Re: Agile everything
'Peace of work' - my main problem is that they hired contractors.
56 posts • joined 16 Dec 2007
'Peace of work' - my main problem is that they hired contractors.
I'm enjoying this level of openness. We didn't see it on previous government buildouts and I think that is why some of them managed to spend hundreds of times more before getting cancelled.
Every successful programme of work contains basket case projects that should get canned early and may not for political reasons.
This may be one of them. With the heat on like this, we may get to find out.
I just wish The Register wasn't so openly gleeful about solely pouncing on every misfortune and could give the balanced view as well. I guess they've read the clicks - but first dotcom boom around this (then: proudly) "rag" used to float above that sort of laziness and read between the lines.
They supply 12%, so ummmmm no. Sorry. There would be pandemonium
Take your example from the book (which I haven't read). There are two problems,
1) You ignore the political capital required to support change. If the Canadian government are unable to offer jobs to local factories to produce the solar panels then they lose some of the support they require to pass legislation that will (inevitably) require higher taxes. This could be enough to prevent them from ever being able to pass similarly progressive legislation.
2) By introducing these feeder tariffs - Canada makes its own manufacturing economy less competitive compared to a country using (for example) just coal power. If it cannot protect its own industry from the losses it suffers because of this then the legislation will get rolled back in due course.
The WTO has created a race to the bottom. This suits financialists because they can play the ends off against the middle but it has disempowered individual country's ability to act unilaterally on a whole host of global problems (eg deforestation, pollution, global warming). Even if you force local actors to clean up their act - they'll likely just export all their bad habits.
If you weren't so blinkered you'd understand this. Honestly I don't know who thought it would be a good idea to get you to review any book at all (shouldn't there be a fondleslab you can drool over instead?).
I don't know, you'd have to ask the accountancy multinationals who advise the government on setting taxes and corporations on paying them.
1) Lower Inequality between nations and lower inequality within nations are not mutually exclusive.
2) If we're going to talk about rising inequality within our nation, why not talk about rising inequality within developing nations?
3) Since the 1% within our nation _runs_ our nation we have to contend with rising corruption that both undermines our growth and stability and feeds on itself in an un-virtuous circle of further growth in inequality.
4) The transfer of growing inequality between generations is as pernicious to our growth and societal prospects. Smart kids from poor families have no prospects. Below average kids from rich families end up running the country.
Your whole article read like a smoke screen. You knew your conclusion, "1% holding a third of the country's wealth is trivial" and you worked back from there.
Is good that you mentioned Branko Milanovic - but it also seems odd you didn't mention Piketty at all.
I've run that program already. The answer is 42.
errr they've already got a big office on the Holborn Viaduct that they only just moved into.... bizarre.
The problem with economics is that to the tidy mind it offers superficially attractive remedies to very complex problems.
Enforce a use it or lose it. The supermarkets have massive land banks.
Could you elaborate on what's faddish about GDS, Andrew?
I've been quite impressed by their work (as shared on their blog https://gds.blog.gov.uk/) and I count them as one of the few successes of this government (as evidenced by the so far smooth rollout of the new polling database - in comparison to the recent e-borders payout).
I can't tell if your bile is aimed at GDS specifically or government in general, but I would be saddened if it turned out that a political bent for libertarianism undermined an appreciation for well managed agile engineering practices.
AWS is cheaper than outsourcing your data centres to Accenture...
$35 million sounds like "the cost of doing business" ie a slap on the wrist...
Something a bit more punitive might have helped. Not to mention criminal charges and jail time for US Infosys execs and execs of companies who outsourced to them.
youtube yes, gmail no.
Although you can't do much with google talk any more if you don't have g+.
Since I don't want G+, I can see the very real prospect of being forced to re-acquaint myself with email servers and bayesian spam filters again.
These things are possible. I remember this talk covering some of how you can approach the solution,
However, the best way to deal with the problem is not to have it. If you can adopt a component architecture (SOA, Microservices, plugin frameworks etc) with loose coupling then you should have a component simple enough to perf test for anticipated use and to be able to put it live without requiring downstream releases.
There isn't an application orchestration engine (that I know of) as mature as the Puppet/Chef infrastructure tier and this forces us all to a lot of painful in-house custom work. I've used Glu and Capistrano and both have problems. Asgard might work next time I'm on AWS again.
These aren't selling. Flea markets in ME/Asia are full of marked down units.
As a long time Debian user who has to use CentOS at work, I can see why some of the differences could grate.
Have you tried CentOS by the way?
It's more efficient to use gas in homes than in power stations. Gas is an excellent store of energy and you get a lot more power out of burning it in your home than out of burning it in powerstation sending it to your home as leccy (losing 40-60% during transmission) and then turning it back into heat (and losing some more).
We should stop using gas in power stations. The only reason we do is because it's cheap and easy to throw up a gas turbine whereas it takes years of planning to build equivalent wind turbines or work out where you're going to bury nuclear waste.
Yeah, but they can loan it to yourself.
makes a nice photo op....
The mental overhead of writing in one language and debugging in another is too high.
it works very well, the assumption being that it is to discourage employees from filing expenses...
which is why they need to be balanced by other sources (wind) across a continent wide smart grid (where the productive day is also longer) and storage solutions can be made use of (eg Norwegian water storage, but there are other ways).
The Against the Grain podcast explores this a little bit.
Because you can't imagine how the human race could beat global warming you refuse to believe in it. That's quite normal. It's not rational, but then few people can think rationally about such an abstract subject.
However, as a tech journalist, I wish you were more inquisitive and read the non-military news. We've just opened super-connectors with Iceland (Geothermals) and Norway (Hydro storage). Siemens (Desertec) is building super-connectors to Morocco where solar concentrators offer a rare-earth elements free method of generating vast amounts of electricity.
Against the Grain just broadcast a really good interview with Gar Lipow on this subject, where he goes into some detail on the technological solutions we already have and how we could pay for them here and in the global south. Simply put, If there was cross-border state investment in expanding the projects I described above we could generate 70% of our energy from renewable sources in less than twenty years.
Also this week's Analysis explored the topic of political prejudice in some detail and why people have trouble adapting their opinions on these subjects
Both would be worth while listening to and would offer a lot more of value to you and other readers than the sort of sensationalist pap that I'm more used to seeing in the Metro free-paper.
They learnt well from US (who did same thing after kicking Britain out).
Shoreditch was so named because it was originally the City of London's open sewer.
Can you feel a bit of the glamour now?
Always the problem with incubators is kicking out the startups which don't succeed.
To me Old St === insurance. Mind you, plenty of insurance internet startups...
The Nationwide website is on the blink every day. The hilarious thing is that that they seem incapable of grasping the fact. Maybe the servers are fine and is just the network bridge to the internet outside of swindon towers which is foobarred.
We're at our most adaptive and in a position to learn most when we're young.
At a university you are guaranteed to be challenged to a certain minimum level and to spend all your time constantly learning new things.
You might be so lucky in your first job, but you could easily get thrown in a corner and taught a lot of very bad habits.
If you are hugely ambitious (this probably matters more than smarts) and are confident that you can drive yourself forward then a degree probably isn't necessary. For anyone else, you might get lucky - but you'll probably drive yourself down a dead end career.
If I were an 18 year old today I would get a degree in agricultural engineering. Lots of very old farmers about to pop it and a huge shortage of fertilizers coming in the next 40 years. You stand to make a mint.
These are their estimates and don't include estimates for the damage that drilling will do to local economy (destroying farming).
I've not read anything that good on the Register for years. many years.
It might be because it attempted to migrate my profile (I remember that being why firefox 3.0 was so painful).
Anyway, it slowed all of our computers (mac + linux) down too much.
Much happier back on ff3.6.17.
It's businesses which sell their IP down the river to China for a quick boost to earnings (no doubt linked to Executive bonuses). It's businesses which undermine the loyalty and pride that most employees want to have in their workplace just so they can save a few bucks that look good in one single quarterly earnings report.
And then government goes and copies all the worst things about businesses.
Why bother studying when it's increasingly just rote learning for the benefit of school league tables and of no benefit to your future career at all?
Why bother healing people when you can get them more ill and then squeeze more money out of them (or in the UK: why bother healing people when the most important government target of the week is empty beds).
These stupid targets are set by governments who think everything should be measurable just like in a logistics business or pizza restaurant.
Only the Germans and the Chinese (and a few other smaller economies) have a systemic respect for the complexity involved in and flexibility required in running a modern country.
And I blame big business for that because it was their policy to lobby for and support braindead governments less likely to oppose them.
We should be celebrating the ability of these companies to attract VC and even generate profits.
Where there are independently wealthy trust fund kiddies dabbling in trendy nonsense, they deserve to be skewered but there are far more of those types draining oxygen out of the talent pool through internships all across the city.
Name dropping Nathan Barley is a tired cliche that was already pretty old when the tv series came out five years ago.
The only thing which makes sense is to hook up the whole shebang with the EDF. Why would we want a navy which isn't integrated into Europe?
Alternatively, if you're an anti-European we should just get rid of the navy and rely on the Americans.
Either way, there's no more point going it alone. Hasn't been for years.
Shouldn't he be playing Zynga's latest extension to the Farmville franchise, "toffs and oiks"?
In my business at least, I have watched as we've sawn off the bottom rungs of the career ladder and exported them to Eastern Europe.
And then there's the people who offer to work for free for three months (in Central London I might add) just to get some experience.
Seems like the only way to get off the ground these days is to have a trust fund or to have been running your own business since you were 16.
Wow, the second page was so short I got bored of clicking next. What gives?
I preferred Warren Ellis' take.
You guys are getting lazy.
So will noscript protect me from XSS attacks?
Are these the ones that fish eat?
If so the invasion problem is less a jellyfish one and more of an issue about over fishing.
There's an interesting study on Cape Cod somewhere which talks about the failure of fish numbers to recover. Apparently the same jellyfish that the cod used to eat now eat the cod eggs.
Mother Nature sure has a sense of humor.
due to lack of snow. I confidently expect them to be cancelled tomorrow due to "lack of snow".
with melting the ice caps / glaciers for terraforming processes (or indeed throwing comets at it) has always been that the low gravity on Mars means too much of any released atmosphere would leak to make settlement viable.
because it comes in red.
Shame really, the Debian support for EEE is getting very good.
double deckers are so sloooooooooooooow at loading/unloading. I wish I had seen one ticket inspecter like _ever_ but if they do get rid of them, it will make the busy routes take literally hours longer end to end.
Things carry on the way they are in Russia and an expensive gas plan that reduces the amount of gas burnt might start to look very attractive indeed.
If you want a new job, it's worth boning up on "just getting out of university" questions. If you're smart enough to work at Google it wouldn't take long. The technical questions would be a breeze.
What they've established by interviewing you is that you're not committed enough to wanting the job, which probably means the recruiter shouldn't have put you forward. You're "happy" in the job you're at. End of story.
There are disadvantages to 3+ interviews, however. If a company can't get organised enough to go from square one to making an offer in under a week, they're likely to lose the best applicants to nimbler hirers. In a buoyant economy, of course.