You are talking about a US trillion here, which is a UK billion.
Thanks, mine is the one with the operator's manual to the Milliard Gargantubrain...
1994 posts • joined 15 Mar 2007
You are talking about a US trillion here, which is a UK billion.
Thanks, mine is the one with the operator's manual to the Milliard Gargantubrain...
I though most girls did, but of the 'AA' size.
Indeed, I still have (and prefer) my fx-570c to a newer model that tries to do things in some sort of procedural way (i.e. you have to enter 'sin' '0.5' '=' and not that stack-based '0.5' 'sin' sort of way).
I prefer the stack-style as often you compute something, and then want its log, etc, and it is annoying not to just press 'log' and get the result of computing it on what is currently on display.
"Microsoft Office Web Apps is also perfectly adequate"
Maybe, but you still don't need Windows to use it, nor the ability (AFIK) to install anything locally, so a Chromebook is still usable with that.
Very true, as we do have time outside of "work", at least sometimes.
Have an upvote & beer!
Chrome OS is not really for the average El Reg reader, it is targeted at Joe Average for home use when all they really need is web access for shopping, web mail, facebook, youtube, etc.
If you are technical and inquisitive you probably run Linux or something more bizarre already.
If you are in the "creative" industries and have the money you probably have a Mac to run Photoshop, etc.
If your corporate balls are in MS' vice with Active Directory, Exchange and heavy Office use you are obviously going to use x86 Windows. Same for various special applications like CAD, etc, where you have no choice.
Home users who need Win 8 & Office are already rushing out to buy WinRT tablets. Oh wait...
I would hardly say "crippled" as it appears to do what it was intended, be a cheap way of gaining web access and running a selection of light tasks that is probably enough for most home use.
You can get other Chromebooks with 4GB and bigger SSD for around the £250 mark, so if it really matters go for one of those.
After all, this sort of design won't be bloated in time with AV software running and lots of pointless toolbars and auto-updating software that can't use the OS' mechanism for updates, unlike certain well known alternatives.
Poor attempt at trolling.
Incidentally, who cares about MS Office for home use? For the odd letter Google docs is perfectly adequate, and most folk would have a lot more fun with the £200 or so for Win 8 + Office than pointless formatting.
Unless, of course, you are the sort of person who just has to write letters in green ink with odd fonts to make a point?
Here, have a beer and hope your MS fixation gets better in 2014.
True, as I bought a replacement printer for a friend who had been sold a Lexmark and discovered it would cost more for a set of inks than a new Epson (that took 3rd party cartridges, unlike the Lexmark).
Oh very safe indeed, as they have another back-up held off site.
In an unmarked building.
That no one publicly knows exists...
Yes it is low, but it is also small and pretty cheap, so it has *some* excuse for that choice.
Also I personally hate Caps-lock keys, as I am a poor typer and sometimes find I hAVE TYPED A LOT IN CAPS having hit it accidentally when going for the 'A' key. I see little use for that function in this day and age of simply putting titles in bold or larger fonts. Good to see it used for something else, but ideally just get rid of it (or make it smaller and further from the 'A' key).
As for printing, that is a pain not being easy to do locally. While I find it a rare need, it is sometimes needed for boarding passes, Groupon vouchers, etc.
Yes, most families who may be interested already had a fondleslab and/or couple of phones, so era of mega-growth (OK, lest say kilo-growth) is over.
Incoming news about bears...
It is also relative. You have to remember the moon is surprisingly dark (albedo around 0.12, similar to worn asphalt according to Wikipedia).
It is the MS way - buy over a successful multi-platform product, then crapify it by making it only work on Windows, and often then not as good as before. Then profit!
"All hardware is full of gaping holes"
Not quite, but we are in a position where most systems are so complex they are beyond our collective ability to understand fully to make them properly secure. Add in to that the secrecy of the 'propitiatory' BIOS and HDD firmware and there is little chance to easily detect against boot-time root kits introduced by those means.
"I will bring the beans."
Just no making me squeal like a piggy, OK?
The underlying problem with IP rights, both in 'the individual' case and in the behaviour of traditional media, is that it relies on actually fighting such problems through the courts. And that costs money. Serious money.
Add to the the financial penalties which, in the US at least, are ruinous to an individual but petty cash to a billion pound business, and you start to see why it is fairly hard for any individual to challenge, but easy for industries (and or their representation groups such as the MPAA, etc) to threaten small innovative players into obedience or destroy them.
Short of settlements being means-based (say 0.1% of one's worth, so few thousand for an individual but maybe millions for a big business or a group they back), and making the court process faster and cheaper, that is hardly going to redress the situation we find ourselves in.
As for the spooks, well they get laws made up to suit what they want to do, so none of this would make any difference.
"...as nothing is more apt to imperil civil liberties than the success of a terrorist attack on American soil"
9/11 attack deaths = 2,977 (+ 19 hijackers)
US road deaths = 34,080 (for 2012)
US Gun related deaths = around 32,000 (of those, around 60% are suicides).
Really, it is OK to do ANYTHING in the name of anti-terrorist actions, but damn all about the real killers?
It will be good if MS drops to around 1/2-1/3 of new sales, but no less, as that way all main OS (Windows, Linux, MacOS) should get decent support by peripheral suppliers and be designed to begin with for that goal. And that is a good thing for everyone.
"all those people who continually bash Linux"
I think you will find this is the same sad AC that always comes up with this sort of thing. Why AC you might ask? Presumably so it is not easy to see their posting history as that would reveal it. At least the knob-end that was EADON was up front about his anti-MS rants.
Next thing they will be telling you, again without actual facts, that Windows is much more secure, etc.
Welcome AC, now just you go and enjoy your lovely working copy of Windows with its _NSAKEY built in, nice to be pre-lubed, eh?
History is a funny thing, and you have to considered carefully why things are the current way. They brought back Charles II in 1658 after Cromwell's death because it was considered better to have a monarch with prescribed powers (largely ceremonial since) than a Lord Protector with no limits.
Looking at it another way, she was actually around at the time of his conviction, so is that not a better choice to offer a pardon?
And it gives less opportunity for the slime-ball that is Dave Cameron to appear 'good'.
Sadly what I think is needed are new liability laws that make software and device manufacturers liable for failing to fix disclosed bugs in a reasonable time scale and for, say, five years after the device was on sale.
I'm looking at, for example you HTC, for your crappy phones with little or no updates, and you, most phone networks, who add all sorts of crapware and then don't pass on any underlying OS bug-fixes because of that.
And also without causing endless trouble for users by the fix being incompatible and needing a "factory reset". I mean, come on Android (and others) you are using an underlying OS that already supports modular updates and bug fixes (and has done for years and years). Why, oh why, can't you use that mechanism?
Sadly all GUI developers seem to be suffering the same syphilitic brain problem of removing anything and everything of use, and hiding the remaining features in stupid non-obvious places.
Desktop morons abound (Gnome 3, to a large extent Unity, Win8 TIFKAM).
Web browser morons abound (Firefox, Chrome, etc all removing menus and options that you might actually want to use).
Cloud services buggering around the same way, like Google's docs, etc, having things make more Fisher-Price and hiding them behind icons that mean nothing (WTF is the matrix of squares that now pops up the other services supposed to represent?)
A pox on them all :(
XP in a VM is isolated from underlying changes to hardware or, by and large, to the host operating system. You could use Win7/8 or any one of a range of Linux distros, depending on your use-case and licensing costs, etc.
In my experience the XP VM runs as well, if not better, under Linux as natively (intensive graphics aside) and you can save & restore from backup in minutes if corrupted. You can also have several VM, each with different software that won't play happy together, and run the one you need at a given time.
As such, you can also run RAID on the host machine for better availability, etc, and the workings of that need not concern the VM, it just sees the virtual disk as a file stored somewhere.
As for time, skill, etc, needed, well this is El Reg and folk here are discussing how they choose to solve things. If you don't know then find someone who can advise and implement, and pay them for it. Simplez!
"tied to the MAC of the network card in said computer"
In that case a VM of XP might be your saving, as you can then assign a MAC address matching the original card to it. Of course, if it used other hardware factors (e.g. C: drive serial number, etc) that may not work, but it is well worth trying.
While I can't speak for the AC above, my own reasons for sticking with "old software" vary, in some cases the cost is sometimes just not worth it when it is hardly used and/or not business critical.
But more often it is not the "few thousand" for a new copy/license, it is the years of work and business processes that are disrupted by the new version being different in subtle through to bloody annoying ways. That can cost WAY more than the new version would.
Also the node-locking may not be tied to the physical machine, more likely it is a parallel port dongle on an XP box that serves the software (like one of my CAD packages). A new PC with an additional parallel port card may solve hardware failures with much less disruption than a complete change, but moving from W2k/XP could be far more difficult.
My own choice is to run XP in a VM and then it need not have full, if any, internet access.
The host machine can be your choice of course, but mine is Linux for a range of reasons. Without wanting to start yet another pointless OS willy-waving contest, my own reasons are freedom (both as in speech and as in beer) and the far smaller number of attacks. Most of the stuff I need runs fine (email & web, compilers, etc) and the Windows-specific stuff can stay in the VM.
Should the VM get hosed, then it is deleted and the backup uncompressed in minutes. Should my host hardware change, well the VM need not care and mostly the recent Linux distros "just work".
Sure it is not perfect, and unskilled staff need training to master the "two computers in one" setup, but then if you change from XP to Win 7 (or God forbid Win 8's TIFKAM) then you have a lot of training as well to deal with anyway.
Of course, with a suitably fitted tin-foil hat, I could postulate that Intel CPUs keep a cache of recent AES keys that can be accessed by some secret instructions so that user code can reveal them in a way that software implementations of AES could not.
You would need native code execution to exploit this, of course, which is hard to do outside of a few US-friendly suppliers of, for example, web browsers. Oh yes, there is Adobe Flash after all on some 90% of machines...
"AES is an official American encryption standard"
You seem to have forgotten the part where it was created by Belgian cryptographers and subject to estensive world-wide analysis before being adopted. That is how it should be (but not always Belgian, unless we are looking at a two-horse race with the Swiss for chocolate).
If you were pointing at the dodgy elliptical curve standard, or the secret Intel random number generator, then you would have a valid point...
I beg to differ here.
We know the NSA, GCHQ, etc, are spies, that is their jobs. And if they occasionally asked for secret 'favours' of big companies in their home lands we would not be terribly surprised either, nor be calling for action.
No the big point here, and I mean BIG POINT, is the sheer scale of their involvement and apparent contempt for the spirit of the law (even if they can wriggle out of prosecution).
Basically they treat us all as criminals and have weakened or subverted the very standards that were supposed to protect us. It time we are sure to find organised crime, or other nations, using those same flaws against us.
It is good to see IBM and other major US companies taking a multi-billion dollar hammering, as money sadly is only thing that seems to make politicians act these days.
I can see the efficiency of block level sync, and ZFS support replication using the same principles, but my own paranoia is that a software/firmware bug on one that trashes file systems is then block-replicated to another much as RAID would do between disks.
While that is a low probability, it still makes me happier with the option of making snapshots and syncing the file system across. Of course, no gain if you are using a block-style access (iSCSI or raw database sort of thing).
It is odd to see how a NAS could break the disk short of a major overheat.
However, I have had a number of 1TB Samsung HDD die on me, typically they would go off-line (SATA time-out, even SMART not showing status) and need a power cycle reset then come back with all data OK, but the up-time was getting shorter and shorter so I swapped them for other HDD and let the RAID rebuilds deal with it.
"In the end they got Vista more-or-less working properly"
Yes, and then they sold it as Windows 7 rather than upgrading the poor suckers who had been visted.
You seem to be mistaking stealing, where you deprive the owner of their property (a criminal act), with copyright infringement, where an unauthorised copy is made but the original is still there (a civil act).
You also seem not to have comprehended that this was about saving a copy of a video stream that, I am guessing, you already paid for. So it is not even depriving the copyright holder of revenue, but simply doing what is perfectly legal in other cases (see the judgement(s) in respect to the original VCR use) and what most people see as "fair use".
That "three line post" is but a continuation of the same tedious vague claims made by (most probably) the same AC over and over again.
Just as tedious as those who claim Linux in invincible to every Windows hole found.
Most folk are not El Reg readers, they just buy some modem thingy from the local store and plug it and it just works! Great!
Of course, no Wi-Fi password and default admin log-in, but why make it hard for your users then would have to support them?
Ah yes, a report from 2010 is conclusive evidence of Linux vs Windows today?
And did you actually read it?
"But should be the out-of-date Linux server the only reason of this huge amount of defacements?
Yes and no.
We were talking about local kernel exploits, but the first problem is in the website code. For example, we received too many single defacements due a remote upload flaw in OsCommerce CMS, that allows the defacers to upload anything to the CMS folder without a proper credential check. When this flaw became public, the developers had a too much time to fix it, but the fix appeared few months later. Pity.
Year after year, the developers are still coding by an unsafely, keeping tons of the remote and local file inclusion and the SQL injections, that the attackers use as the first step to gain the access into the server OS."
That read to me as if the web developers and tools are the biggest part in such attacks. But hey, you don't care when having a good rant?
True, 1080 is not that much, but:
(A) This is a £340-ish thing, not a near £1k ultrabook with piss-poor 900 lines.
(B) There is very little above 1080, some monitors have 1200/1440/1600 but cost £300/500/1000 sort of price for the monitor alone.
Overall I am impressed by this and can see it suiting a range of folk for basic computing needs, particularly for the likes of my elderly parents for whom even a 15" wide screen laptop display is simply too small, and for whom paying >£1k for a 17" laptop is just not on.
At this sort of size it is not just a fondle, more of an orgyslab...
None of your new-fangled pentodes, sir! We want triodes, and bright emitter ones at that!
I was in PC World recently (UK box shifter of computer & TVs etc) and noticed that there was about 3 times as many customers looking at the range of Apple & Android devices as were looking at Windows laptops, even though the latter has over twice the space allocated to it.
Of course, that may not match actual sales.
Have an up-vote for "Tiles 8.11 for fondlegroups"
The Ride of the Valkyries played on banjos - now that was scary!
I hope this is picked up in the USA as they have class-action lawsuits to make it worth while for the lawyers to go after them for compensation.
Sadly the worst likely to happen here is a ICO slap on the wrists. I hoped the BBC and so on would cover it on national TV, that would be fitting punishment for the company - to have its amoral behaviour aired the way its customers where being aired.
Better than the goatse one they almost chose for the London Olympics:
I think this is the point of the cynicism. MS so much want people to support WindowsRT and then can't be arsed to do it themselves, that says a lot.
Really, they gouge you on everything they can, to the extent of locking out rival SFP units "because they can":
If they had a supported list that included any rival's products then you might have believed the quality assurance bullsh*t...
Really, when the US gov can ask in secret for the data and pretty much compel any US-related business to comply, what is the point in them huffing and puffing and putting in SSL links that, most likely, use a certificate that is from a potentially compromised issuer?
The issue behind all of this is judicial oversight, or more precisely the lack of. We, the public, should expect privacy unless there is "probable cause" for investigation, and that should be properly signed off by a judge after considering the supporting evidence and not rubber-stamped en mass and in secret.
Fix that, USA, and maybe some trust will return. Until then everyone should treat all USA-based companies as fundamentally compromised.
Do they also allow you to export all your data on to HDDs to move to another provider if needed?