70 posts • joined Friday 7th December 2007 18:48 GMT
On more than expected
Usually the instruction to turn off the device is after bags have been stowed, seat belts fastened, the safety drill being demonstrated, & the plane toddling it's way to take off. Virtually no-one at that stage will disrupt everything to unstow hand baggage to turn off their phone if it's in the hand baggage.
I reckon most flights take off with many devices in full working mode.
Re: Environmentally friendly Windows PC ..... NOT!
The anagram of "Deano"
When I hear "blue" in an IT context the association I have is with "Big Blue", i.e. IBM. MS isn't "blue", it's "Azure", surely ?
It'll be interesting to see how MS holds on to it's revenue stream. My view is that they'll hold onto the business customers for Windows / Office in a single word: Excel. Every business outfit I know has lots of stuff on Excel that's been around donkeys. No one really knows how it does what it does & no one in their right mind would risk their job by suggesting an alternative. It's easier, cheaper & less livelihood threatening simply to pay MS's rental fees. The overwhelming majority of users neither know nor care what OS / software they're using, they just want it to work the way it did last week & no changes, thank you very much. That's a heavy inertial load in favour of MS in business for the foreseeable future.
Outside of business, there doesn't seem to be much reason to pay MS's increasingly hiked-up charges. XP still works just fine, & MS are asking £190 for W8, way more than Apple ask for OSX. Old versions of Office also work just fine & the latest versions (home & student) have had their price hacked up from £80 for 3 licences to £109 for a single licence. Unless you need or are required to use Office then Google's "Drive", at a purchase cost of zero, and a maintenance cost also of zero, seem very attractive. And, being cloud-based, it's got automatic backup built in, which means you don't need to wrestle with Windows Backup. Or as is often suggested Libre / Open Office might be worth looking at (can't say I was too enamoured of it myself when last I tried it, but that was some time ago).
I reckon that for the first time for years MS have a real fight on their hands. It'll be interesting to see how, or if, they can effectively respond.
Surely it should be the originators of most of the dross on You Tube who should pay for foisting the stuff on us???
Re: Sod that, wake me up when........
Can't see many sales for a device that shone lasers into the eye. Bit of a tricky thing to sell?
Two-pin kettle lead
I know a chap who was asking for one of those a couple of weeks ago - he's inherited an old coffee maker that uses such a lead & there wasn't one with it.
Put it on eBay please!
Why cull ?
We've had cattle for hundreds of years in Britain & Badgers are native fauna. They seemed to have got along together now just fine for a long time. So why do we now need to start shooting them ? What's changed in the last few years to make this so necessary ?
Personally I'd be looking to see what changes in farming practices have coincided with this apparent rise in the TB "threat".
So do I just put everything I'm unsure about into a sub-folder of "Personal" & it's no longer available to investigators ?
Re: Talking of Tax Rebates
Yes - if paying under PAYE the rounding system usually means you pay a few pounds less than is actually due -
e.g. allowances £6545 gets rounded in the employer PAYE calculation to £6550, so £5 @ your tax rate too little is paid.
It was explained to me, long ago, that this was to prevent small overpayments arising which would create mountains of clerical staff to calculate & repay.
A Choice of Catastrophe
A s Isaac Asimov pointed out: "The universe isn't hostile, it's merely indifferent".
The climate is beyond the ability of most (if not all) of us to comprehend, so to fix on a single factor, be that CO2, sunspots, or <your chosen factor goes here> isn't likely to be useful. By continuing to argue over causes (which is valid research) we're missing the wider issue that come what may, the climate will change. Surely the rational approach should be to decide what we need to do to mitigate the potential adverse effects of climate change. (E.g. stop subsidising the insurance policies of homeowners building on coastlines subject to hurricane risk to discourage such development). If, along the way we can reduce substantially CO2 emissions then, on the precautionary principle, that seems a very good idea. But unless the IPCC is way wrong, we're going to have global temperature rises across the whole of this century, at least, irrespective of sunspots, Earth's orbit, passing asteroid clouds or whatever.
But only to replace VAT
I've long thought a carbon tax seems both rational & sensible - but only if it replaced VAT as a spending-type tax. Unfortunately, I just don't trust politicians sufficiently to replace VAT. On past form, it would be brought in as yet another additional tax.
My favourite distracted driver was spotted in Florida. The car was weaving about the Interstate & we decided to put some distance between him and us. As we went by, we noticed the driver was steering with his knees, both hands being needed to eat his bowl of cornflakes.
My main problem with the CO2 figures being bandied about is the method of presentation. We're continually given CO2 as 300 or 400 ppm, as if that were a 33% rise. But ppm is a scientific shorthand, used mainly by scientists. In straight numbers, it's a rise from 0.003% of the atmosphere to 0.004%.
It just doesn't seem to ring true that the climate system is so sensitive to such tiny changes in CO2 levels.
Nope - some went twice
I thought as you did, it must be 27 (3 X 9), but some astronauts went twice, e.g. IIRC Jim Lovell was on both Apollos 8 & 13.
So 24 is probably correct.
He's not the only IT bod that likes the briny
Paul Allen has something approaching an aircraft carrier - with heli pad & submarine launchers.
The Hungarian that invented Excel has a nice 200+ foot cruiser called the SKAT, which also has heli pad & boat doors for the zodiacs. Saw it in Stockholm in May & it looked very desirable. No chance on being allowed on board, unfortunately.
A good idea ????
What planet is he living on?
It's all down to communications
The trouble with the formal approaches is that they tend to focus attention on completion of paperwork - progress reports, red / amber / green "flags" and the like - which diverts the PM's time & attention away from actually understanding what the reportees are actually doing. If the PM can't or won't interpret just what he / she's being told against the cold light of reality then the project will fail, no matter how many interim targets are allegedly met.
If the PM actually understands what he / she's being told - irrespective of formal targets - then it's much more likely the project will proceed to successful completion. The formal approaches only work when they are used as an aide where appropriate, & not an end in themselves.
Yet again sloppy security from those who should know better.
Why are DVD/CD drives & USB ports even available to users ? Just superglue the lot & the problem disappears.
Leaving only laptops, Blackberrys & smartphones to be left in wine bars, trains, etc.
Intranet based app??
Intranet-based ? Que?
This is a CD-ROM sent out to employers by HMRC. Intranet isn't relevant.
And the system is donkeys years old (which presumably is why they are replacing it with a web-based app) - when it was invented, this new-fangled interweb thingy was just a geek's wet dream.
The "autoupdate" is a user spotting an error that's slipped by QA/QC & reporting it to HMRC. Who then have to decide if it's worth doing anything about.
More akin to an error in a published book.
Not the outfit I knew
This is soo sad. When I worked for HMRC we were bombarded with compulsory "diversity" courses & awareness events. I really wouldn't think anyone within HMRC would behave in this manner (or be so stupid as to think they wouldn't be caught).
And, Mr AC, HMRC mgt take extreme umbridge to any of their staff who are not 100% honest. Just because you may not like what they tell you (esp in relation to IR35), that doesn't justify the "nine bob bit" slur.
Re: Or alternatively
Maybe because they don't want software that crashes repeatedly & runs like treacle ?
And what was the return ?
Pity we're not informed as to how many of these intercepts resulted in successful prosecutions. I'd hazard a guess that the answer is "not many", because if they had been successful, the results would be trumpeted from the rooftops.
The suspicion is that it's just prurient, ineffective snooping, achieving very little other than wasting police, etc., time
What is the point of this lot ?
I've never figured out just what the BCS are supposd to do or be about.
I first came across them in the 1970's & couldn't figure out what they were doing for me then, a lowly programmer.
Things haven't changed since - I've never come across any evidence that they have any relevance to workers or managers in IT.
I just don't see the point of them.
Hard to see how microfiches are going to go
It's hard to see how HMRC are going to get rid of microfiches at all - they've been recording up to 20M employees pay, tax & NI details per year onto microfiche for decades.(Although under electronic submission of employee data it's probably stopped now). Whilst it would no doubt be useful to transfer the lot to an electronic format, the chances of money under any foreseeable gov't being made available to do that must be pretty close to zero. The costs would be enormous & in lots of cases, human intervention would be needed to interpret images, giving rise to further occasions of error. So they'd still need to retain the originals, as actual copies of the source documents.
The problem that the NI office face is that they need to keep data going back to 1948 (start of NI [aka "Social Security] in the UK), so the data mountain just keeps growing.
A long overdue death
The quicker Flash dies the better IMHO.
Buggy, slow & used by learner programmers to impress ignorant management. Looks great on the in-house Intranet, runs like a soporific tortoise on the Internet.
In 99% of cases it detracts from the user experience. And anything that Adobe has had it's hands on seems to be associated with crashes & weird PC behaviour.
Just another civil service outfit
As usual with gov't dept's, things are organised for their benefit, not the customers.
My late stepmother died & I was warned that I could either a) tax her vehicle, or b) SORN it. Both required her signature - a bit tricky.
No third option - they clearly hadn't even thought of such an event happening, although it must be a relatively common thing to occur. Brainless, just brainless.
MBNA as well
MBNA have just told me I can't log in as their systems are down for maintenance - on PAYDAY ?!?!
My 2-point Plan...
for the beeb to save money is simple:
Only send one reporter to cover an event. There's no need to send journos from various parts of the organisation.
Dump the pointless local radio stations. The aural wallpaper they churn out is well duplicated by the commercial sector.
I saw some newsreel footage of one of these 'ships a few years ago & it was simply awesome. It semed - and still seems - an ideal way to patrol long seaboards.
What about partially-used batteries?
It sounds simple to swap over an exhausted battery pack for a fully charged pack, but in reality the old pack will always have some residual charge - else how did you get to the station?
So some means needs to be incorporated to give the driver credit for the unused charge. This is never mentioned - is it a practical possibility ?
The Case is Overwhelming, M'Lud
Ever seen a banker without a mobile clamped to his / her ear ?
Useless Parliament bypassed again
The bit I don't like about this is that Ed Balls has just decided to change what was agreed to by Parliament. Nu Labour are recidivists in removing as much of Parliament's authority as it can get away with & move powers to ministers. This is just a continuing example of them doing it.
Mind, given that many MP's seem to think their job is inventing expenses claims rather than scrutinising legislation, maybe we shouldn't be surprised when yet more dross like this gets a FAIL as soon as it gets anywhere close to reality.
And here's cynical old me thinking that Food Miles were nothing more than an attempt by our farmers to make us feel guilty about not buying British food, enabling them to wrap protectionism in a nice, cuddly, green blanket.
Who gains ?
Just what is the point of patents (and copywrights) ?
In the past they may have had a role in defending the heroic lone inventor from the rapacious capitalists. But now all they seem to do is feed lawyers. Ther's no discernable benfit to the user as far as I can see.
Scrap the lot o' them, I say.
Greed, pure greed. They've already been (very) well paid once to do the work & now want paying again.
As Court dicta effectively change Statute law, and such dicta are based in part on lawyer's submissions, this argument adds up to a tax on the citizen seeking to read the laws he / she is bound by. Just pure greed from an already very well remunerated section of society.
But what's in it for me ?
W95 gave me a half-way decent screen interface;
W98 gave me easy access to the Interweb;
XP gave me the use of USB (or was it the other way round ?);
Vista gave me...a prettier screen ?
What's the in it for me to migrate to W8 ?
Please will someone (preferably not from MS) tell me ?
Did I say W8?
If so I meant W7.
"There have been cases..." Typical politician use of unsupported "data" to justify sticking their nose into other peoples business.
It's a pity these self-appointed busybodies can't get it through their skulls that if someone wants porn, they'll find it. Always could, always will.
But that doesn't justify interfering with the other 99%+ of the populations PC's.
And even if the technology could be effectively fitted (unlikely), who would determine what was OK & what was not ? Wacki Jacki's hubby ?
Don't forget the timing
Don't forget that IR35 also gets tax into the govt's coffers - via PAYE - faster than as a dividend from the service company. But that's only a tiny crumb of comfort for Gordo. The whole IR35 is now exposed as just another anti-business ploy.
Yet another example of how the civil service will come up with any figure to support whatever bandwagon is currently being spun by useless ministers.
Roll on the election. The sooner the better.
Well fancy that
Politcians pass the Freedom of Information Act.
Politicians decide it doesn't apply to them. High Court says they don't understand the Act of Parliament they passed.
Politicians then decide they need time to "review their claims" (i.e. actions that your & my employer would reward via form P45).
Newspaper publishes the unsanitised version of the claims.
Politicians decide the appropriate action is to call in Plod.
You couldn't make it up.
What about the CPU load ?
I've given up with FF - on my trusty lappy it runs the CPU @ 100% & the fan is constantly cutting in out to keep the temp down.
Mozilla don't seem to mention this so I assume no change then ?
Until the address this, I'm sticking with the no-trouble, reliable IE8.
The programe is dead - if technical aspects don't kill it, the dumping of NuLab at the next election certainly will.
In the meantime, we're paying for civil servants to continue to work on a scheme that'll not see the light of day, nor will it hold the said civil servants accountable for how they dribbled away taxpayer funds. You can see why they want it kept on life support. Better than working on something where thay may be held to account one day.
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Facebook offshores HUGE WAD OF CASH to Caymans - via Ireland
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Microsoft teams up with Feds, Europol in ZeroAccess botnet zombie hunt
- Three offers free US roaming, confirms stealth 4G rollout