I will bow to your superior knowledge @cray74. I have never had the privilege of touring or ever seeing a B-52 in the flesh, so most of my knowledge is based on Dr. Strangelove....
519 posts • joined 28 Nov 2007
I will bow to your superior knowledge @cray74. I have never had the privilege of touring or ever seeing a B-52 in the flesh, so most of my knowledge is based on Dr. Strangelove....
It wasn't perpendicular, it was at an angle. the angle was calculated to have the maximum chance of at least one bomb hitting the runway.
In these days of precision guided weapons it difficult to remember the bombs the Vulcan were using were not any more accurate than the ones used in the 2nd world war. They slightly better radar and computers, but not much better.
Dropping 10000ft meant it would not take much of a change in wind speed to cause the entire stick to miss the target, so they decided on the least risk strategy.
I also disgree that it had no effect on the war. The fact the RAF proved they could launch missions at such range, meant the Argentinian air force was forced to keep more planes on the mainland in case of attack on the air fields there.
If you get a chance to climb into the Vulcan cockpit (at EMA aeropark they have open days), do so. You will be surprised by disparity between the size of plane and the crew compartment, which is let us say, snug.
None of the huge acerage that the yanks have in the b-52, which makes the black buck missions even more remarkable.
Went to see her for the last time at EMA Aeropark.
She's a sprightly girl for a lady of 55 and it was a privilege to see her for the last time.
I doubt we will see her like again. The costs of keeping some complicated machines flying means there will probably never be a equivalent project in the future. Congratulations to the Vulcan to the sky team for keeping her going this long.
Sorry, but you don't really understand the law - which is a bit alarming even for a hobby photographer.
That's because I'm not a copyright lawyer, I do have some standards. I would take a bet that 95% of photographers have little or no understanding of copyright law. After all it's a hobby that causes no harm to anyone, why should we spend time studying law texts?
As most photographers I use the law of common sense. Don't trespass on private property, avoid taking photos around military installations and parks where children might be playing and be polite and courteous to all around you.
This is the problem with copyright law(yes I have studied it a little bit). Once you manage to dis-entangle it, it makes little common sense, so goes against most peoples expectations. That is a crucial test of a good law.
You may be being hassled under terrorism laws, but that is nothing to do with copyright.
No, but it is an example where laws are misused to restrict rights that people widely believe they hold. Copyright law is often used in the same way.
The "freedom of panorama" doesn't need "saving", as this is not a legislative proposal.
I think Mr Orlowski has (and not for the 1st time) missed the point.
I'm no expert on the EU legislative process (who is), but a number of facts stand out.
The MEP made an attempt to hamonise the law on the side of the artist in terms of who owns the copyright of public buildings. This was turned round so that the proposed legislation would actually go in the opposite direction.
There is a fair chance that this will never become law and be squashed in the many stages it probably has to go through. However that is no reason why every attempt should be made to squash any possibility flat before it has a chance of being born.
As a hobby photographer I find it has become more and more common to be hassled when trying to take images in towns and cities. Legislation that was designed for anti-terrorism has become a catch all to stop anyone with a camera taking photos by any security guard with a Napoleon complex. What we desperately need is greater clarification about the rules on photography in public places. Any whiff of any legislation that affects those rights should be stomped on quicker than a wasp trying to sup your beer.
There is a online petition if you agree
I think the challenge for that sort of application would be the brightness and resolution. Most of the e-ink colour displays I've seen make the image look like its been dipped in mud. Also e-photo frames don't need to be portable, so battery life is not a great issue(if you wanted to save power connect a sensor that turns the display off when no ones around.)
I've had a kindle e-reader for years, the one with Whispernet(does that still work?) and physical page turn buttons. I bought it originally as a e-reader, but also so I could access the internet while camping(I was too poor/tight to afford a smartphone in those days).
This instantly showed the limitations of e-ink, in that web browsing was a frustrating experience(however it did so the benefit of having a always connected clod device). However as a e-reader it has been great, and generally I use it when flying because I know that I won't be eeking out it's battery life at the end of a 8 hour flight(I also like the fact it is not touch screen. Physical buttons are far better for page flipping).
However it has its limitations. While it is great for text based literature, it is is generally useless for anything technical in nature. The small screen size and the tendency to re-format pages on a ad-hoc basis means that code examples or technical diagrams tend to be distribute haphazardly or badly rendered.
I had high hopes for the A4 reader that Plastic Logic were promising to bring out in the day, but that turned out to be vapourware. I still think a low power A4 device would be great for schools and university if the price was low enough, but now you can get a perfectly usable A4 android tablet for less than £200 maybe that market has gone
Anyone remember the great egg race? These sort of challenges bring back warm memories when engineering involved more than minecraft
I live near Donington Park. By the end of the festival you will have trouble identifying the species never mind what their face looks like
As long as there have been telegraphs, there has been tapping...
Electronic espionage is just an extension of the age old practices. For example Queen Elizabeth I security services would intercept sealed messages, copy them down and re-seal them.
I remember going there too, although I wasn't aware it was Will Hay's old place. Some impressive instruments, but terrible location. I remember one problem they commented on was getting Mercury lines on their spectrum caused by the local football grounds floodlights.
However I was impressed by the CCD one student had built housed in a old bake bean tin...
well, that's a good question and complicated that they may be the same individual i.e an employee, may also be a shareholder and a customer.
But let's assume the majority of the shareholders are not employees, just people who are using the shares as an investment. They don't in any way contribute to the success of the company, instead ride on the company coat tails. In fact you could argue they can reduce the success of a company by indulging in short term speculation which results in a lack of long term strategic thinking from the company involved, for example paying large dividends to maintain the share price rather than investing in R&D, infrastructure or retaining key employees.
Once the original shareholding has been sold, are new shareholders really investors, or more equivalent to parasites riding their host and trying to suck out it's life?
Ok, an increase in shareprice may have some benefit to a company, but if I buy shares in company A, what benefit does that accrue to the company. Presumably they don't get a cut of that money?
Jobs wasn't the messiah, he was a very naughty CEO...
Had a blue-ray player for about 2 years. Bought it when the DVD went pfft, and it was only £5 greater, so i though why not.
Since then it has never seen a blue-ray disk. On the rare occasion when i do buy a DVD, I look at the price difference and think what's the point. Yes it may display a bit clearer, but it won't make the acting, script, special effects any better.
If I would to see a film in hi-def I goto the cinema.
I think it was P.J O'Rourke who said that the right wing are always more sexy because no-one ever fantasized about woman standing over them with a whip dressed in a liberal uniform
well an interesting article, and it's so nice for El Reg to become the UKIP's mouthpiece. Of course this is not the BBC so I won't hold my breath waiting for the opposite piece for balance.
But still he nailed his colours to the mast early unlike some daily express article pretending to be balanced, so lets see what we've got
"The economic effect of leaving the EU would also be nothing"
Interesting, so basically he is saying that the EU has no effect on our economy? So why is everyone getting upset? I on the other hand contend that there will be an effect, I just don't know whether it would be positive or negative. Unlike pollsters and economists, I don't pretend to have crystal ball. What I do think, working for a major multi-national is that it will will be worse for me because the UK may look like a less attractive place to invest. But's that's just me. All I can say is that the reason why the UK joined in the 1st place is that the EU region economies were growing faster than hours. Since we joined the rate as evened out. Causation or Correlation. Sorry not qualified to comment.
"the EU is a political system "
Fine, but that assumes that trade is not a political issue. Trade barriers, import duties, even harmonization of things like capital gains tax are political artifacts.The difficulties is defining where trade ends and local politics begins. the truth is with globalization it is very fuzzy line when trade embargoes can be the goto weapon of choice against countries you don't like.
" Britain pays into the general funds very much more than it gets out"
True on a simple balance sheet type of analysis. But there is of course the other things like access to European programs like those involved in science. Also how do define the cost of influence? It really is not that simple.
"a free market and free trade economy becomes more and more efficient. And more efficient is a synonym for the people getting richer, for GDP rising"
Efficient. Nice word. Free trade marketeers are always putting this forward. But efficiency has a price.
China is very efficient, of course you don't have any job protection or health and safety, but everyone's getting richer so that's ok isn't it. Of course not everyone get's richer, but's that's OK as long as your one of the lucky few.
Also we need to look outside the pure economic argument. Being part of th Eu means we are part of a larger club, not just those who can afford it(it is amazing how many anti-EU have villa's in France and Spain). it means my kids will have opportunities to work and live anywhere, and we have access to the best talent in Europe. Personally I'm happy with that. The fact it probably still makes economic sense is just a bonus.
Skylab 4 was an 84 day mission. The astronauts were exposed to about 17 rems cumulative over that time, or 0.17 Grays
I could be wrong here, but wasn't skylab in low earth orbit so was protected from the majority of the nasties by the earths magnetic field? I guess the closest equivalent is the moon missions but of course they only lasted 4 days so it would be difficult to extrapolate to a 2 -3 year mission.
Of course the best way to reduce exposure would be to get them there and back faster....
I had a ZX and a Xsara. I had a total electrical failure in the ZX due to the brilliant design decision to route the engine electrical connector through the top of the bonnet where loose leaves could cause a blockage, causing water to accumulate and submerge the connector in water for a considerable period of time, so rotting the seals.
In the Xsara, it seemed to eat radiators. I went through 3 and then the internal heating sprung a leak meaning I had to drive in a fog(virtually impossible to get to, to fix). Similarly the ZX manifold sprung a leak meaning eventually the aluminum engine had to re-skinned(partly my fault, should of taken it to the garage when I noticed the water level continually getting low)
I now drive a Skoda (imagine admitting to that 15 years ago),and the difference is chalk and cheese. Far more reliable, but the important thing it feels solid, compared to the Citroens which feel like things will come off like some clown car if the hit a bump.
Citroens were always quirky, so you would forgive their foibles. But when they tried to go mainstream, it was harder to forgive their faults, especially when there were better alternatives.
Tory - Cobol - Traditional programming values plus tends only used on Mainframes so that poor people can be stopped from using it
Labour - Java - solves everything, but at a cost
Lib Dem - Scratch - A language for eveyone which never quite seems to do anything useful
UKIP - Assembler on a ICL mainframe - harking back to when Britain had an empire, before these pesky foreigners mucked it up for us
SNP - ML - Scottish languages for Scottish people
Pity he lives in Singapore. My local MP probably thinks C++ is woman's clothing size
It should be mandatory that all leaders know at least two programming languages (and no Mr Cameroon, Miliband,Farage et al, HTML and Word do not count)
"There's free software and then there’s open source,then there is this thing called the GPL, which we disagree with. It creates a license so that nobody can ever improve the software"
It is fantastic to see these images come in and a a great testament to engineers who put this together. As someone who throws things around when his code takes more than 10 seconds to compile,. I can't imagine having to wait 9 years to see if the system would work as planned.
Is it just me, but can you see a lighter patch to the bottom left of Pluto? Can't wait for the close-ups
While I applaud Google attempts to make Chrome more secure, I do wish they treated us as grown-ups.
If after weighing up the risks I want to run a potentially in-secure plug-in I don't see why I cannot be given the option. Why should should Google arbitrate on my level of risk?
I have noticed a number of Intel design wins for Android devices recently, and I wondered what they are making on those. The answer know is clear, nothing or as near to nothing to make no difference.
It is clear they are eating their own tail in order to make a dent into mobile and having limited success
Surely they are "star challenged" galaxies..
About 70 per cent of the world's PCs rely on Intel graphics,
About 70 per cent of the world's PCs put up with Intel graphics,
There is no doubt his character of Spock was a great role model for me. I mean here was a character who was a expert in science and technology, but also could kick serious ass when needed and was a serious babe magnet, without even trying. Up to this point all nerds were played as bumbling boffins in white coats trying to locate their glasses or acne ridden four eyes youths with as much sex appeal as a road accident.
However his later life showed a man of many talents that should not be over shadowed by that one role. Not only a great Actor, but Photographer and Director,
Will be greatly missed, but always remembered LLAP.
Typically I bought a Moto E for my daughter at Christmas. She love it, and has not felt constrained in any way on the present lack of front camera or processing power. So I am sure the new camera would improve a already great little phone. Not sure about whether LTE is important at this price point, although I guess it makes it more future proof.
My only real complaint about the Moto E is the lack of a decent flip case. I love my case on the Moto G, which also switches the phone from standby to online when I open it. I am guessing the Moto E does not have the proper magnetic switches to support that, which is a curious omission considering how much money Motorola must make from accessories markup
We have an incentive to provide new features very quickly, to ship them as they are ready."
Well, that's one way of looking at it
Another way is that developers can get away with doing bugger all, because whatever they produce you are tied to them for life.
At least with the upgrade model, companies had to work hard for our money, now it just rolls in every month whatever they do.
The truth is, if Photoshop had any glimmer of competition out there, there is no way the could support a subscription only model. I wonder how long until they end up like all monopolies, fat and lazy.
I get a little tired of this myth that paying a creative commons licence is somehow good value.
It really depends on what you do. If you work for large company doing advertising images or your buisness involves photographsetc then it might well be. But for the hobbiest photographer it makes far less sense.
For people who already have CS6 it makes no sense, since there despite Adobe's publicity there has been virtually no must have features since the day they turned off the purchase outright option. Apart from UI tweaking it could be argued that there has been no major feature added since CS3
If you do not have a copy, it seems great that you get the latest copy of PS and lightroom for a monthly outgoing. But remember it means that if you have a life event where £110 a year could be useful, that means you lose not only access to software now, but also the ability to access your old files in PS format.
Also do you really need PS CC? If you are a photographer, lightroom will do 95% of the job which you can buy outright. (The reason lightroom has not gone totally CC is that there are plenty of competition out there for Raw processing such as Dx0)
There are only two good reasons for getting PS CC. One is that there is training for virtually every manipulation task out there, but virtually all use PS. If you use GIMP somehow you have to translate the instructions to an alien interface.
Secondly is plug-ins. Plug-ins like the Google Nik collection are in some ways more essential than PS itself. Then again they can also be used in LR.
Personally I use PS CS2 and can do most of the things I want and 99% of the tasks can be achieved without paying blood money to Adobe each month. Hopefully I will get to the point where I can understand photo processing basics enough to ditch PS totally and move to something like Gimp
After watching many episodes of timeteam, it is apparent that any object found with no obvious purpose is instantly cataloged under the global moniker of "object for religious offering or deity veneration"
Saying that, in some cases they may not be too far from the ballpark
hmmm, 2000 years. I have trouble getting some companies to meet there 1 year guarantee obligations.
It will be intresting to see someone try it in 4013 if it turns out not to work.
She should put it on youtube....
I think you'll find that in the last year alone Apple copied the concept of the wearable in the form of a Watch
but have also blown the smartphone world apart with their astonishing discovery that everyone was buying phablets so copied the form factor pioneered by Samsung et al
Fixed it for ya!
Come on, they made it thinner. What more do want?
Sounds exciting...but then again I'm still waiting for MS to release a consumer version of it Table surface product they announced in 2008.....so maybe we are getting ahead of ourselves
1 vote for Battleship. the film that is the very epitome of what is wrong in Hollywood
(P.S to the commentator who voted for waterworld, that is suprisingly watchable, now the Postman is another story ....)
I remember the days when 3D TV's were going to be the next big thing....
Excuse my ignorance but...
Is it any different to keeping a large telescope like the James Webb in a lagrange point, which is the current plan? A relay would be cheaper and as long as you could get 20 years out of it, cost effective to replace
I am not sure why it would need 100's of KW. The fact the signal can be buffered and re-sent means you can improve data rates and s/N with not a large power increase.
Of course, the other option is to increase the signal by looking at things like masers to send the data, if the tracking issues can be solved
All good and valid points.
However I wonder.
1. If you positioned one at each of the Jupiter Lagrange points, would that give you enough coverage?
2. Enough nuclear power would keep them in operation for some time
3. Without gravity, surely it is easier to deploy large dishes since they do not need bracing to keep them from collapsing.
Also while it is not communicating with spacecraft it could be doing other things like radio astrononmy far away from noisy radio spectrum.
Just some ideas of the top of my head(or another part of my anatomy)
. BMW is actively looking at Ethernet too, so is GM. So Tesla is not alone. Ethernet has gone a long way and modern twisted pair chipsets have better error rates and higher MTBF that Cambus (especially when running at "mere" 100Mbit).
Deterministic ethernet will probably replace Canbus in the next few years mainly because cars are far more "intelligent" than years ago when all you wanted your network to do is to turn your headlights on and off. Now, apart from the intelligent sensors festooning the car, we also want GPS, SatNAv, internet, DVD and a sound system. Not only that but if you add a TV screen to each seat, that is a lot of data being thrown around.
Now you could have separate networks for these things, but in terms of simplicity and weight it makes sense to have it on one network. Ethernet has the bandwidth and is already utilised for a lot of this stuff. Of course you have the issue of data separation and ensuring the ABS is not delayed by little Johnny watching Frozen for the 50th time, which is why we need the later deterministic ethernet standards to be more widely implemented that allows QOS and determinism of multiple VPN's across the same cable.
Intel is particularly proud of the graphics performance upgrades of the 14nm chips. Broadwell offers up to a 22 per cent improvement in 3D graphics performance, the company said, and video conversion runs 50 per cent faster.
22 percent improvement on poor only gets you to barely adequate...
To be honest I was prepared to hate this because so far the series so far has been disappointing with a poor backstory, lousy science and more plot holes that a bucket full of Swiss cheese.
When we had the pre-view showing Santa Claus, I thought here we go again, a sentimental slushy Christmas special.
But I found myself enjoying it. Foe once the monsters were scary, the relationship between doctor and assistant had some bite and there is always something disturbing about the dream within a dream motif because it tugs on the nature of your own reality and whether you can trust what you can actually see around you.
So this was probably the best Christmas special for a while. What we need now is Moffat to get back to his A-game(weeping angels) and stop trying to stuff more stories and characters than a under sized Christmas turkey. Dr who works best when it is pared back to it's simplest. It doesn't need flashy effects to make it scary our brain does that well enough thank you. Also get some new blood into the writing team. The Neil Gamain episode worked well, lets have some more of Authors like that (Terry Prachett anyone??)
While we're at it you can keep your ghastly Hershey's to yourself
Ahhh, Hersheys. As a lad brought up reading Marvel comics where we used to get all the american adverts, I grew up with a desire to eat Hershey bars and twinkies (Also get x-ray specs for some reason ). So on my 1st trip to the colonies, I headed to the local Walmart and bought a big bag to bring home to the family.
I could not believe how bad they tasted. They had the consistency and aftertaste of something produced in a industrial plant rather than something organic. It was so bad that even my children who normally hoover up anything related to chocolate (advent calendar chocies, I'm looking at you ) would not touch it. Which just goes to show you can sell anything if your advertising budget is big enough and you wrap the American flag around it(which also explains Ford/GM).
Saying that I have had some great food in the states, but also the worse lasagna I have ever tasted (A note to the residents of Albany, please use beef mince next time). Now I know it's a bit pot/kettle complaining about another countries food, but at the top end American food is better as good as any, but below that it is mass produced crap with little taste and dubious ingredients
It's a great idea, but the main issue is that you give your staff high quality training and pay them crap wages.
After 3 years you produce a 21 year old who has a degree plus 3 years experience. The company then turns round and offers a small increment on the wage, at which point your worker says thank you very much and moves off to another company who are willing to pay the going rate for the experience and qualifications, meaning now the original companies investment 3 years is down the drain.
Obviously not the student fault, just shortsightedness by the company .
Of course there used to be an effective way of training your staff to degree level and that was the OU. That was before the government felt that OU degrees should cost the same as any other university making it out of reach for most mature students.
I'm guessing the author lives in one of the big metropolitan areas. For the rest of us complying about a phone not having 4G is a bit like living in a desert whingeing about your lack of gills.