:O
To be fair, I did see a picture of the table in question - and it was definitely asking for it...
He could have at least brought it dinner first though...
476 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Mar 2007
The major problem with the Nokia N810 is - the Asus EEE Pc. The Eee PC is cheaper and more pc-alike (that's assuming you can get hold of one, of course).
And this coming from an N800 owner. It was a superb device when I bought it - and it still is - but for all the Eee offers for less money (albeit in a bigger form factor), it's getting harder to justify the Nokia.
"'the other reason I'm not buying a Blu-Ray player is the fact that there's no guarantee the player I buy today will work with the disks I buy tomorrow.'
No, you ARE guaranteed to be able to play the movie, which let's face it is the important part. It's all the extras that may not be compatible."
Now who's cherry-picking ? If you're content to only have part of the product you paid for working, then good luck to you.
"'I guess any blu-ray manufacturers who aren't Sony can start getting concerned round about now'
Again, No. The blu-ray standards have to be available to ALL consortium members. This is not a sony owned proprietory format, lots of different companies are involved."
Yep, available to all. And since DVD was invented, we've seen that manufacturers just can't adhere to standards - remember when The Matrix wouldn't play on a fair few players? My point is that with a moving target (as people become more adept at BR authoring, they'll push to the latest standards - this has always been the way it works), this situation is likely to only get worse.
Well, despite owning the HD-DVD for the 360 (which is far too noisy to watch a film in peace with anyway), I'm actually glad this is all over.
It's been far too annoying for far too long. So despite the fact that I'll eventually buy a Blu-Ray player and consign the 360 kit to the cupboard, I'll at least be able to console (haha) myself that I wasn't one of the really early adopters who paid hundreds for their kit.
I'm sure that this experience is something everyone will remember next time the AV industry moves on a leap. The consumer gets screwed in the short term, but when the time comes, the manufacturere will get their's when they want us to open our wallets for the next big thing.
Of course, the other reason I'm not buying a Blu-Ray player is the fact that there's no guarantee the player I buy today will work with the disks I buy tomorrow. You know, what with the standard not being set in stone etc.
Hmm. I wonder if any manufacturer sells a blu-ray equipped device, that can easily connect to the internet for updates for those troublesome discs ? You know, someone with some inside knowledge about blu-ray itself, the kind of manufacturer who really knows the system inside out? The kind of manufacturer who has shipped the most blu-ray units out there to date ? I mean, that would have to be the most compatible device out there, and thus you'd be guaranteed a smooth experience if you bought one of their players.
Or to put it another way - I guess any blu-ray manufacturers who aren't Sony can start getting concerned round about now...
>To be honest I was more concerned with "I was on a farm and I saw a robotic arm milking a cow. "
...
Reminds me of an old Emo Philips gag...
(to be read while wriggling about uncomfortably on a chair, waving arms around and pulilng your own hair).
I was on the farm the other day, and my father said "Emo, go milk those cows". I came back later and he asked "How did you get on?", and I replied: "The one with the horns nearly killed me!!". He said, "You idiot Emo - that was the bull!!"
So, now I'm not feeling so bad I only got half a cup...
Does that mean that if I happen across any blue-eyed couples, that I should grab my crufix/pitchfork and denounce them (loudly) as aberrations, in-breeders and general against-God's-law types ?
Cool. But tough luck for you, Iceland. Prepare to burn !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_color#Blue
Yours, Daily-Mail-grabbingly..
"Other than during this very brief transitional moment in the show, Miley performs live during the entirety of both the Hannah and Miley segments of the concert"
So, they start playing a tape of her singing the moment the chap with the cloak appears, so the track is un-interrupted while she gets her kit off ? A suspicious chap might suggest that it was all on tape to begin with and she was - shock! - miming ? Perhaps the fact that she's there at all is all that's needed to justify the "live" tag?
I don't know. My sense of child-like innocence just gets one knock-back after another these days...
"They're still on the run," Sgt Pacheco said of the brothers. "We have reason to believe they have international ties."
Well, that's not much of a disguise. They'll need more than a fancy tie to evade detection. Chaps, if you're reading this, some sort of hat may be in order. And consider swapping the tie for a scarf while you're at it ?
Stay away from the Groucho moustache/specs combo though - it rarely works.
And she's modelling for subguns.com and yet didn't shoot anyone ? That's clearly a poor choice of model. Wouldn't have happened if Charlton Heston had been there...
Me @ Pentonville.
"The troops will just have to go 'bang' themselves when they pull them," said Ian Dalzel-Job of the Scots Guards Association
Brilliant. I stopped reading at that point and thus have no interest in this story in case it doesn't turn out the way I assume it does.
I thought it was just the sailors that were into all that saucy stuff? I can see I've been grossly mis-informed over the years.
Was it the one true ring then? Perhaps he was on his way to Mordor, and was in fear of it being nicked by otherworldly-creatures. Seems like he just chose a poor place to secrete it about his person.
The (Japs) Eye of Sauron must have clocked it, I'm sure...
One ring to bind them all, indeed !
Biggest obstacle to me downloading all my hi-def films at the moment is the quota my ISP sticks on me.
As reported yesterday, apparently Brits don't want faster net (aye, right!), so the broadband market is well up for stagnation in the UK by the sound of it.
Result: quota and speed limit for the forseeable future. If this truly is MS plan, then they can pretty much forget it in the UK while this carries on.
The quickest of looks at their new site made me instantly wonder why they didn't have some very-well established streets (and we're talking centuries-old streets here) in my City Centre not on the map.
This isn't a case of 'just not mapped yet', because I was part of the celebration marking GB being the first country in the world to be digitally mapped to what they defined as 'completion'. And the streets in question have been provided to subscribers for well over the last 10 years by OS themselves, in their landline and mastermap products. The addresses in them showed up in what was once called AddressPoint and of course in their successive product. So how come the streets aren't showing up ?
Incidentally, as they're using OpenLayers on openstreetmap, it would take next to nothing for some enterprising individual to overlay google maps on top of their source, and simply trace through.... thus filling in the blanks OS have apparently put in themselves.
What's up with that, OS ?
'Fraud' only happened to me once with a Gameboy game I bought for the kids. When it turned up, it was clearly counterfeit. So I left the guy some appropriate feedback, but as it actually worked I let it slide. About 2 months (yes, months) later, I receive an email from ebay advising me not to complete the transaction because the seller may be selling counterfeit items.
This was long after I had already paid (through paypal, I might add) and received the item, and the feedback thing had been done on both sides.
Textbook case of shutting the stable door after the horse had bolted. Well done, ebay !
On the Spike Milligan theme, how about "Clearly, I was mentally ill" ?
or
Don't stand there - you'll burst them!
CCTV in action - nork-lifters will be prosecuted
Question: will she be going for the Y-shaped coffin at all ? Or perhaps a little creative corpse arrangement could negate the need for a vase at said site ? Take the Billy Connolly route and give visitors somewhere to park their bike ?
Why is this a surprise ?
Can't see why anyone would give their trust re their hard-earned cash to a system where they have no visibility of how the game is being run. It seems like the desire to gamble overrules the common-sense, no ?
At least when you all sit down at a table, you can watch what's going on, see where the cards come from etc. Plus, if you get roundly beaten, you can turn the table over and shoot the other guy (so Hollywood tells me).
Always had a deep-seated suspicion that the game that ran on my Spectrum was cheating. After all, the computer knew exactly what cards I had as it was of course the dealer. It's that reason alone that I was awful at it and nothing else.
Hrumph...
"Many PCs use WSUS. They won't get this update."
Actually, in a default install of WSUS, updates to Windows Update itself are set to automatically approve for "All Computers", so unless your sysadmin has unticked that option, all your internal machines updating from WSUS will likely have received and applied this update by now.
"Gorilla-tactics: Seduction for your home & car"
Auction doesn't state if said Gorilla is included, but even if it was, I doubt I'd be able to keep the thing in bananas for more than a day or two. I have it on good authority (slang for "I assume") that they stink, and the neighbours might complain if I leave the window open.
Plus, if it got the hump, it might end up with me getting the rogering of my life. And not in a good way.
Unless I've read it wrong, and actually the item in question recommends hanging upside down from the chandelier, grunting and throwing my shit at prospective partners ?
Either way, doesn't sound too appealing to me.
I'm trying to contact the autopatcher admins to see if one of them would like to see - and if interested, take over the code of - my patching app.
As autopatcher helped so many people, I think it would be right to let people legally use this (and MS own tools of course) to achieve the same end.
If one of them is reading this, please contact me via the comment on the autopatcher page.
Perhaps if some kindly El Reg admin has a direct line, they might pass on my email :P
There's a simple solution to this, which I've already written, and it all relies on some nice tools provided by MS :)
Ingredients:
1. Download MBSA (Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer) from MS.
2. Download the latest wsusscan.cab from MS.
Run the MBSA tool against their CAB, specifying XML output. Parse that XML output for a list of patches needed including their HTTP locations at MS, and get your little app to download them to a cache. Install if necessary. (Or, copy cache to a dvd/cd, and run same app at friends, just doing the scan/install part).
I have this working, but it needs a bit of polish.
As it wouldn't distribute any MS code, surely it can't be illegal ?
"One in three mobile workers worldwide routinely hijack wireless connections"
Surely, piggyback would be a more accurate term? When I checked my email at the Travel Lodge in Kings Cross Road (thanks to the house across the road), I didn't hijack it at all. The owner still had his access, I just came along for the ride.
Sure, flattening the link with a heap of torrents or locking the owner out of his own router would have other connotations, but if it's only a quick peek, well - where's the harm ?
Ah come on, all these rappers love to play up the "Gangsta" lifestyle.
Now, she can "keep it real" in her cell for a while and come out smiling, safe in the knowledge that her credibility is at least twice* what it was earlier. I mean, OK, she didn't exactly "pop a cap" in someone's "ass", but hey - it's a start !
Actually, it could make for some pretty good telly - forget all this cowardly East Coast vs West hide-in-a-car-take-pot-shots-and-drive-off rubbish - I say we get them all lined up in the Mall carpark and they fling mobiles and blackberries at each other until someone is crowned the victor. I'd pay to see it !
* quick: what's two times zero again ?
"Microsoft has that horrid, arrogant nature -- either you accept automatic updates and reboot "when WE say so, or you do them manually yourself which means they probably don't get done.
Neither is acceptable. A third choice is urgently needed -- install the patch, but put up a less-intrusive "reboot when convenient" message and leave it entirely to the user. No nagging in the meantime, and certainly no rebooting if the user doesn't manage to say no soon enough."
Get your network admins to change this via Group Policy - it's an option in there to either change the default time from 10 minutes to whatever, or not nag the user at all.
For the home user, the simplest way to kill that message is to wait until your patch is installed - and then do Start, Run, "net stop wuauserv". Once that service stops running, so do the nags.
">Yes, but I'd wager most home PCs are set to Automatic Update
But most PCs are corporate, so are likely to have their patches applied at the same time thanks to a site or company wide policy."
Yes, most corporate PCs are updated - as you say - at the same time via policy. For that same reason, most corporate PCs use a local patch distribution mechanism such as SMS or WSUS. Otherwise, you get thousands of PCs all going out via the company link and downloading the patch. And what organisation lets their clients just run out and install the moment a patch is released anyway ? "Change control" is the order of the day in any well managed organisation (christ, I sound like my boss..)
Corporate patches tend to be rolled out more conservatively to clients and servers. Patches frequently cause problems of their own and just plain can't be trusted in a global push to the corporate environment. This is why we employ methods such as WSUS and SMS, so that we can target patches to test groups first, and then roll out gradually.
For this reason, I'd expect that we can largely discount corporate PC users from the Skype traffic group. Plus, and fwiw, we don't allow Skype within our domain anyway. I wouldn't expect we're alone in that.
"Microsoft's publishes its monthly patches on the second Tuesday of every month. Many clients will automatically download the updates on Wednesday and apply them on the next system reboot, which could be Thursday morning."
Yes, but I'd wager most home PCs are set to Automatic Update (the default since XP SP1?) - which automatically downloads and installs the patches, there and then. And then begins nagging the user to reboot every 10 minutes, until they do so. I'm sure most Windows-using readers have seen, cursed and hit that "reboot later" button plenty of times.
Only on a scheduled update is the installation delayed (typically, this might be used with an AD scenario and controlled via Group Policy, for larger/corporate-type installations). And if you have downloaded updates, you will be prompted to install them when you go to shut the system down (if you're shutting down, are you likely to restart it just to see if the patches worked?).
I would therefore think the majority that download them get them installed practically instantly.
Lastly:
"Many will apply patches before then but are unlikely to do so en masse at the same time."
There's no difference between Skype coming online because we woke up and just started Windows, or Skype coming online because we just restarted Windows because of a patch.
And anyway, this isn't the first month MS have released patches on first Tuesday. They have been doing that for ages now !
If Skype has a bug, then fine - but I'm not convinced the AU theory holds plenty of water...
This sounds to me like a fantastic idea.
If such a system gets off the ground and is needing volunteers, then I'd like to extend an open hand towards T.I.T.S. Indeed, I'm sure many of my brethren, sick and fed up of malware, would rather spend time with T.I.T.S than trying to work out which AV is best.
Perhaps some certification for those T.I.T.S-testers would be in order, I mean it's not like 'we' (see, I'm already in the community-spirit) could let just anyone get into T.I.T.S.
ISC/SANS has their handlers, and, without question, T.I.T.S should have theirs ! There'd need to be accreditation of some sort - to qualify and be recognised as an *U*n-biased *P*rofessional for example
To that end, I would suggest the T.I.T.S-U.P accreditation programme, whereby those showing keen-ness and willing would be elevated within their community, their pink noses held-high.
It's a starting point - any offers? Who likes the idea of T.I.T.S? I'm sure we could get it off the ground, if we all pull together !!