated in our education system and creating rubbish for our landfill sites,
Vehicles on roads - Vehicle Excise Duty, Excise Duty on Fuel, (Can't count VAT on fuel as that can be reclaimed). Let's not forget the vehicle manufacturers who benefit by selling these - a further economic benefit that it's convenient to ignore.
Employing People Educated in the system. : NI; PAYE; not to mention the fact that the employees are not a drain on state resources.
Rubbish for Landfill... Some of that responsibility lies with the end user and how they dispose of and/or recycle their rubbish. Some of it is covered by payment of business rates - I believe that they are not inconsequential.
In short - any discussion has to focus on PROFITS and whether or not profits should be taxed in the country of origin or else where.
Consider yourself corrected.
The tax that you pay on these products (VAT) is not part of the current discussion.
Of Course - but only if you're prepared to pay for it.
Not just 3 who had to be different. With Vodafone, the reporting number is VSPAM (87726)
And apparently, Virgin don't even list a number as an option.
Other members of the Ark to include ...
Telephone Sanitisers, Hairdressers, Second-hand Car Salesmen,TV Producers, Personnel Officers, Management Consultants, Insurance Salesmen and Public Relations Executives
just wanting something because their friend has one or because an asshole in a clown suit tells them they need it.
Applies to many over 12s as well.
"As it stands, Ofcom's rules state that mobile, phone and broadband providers have to give their customers a minimum of one month's notice regarding any major change to contractual terms. Subscribers can then cut loose from the contract without being stung with a penalty for walking away early"
"Raising Prices in Line with Inflation" must fall outside the definition of a "major change" if Three can include the following paragraph in their advisory on price changes earlier this year.
"Our terms and conditions allow us to raise prices in line with inflation so that we can cover our business costs. This means that you won't be able to leave your contract early as a result of this change."
Vodafone did something similar shortly after.
despite all that, Reding points out that America's credit rating isn't being threatened and no one is doubting the dollar,
And this of course is in no way related to the fact that the ratings agencies that people listen to (e.g.Moodies, S&P) are all US based?
Wonder what would happen if some European agencies or agencies from the BRICs block were to let fly with a rating that was less than favorable to the dollar...
Starts circa 2hrs 45mins in.
It was quite a shock to hear someone from the BBC defending this government.
Worked for me when contacting them from a mobile - and was included in the standard minutes allowance.
The number is 0330 1234 151.
As we get all sorts of top 10's from El Reg, why not give us the top 10 laptops with decent screen resolutions. Say 1600 *1200 for starters. It seems to increasingly be the factor that eliminates laptops from the list of possible replacements that one might consider.
Now are you telling me that's not worth twenty shekels?
I seem to recall one of those "Know your Rights" type programs on the BEEB or such like saying that it depends on when the error is spotted. If the error is spotted before the transaction is complete then the merchant is not compelled to complete the transaction - although they must fix the ticket price near enough immediately. However, if you get you mitts on the goods and payment has been completed then it's yours and there's nothing that they can do about it.
The wrinkle with distance selling is that the money has been taken - but you don't have the goods. So is the contract complete at that stage? One for those legal eagles.
"Computer security historians would be interested to note that 20 years ago there was an anti-virus program for Mac, also called Gatekeeper. The software, developed by independent programmer Chris Johnson, was shelved many years ago."
Hope they've determined whether or not they need to buy the rights to use the name. Otherwise the marketing department needs to be rebranded "iShouldHaveChecked"
"I am not at home right now - in fact I'm at the other end of the country. This would be an opportune moment for you to go and check out where I live. DO you like the electronic goods that are on display - they are yours for the taking."
Still don't see the attraction to telling people that you are not at home.
This is going to put a cat amongst the ACTA pigeons.
They will not be happy.
"Samsung will have rushed the Galaxy Nexus, which misappropriates many patented features from the iPhone, to capture market share from Apple that Samsung will be able to retain long into the future"
And if we get the injunction, we can capture market share from Samsung that we will be able to retain long into the future - even if we lose the case.
Oh for a dream world where the judge says something along the lines of :
"Granting or refusing this injunction will unfairly disadvantage one or other of the parties. Therefore the only fair result to so ban both of you pillocks until we sort this out! Now why don't you both clear off out of my sight and come back when you want to behave like grown ups"
Ah well... back to the realities of a Monday afternoon.
OI! You can't behave like a talentless twat! I have a prior claim on that and I'll sue you!
That should cull a large part of the X-Pop-Strictly-Got-No-Talent-On-Ice brigade!