I love this dumbass stuff...
Myth #1: Linux is all standards and Microsoft doesn't comply.
Sorry, princess, get back to your mom's basement. If 90% of machines do something a certain way then *that* is the standard. The french really do believe that the prime meridian passes through Paris and may have written it down as an international standard on a whole heap of occasions but the rest of the world population are happy to agree on it passing through Greenwich. You can write as many RFCs as you like (and they are *Requests* *for* *Comment* and not *standards* *to* *be* *adhered* *to*) but if 90% of the world's PCs adopt a different standard then you can either join up or lose out.
Myth #2: Linux is more secure than Windows.
Maybe, but it's not been proven either way.
Myth #3: Making software open source means that you immediately get thousands of highly trained security conscious programmers crawling over the code improving it.
Dude, it just does not happen. Because people *can* see the code does not mean they bother. It also doesn't mean they have the skills to do anything with it. There are the odd exceptions but most Linux fanbois who use that arguement couldn't fix a bug even if they had the inclination to because they rely on their imaginary army of Microsoft busting superheroes to do it.
Saying that making something open to the public makes it more secure is like saying that Wikipedia is more accurate because anyone *can* change it (and I think that's been proved wrong enough times - who wrote that S Club track again?).
Myth #4: Getting indignant about how Microsoft are in the wrong makes some sort of difference.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Tosser.