Re: How the hell ...
millions of man-hours a few horny-teenager-hours testing
Fixed it for you...
2902 posts • joined 15 Mar 2007
millions of man-hours a few horny-teenager-hours testing
Fixed it for you...
Its a disgrace that Windows 10 has not kept such perfect protection!
Damn, now I might have to actually talk to children and educate them about safe and sane behaviour on-line instead of watching TV in the next room.
Mind you, who would be foolish enough to trust the communication 'pipe' to implement security & authentication? Damn, that was a dumb question!
End-to-end or no cigar...
"but it was his decision to pursue Beckedahl and fellow journalist Andrew Meister for treason that led to his downfall."
So when will we see a matching Hitler-rant parody?
He could have bought an IP connected power block and simply cut the AC power remotely. Given the pain of managing remote boxes, I would do that even though I don't have anything particularly worth encrypting to that degree.
"What are the ways to beat a keylogger?"
Tricky, but I would go for booting from a 'live' CD-ROM so you always have an un-tampered OS (assuming it was clean to start with). Bad luck if they manage to infect it just before you enter your pass phrase, but I guess you should not do email/web sessions before you have already closed the encrypted container.
How long you could do so and put up with the inconvenience is another matter...
I was once installing stuff in Egypt a long long time ago and the IT/computer room/office was set to 18C when outside it was 35-40C. This room was mostly workstations and some photographic plotters, etc, not a data centre.
They had to wear extra cloths / coats indoors and complained about fingers going numb. Despite being used to much colder in the UK I also found it uncomfortable when dressed for that sort of region so set the A/C controls to 25C as no one there felt they had the authority to do so. End result was a much happier work force and greatly reduced electricity bill!
A plug-in that always reports a low, but random, value? That way you don't get force-fed high usage crap, but still it is not an identifying value (except maybe that you are running such as plug-in)?
Damn, looks like I will have to study that list in case I am missing something. Other than scruples, that is.
Still, I didn't know there was a web site stiflersmom.com but I guess having seen it mentioned in India Today I will check it out later, and not at work. Look, its bound to be NSFW...
The one with btrfs should support snapshots to allow a roll-back to a past point in time. Not sure I would choose that over ZFS mind, but then all file systems have sucked donkey balls in my experience. As a previous commentard reminds us RAID != Backup, and of course an on-line file system is not a backup.
Not exactly, but it supports 'snapshots' as it is a copy-on-write file system. So malware that trashes files on your Z: drive or whatever will cause the file system to write the malicious changes to new blocks on disk. Once you find out, and have killed the infection, you can go back to the snapshot time and get your previous files' contents back.
Assuming you snapshot regularly and notice the infection before those snapshots get overwritten.
What you need in access speed depends on what you are doing, i.e. the balance between your computer's ability to process data and the storage systems ability to provide/accept it.
Most cheap NAS can achieve about 1/2 of a HDD speed if you have Gbit networking and if your budget is limited you might be happy enough just to let it run overnight, etc.
If you are not using the NAS for sharing (i.e. it is a backup copy and/or space for keeping very large files) then try to use it as an iSCSI target, and then have the block storage formatted in Apple's own file system. That way the (stupid IMHO) use of alternate data streams for photo metadata, etc, are all supported.
Down side is the extra faffing to get that running and that you can't really access those files on any other machine.
Please, there is only one application for a RAID-0 box and that is a temporary store for massive video files, etc, while you work with them. You should make that very clear in any proposed test. If you value your data then RAID-0 has no place at all!
Also worth pointing out for the more technical commmentards to consider, you can get an HP ProLiant Gen8 G1610T micro server for under £200 and slap FreeNAS on it, and if you want some more performance also stick in a small SSD for the ZFS Intent Log to give you a reasonable comprimise in performance vs. storage cost.
"There are always conditions attached"
Which are not explained, or often are changed after you have signed up. THAT is the problem.
If I have paid for a 8Mbit/sec connection why can't I use it all the time? Why should it slow down?
Now you and I both know the realities of networking hardware and the fundamental limits of information theory so we realise the situation is complex and usually over-subscribed so throttling is inevitable at times. But the majority of customers were lied to in order to get their custom, and they know SFA about how it works. That is the whole point of this action.
"I know half a dozen people who abuse their "unlimited" data plans or have in the past. People who would stream Netflix and Hulu for hours on end."
I'm sorry but you can't "abuse" unlimited because it is, as they say: unlimited.
Now if they can't actually deliver on that, why did they offer it? Did they lie to millions of customers who know nothing about spectrum usage and contention ratios, etc, to obtain their custom? If so they deserve the fine and it has to be big enough to make them, and others, think again.
It is just a shame that other toothless regulators have not been forcing honest advertisement of what you can expect to get from an ISP for your money.
Maybe gov spending is not very efficient, but are any of the other options actually better? A lot of charities are way less efficient at delivering aid to the intended.
Here is a good infographic on what the UK spends money on, though I have not verified it is correct:
"People in the UK give over £10 billion a year to charity"
The problem is the UK's welfare spending is an order of magnitude bigger than that, and there is no way that those of a chartable disposition are in a position to donate 10x more for reasons that are not personal factor to them (e.g. protecting animals, children, etc)
Try the approach I went for - run Linux as your host and have a couple of VMs of XP, 7, etc for the software that is only windows. OK, you need a decent amount of RAM, but it works well enough and those VMs generally never need to see t'Internet so a few less security points to worry about.
When you install Linux go to the advanced options for disk partitioning and set up something like this:
/ ext4 (~30GB if you have enough space)
/home ext4 (most of the rest of the disk)
And leave about 30GB if you can (say on a 1TB HDD or similar so its no big deal). That way you can nuke your OS installation without losing your own data, and if you prefer install a later version in the unused space and also have it mounting your home partition later. Then the grub boot menu will give you the chance to boot in to old or new versions.
Firstly I must thank you for cheering my day up with the description " the rancid free-for-all of today’s clickbait-infested swamp", it is spot-on!
It remains to be seen how well the system works, but for a lot of commercial sites I can see it would be a great advantage if photos and other materiel could be licensed for a small fee more-or-less instantly. Even for some of us who choose to put things up for free, it would be nice to track its popularity (particularly if your funding is based on "public impact" factors).
However, the issue of meta-data stripping is more complex as it can reveal information about the person they really don't want public. For example, the lat/lon of their home, or a personal identifier if its a crime they reported. Having an agree copyright metadata field that is not stripped by web sites on pain of legal action is much better, so long as phones, etc, always confirm you want it sent in sensitive cases.
It is worth a read of the report, in particular section 6.7 is damning of the quality and consistency of the DAB radios out there.
I am not surprised really, and having read parts of the DVB-S2 standard you can see why it is a high risk to implement and of these sort of systems in silicon for space projects etc - the standard is so damn long (from memory about 1000 pages in the various pdf documents) and complex that the chances of someone implementing all of it correctly is quite small.
Really, when you compare DAB in practice to FM and factor in receiver availability, battery life, coverage, etc, there is not a good case for DAB. The suggestion of killing it off and leaving FM and IP radio is a worth considering.
Funny when I read the article the last part was:
Have also fired 12-bore shotguns on a few occasions and was once even present at a grouse shoot.
Sponsored: How to deal with Windows Server 2003 end of support
Related I wonder?
Very much so if you have a few PCs on a LAN and are not using WSUS (like most homes and small businesses). In that case the overall benefit to you is probably much more than the penalty of it sending a copy out again.
The bandwidth problem for worthwhile 4k is also an issue for IP TV, at least, unless some serious headway is made in terms of fibre to, ideally, the home.
The Japanese have looked at Ka-band satellite for UHDTV as there is really not much spare at Ku band. However, the investment in both space-side and the upgrade costs for everyone wanting it are not pretty
OK, if we dropped a lot of the 100+ shit channels we might have it on Ku, but that is not looking likely.
On a technical level IP TV is a horrendous wast of resources, all of those duplicated data streams...
While I happen to think EastEnders is rubbish as well, I don't mind the BBC paying for it to be made as a lot of folk do link it.
What I do/would object to is the BBC bidding stupid sums of money for sports coverage. Not that I am against them doing sports, but I think the amount of money pissed up the wall by premier league footballers or the organisers of F1, etc, is not a good way to spend money. Other up-side is that Sky can pay a bit less for said sports, so those who do end up paying don't need to spend as much either.
That is a good example, but I fear that ISP's would abuse the ability to rank and manipulate streams and app developers, for that matter, to lie about what they are to appear better to a customer.
The most obvious beneficial case is caching common and/or large volume stuff, something that was largely pissed on by DRM anyway and becomes impossible for always-encrypted traffic.
"we want to provide mechanisms to let operators try to add value"
Can anyone explain what "added value" is in this context? Why would I want it? (And I don't mean being whored to advertisers by my ISP)
Is the bad behaviour on Google's cloudy editor, etc, shown also on MS' offering?
Do MS still push Active-X stuff if they can for Windows browsing of Office365?
I don't know much about guns, but I imagine that a typical shotgun charge has a lot of small round shot in it, so the risk of that coming down far away elsewhere under gravity and remaining momentum is a whole lot smaller than a bullet.
Any commentards with more knowledge willing to add to this?
Maybe for you, and your use.
But for various non-tech folk I know they are a breath of fresh air without all of the AV and other crap that a Windows laptop has/accumulates in short notice. Also they are often much cheaper than a laptop for a decent screen resolution, for reasons I never could fathom...
Of course, they could check first if the phone can be reliably located to the immediate vicinity of the alleged incident and, if not, treat the call as a touch suspicious and perhaps survey the scene a little more before bursting in with guns blazing.
Lets just hope all of this new software-controlled driving is more reliable than their stop/start switch that needed a patch recently.
No, the fundamental reason why these "trade pacts" should be kicked out is simply the undemocratic process by which they were generated. Secret negotiations with only a few officials (and certain lobby groups) being given access, and not us, the people to which they will apply.
So no matter what they are offering, they should be destroyed on the simple principle that they are attempting to re-write our laws by the back door - by secret agreement that is then presented as fait accompli for the EU nations, Australia, etc, to swallow without any sort of scrutiny.
Carriers monkey with the OS/apps, then the carriers should fix them. It is high time that the law treats this sort of thing as a fault to be fixed for, say, 5 years after last sale. For everyone, so no supplier can wriggle out and not have to pony up to fix the damn software.
Of course it could send itself to everyone in your contacts list, and to everyone they know...
Nice. Maybe Google and the phone makers should face a class-action suite if they don't fix it? MS must be laughing at the same sort of mistakes being made a decade later.
They, and a lot of other software houses, are seeing the same problem. So when faced with two choices what would you, as a customer and developer, want to follow:
1) Build on what you know to make a product that does what the customer wants, reliably, and securely.
2) Dick around with the GUI and look for ways of whoring your customer's data to advertisers?
Now ask yourself what most MBA type running those companies go for...
"Android developers are being lured ever closer to GMS, with Lollipop adding 5,000 new API calls"
Bummer that. Sadly I don't feel much sympathy for MS getting burnt in that area considering how they pushed Windows devs in to using calls that are only on Windows, etc, instead of POSIX and anything portable.
I wish I could, as Google doing the same does not make it OK or in the customer's interests. And I mean the phone's owner, not those to whom they are being whored for advertising reasons.
How many people have their own drive ways so they can use a home charger? Most cars I see are parked in the street, so that is not going to happen.
OK, maybe for high-end cars like the Tesla folk might be in luxury homes with their own drive, but certainly not for the mass of cars in current use.
"more efficient and produce less pollution per unit energy that a car engine"
Really? I thought modern turbo diesels were pretty much a match for most power station, but I don't have the numbers. Do you? Also what about the extra mass of the battery to throw around, or is that largely covered by regenerative braking?
As an aside, recently I saw my first electric charging station in the UK. It had three bloody cables since the ass-hat manufacturers have not standardised on one. A 43kW AC one, and two 50kW DC ones. Why?
Mind you, a typical UK main supply fuse is 100A, so a home supply could provide at most 23kW.
How stable would the grid be with even 50% renewable energy?
What would the black-start options be?
Intelsat don't want a business plan, but knowledge of the transmissions to see if they are a threat to proper operations. LEO satellites are global, so they have the potential to piss on everyone's party if done badly.
"Obviously the LEO satellites would be licensed for a different frequency"
Very likely NOT.
There are only a few viable and allocated bands where you can get cheap COTS hardware, etc, to support this and they are all pretty full, so very likely they will be broadcasting on the same frequencies as the GEO birds but relying on (hoping?) that the directional properties of the antenna (both their own, and the GEO ground terminals) are sufficient to stop interference.
I am pretty sure that is why Intelsat wants the details, do do their own analysis of the interference mitigation strategy to see what the impact might be. Beyond that, there is also the heavy congestion of the usual S-band TTC range to consider, and what impact trying to manage a fleet of a thousand small satellites over a couple of operators will be on other satellite's TTC.
"on the side of angels, albeit deeply misunderstood"
Wasn't Lucifer himself an angel once, and now has a bit of a PR problem?
In many cases, yes. But that is not an excuse for not properly engineering systems that are safety critical.
As already pointed out: start aggressively jailing managers who fail to enforce proper safety processes in product design, testing, and support.
Industry won't go bankrupt, and after a few execs are doing jail time the behaviour will improve remarkably.
I wonder how the "low-status, poorer-performing males" on Fetlife react?