Re: Should be easy enough to clear up
She should put it on youtube....
484 posts • joined 28 Nov 2007
She should put it on youtube....
I think you'll find that in the last year alone Apple copied the concept of the wearable in the form of a Watch
but have also blown the smartphone world apart with their astonishing discovery that everyone was buying phablets so copied the form factor pioneered by Samsung et al
Fixed it for ya!
Come on, they made it thinner. What more do want?
Sounds exciting...but then again I'm still waiting for MS to release a consumer version of it Table surface product they announced in 2008.....so maybe we are getting ahead of ourselves
1 vote for Battleship. the film that is the very epitome of what is wrong in Hollywood
(P.S to the commentator who voted for waterworld, that is suprisingly watchable, now the Postman is another story ....)
I remember the days when 3D TV's were going to be the next big thing....
Excuse my ignorance but...
Is it any different to keeping a large telescope like the James Webb in a lagrange point, which is the current plan? A relay would be cheaper and as long as you could get 20 years out of it, cost effective to replace
I am not sure why it would need 100's of KW. The fact the signal can be buffered and re-sent means you can improve data rates and s/N with not a large power increase.
Of course, the other option is to increase the signal by looking at things like masers to send the data, if the tracking issues can be solved
All good and valid points.
However I wonder.
1. If you positioned one at each of the Jupiter Lagrange points, would that give you enough coverage?
2. Enough nuclear power would keep them in operation for some time
3. Without gravity, surely it is easier to deploy large dishes since they do not need bracing to keep them from collapsing.
Also while it is not communicating with spacecraft it could be doing other things like radio astrononmy far away from noisy radio spectrum.
Just some ideas of the top of my head(or another part of my anatomy)
. BMW is actively looking at Ethernet too, so is GM. So Tesla is not alone. Ethernet has gone a long way and modern twisted pair chipsets have better error rates and higher MTBF that Cambus (especially when running at "mere" 100Mbit).
Deterministic ethernet will probably replace Canbus in the next few years mainly because cars are far more "intelligent" than years ago when all you wanted your network to do is to turn your headlights on and off. Now, apart from the intelligent sensors festooning the car, we also want GPS, SatNAv, internet, DVD and a sound system. Not only that but if you add a TV screen to each seat, that is a lot of data being thrown around.
Now you could have separate networks for these things, but in terms of simplicity and weight it makes sense to have it on one network. Ethernet has the bandwidth and is already utilised for a lot of this stuff. Of course you have the issue of data separation and ensuring the ABS is not delayed by little Johnny watching Frozen for the 50th time, which is why we need the later deterministic ethernet standards to be more widely implemented that allows QOS and determinism of multiple VPN's across the same cable.
Intel is particularly proud of the graphics performance upgrades of the 14nm chips. Broadwell offers up to a 22 per cent improvement in 3D graphics performance, the company said, and video conversion runs 50 per cent faster.
22 percent improvement on poor only gets you to barely adequate...
To be honest I was prepared to hate this because so far the series so far has been disappointing with a poor backstory, lousy science and more plot holes that a bucket full of Swiss cheese.
When we had the pre-view showing Santa Claus, I thought here we go again, a sentimental slushy Christmas special.
But I found myself enjoying it. Foe once the monsters were scary, the relationship between doctor and assistant had some bite and there is always something disturbing about the dream within a dream motif because it tugs on the nature of your own reality and whether you can trust what you can actually see around you.
So this was probably the best Christmas special for a while. What we need now is Moffat to get back to his A-game(weeping angels) and stop trying to stuff more stories and characters than a under sized Christmas turkey. Dr who works best when it is pared back to it's simplest. It doesn't need flashy effects to make it scary our brain does that well enough thank you. Also get some new blood into the writing team. The Neil Gamain episode worked well, lets have some more of Authors like that (Terry Prachett anyone??)
While we're at it you can keep your ghastly Hershey's to yourself
Ahhh, Hersheys. As a lad brought up reading Marvel comics where we used to get all the american adverts, I grew up with a desire to eat Hershey bars and twinkies (Also get x-ray specs for some reason ). So on my 1st trip to the colonies, I headed to the local Walmart and bought a big bag to bring home to the family.
I could not believe how bad they tasted. They had the consistency and aftertaste of something produced in a industrial plant rather than something organic. It was so bad that even my children who normally hoover up anything related to chocolate (advent calendar chocies, I'm looking at you ) would not touch it. Which just goes to show you can sell anything if your advertising budget is big enough and you wrap the American flag around it(which also explains Ford/GM).
Saying that I have had some great food in the states, but also the worse lasagna I have ever tasted (A note to the residents of Albany, please use beef mince next time). Now I know it's a bit pot/kettle complaining about another countries food, but at the top end American food is better as good as any, but below that it is mass produced crap with little taste and dubious ingredients
It's a great idea, but the main issue is that you give your staff high quality training and pay them crap wages.
After 3 years you produce a 21 year old who has a degree plus 3 years experience. The company then turns round and offers a small increment on the wage, at which point your worker says thank you very much and moves off to another company who are willing to pay the going rate for the experience and qualifications, meaning now the original companies investment 3 years is down the drain.
Obviously not the student fault, just shortsightedness by the company .
Of course there used to be an effective way of training your staff to degree level and that was the OU. That was before the government felt that OU degrees should cost the same as any other university making it out of reach for most mature students.
I'm guessing the author lives in one of the big metropolitan areas. For the rest of us complying about a phone not having 4G is a bit like living in a desert whingeing about your lack of gills.
My wife still uses a Motorola V3 Razr. Every once in a while I suggest an upgrade to something more modern, at which point she goes and hides clutching the phone to her chest.
Saying that, in terms of industrial design, it could give Mr Ives a run for his money. the downside is the software which was obviouisly designed by committee and afyter 4 text messages the buffer is filled up
"Even Erlang" !!!???
I'm sorry but was the author scared as a kid by Erlang's non-imperative syntax, concurrent architecture and nine nines reliability?
As that great programmer Bill Shakespeare put it..
If you load us, do we not use memory?
if you run us, do we not execute?
if you wrongly implement the functionality , do we not die?
and if you wrong us, shall we not have a flame war or the benefits of functional programming languages?
You hurt me, you really do
I agree in some ways. Give a pro any camera and they will get a better camera than mr average because some things the camera cannot do for you, like great composition.
On the other hand a good DSLR camera allows you to more easily adjust shutter speed, aperture. The biggest difference though is that a DSLR allows the user to control depth of field which is difficult with a phone camera. However they do need to learn how to use it first, unfortunately I have lost count of the number of people with expensive cameras around their neck, but on full auto and still shooting JPEG's rather than RAW.
Agreed, just because you cannot go to the worlds exotic locations should not be a constraint on great photography.
Sometimes such constraints work to your advantage, forcing you to concentrate on the basics. Take photos of birds and squirrels on a backyard bird table, find a local deer park during the rut, try macro for insect.
By adding restrictions you increase your ingenuity and imagination to the point that if you do get the chance to go target rich environment, you won't waste your time taking poor photos.
There has been a vehicle anomaly
Really?!! You think?
I just thought July 4th/November 5th/<inser celebration of your choice> had come early
Top award for stating the bleeding obvious....
I agree generally that the roads in Holland are excellent, but when I drove from Calais to Holland, it was noticeable how poor the roads got in Belgium and how good they got once you entered Holland...
All regulation is bad. I know because I read it some novel written by some chick called Ann Randy or something
<Insert Icon for extreme sarcasm here>
I remember learning to program windows using Petzold book as a young programmer just cutting their teeth on coding.
Looking back now, I do think that Petzold taught a lot of early windows programmers some really bad habits such as the use of naked global variables to store things like handles and we ended up with a lot of really bad, unstructured, difficult to maintain code.
Unfortunately at the time I didn't know any better
Satya, that was Bill on the phone again. He wants to know where you are with his idea to port windows 98 as the new mobile OS?
That's an unfortunate image
Triple Sigh. Now your just being silly.
I think most people can tell the difference between normal situations and a shooting range or a clay pigeon shoot. I think the number of occasions that the police have been called by people who find themselves on shooting ranges about the presence of firearms are very small.
In 99% of the rest of the country however.
I think I can also tell the difference between a shotgun and say a pistol, thank you very much. However if someone went up the high street with a shotgun on there shoulder i think there would be reason to call the police. I also seriously doubt that people walk from the car park to a clay pigeon shoot carrying loaded shotguns. The bar is so high on owning such weapon, that such people know how to carry them responsible.
The list of scenarios where it's appropriate to call the Police because a non-uniformed individual is in possession of a firearm is actually quite short.
Actually on your basis The list of scenarios where it is appropriate for a non-uniformed individual is in possession of a firearm is actually quite short. Apart from your definitions I cannot think of any other occasion where an armed individual is not considered a potential threat.
The point is the UK has a different mindset to firearms. They cause attention, which if you are a criminal is unwanted.
1) As you're seeing now in Britain, if guns are made illegal then only criminals have guns.
There is very little you can do to restrict access to something if someone really wants it and it is widely available elsewhere. However...The big difference is that in the UK owning a gun is not seen as something common place or ordinary. If I saw a non-uniformed person carrying a fire arm I would call the police. This makes the use and access to guns far more difficult and attractive. Not only that crimes involving firearms (even carrying one) carry a much higher tariff, again making them largely unattractive to the criminal classes. More importantly because gun ownership is so low, the general population does not feel the need to engage in an arms race based on some FUD factor. Gun ownership itself is not an issue, but glorification of the need for ownership of a lethal device is.
3) Well true, although the original intention was so that the population could resist foreign aggression against the bigger adversaries of the time. I doubt the founding fathers foresaw the time when the USA would be the worlds military superpower. Nor does it specify what sort of weapons should be allowed. If we are a origionalist you could argue it should be restricted to a brown bess musket. On the other hand some on the right feel they will never be safe unless the are nuclear armed. This amendment has been stretched by various arms lobby groups to the point where it no longer provides the protections that it was originally designed to provide.
Yeah, has anyone told Microsoft...
Something I see when I am starting and shutting down my PC
Surely its windows 2????
For the innocent bystanders – whose exclusive rights of reproduction, and also moral rights over their images were abused by the Mirror
I thought this was all about the build up to reproduction...
Paris, because....Well you know
seemed like a guy who has put his money where his mouth is, so fair play to him.
Need a big mouth for that sort of money. Luckily Larry's got both
All those conspiracy theorists must be kicking themselves now
Wiping your bottom with a iphone 6?
The article makes some good points, but the argument can be turned on its head.
Why buy a $700 Apple device when a $100 android version will do 99% the same? And if the West's market is saturated with smart phones, where does that leave Apple? Trying to sell expensive hardware into a market like China and India which just cannot support that price point?
Of course Apple will survive, because as has been shown there is a value in the cachet of owning a Apple product, but can it still grow and maintain the same margins?
They provide the sensors for some of the camera manufacturers you mentioned, predominantly in the lower echelons of the product ranges
First time I've heard the Nikon D810 as a lower echelon of camera products.
On that basis I would love to have one of the upper ones
Sony still makes good products, but they are just too slow to innovate. They showed with the PS4 that they can get things right, and the camera division has shown signs of out innovating Canon and Nikon.
Where they get things wrong is where they think the Sony name is enough for market share, without the technical innovation to earn it. For too long a time they traded on the Sony walkman brand, long past the point when it had any market relevance. Same with the TV branding when they seriously missed the boat as the market moved from CRT to LCD TV's.
Also they should dump the entertainment division. While it makes a profit, it also holds back innovation by requiring the media consumers to kow-tow to the requirements of the media producers.
.who could fail with that sort of customer base?
You could argue they didn't fail, but were too successful and therefore came into competition with the network operators who wanted a bigger slice of that very same market
You don't understand the American competitive bid process.
Each company puts in a bid based on the technical requirements. These are analysed by the technical experts, government advisers, lawyers and other stakeholders and a recommendation is made based on value for money and best technical solution
This is then totally ignored when scrutinized by the Senate and Congress committees, who base their decision on how much of the pork barrel they can divert to their particular state.
So basically that's 2.6 billion for the space capsule, and 2 billion for state subsidies, lobbyists kick backs, and government funded state job creation schemes.
maybe now his old alma mater has splurged the cash on minecraft, he is intending to recreate battlezone using real tanks.
Who like me, would like to see a deep blue like challenge of one of these against Usain Bolt?
Even better one of these hunting down Usain Bolt (Nothing against the guy, lovely bloke. I have just watched too many terminator movies.)
We will be producing our Apple TV, just as soon as we work out how to gouge our usual 15% cut from the content providers.
This a great pity. The thing about Phones4U is you got a great choice of phones, especially if you are a PAYG customer, where the choices offered by the in-house retail organisations is frankly laughable.
This is a blatant attempt by the service providers to further carve up the phone landscape, force customers of a PAYG contract to a more profitable contract and ensure it is harder to jump ship.
It is also deeply anti-competitive and I'm pretty sure there will be some sueballs thrown soon.
Whatever you thought of the company, this is definitely a loss to the average consumer.
I can forsee a see a few issues when after the 4 mile run they have to dive into the nearest slit trench.
Wouldn't it be better to cut the middle man out and just provide wings as well
I can forsee a split in a opinion on this technology between the States(which after all is Apple's main market) and the rest of the world because basically everyone outside the states uses chip and pin which is pretty secure, while the states still mag stripe technology and signatures, which in terms of security is pretty laughable.
So basically in the states anything is better than the current system, while every where else the gains are not so apparent.
At least we know now what the windows 9 user interface will now look like
The iWatch is a typical Apple product. Beautifully engineered and seamlessly combining a number of technologies.
However, the one thing Apple has not managed to do is make a compelling case for owning it. It is another $400 to basically do the same function as the phone in your pocket(which with contract costs has already cost you over $2000)., but does not perform those same functions anywhere neaer as well. I'm sure they will initially sell tons of them, especially to those with more money than sense, but i'm predicting that after a few months they reside next to that old PDA in the desk draw.
Why? well first issue is that they do not replace the mobile but are paired with it meaning you have to now carry two devices, when you generally only need one. Secondly the battery life means you will now need to take two chargers with you where ever you go. In fact it is a surprise that the iPhone 6 does not use the same charging manner as the iWatch, which would make more sense.
Of course it will have a few users who will persist with it and may even find it useful. But personally I will stick with my old analog watch. The fact it has a simple interface and long battery life is almost Jobsian in its concept.
One thing is for certain, the Gnomes of Zurich will not be losing any sleep today
I severely doubt we will ever see a 6C,
The 5C just failed to raise the interest of the buying public.
Compared to it's Android competitors it was just too expensive while at the same time did not have the Apple coolness factor that justified the price. The only benefit to the consumer was allowing a cheaper way into the Apple ecosystem, but that in itself could not justify the price when for just a little bit more you could buy the perceived "real" deal.
It sat painfully between two stools, and I can see Apple quietly shelving it in a few years, instead concentrating on the 5S as its developing market phone.
Its what you don't.
No iphone 6c.