1637 posts • joined 15 Mar 2007
Re: physical DRM
What are you scanning in your pocket? Or are you just please to see us?
True, but if it is a case of money from Apple that is less than x86 or Apple staying with Samsung and getting nothing, not so simple.
I suspect the bigger worry for Intel is if this indirectly leads to more interest in ARM for servers running massively threaded code where lots of cores at high MIPS/Watt is far more attractive than high-profit high-end x86 chips.
"seem to point towards the new x86 chips being very close to competitive with ARM"
But how much of that is down the the chip design (i.e. logical structure) and how much of that is down to Intel having a ~2 year lead on advanced manufacturing processes?
If they are matched simply because a 2 year advance makes the x86 equal to the ARM for power-critical tasks, then ARM is still a winner for most, and if Apple do get access to the best fab service then they will have a major advantage over all others.
That alone, far more than not paying Samsung for fabbing, would help Apple in the premium smartphone arena.
Why just FRAND?
Really, stop all of this injunction business on patents and allow the courts to swiftly decide the 'value' of such claims and then get party A to pay party B what is reasonable for it, and to enforce a transparent settlement so cartel-like operations to price out newcomers is not an option.
Considering there are hundreds, if not thousands of patents, for any complex product we should see more sensible settlements of a few quid per half-dozen patents on a ~£200 device.
Re: Just as I expected.
That could well be due to not being able to do much of note on a Chromebook, unlike a full-flavoured penguin.
<= He may look cute, but turn away and he will eat you Uncle Fester.
As I asked before, what law?
Please quote the text of this law, or cite some reference to it in any EU documents, or as a last resort give us a link to a Wikipedia article on it.
I say this is simply a case of MS licensing strong-arm tactics.
"EU laws say "maschines sold to privat users must include an OS""
Can you be specific about that?
AFIK this was something MS insisted on to get good DOS/Windows pricing for OEM deals, which of coure all the big PC vendors want. You can buy a PC from small custom-build PC shops without an OS, so I smell BS here.
Laptop screens are crap
Really, its true. The "best" of almost all (excluding Apple retina) are 1080 lines, that is poorer than my 17" CRT monitor of 10 years ago! Almost gone are the 1200 line models or 4:3 aspect ratio, both much better for everything except watching DVDs. But that is cheap, so the computing industry has gone to using TV screens instead of 'better'.
I would be perfectly happy with normal (i.e. non-retina) resolution if I could get more height, but today you pay stupid prices for an "ultrabook" that has less display area then my father's ancient el-cheapo 15" 4:3 laptop.
I for one am not buying!
Re: Why a file system...
Of course there is also other tasks such as security & auditing, etc, that a file system currently performs. The memory management of most CPUs can also enforce access control but there is still some need for a structure & metadata to match.
Why a file system...
The problem with flash memory, which it shares with HDD in many ways, is it is block-orientated. Also the block erase operation is many orders of magnitude slower than a read. The job of organising reads and writes in to blocks is one task of a file system.
The other, of course, is to provide the organisation of said blocks in to logical entities as files, and to do so in a manner that is reasonably fault tolerant of (partial) media failure or unexpected crash/power-off events.
Until someone has NV memory that can be word-addressed for writing without the erase speed penalty and the limited write numbers of flash, it still makes sense to treat 'storage' and 'memory' as different things. You could have fancy RAM caching over flash with battery back-up so it can be committed to NV storage on an unexpected event, but I guess we already have that with a laptop's suspend feature.
Re: How do they not get this?
Same here - the only laptop I could find with a decent screen so far is the Apple retina with 16:10 and high resolution, but very high price and I am deeply unimpressed by the "features" such as glued-in battery and no standard Ethernet port.
The Chromebook with another version of Linux on it is looking more like it, but really why can't I buy anything that has a decent vertical size/resolution any more?
Yes, I know they all use TV screens and pass on the cost saving which is why the new ultrabooks are so affordable. Oh, did I get that wrong? Damn :(
Re: So Long
Apparently she is moving it to something involving tentacles, my initial thoughts involved a speciality Japanese form of cartoon, but sadly probably not :(
<= Still, have a virtual one from me
Not working is not the problem
My problem is when some IQ=80 thief thinks it will work! The loss of my hand is far, far more worrying than my bank account.
Re: @Graham Newton
Also the arcing problem tends to be during out-gas when the pressure get low, and you have high electric fields (e.g. radio transmitter filters with high Q resonators). Less of a problem one you really have near-vacuum.
I wondered about that - more specifically about the phone's battery still being fitted and/or out-gassing from the LCD panel.
No - saviour of the universe!
An alternate one, at least to here...
Re: XP Holdouts
Good enough for some, not everyone needs >= 4GB memory.
You have old apps that only work on XP and/or you can't re-licence for a new OS.
You are not a geek so see spending money for OS changes, most of which you suspect your won't like, is not worth it compared to other choices.
<= other choice.
My HTC phone sucks them regularly due to its crap software, so being full of inviting orifices for those indulging in nefarious activities comes as no surprise.
Really, why is crap security not an issue that has a basic legal basis by now? I know you can never be 100% secure/safe by design, but so much of today's products (generally the software, but not always) are pushed out as utter crap with hope/promise/day of unicorns coming that things will be fixed.
It is about time that security should be an automatic liability unless the supplier can show (with a straight face) that reasonable care and good practice has been followed in the design, implementation, and testing of the product.
So how to customers get refunded?
I guess this single outage trashes their SLA promises of uptime over the coming year, so what happens now for the customers? Do they get a year's refund or free?
Yes, I know its online somewhere but could not be arsed looking up the legalise...
Re: Where are all my files? <whimper>
I almost suffered badly from a simpler mistake, but logged in as an ordinary user thankfully not much happened. I was lucky that time, so don't try this folks:
chmod -R <somesetting> .*
I wanted to change settings on all hidden files/directories in my home folder, but I had not anticipated that '..' is also a match to '.*' and so the recursive application went UP a directory then down everyone else's home!
So think VERY CAREFULLY about wildcard/regex matches before doing something like this, and maybe test on a begin action before something almost irreversible like rm/chmod/chown.
Re: There are so many reasons...
I think for (1) they mean outside of their company.
For (2) please provide more, most of the stuff I have seen mentioned is only secure between your PC and the servers, not 'secure' on their servers in the sense of encrypted by a key they do not hold. Also when it comes to encryption I would ONLY trust an open source implementation of the client side, otherwise how can you check at all if it has a back door? (Yes, I know there could be subtle flaws introduced to make GCHQ/NSA/etc's job easier, but its about the best you can ask for).
(3) depends on your business, for some work yes it is but for a lot of design and manufacturing work you can work quite well (in some cases better!) without an internet connection for a day or so.
Re: LArge Screen TVs
Either way, if it is an affordable laptop with a decent screen size/resolution and can run some non-Google Linux distro then I am interested.
Re: preferably with BBQ sauce
Or baby oil...
That is a perfectly good question for any non-Linux user and it is disappointing to see that someone down-voted you for it.
As a general rule, you have two options for installing software on a Linux box:
1) Use the supplied package manager such as aptitude to get it from one of the original repositories, or from one that you have added.
2) Install directly from a file such as the .deb ones used for Debian-based systems (such as Ubuntu).
In the first case you are limited to what is officially offered for your system, but it will automatically handle any updates and their dependencies. You can configure what it will do, and for my own machine I choose to be notified and install manually, for my friends/family I chose to update security stuff automatically.
In the second case you can install ANYTHING and of course that needs the usual (and often missing) sense of what is safe or otherwise to install. Unless said .deb file adds a repository automatically (as Opera do), it is up to you to manage updates.
In general it is a good system, not perfect, but an order of magnitude better than Windows where critical updates such as Adobe stuff can't use MS' own update system and so pollute the machine with updaters, all gobbling resources and giving non-technical users gibberish messages that they either accept blindly (good for malware writers) or ignore (also good for malware writers!).
MS' market place system should avoid that, but has all sorts of dubious side-effects where money and freedom are related (as iOS also has).
Re: Lots Of IT Propaganda Whores Here
"the pinko-liberal new-age dream"
Forgive me if my understanding of US politics is not up there, but I thought the whole outsourcing idea was very much a Republican/right-wing system to profit the few at the top (i.e. shareholders / CEO), rather than the workers? (usually the "pinko" term is applied to what would be middle/left in the UK politics).
As for VLWI based machines, I used some TI DSP based on that some years ago and found that the compiler technology was piss-poor in delivering anything like the promised performance. It needed tedious hand-optimisation of C code and/or the "sorry, life if too short" resort of assembler (after learning the architecture inside-out) to get there.
In my humble opinion, dropping the Alpha was possible HP's worst move of all if they had any intention of being in the non-commodity hardware business.
Clearly the #1 motive for any business is making money. So when a company is keen to move you to a different way of paying, there can only be one who really benefits.
If you have a copy of Office already, there is little new to act as an incentive to change. The 'cloud' aspect is dubious - all your private data in a US company's hands for a start - which you can already do in a more flexible way with Dropbox and others.
For business use Office is more or less needed to allow document exchange for editing and all of the strange automation that folk have built up over the years. For final documents, you can save as PDF and get a print-final version that just works.
For a family use, and if you really need lots of copies, then OpenOffice / LibreOffice are OK and have PDF save already. Really, why pay for occasional home use for the odd letter or spread sheet calculation?
"the Oric - the name, conjured up by Tullis from a partial anagram of ‘micro’"
Was it not taken from Orac, the supercomputer with a 'personality' of Blake's 7 fame?
Funny, my "retail, perpetual-license version" has served me well since ~2000 and is better value than the on-line version, plus I don't have to share my work with a US company.
Since discovering vmplayer would run my old w2k machine better than the old dying hardware ever did, I am happy. Now if they offered office for Linux, minus the ribbon (how hard would that option be?) then I might be willing to pay again...
I'm sorry, I got through the article to the point when it said "the hallways at Microsoft were no longer home to barefoot programmers in Hawaiian shirts working through nights and weekends toward a common goal of excellence" and I realised it was bollocks!
Almost - what is needed is to get rid of the 16:9 fixation as that, as much as the stupid 1080 line fixation, is what leads to laptops and monitors having crap vertical screen size.
Getting twice the resolution on currently popular screen dimensions is not really what I need as my eyes age.
" they ran fine on MIPS, Power and Alpha"
I know that Windows NT ran fine on those machines' CPUs, but was Office every offered for them? And in "full fat" mode with all of the VB scripting, etc, that makes them such a dependency for a lot of businesses?
The 64-bit point made by another commentard is less of an issue, as we know that most 32-bit software would run OK on 64-bit Windows (though not all of the 16-bit stuff).
(p.s. this is a genuine question, not simple trolling)
Funny coincidence. I didn't buy an ultrabook with crap screen resolution in 2012 either, and I doubt I will in 2013. I am looking for at least 1200 lines, and that seems rate to the point of being all but extinct in the laptop world.
Unless of course I get a macbook retina and even higher price (and no Ethernet port either!). Or a medium priced fondleslab. Oh dear, looks like I will have to spend my money on fast women and loose cars instead.
Re: Most people will stick with Windows 7
Most people don't care about a PC, or its OS. As already said, outside of serious gamers and El Reg readers a PC is more or less "white goods" now. For most other the iPad is still today's "shiny" and various Android fondleslabs a good and economical alternative.
Really, what is Windows 8 going to bring to most users that is a compelling reason to upgrade? If anything, the Windows trademark is associated with work & malware to the general public and not a selling point.
Business use is different, where Windows is often needed for specialist or legacy software, but even there going to 8 is not as appealing as XP -> 7 is, even then money is tight. So weak sales are hardly a surprise!
Re: We had a Gateway tower
We also bought a few Gateways, decent enough machines and strange black-and-white cow boxes. Mine lasted from ~1998 to ~2002 at work then a friend "inherited" it for home use. Lasted a good few years after that (few malware infestations aside).
Re: Hardly the scientific approach is it?
Well you could look at the teenage pregnancy statistics for the last 20 years to see how much impact t'Internet has had and you will see it is terrible!
Actually, no, it has dropped slightly in the last few years. Kind of puts a dampener on all of this Pornogeddon "think of the children" rhetoric we hear from DM reading politicians. But since when has fact-based policy been used by either party?
<= Our esteemed leaders.
Re: I'm not to sure...
Personally I think you can't trust ANYONE with your own data, and at least Mega are going to encrypt by default (unlike dropbox, etc) so their staff (and anyone working with them, sizing the hardware, disposing of old HDD, etc) can't easily access YOUR data.
So fine for sharing/syncing but like all of the other "cloud" services, plan for a sunny day and have your own backup copy!
This Reader X you talk of - not available for Linux I see, as my copy of Adobe's bloat (used for cases when Evince is not OK) seems to be stuck on bug-riddled version 9.
So yes, they have learned from Microsoft by taking a cross-platform product and dropping support for all but Windows and (no doubt reluctantly) MacOS.
Re: There isn't enough porn in the world.
Then we must make more!
I would second your suggestion!
Adapt NTP to offer TIA along with some ways(s) of getting leap second and UT1-UTC information (either in NTP packet if small enough, or several redundant web sites with it in a standard machine-readable ASCII format, etc), then practically everything you ever need to do time-wise is sorted! No leap second problems, time differences easily computed in either civil (UTC) or real (TIA) cases, etc.
Alternatively, some companies might just allow interoperability with open & free standards to build up a supporting 'ecosystem' around some new product, rather than trying to gouge others for all they can?
Oh I don't know, like TCP/IP?
Re: I'm wondering ...
I have no problem with some sort of electronic ID for paying for meals, but I can't see why she has to ware it all of the time, nor do I see why it should EVER have been something related to visiting the bathroom.
Really, how come for decades we all managed to grow up in schools with little more than a blackboard & chalk for technology? It seems this is a self-serving waste of money attempting to deal with societies ills by walking to an Orwellian nightmare.
Re: I'm wondering ...
I wondered the same - if she can go without RFID tracking then why the hell not without the lanyard?
Or would that give other kids the idea they could be free of big-bother oppression, which clearly will never do?
Why should the OS age matter in terms of being patched correctly? If anything, the older code should be better understood and so less likely to have problems.
Re: You got the title wrong...
All OS suck donkey balls, you just have to sit down and decide if you want warty, hairy or crusty.
Office for Linux?
Really, I would pay £100-200 for a proper working version of Office for Linux (minus the ribbon, which should have been a user-choice against traditional menus). Would save me having to run a windows VM for that.
How long until they do it for iOS? That is a real market (even if you think Linux users are all freetards) and the only reason I can see for them not doing it is to protect Windows and try to encourage it for fondleslabs. They might regret that...
Cisco of course is immune to Chinese tampering. What, you mean they are made in China as well? Tell me its not so!
<= for the hard of thinking.
I don't know, but think the tactile feedback of a real keyboard is nice and not likely to be easily replaced. Same goes for a mouse versus touchscreen - mouse wins for precision any day.
Having said that, the masses for whom the main players target their sales may have other ideas, and thus lead us all to a crappy solution.
Can I use this post as another opportunity to complain about 1920×1080 as being crap? Sadly the market for HD TVs seems to have squeezed out better screens, with Apple offering better but not in my OS/price range.
Re: This is 2013, manufacturers. Get with the program.
We have some old-ish MGE UPS and they are also incompetently designed.
For example, there are some features/parameters you can set using the Windows software that you can't do on the Mac or (now missing?) Linux versions, and what is more stunningly stupid is you can't do it by network at all! Yes, so unless you have a Windows box directly connected by RS232 to the head, your UPS in the far away data centre is crippled by design for network control/monitoring even though it runs a web server.
Incidentally, do you know of anyone who makes HDD with programmable faults (bad sectors, silent bad sectors, read/write faults, etc) to test RAID systems more easily?
I know there is an option in Linux software RAID to put in a fault layer for debugging RAID stuff, but it would be nice to have an HDD (or SAS/SATA in-line thing) that could emulate typical hardware faults to test 'black box' systems.
How good is the protection?
Having read the article, it is clear the author like the thing, even though it has a dumb-ass design of needing OS-specific management software. Compared to the various NAS I have used which have a web interface, that is just such a backward move and limits your choice of OS.
But the linked article told us nothing about how "BeyondRAID" works, only the sort of thing it is supposed to do better. Further more some of the points made, such as disk swapping/order, have not been an issue on hardware or software RAID for years now. When anyone makes up a fancy marketing name like this, and you see little about what it actually does, my BS detector starts to twitch.
So far (I guess?) you have had no HDD fail so presumably you don't know how well it handles real-life failures? Has the unit got support for periodic disk scrubbing? Have you tested it with double parity and pulling/replacing one disk, and during the rebuild pulling and replacing another? (with something like ZFS on the iSCSI allocations so you can check the file's integrity afterwards)
- +Comment Trips to Mars may be OFF: The SUN has changed in a way we've NEVER SEEN
- OnePlus One cut-price Android phone on sale to all... for 1 HOUR
- MARS NEEDS WOMEN, claims NASA pseudo 'naut: They eat less
- UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
- Back to the ... drawing board: 'Hoverboard' will disappoint Marty McFly wannabes