15 posts • joined 12 Dec 2007
Video is made up of still images, or frames , The number per second being dependant on the standard being used.
......for the next craze of running down a street at 2am, unplugging all the charging cars causing chaos the following morning when the drivers realise they can go nowhere.
sorry, should have written £720, not £799.
Still if you look at the specs, the camera is missing some fundamental functions for this price point.
It doesn't have an inbuilt focus motor, so you'll need to use AF-S lenses, which is limiting.
It also doesn't have a second controller wheel, so manually changing aperture and shutter speed at the same time isn't possible.
It looks on paper very much like a bridge camera you can change lenses with.
It's hardly an entry level piece of kit when the body alone is £799 rrp..
Entry level is still served very well by the aging but fantastic D40 which produces stunning images for its sub £300 price.
bring back the Osterich!!
The only Sony phones that I ever used that were ever any good were the analogue 'mars bar' 333 and the CMD-Z1 'walking osterich' phone...
And Ericssons were amazing back then too.
..if Blizzard doesn't sort out its flakey servers before the 13th.
Roll on Wrath of the Lost Wife.
We'll see if it changes much.
It would be nice if, in no particular order they:
Fix the economy,
Fix the damage form Hurricane Katrina
Stop sticking their noses in other countries business
and stop treating the rest of the world as terrorists.
someone loves him...
get James May to bid on it surely...
Why on earth are you reviewing a two year old camera who's replacement and upgrade has been out for almost a year in itself?
Please Reg, stick to PC related reviews.
Chuck Norris doesn't need to decrypt data.
The data takes one look and Chuck and rearranges itself in the correct order to save it self from the inevitable.
Point and laugh..
...at your friends who still trudge out to the shops rather than download the film via Bittorrent...
they really don't have the richness, the responsiveness...........
Not normally what I thing of when it comes to Microsoft either...think more Bloat and Sluggishness, then your on the right track.
So, obviously, congestion is no longer a problem in London...........
Oo....satnav and in trolley entertainment......
......for when your on the lash and pushing your mates along the highstreet or down multistorey car parks...
Paris of course for her aptitude at getting trollied..
"Just had my visit from the license collectors to check why I haven't paid and they were quite happy to see my TV being powered by my media PC playing iPlayer programs."
So does your TV not have a tuner? Even if you don't use it for tuning into a broadcast you still need a license!
It's like cutting the plug off the TV, it doesn't matter, you still own equipment capable of receiving a signal.
You are totally wrong.You only have to read your final sentence to see you have no idea what your talking about.
You only need a license if you watch broadcast material, which is either via satellite, cable or Analogue or Digital reception.
You do not need a license if your TV is connected to a PC / DVD player / VCR only and is not receiving broadcast signals.
The TV is then classified as a 'monitor' and becomes exempt from the stealth tax.
Following text lifted from /www.tvlicensing.co.uk.
- Twitter: La la la, we have not heard of any NUDE JLaw, Upton SELFIES
- China: You, Microsoft. Office-Windows 'compatibility'. You have 20 days to explain
- Apple to devs: NO slurping users' HEALTH for sale to Dark Powers
- Is that a 64-bit ARM Warrior in your pocket? No, it's MIPS64
- Apple 'fesses up: Rejected from the App Store, dev? THIS is why